Chapter XXVIII: Destruction Of Paganism.—Part I. 第二十八章 异教的覆灭——第一节
¶
Final Destruction Of Paganism.—Introduction Of The Worship Of Saints, And Relics, Among The Christians.
异教的最终覆灭。——圣徒崇拜与圣物崇拜在基督徒中间的兴起。
¶
The ruin of Paganism, in the age of Theodosius, is perhaps the only example of the total extirpation of any ancient and popular superstition; and may therefore deserve to be considered as a singular event in the history of the human mind. The Christians, more especially the clergy, had impatiently supported the prudent delays of Constantine, and the equal toleration of the elder Valentinian; nor could they deem their conquest perfect or secure, as long as their adversaries were permitted to exist. The influence which Ambrose and his brethren had acquired over the youth of Gratian, and the piety of Theodosius, was employed to infuse the maxims of persecution into the breasts of their Imperial proselytes. Two specious principles of religious jurisprudence were established, from whence they deduced a direct and rigorous conclusion, against the subjects of the empire who still adhered to the ceremonies of their ancestors: that the magistrate is, in some measure, guilty of the crimes which he neglects to prohibit, or to punish; and, that the idolatrous worship of fabulous deities, and real daemons, is the most abominable crime against the supreme majesty of the Creator. The laws of Moses, and the examples of Jewish history, 1 were hastily, perhaps erroneously, applied, by the clergy, to the mild and universal reign of Christianity. 2 The zeal of the emperors was excited to vindicate their own honor, and that of the Deity: and the temples of the Roman world were subverted, about sixty years after the conversion of Constantine.
在狄奥多西的时代,异教走向了毁灭;一种古老而深入人心的迷信竟被连根拔尽,这或许是绝无仅有的一例,因而在人类心智的历史上,堪称一桩奇特的事件。基督徒——尤其是教士阶层——对君士坦丁的谨慎迁延、老瓦伦提尼安一视同仁的宽容,早已按捺不住;只要对手还获准存在,他们便不肯把自己的胜利看作圆满而稳固。安布罗斯及其同道对年少的格拉提安素有影响,又深得虔诚的狄奥多西信重;于是他们便利用这份影响,把迫害的信条灌注进这两位皈依的皇帝心中。他们确立了两条貌似堂皇的宗教法理原则,并据此对帝国境内仍固守祖先仪典的臣民,推出一个直截而严厉的结论:其一,凡官长对某些罪行既不加禁止、又不予惩处,便在某种程度上也难辞其咎;其二,崇拜那些子虚乌有的神明、实则实有的恶魔,乃是对造物主至高尊严最为可憎的冒犯。教士们又匆忙地——或许也错误地——把摩西的律法和犹太历史的先例,1 一并套用到基督教这温和而普世的治世之上。2 皇帝们的热忱被激起,誓要维护自身与上帝的荣誉;于是,在君士坦丁皈依约六十年之后,罗马世界的神庙便纷纷倾覆。
¶
From the age of Numa to the reign of Gratian, the Romans preserved the regular succession of the several colleges of the sacerdotal order. 3 Fifteen Pontiffs exercised their supreme jurisdiction over all things, and persons, that were consecrated to the service of the gods; and the various questions which perpetually arose in a loose and traditionary system, were submitted to the judgment of their holy tribunal. Fifteen grave and learned Augurs observed the face of the heavens, and prescribed the actions of heroes, according to the flight of birds. Fifteen keepers of the Sibylline books (their name of Quindecemvirs was derived from their number) occasionally consulted the history of future, and, as it should seem, of contingent, events. Six Vestals devoted their virginity to the guard of the sacred fire, and of the unknown pledges of the duration of Rome; which no mortal had been suffered to behold with impunity. 4 Seven Epulos prepared the table of the gods, conducted the solemn procession, and regulated the ceremonies of the annual festival. The three Flamens of Jupiter, of Mars, and of Quirinus, were considered as the peculiar ministers of the three most powerful deities, who watched over the fate of Rome and of the universe. The King of the Sacrifices represented the person of Numa, and of his successors, in the religious functions, which could be performed only by royal hands. The confraternities of the Salians, the Lupercals, &c., practised such rites as might extort a smile of contempt from every reasonable man, with a lively confidence of recommending themselves to the favor of the immortal gods. The authority, which the Roman priests had formerly obtained in the counsels of the republic, was gradually abolished by the establishment of monarchy, and the removal of the seat of empire. But the dignity of their sacred character was still protected by the laws, and manners of their country; and they still continued, more especially the college of pontiffs, to exercise in the capital, and sometimes in the provinces, the rights of their ecclesiastical and civil jurisdiction. Their robes of purple, chariotz of state, and sumptuous entertainments, attracted the admiration of the people; and they received, from the consecrated lands, and the public revenue, an ample stipend, which liberally supported the splendor of the priesthood, and all the expenses of the religious worship of the state. As the service of the altar was not incompatible with the command of armies, the Romans, after their consulships and triumphs, aspired to the place of pontiff, or of augur; the seats of Cicero 5 and Pompey were filled, in the fourth century, by the most illustrious members of the senate; and the dignity of their birth reflected additional splendor on their sacerdotal character. The fifteen priests, who composed the college of pontiffs, enjoyed a more distinguished rank as the companions of their sovereign; and the Christian emperors condescended to accept the robe and ensigns, which were appropriated to the office of supreme pontiff. But when Gratian ascended the throne, more scrupulous or more enlightened, he sternly rejected those profane symbols; 6 applied to the service of the state, or of the church, the revenues of the priests and vestals; abolished their honors and immunities; and dissolved the ancient fabric of Roman superstition, which was supported by the opinions and habits of eleven hundred years. Paganism was still the constitutional religion of the senate. The hall, or temple, in which they assembled, was adorned by the statue and altar of Victory; 7 a majestic female standing on a globe, with flowing garments, expanded wings, and a crown of laurel in her outstretched hand. 8 The senators were sworn on the altar of the goddess to observe the laws of the emperor and of the empire: and a solemn offering of wine and incense was the ordinary prelude of their public deliberations. 9 The removal of this ancient monument was the only injury which Constantius had offered to the superstition of the Romans. The altar of Victory was again restored by Julian, tolerated by Valentinian, and once more banished from the senate by the zeal of Gratian. 10 But the emperor yet spared the statues of the gods which were exposed to the public veneration: four hundred and twenty-four temples, or chapels, still remained to satisfy the devotion of the people; and in every quarter of Rome the delicacy of the Christians was offended by the fumes of idolatrous sacrifice. 11
从努马的时代直到格拉提安在位,罗马人始终维系着祭司各团体一脉相承、未曾中断的传承。3 十五位大祭司对一切奉献于神明的事物与人员握有最高裁断之权;这套体系松散而全凭传统,其中层出不穷的种种疑难,都交由他们那神圣的法庭裁决。十五位庄重而博学的占卜官仰观天象,凭飞鸟的行迹来指点英雄豪杰的行止。另有十五人执掌《西比拉书》(他们“十五人团”之名,正是由其人数而来),不时翻检那部预告未来、乃至(看来)连偶发之事也无不载录的簿册。六位维斯塔贞女以其童贞之身,守护着圣火,也守护着那些关乎罗马国祚绵长、却无人知晓其为何物的信物——凡人若擅自窥看,无不招致灾殃。4 七位祭宴官为诸神备办宴席,主持庄严的仪仗行列,并料理一年一度节庆的种种礼仪。朱庇特、玛尔斯与奎里努斯三位神祇的弗拉门祭司,则被视为这三位最有权能之神的专属侍者——正是这三位大神,护佑着罗马与整个宇宙的命运。至于“祭祀之王”,则在那些唯有王者之手方可执行的宗教职事中,代表着努马及其历代继承者的身位。萨利祭司团、卢佩尔奇祭司团等等,则奉行着一些足以令任何明理之人报以轻蔑一笑的仪式,却又满心笃信,以为凭此便能博得不朽诸神的青睐。罗马的祭司昔日在共和国的议事中曾握有权柄,然而随着君主制的确立、帝国都城的迁移,这份权柄也就渐次消泯了。但他们神圣身份所带的尊荣,仍受本国法律与习俗的庇护;他们——尤其是大祭司团——也依旧在京城、有时也在各行省,行使其宗教与世俗两方面的裁断之权。他们身着紫袍,乘坐华贵的礼车,大摆盛筵,赢得万民艳羡;又从圣地的产业与公家的税收中领取丰厚俸给,足以阔绰地支撑祭司阶层的排场,以及国家宗教崇拜的一应开销。既然侍奉祭坛与统率大军并不相妨,罗马人在做过执政官、举行过凯旋式之后,便还想更进一步,谋取大祭司或占卜官的席位;西塞罗5 与庞培当年占据的席位,到了四世纪,仍由元老院中最为显赫的成员填补;而他们高贵的门第,又为其祭司身份平添了几分光彩。组成大祭司团的那十五位祭司,因得以侍从君主左右,地位尤为尊显;就连历代基督徒皇帝,也曾屈尊接受那专属于最高祭司长一职的法袍与徽记。然而格拉提安登基之后,或因更加审慎,或因更为开明,便断然摒弃了这些渎神的标记;6 他把祭司与维斯塔贞女的收入拨归国家或教会之用,废除了他们的荣衔与特权,并就此拆毁了罗马迷信那座古老的殿宇——它本是靠着一千一百年来的世俗观念与习惯支撑起来的。然而在元老院里,异教却依然是法定的信仰。元老们聚会的殿堂——或者说神庙——中,供着胜利女神的雕像与祭坛;7 那是一位仪态威严的女神,脚踏地球,衣袂飘飘,双翼舒展,一只手向前伸出,托着一顶月桂花冠。8 元老们向来要在这位女神的祭坛前立誓,遵守皇帝与帝国的法度;每逢公开议事之前,照例先要庄严地献上酒与香。9 君士坦提乌斯当年对罗马人的迷信所做的唯一一件冒犯之事,便是搬走了这座古老的圣物。胜利女神的祭坛后来由尤利安重新立起,瓦伦提尼安在位时听其存留,最终又因格拉提安的热忱而再度被逐出元老院。10 不过这位皇帝对那些公开供人瞻拜的神像倒还手下留情:全城仍留有四百二十四座神庙或神龛,供百姓寄托其虔敬之情;而在罗马的每一个街区,偶像祭祀的烟气都熏冒不绝,触犯了基督徒那份纤敏的情操。11
¶
But the Christians formed the least numerous party in the senate of Rome: 12 and it was only by their absence, that they could express their dissent from the legal, though profane, acts of a Pagan majority. In that assembly, the dying embers of freedom were, for a moment, revived and inflamed by the breath of fanaticism. Four respectable deputations were successively voted to the Imperial court, 13 to represent the grievances of the priesthood and the senate, and to solicit the restoration of the altar of Victory. The conduct of this important business was intrusted to the eloquent Symmachus, 14 a wealthy and noble senator, who united the sacred characters of pontiff and augur with the civil dignities of proconsul of Africa and praefect of the city. The breast of Symmachus was animated by the warmest zeal for the cause of expiring Paganism; and his religious antagonists lamented the abuse of his genius, and the inefficacy of his moral virtues. 15 The orator, whose petition is extant to the emperor Valentinian, was conscious of the difficulty and danger of the office which he had assumed. He cautiously avoids every topic which might appear to reflect on the religion of his sovereign; humbly declares, that prayers and entreaties are his only arms; and artfully draws his arguments from the schools of rhetoric, rather than from those of philosophy. Symmachus endeavors to seduce the imagination of a young prince, by displaying the attributes of the goddess of victory; he insinuates, that the confiscation of the revenues, which were consecrated to the service of the gods, was a measure unworthy of his liberal and disinterested character; and he maintains, that the Roman sacrifices would be deprived of their force and energy, if they were no longer celebrated at the expense, as well as in the name, of the republic. Even scepticism is made to supply an apology for superstition. The great and incomprehensible secret of the universe eludes the inquiry of man. Where reason cannot instruct, custom may be permitted to guide; and every nation seems to consult the dictates of prudence, by a faithful attachment to those rites and opinions, which have received the sanction of ages. If those ages have been crowned with glory and prosperity, if the devout people have frequently obtained the blessings which they have solicited at the altars of the gods, it must appear still more advisable to persist in the same salutary practice; and not to risk the unknown perils that may attend any rash innovations. The test of antiquity and success was applied with singular advantage to the religion of Numa; and Rome herself, the celestial genius that presided over the fates of the city, is introduced by the orator to plead her own cause before the tribunal of the emperors. “Most excellent princes,” says the venerable matron, “fathers of your country! pity and respect my age, which has hitherto flowed in an uninterrupted course of piety. Since I do not repent, permit me to continue in the practice of my ancient rites. Since I am born free, allow me to enjoy my domestic institutions. This religion has reduced the world under my laws. These rites have repelled Hannibal from the city, and the Gauls from the Capitol. Were my gray hairs reserved for such intolerable disgrace? I am ignorant of the new system that I am required to adopt; but I am well assured, that the correction of old age is always an ungrateful and ignominious office.” 16 The fears of the people supplied what the discretion of the orator had suppressed; and the calamities, which afflicted, or threatened, the declining empire, were unanimously imputed, by the Pagans, to the new religion of Christ and of Constantine.
然而在罗马元老院里,基督徒是人数最少的一派;12 面对异教徒多数派那些虽属渎神、却合乎法度的举措,他们唯一能表达异议的方式,便是缺席不与。在这个议事会中,自由那将熄的余烬,一时竟被狂热之风重新吹旺、燃烧起来。元老院先后表决通过,四度派出体面的使团前往帝国宫廷,13 陈说祭司阶层与元老院的种种冤情,恳请恢复胜利女神的祭坛。这桩要务托付给了口才出众的叙马库斯,14 他是一位既富且贵的元老,一身兼有大祭司与占卜官的神圣身份,又担着阿非利加代执政官与罗马城长官的世俗高位。叙马库斯胸中怀着最炽热的一腔热忱,为这奄奄一息的异教事业奔走;而他那些宗教上的论敌,则一面惋惜他这般才华竟用错了地方,一面又叹息他那些德行终归无济于事。15 这位演说家上呈瓦伦提尼安皇帝的那份陈情书至今尚存;他心里清楚,自己所担的这桩差事既棘手又危险。凡是可能被看作影射君主宗教的话题,他都小心翼翼地一概回避;他谦卑地声明,祈求与恳请便是自己仅有的武器;他更巧妙地从修辞学派、而非哲学门户中去汲取论据。叙马库斯极力铺陈胜利女神的种种神能,想借此撩动这位年轻君主的想象;他又旁敲侧击地暗示:把那些奉献于神明的收入没收充公,实在有失君主慷慨无私的品格;他还坚称:罗马的祭祀倘若不再由国库出资、也不再以国家的名义举行,便会丧失其效力与灵验。他甚至叫怀疑论也来为迷信张目辩护:宇宙那伟大而不可参透的奥秘,本非人力所能穷究。理性既无从指点,那便不妨听凭习俗引路;每个民族既然虔守着那些历经世代认可的仪礼与信念,看来也正是遵从了审慎的教诲。倘若这一代代岁月都以荣耀与昌盛为冠冕,倘若虔诚的子民屡屡在诸神的祭坛前求得所祈的福祉,那么坚守这套灵验的旧法便显得愈发明智,而不该贸然革新,去冒那些未知的祸患。拿古老与成功这两条标准来衡量,努马所立的宗教便占尽了便宜;于是这位演说家索性请出罗马本身——那位主宰全城命运的天界守护神——让她亲自到皇帝的法庭前为自己申辩。这位可敬的老妇说道:“至圣至明的君主啊,祖国之父啊!请怜悯、请敬重我这把年纪——我这一生始终虔敬不辍,从未间断。既然我并不悔悟,就请容我继续奉行我古老的仪礼。既然我生而自由,就请让我安享我固有的典章。正是这套宗教,使天下都俯首于我的法度之下;正是这些仪礼,把汉尼拔挡在了城门之外,把高卢人逐出了卡皮托利山。难道我这满头白发,竟是留着来蒙受如此难堪的羞辱么?你们要我改奉的那套新制度,我一无所知;但我深知一点:到老来还要受人纠正管教,从来都是件令人不快、颜面尽失的差事。”16 演说家出于审慎而不便明言的话,百姓的恐惧却替他说了出来:凡是折磨着这衰颓帝国、或威胁着它的种种灾祸,异教徒都异口同声地归咎于基督与君士坦丁的这套新宗教。
¶
But the hopes of Symmachus were repeatedly baffled by the firm and dexterous opposition of the archbishop of Milan, who fortified the emperors against the fallacious eloquence of the advocate of Rome. In this controversy, Ambrose condescends to speak the language of a philosopher, and to ask, with some contempt, why it should be thought necessary to introduce an imaginary and invisible power, as the cause of those victories, which were sufficiently explained by the valor and discipline of the legions. He justly derides the absurd reverence for antiquity, which could only tend to discourage the improvements of art, and to replunge the human race into their original barbarism. From thence, gradually rising to a more lofty and theological tone, he pronounces, that Christianity alone is the doctrine of truth and salvation; and that every mode of Polytheism conducts its deluded votaries, through the paths of error, to the abyss of eternal perdition. 17 Arguments like these, when they were suggested by a favorite bishop, had power to prevent the restoration of the altar of Victory; but the same arguments fell, with much more energy and effect, from the mouth of a conqueror; and the gods of antiquity were dragged in triumph at the chariot-wheels of Theodosius. 18 In a full meeting of the senate, the emperor proposed, according to the forms of the republic, the important question, Whether the worship of Jupiter, or that of Christ, should be the religion of the Romans. 1811 The liberty of suffrages, which he affected to allow, was destroyed by the hopes and fears that his presence inspired; and the arbitrary exile of Symmachus was a recent admonition, that it might be dangerous to oppose the wishes of the monarch. On a regular division of the senate, Jupiter was condemned and degraded by the sense of a very large majority; and it is rather surprising, that any members should be found bold enough to declare, by their speeches and votes, that they were still attached to the interest of an abdicated deity. 19 The hasty conversion of the senate must be attributed either to supernatural or to sordid motives; and many of these reluctant proselytes betrayed, on every favorable occasion, their secret disposition to throw aside the mask of odious dissimulation. But they were gradually fixed in the new religion, as the cause of the ancient became more hopeless; they yielded to the authority of the emperor, to the fashion of the times, and to the entreaties of their wives and children, 20 who were instigated and governed by the clergy of Rome and the monks of the East. The edifying example of the Anician family was soon imitated by the rest of the nobility: the Bassi, the Paullini, the Gracchi, embraced the Christian religion; and “the luminaries of the world, the venerable assembly of Catos (such are the high-flown expressions of Prudentius) were impatient to strip themselves of their pontifical garment; to cast the skin of the old serpent; to assume the snowy robes of baptismal innocence, and to humble the pride of the consular fasces before tombs of the martyrs.” 21 The citizens, who subsisted by their own industry, and the populace, who were supported by the public liberality, filled the churches of the Lateran, and Vatican, with an incessant throng of devout proselytes. The decrees of the senate, which proscribed the worship of idols, were ratified by the general consent of the Romans; 22 the splendor of the Capitol was defaced, and the solitary temples were abandoned to ruin and contempt. 23 Rome submitted to the yoke of the Gospel; and the vanquished provinces had not yet lost their reverence for the name and authority of Rome. 2311
然而米兰大主教那坚定而巧妙的反对,却一再挫败了叙马库斯的指望;这位大主教使皇帝们心志坚定,不为这位罗马辩护士似是而非的雄辩所动。在这场论战中,安布罗斯竟屈尊操起哲学家的口吻,略带鄙夷地反问道:那些胜利,单凭军团的勇武与纪律便足以解释,何必非要抬出一个虚构而无形的力量来充当缘由?他又不无道理地讥讽那种对古制的荒唐崇拜——他说,这种崇拜只会挫伤技艺的进步,把人类重新推回原初的野蛮之中。接着,他的声调渐渐拔高,转入更为崇高的神学腔调,断言唯有基督教才是真理与救赎之道,而形形色色的多神教,无一不引着受骗的信众沿着歧途,堕入永罚的深渊。17 这样一些论调,一旦出自一位深得宠信的主教之口,便足以阻止胜利女神祭坛的复立;然而同样的论调,若出自一位征服者之口,那分量与效力就要大得多;于是古老的诸神便被拴在狄奥多西的凯旋战车轮后,作为俘获示众。18 在一次元老院的全体大会上,皇帝依照共和国的旧仪,郑重提出了这样一个重大问题:罗马人的宗教,究竟当以崇拜朱庇特为准,还是当以崇拜基督为准。1811 他表面上装作允许自由投票,可他亲临现场所激起的种种指望与畏惧,早已把这份自由葬送殆尽;而叙马库斯不久前遭到肆意放逐,更是新近的一记警钟:违逆君主的心意,是要冒风险的。元老院照例分组表决,结果以压倒性的多数,判定朱庇特有罪,将他黜落神坛;倒是颇令人意外:竟还有那么几位成员胆敢在发言与投票中公然表白,说自己仍旧忠于一位已然退位的神明。19 元老院如此仓促地改宗,其缘由不外乎两端:要么出于超自然的感召,要么出于卑污的私利;这些勉强皈依者当中,不少人一有机会便露出马脚,显出他们内心巴不得早日摘下那副可憎伪装的心思。然而随着旧信仰的前景日益无望,他们也就渐渐在新宗教里安顿了下来;他们屈从于皇帝的权威、时代的风尚,也屈从于妻儿的苦苦劝求,20 而这些妻儿,又正受着罗马教士与东方修士的怂恿摆布。阿尼奇家族树立的这番楷模,不久便为其余贵族争相仿效:巴苏斯家族、保利努斯家族、格拉古家族,都纷纷归信了基督教;用普鲁登修斯那些夸饰的说法来讲,便是:“这世上的光明、加图辈那可敬的会集,个个迫不及待,要褪去大祭司的法袍,要蜕下老蛇的旧皮,要披上洗礼所赐、洁白如雪的纯真之袍,并把执政官束棒那份骄矜,谦卑地俯伏在殉道者的坟茔之前。”21 那些靠自己劳作糊口的市民,那些靠公家施舍度日的平民,都成群结队、络绎不绝地涌入拉特兰与梵蒂冈的教堂,做了虔诚的皈依者。元老院颁下明令,禁绝偶像崇拜,这些法令又得到罗马人的普遍拥护而正式生效;22 卡皮托利山昔日的辉煌被抹去,一座座冷落的神庙则任其倾颓,无人理睬。23 罗马终于俯首于福音的轭下;而那些被它征服的行省,对罗马之名及其权威的敬畏,此时都还未曾消减。2311
Notes 注释
1
↩
St. Ambrose (tom. ii. de Obit. Theodos. p. 1208) expressly praises and recommends the zeal of Josiah in the destruction of idolatry The language of Julius Firmicus Maternus on the same subject (de Errore Profan. Relig. p. 467, edit. Gronov.) is piously inhuman. Nec filio jubet (the Mosaic Law) parci, nec fratri, et per amatam conjugera gladium vindicem ducit, &c.
圣安布罗斯(tom. ii. de Obit. Theodos. p. 1208)明确赞扬并推许约西亚捣毁偶像的热忱。尤利乌斯·菲尔米库斯·马特尔努斯就同一题目所用的言辞(de Errore Profan. Relig. p. 467, edit. Gronov.),则可谓虔敬得近乎残忍:Nec filio jubet (the Mosaic Law) parci, nec fratri, et per amatam conjugera gladium vindicem ducit, &c.(摩西律法命人对儿子也不宽赦,对兄弟也不宽赦,甚至要人握起复仇之剑,穿过自己所爱的妻子,云云。)
2
↩
Bayle (tom. ii. p. 406, in his Commentaire Philosophique) justifies, and limits, these intolerant laws by the temporal reign of Jehovah over the Jews. The attempt is laudable.
培尔(《哲学评注》,tom. ii. p. 406)以耶和华曾在世俗层面统治犹太人为由,既为这些不宽容的律法辩护,又为之划定界限。这一尝试值得称许。
3
↩
See the outlines of the Roman hierarchy in Cicero, (de Legibus, ii. 7, 8,) Livy, (i. 20,) Dionysius Halicarnassensis, (l. ii. p. 119-129, edit. Hudson,) Beaufort, (Republique Romaine, tom. i. p. 1-90,) and Moyle, (vol. i. p. 10-55.) The last is the work of an English whig, as well as of a Roman antiquary.
关于罗马祭司等级制度的概貌,可参看西塞罗(de Legibus, ii. 7, 8)、李维(i. 20)、哈利卡纳苏斯的狄奥尼修斯(l. ii. p. 119-129, edit. Hudson)、博福尔(Republique Romaine, tom. i. p. 1-90)以及莫伊尔(vol. i. p. 10-55)诸家论述。末一种著作,既出自一位罗马古物学者之手,也出自一位英国辉格党人之手。
4
↩
These mystic, and perhaps imaginary, symbols have given birth to various fables and conjectures. It seems probable, that the Palladium was a small statue (three cubits and a half high) of Minerva, with a lance and distaff; that it was usually enclosed in a seria, or barrel; and that a similar barrel was placed by its side to disconcert curiosity, or sacrilege. See Mezeriac (Comment. sur les Epitres d’Ovide, tom i. p. 60—66) and Lipsius, (tom. iii. p. 610 de Vesta, &c. c 10.)
这些神秘的、或许纯属子虚乌有的信物,衍生出种种传说与臆测。看来大致可信的是:那帕拉狄乌姆乃是一尊密涅瓦的小型雕像(高三腕尺半),一手执长矛,一手持纺杆;它平日封存于一只名为 seria 的木桶之中;旁边还并排安放着一只一模一样的木桶,好教好奇者或亵渎者无从下手。参看梅泽里亚克(Comment. sur les Epitres d’Ovide, tom i. p. 60—66)与利普修斯(tom. iii. p. 610 de Vesta, &c. c 10.)。
5
↩
Cicero frankly (ad Atticum, l. ii. Epist. 5) or indirectly (ad Familiar. l. xv. Epist. 4) confesses that the Augurate is the supreme object of his wishes. Pliny is proud to tread in the footsteps of Cicero, (l. iv. Epist. 8,) and the chain of tradition might be continued from history and marbles.
西塞罗或直言不讳(ad Atticum, l. ii. Epist. 5),或旁敲侧击(ad Familiar. l. xv. Epist. 4),都承认占卜官之职乃是他毕生梦寐以求的至高目标。普林尼则以能追随西塞罗的足迹为荣(l. iv. Epist. 8);这条传承的脉络,还可以从史籍与碑铭中继续追溯下去。
6
↩
Zosimus, l. iv. p. 249, 250. I have suppressed the foolish pun about Pontifex and Maximus.
佐西莫斯,l. iv. p. 249, 250。原文中有一处关于 Pontifex 与 Maximus 的拙劣双关,我已略去不录。
7
↩
This statue was transported from Tarentum to Rome, placed in the Curia Julia by Caesar, and decorated by Augustus with the spoils of Egypt.
这尊雕像由塔兰图姆运至罗马,恺撒将它安置在尤利乌斯会堂(Curia Julia)中,奥古斯都又用埃及的战利品加以装饰。
8
↩
Prudentius (l. ii. in initio) has drawn a very awkward portrait of Victory; but the curious reader will obtain more satisfaction from Montfaucon’s Antiquities, (tom. i. p. 341.)
普鲁登修斯(l. ii. in initio)为胜利女神勾画了一幅十分拙劣的画像;不过好奇的读者若去翻阅蒙福孔的《古物志》(tom. i. p. 341),当能得到更多满足。
9
↩
See Suetonius (in August. c. 35) and the Exordium of Pliny’s Panegyric.
参看苏埃托尼乌斯(in August. c. 35)以及普林尼《颂词》的开篇(Exordium)。
10
↩
These facts are mutually allowed by the two advocates, Symmachus and Ambrose.
这些事实,叙马库斯与安布罗斯这两位辩士都彼此认可。
11
↩
The Notitia Urbis, more recent than Constantine, does not find one Christian church worthy to be named among the edifices of the city. Ambrose (tom. ii. Epist. xvii. p. 825) deplores the public scandals of Rome, which continually offended the eyes, the ears, and the nostrils of the faithful.
那部《城区志》成书晚于君士坦丁时代,却在罗列全城建筑时,竟找不出一座基督教教堂值得一提。安布罗斯(tom. ii. Epist. xvii. p. 825)痛惜罗马那些当众招摇的丑事,说它们不断地冒犯着信徒的眼、耳与鼻。
12
↩
Ambrose repeatedly affirms, in contradiction to common sense (Moyle’s Works, vol. ii. p. 147,) that the Christians had a majority in the senate.
安布罗斯却一再断言——全然有悖常理(见 Moyle’s Works, vol. ii. p. 147)——说基督徒在元老院里占了多数。
13
↩
The first (A.D. 382) to Gratian, who refused them audience; the second (A.D. 384) to Valentinian, when the field was disputed by Symmachus and Ambrose; the third (A.D. 388) to Theodosius; and the fourth (A.D. 392) to Valentinian. Lardner (Heathen Testimonies, vol. iv. p. 372-399) fairly represents the whole transaction.
第一次(公元 382 年)呈于格拉提安,他拒不接见;第二次(公元 384 年)呈于瓦伦提尼安,其时叙马库斯与安布罗斯正各执一词、争持不下;第三次(公元 388 年)呈于狄奥多西;第四次(公元 392 年)又呈于瓦伦提尼安。拉德纳(Heathen Testimonies, vol. iv. p. 372-399)对整桩交涉的叙述堪称公允。
14
↩
Symmachus, who was invested with all the civil and sacerdotal honors, represented the emperor under the two characters of Pontifex Maximus, and Princeps Senatus. See the proud inscription at the head of his works. * Note: Mr. Beugnot has made it doubtful whether Symmachus was more than Pontifex Major. Destruction du Paganisme, vol. i. p. 459.—M.
叙马库斯身兼一切世俗与祭司的荣衔,他以最高祭司长(Pontifex Maximus)与元老院首席(Princeps Senatus)这两重身份代表皇帝。可参看他文集卷首那段自矜的题铭。*编按:伯尼奥先生对叙马库斯是否不止于“大祭司”(Pontifex Major)一职提出了疑问。见 Destruction du Paganisme, vol. i. p. 459。—M
15
↩
As if any one, says Prudentius (in Symmach. i. 639) should dig in the mud with an instrument of gold and ivory. Even saints, and polemic saints, treat this adversary with respect and civility.
普鲁登修斯(in Symmach. i. 639)说,这就好比有人拿着金与象牙打造的器具去挖泥掘土。可见即便是圣徒,即便是好辩的圣徒,对待这位论敌也仍不失敬重与礼数。
16
↩
See the fifty-fourth Epistle of the tenth book of Symmachus. In the form and disposition of his ten books of Epistles, he imitated the younger Pliny; whose rich and florid style he was supposed, by his friends, to equal or excel, (Macrob. Saturnal. l. v. c. i.) But the luxcriancy of Symmachus consists of barren leaves, without fruits, and even without flowers. Few facts, and few sentiments, can be extracted from his verbose correspondence.
参看叙马库斯书信集第十卷第五十四封。他那十卷书信的体例与编排,都仿效小普林尼;他的友人还以为,他那丰赡华丽的文笔可与小普林尼比肩,甚至更胜一筹(Macrob. Saturnal. l. v. c. i.)。然而叙马库斯的所谓繁茂,不过是一片片不结果实、乃至连花也不开的枯叶罢了。从他那连篇累牍的往来书信里,实在榨不出几桩史实、几点见识。
17
↩
See Ambrose, (tom. ii. Epist. xvii. xviii. p. 825-833.) The former of these epistles is a short caution; the latter is a formal reply of the petition or libel of Symmachus. The same ideas are more copiously expressed in the poetry, if it may deserve that name, of Prudentius; who composed his two books against Symmachus (A.D. 404) while that senator was still alive. It is whimsical enough that Montesquieu (Considerations, &c. c. xix. tom. iii. p. 487) should overlook the two professed antagonists of Symmachus, and amuse himself with descanting on the more remote and indirect confutations of Orosius, St. Augustin, and Salvian.
参看安布罗斯(tom. ii. Epist. xvii. xviii. p. 825-833)。前一封信是一段简短的告诫,后一封则是对叙马库斯那份陈情书——或曰控诉状——的正式答复。同样的意思,在普鲁登修斯的诗作(如果那也配称为诗的话)里表达得更为铺张;他那两卷《驳叙马库斯》写成于公元 404 年,其时这位元老还在世。颇为古怪的是,孟德斯鸠(Considerations, &c. c. xix. tom. iii. p. 487)竟对叙马库斯这两位公开的论敌视而不见,反倒津津有味地大谈奥罗修斯、圣奥古斯丁与萨尔维安那些更为迂远、更为间接的反驳。
18
↩
See Prudentius (in Symmach. l. i. 545, &c.) The Christian agrees with the Pagan Zosimus (l. iv. p. 283) in placing this visit of Theodosius after the second civil war, gemini bis victor caede Tyranni, (l. i. 410.) But the time and circumstances are better suited to his first triumph.
参看普鲁登修斯(in Symmach. l. i. 545, &c.)。这位基督徒诗人与异教徒佐西莫斯(l. iv. p. 283)意见一致,都把狄奥多西的这次访罗马定在第二次内战之后——gemini bis victor caede Tyranni(两度杀戮篡位者而两度得胜,l. i. 410)。但就时间与情形而论,此事更宜系于他第一次凯旋之时。
1811
↩
M. Beugnot (in his Histoire de la Destruction du Paganisme en Occident, i. p. 483-488) questions, altogether, the truth of this statement. It is very remarkable that Zosimus and Prudentius concur in asserting the fact of the question being solemnly deliberated by the senate, though with directly opposite results. Zosimus declares that the majority of the assembly adhered to the ancient religion of Rome; Gibbon has adopted the authority of Prudentius, who, as a Latin writer, though a poet, deserves more credit than the Greek historian. Both concur in placing this scene after the second triumph of Theodosius; but it has been almost demonstrated (and Gibbon—see the preceding note—seems to have acknowledged this) by Pagi and Tillemont, that Theodosius did not visit Rome after the defeat of Eugenius. M. Beugnot urges, with much force, the improbability that the Christian emperor would submit such a question to the senate, whose authority was nearly obsolete, except on one occasion, which was almost hailed as an epoch in the restoration of her ancient privileges. The silence of Ambrose and of Jerom on an event so striking, and redounding so much to the honor of Christianity, is of considerable weight. M. Beugnot would ascribe the whole scene to the poetic imagination of Prudentius; but I must observe, that, however Prudentius is sometimes elevated by the grandeur of his subject to vivid and eloquent language, this flight of invention would be so much bolder and more vigorous than usual with this poet, that I cannot but suppose there must have been some foundation for the story, though it may have been exaggerated by the poet, or misrepresented by the historian.—M
伯尼奥先生(见其 Histoire de la Destruction du Paganisme en Occident, i. p. 483-488)对这一说法的真实性提出了全盘质疑。颇堪注意的是,佐西莫斯与普鲁登修斯都一致确认元老院曾郑重讨论过这个问题,只是二人所记的结果恰好相反:佐西莫斯声称,会中多数仍固守罗马古老的宗教;吉本则采信了普鲁登修斯的说法——此人虽是诗人,毕竟是拉丁作家,其可信度总要高过那位希腊史家。两人又都把这一幕系于狄奥多西第二次凯旋之后;然而帕吉与蒂耶蒙几乎已经证明(而吉本——参见前一条注——看来也已承认这一点):欧根尼乌斯败亡之后,狄奥多西并未再度访问罗马。伯尼奥先生还有力地指出:元老院的权威此时已近乎名存实亡,唯有一次例外——那一回几乎被当作罗马古老特权得以恢复的一个划时代事件——因此,这位基督徒皇帝断不至于把这样一个问题交付元老院裁决,殊难置信。安布罗斯与哲罗姆对如此惊人、又如此有光于基督教的一桩大事竟只字不提,这份沉默也颇有分量。伯尼奥先生索性把整个场面都归于普鲁登修斯诗人的想象;但我不得不指出:普鲁登修斯固然有时会因题材的宏大而文思飞扬、辞采生动,可这一番凭空杜撰,若真是杜撰,其大胆与雄健却远超这位诗人平日的水准,因此我总不免揣测:这故事背后必有几分依据,纵然或许被诗人夸大,或被史家歪曲了。—M
19
↩
Prudentius, after proving that the sense of the senate is declared by a legal majority, proceeds to say, (609, &c.)—
Adspice quam pleno subsellia nostra Senatu
Decernant infame Jovis pulvinar, et omne
Idolum longe purgata ex urbe fugandum,
Qua vocat egregii sententia Principis, illuc
Libera, cum pedibus, tum corde, frequentia transit.
Zosimus ascribes to the conscript fathers a heathenish courage, which few of them are found to possess.
Adspice quam pleno subsellia nostra Senatu
Decernant infame Jovis pulvinar, et omne
Idolum longe purgata ex urbe fugandum,
Qua vocat egregii sententia Principis, illuc
Libera, cum pedibus, tum corde, frequentia transit.
Zosimus ascribes to the conscript fathers a heathenish courage, which few of them are found to possess.
普鲁登修斯在论证元老院的意向已由合法多数表明之后,接着说道(609 行以下)——
Adspice quam pleno subsellia nostra Senatu Decernant infame Jovis pulvinar, et omne Idolum longe purgata ex urbe fugandum, Qua vocat egregii sententia Principis, illuc Libera, cum pedibus, tum corde, frequentia transit.(且看:我等元老的座席之上,此刻济济一堂、坐满了列位元老,众人一致裁定:朱庇特那可耻的神榻当受谴责,一切偶像都应被逐出、远远赶离这座已然涤净的城邦;而贤明君主的裁断召唤众人奔赴何方,这一群获得自由的人便举步趋往何方——他们不惟以双足相随,更是以一片真心相从。)佐西莫斯把一种唯有异教徒才有的勇气,归在了这些元老诸公的身上;然而遍观他们当中,真正具备这种勇气的,其实寥寥无几。
Adspice quam pleno subsellia nostra Senatu Decernant infame Jovis pulvinar, et omne Idolum longe purgata ex urbe fugandum, Qua vocat egregii sententia Principis, illuc Libera, cum pedibus, tum corde, frequentia transit.(且看:我等元老的座席之上,此刻济济一堂、坐满了列位元老,众人一致裁定:朱庇特那可耻的神榻当受谴责,一切偶像都应被逐出、远远赶离这座已然涤净的城邦;而贤明君主的裁断召唤众人奔赴何方,这一群获得自由的人便举步趋往何方——他们不惟以双足相随,更是以一片真心相从。)佐西莫斯把一种唯有异教徒才有的勇气,归在了这些元老诸公的身上;然而遍观他们当中,真正具备这种勇气的,其实寥寥无几。
20
↩
Jerom specifies the pontiff Albinus, who was surrounded with such a believing family of children and grandchildren, as would have been sufficient to convert even Jupiter himself; an extraordinary proselyted (tom. i. ad Laetam, p. 54.)
哲罗姆特意提到大祭司阿尔比努斯:他膝下儿孙满堂,个个虔信,单凭这一家人,便足以叫朱庇特本尊也归化过来;真是一位非同寻常的皈依者(tom. i. ad Laetam, p. 54)。
21
↩
Exultare Patres videas, pulcherrima mundi
Lumina; Conciliumque senum gestire Catonum
Candidiore toga niveum pietatis amictum
Sumere; et exuvias deponere pontificales.
The fancy of Prudentius is warmed and elevated by victory
Lumina; Conciliumque senum gestire Catonum
Candidiore toga niveum pietatis amictum
Sumere; et exuvias deponere pontificales.
The fancy of Prudentius is warmed and elevated by victory
Exultare Patres videas, pulcherrima mundi Lumina; Conciliumque senum gestire Catonum Candidiore toga niveum pietatis amictum Sumere; et exuvias deponere pontificales.(但见列位元老无不欢欣鼓舞,宛如这世间最为璀璨夺目的光芒;那一众白发苍苍、宛如加图般可敬的老者,个个都迫不及待,急着要披上颜色更为洁白的托加长袍,换上皑皑如雪、象征虔敬的圣洁之衣,同时卸下、脱去他们身上那大祭司的法袍。)普鲁登修斯的想象力,正因这一场胜利而被点燃,愈发显得炽热而高昂。
22
↩
Prudentius, after he has described the conversion of the senate and people, asks, with some truth and confidence,
Et dubitamus adhuc Romam, tibi, Christe, dicatam
In leges transisse tuas?
Et dubitamus adhuc Romam, tibi, Christe, dicatam
In leges transisse tuas?
普鲁登修斯在描述过元老院与民众的改宗之后,不无几分底气与实据地问道:
Et dubitamus adhuc Romam, tibi, Christe, dicatam In leges transisse tuas?(我们难道还要怀疑:这座已然奉献给你、噢基督啊的罗马,早已归顺于你的律法之下?)
Et dubitamus adhuc Romam, tibi, Christe, dicatam In leges transisse tuas?(我们难道还要怀疑:这座已然奉献给你、噢基督啊的罗马,早已归顺于你的律法之下?)
23
↩
Jerom exults in the desolation of the Capitol, and the other temples of Rome, (tom. i. p. 54, tom. ii. p. 95.)
哲罗姆为卡皮托利山及罗马其他神庙的荒废而欢欣鼓舞(tom. i. p. 54, tom. ii. p. 95)。
2311
↩
M. Beugnot is more correct in his general estimate of the measures enforced by Theodosius for the abolition of Paganism. He seized (according to Zosimus) the funds bestowed by the public for the expense of sacrifices. The public sacrifices ceased, not because they were positively prohibited, but because the public treasury would no longer bear the expense. The public and the private sacrifices in the provinces, which were not under the same regulations with those of the capital, continued to take place. In Rome itself, many pagan ceremonies, which were without sacrifice, remained in full force. The gods, therefore, were invoked, the temples were frequented, the pontificates inscribed, according to ancient usage, among the family titles of honor; and it cannot be asserted that idolatry was completely destroyed by Theodosius. See Beugnot, p. 491.—M.
伯尼奥先生对狄奥多西为废除异教而推行的种种措施,其总体评估要更为中肯。据佐西莫斯所记,狄奥多西没收了公家拨给祭祀开销的款项。公开的祭祀之所以停止,并非因为遭到明令禁止,而是因为国库不肯再承担这笔费用。各行省的公私祭祀,本不受与京城相同的法规约束,故而依旧照行不误。即便在罗马城内,许多无需献祭的异教仪式也仍然全然通行。因此,人们照旧祈求诸神,照旧出入神庙,也照旧按古老的惯例,把历任祭司之职铭记在自家的荣衔之列;由此可见,断不能说异教崇拜已被狄奥多西彻底铲除。参看 Beugnot, p. 491。—M