Chapter LXXI: Prospect Of The Ruins Of Rome In The Fifteenth Century.—Part I. 第七十一章 十五世纪罗马废墟之概观——第一节
¶
Prospect Of The Ruins Of Rome In The Fifteenth Century.— Four Causes Of Decay And Destruction.—Example Of The Coliseum.—Renovation Of The City.—Conclusion Of The Whole Work.
十五世纪罗马废墟之概观。——衰败与毁灭的四大成因。——以大斗兽场为例。——罗马城的复兴。——全书结语。
¶
In the last days of Pope Eugenius the Fourth, 101 two of his servants, the learned Poggius 1 and a friend, ascended the Capitoline hill; reposed themselves among the ruins of columns and temples; and viewed from that commanding spot the wide and various prospect of desolation. 2 The place and the object gave ample scope for moralizing on the vicissitudes of fortune, which spares neither man nor the proudest of his works, which buries empires and cities in a common grave; and it was agreed, that in proportion to her former greatness, the fall of Rome was the more awful and deplorable. “Her primeval state, such as she might appear in a remote age, when Evander entertained the stranger of Troy, 3 has been delineated by the fancy of Virgil. This Tarpeian rock was then a savage and solitary thicket: in the time of the poet, it was crowned with the golden roofs of a temple; the temple is overthrown, the gold has been pillaged, the wheel of fortune has accomplished her revolution, and the sacred ground is again disfigured with thorns and brambles. The hill of the Capitol, on which we sit, was formerly the head of the Roman empire, the citadel of the earth, the terror of kings; illustrated by the footsteps of so many triumphs, enriched with the spoils and tributes of so many nations. This spectacle of the world, how is it fallen! how changed! how defaced! The path of victory is obliterated by vines, and the benches of the senators are concealed by a dunghill. Cast your eyes on the Palatine hill, and seek among the shapeless and enormous fragments the marble theatre, the obelisks, the colossal statues, the porticos of Nero’s palace: survey the other hills of the city, the vacant space is interrupted only by ruins and gardens. The forum of the Roman people, where they assembled to enact their laws and elect their magistrates, is now enclosed for the cultivation of pot-herbs, or thrown open for the reception of swine and buffaloes. The public and private edifices, that were founded for eternity, lie prostrate, naked, and broken, like the limbs of a mighty giant; and the ruin is the more visible, from the stupendous relics that have survived the injuries of time and fortune.” 4
教宗欧根尼乌斯四世在位的末年,101 他手下两位侍从——博学的波焦 1 及其一位友人——登上卡皮托利山,在断柱残庙之间小憩,从这处居高临下之地放眼望去,但见一片荒凉,气象万千。2 此地此景,最宜就命运的无常发一番感慨:命运既不宽宥世人,也不放过世人最引以为傲的功业,将帝国与城邦一同埋进同一座坟茔;二人一致以为,罗马昔日愈是伟大,其陨落便愈发可怖可悲。“她太初的模样——遥想上古之世,埃万德尔款待那位来自特洛伊的异乡人时,3 罗马当是何等光景——早已由维吉尔的生花妙笔描摹出来。彼时这塔尔佩亚岩不过是一片荒僻的丛莽;到了诗人的时代,其上已冠以一座神庙的黄金殿顶;如今神庙倾颓,黄金遭劫,命运之轮转过整整一圈,这片圣地重又被荆棘与藤蔓弄得面目狼藉。我们此刻所坐的卡皮托利山,昔为罗马帝国之首脑、大地之堡垒、列王所畏惧者;多少次凯旋的足迹曾令它增光,多少邦国的战利品与贡赋曾使它富足。这曾为举世瞩目的奇观,如今竟沦落至此!变了模样!残破不堪!昔日凯旋的大道,如今湮没在葡萄藤下;元老们的座席,则埋在一堆粪土之中。请把目光投向帕拉丁山,在那些巨大而不成形状的残块中,去寻觅那座大理石剧场、那些方尖碑、那些巨像、尼禄宫殿的柱廊;再遍览城中其余诸山,空阔之处,唯有废墟与菜圃交错其间。罗马人民昔日聚集于此制定法律、推选官员的广场,如今或圈作菜地以种蔬果,或敞为豚栏以纳猪牛。那些本为传诸永世而建的公私楼宇,如今仆倒在地,赤裸而残破,宛如一位巨人被折断的肢体;而那些历经岁月与命运摧残犹存的宏伟遗迹,更教这片废墟触目惊心。”4
¶
These relics are minutely described by Poggius, one of the first who raised his eyes from the monuments of legendary, to those of classic, superstition. 5 1.Besides a bridge, an arch, a sepulchre, and the pyramid of Cestius, he could discern, of the age of the republic, a double row of vaults, in the salt-office of the Capitol, which were inscribed with the name and munificence of Catulus. 2. Eleven temples were visible in some degree, from the perfect form of the Pantheon, to the three arches and a marble column of the temple of Peace, which Vespasian erected after the civil wars and the Jewish triumph. 3. Of the number, which he rashly defines, of seven thermæ, or public baths, none were sufficiently entire to represent the use and distribution of the several parts: but those of Diocletian and Antoninus Caracalla still retained the titles of the founders, and astonished the curious spectator, who, in observing their solidity and extent, the variety of marbles, the size and multitude of the columns, compared the labor and expense with the use and importance. Of the baths of Constantine, of Alexander, of Domitian, or rather of Titus, some vestige might yet be found. 4. The triumphal arches of Titus, Severus, and Constantine, were entire, both the structure and the inscriptions; a falling fragment was honored with the name of Trajan; and two arches, then extant, in the Flaminian way, have been ascribed to the baser memory of Faustina and Gallienus. 501 5. After the wonder of the Coliseum, Poggius might have overlooked small amphitheatre of brick, most probably for the use of the prætorian camp: the theatres of Marcellus and Pompey were occupied in a great measure by public and private buildings; and in the Circus, Agonalis and Maximus, little more than the situation and the form could be investigated. 6. The columns of Trajan and Antonine were still erect; but the Egyptian obelisks were broken or buried. A people of gods and heroes, the workmanship of art, was reduced to one equestrian figure of gilt brass, and to five marble statues, of which the most conspicuous were the two horses of Phidias and Praxiteles. 7. The two mausoleums or sepulchres of Augustus and Hadrian could not totally be lost: but the former was only visible as a mound of earth; and the latter, the castle of St. Angelo, had acquired the name and appearance of a modern fortress. With the addition of some separate and nameless columns, such were the remains of the ancient city; for the marks of a more recent structure might be detected in the walls, which formed a circumference of ten miles, included three hundred and seventy-nine turrets, and opened into the country by thirteen gates.
波焦对这些遗迹作了细致的描述;在世人当中,他算是最早把目光从那些荒诞传说所崇奉的遗物,移向古典时代所崇奉的遗迹的人之一。5 其一,除了一座桥、一道拱门、一座陵墓和塞斯提乌斯金字塔之外,他还能辨认出共和时代的一处遗物:卡皮托利山盐务所内有两排拱顶,上面镌刻着卡图卢斯的名字,记着他慷慨捐建之功。其二,尚有十一座神庙多少可辨,从形制完好的万神殿,到仅存三道拱券和一根大理石柱的和平神庙——后者是韦帕芗在内战与征服犹太的凯旋之后所建。其三,他草率地断定公共浴场(thermæ)共有七座,然而无一座完整到足以显示各部分的用途与布局;唯有戴克里先浴场与安敦尼·卡拉卡拉浴场仍保留着建造者的名号。好奇的观者见其结构之坚固、规模之宏大,大理石之纷繁、廊柱之粗巨繁多,不禁将当初的工役与耗费同其用途和意义两相权衡,为之惊叹不已。至于君士坦丁浴场、亚历山大浴场、图密善浴场——或者不如说是提图斯浴场——则尚能寻见些许遗迹。其四,提图斯、塞维鲁与君士坦丁的凯旋门,无论结构还是铭文都完好无损;一处行将坍塌的残迹被冠以图拉真之名;当时弗拉米尼亚大道上尚存的两道拱门,则被归到福斯蒂娜与加里恩努斯这两个较为卑微的名号之下。501 其五,在惊叹大斗兽场之余,波焦或许忽略了一座砖砌的小型圆形剧场,那多半是供禁卫军营地使用的;马塞勒斯剧场与庞培剧场大半已被公私房舍占据;至于阿戈纳利斯竞技场与马克西穆斯竞技场,除了地势与轮廓之外,几乎再无可考。其六,图拉真纪功柱与安敦尼纪功柱仍巍然矗立,埃及方尖碑却已断折或埋没。昔日出自巧匠之手、宛如神祇与英雄云集的众多雕像,如今只剩下一尊镀金铜铸的骑马像,以及五尊大理石像,其中最为醒目的,是菲狄亚斯与普拉克西特利斯所作的两匹骏马。其七,奥古斯都与哈德良的两座陵寝不可能全然湮灭:然而前者如今只剩一座土丘可见,后者——即圣天使堡——则已改换名称、改换面貌,俨然一座近世的城堡了。再加上若干孤零零、叫不出名字的柱子,这便是这座古城的全部遗存了;至于城墙,倒可看出属于较晚近的建筑——城墙周长十英里,共有三百七十九座塔楼,并以十三座城门通向郊野。
¶
This melancholy picture was drawn above nine hundred years after the fall of the Western empire, and even of the Gothic kingdom of Italy. A long period of distress and anarchy, in which empire, and arts, and riches had migrated from the banks of the Tyber, was incapable of restoring or adorning the city; and, as all that is human must retrograde if it do not advance, every successive age must have hastened the ruin of the works of antiquity. To measure the progress of decay, and to ascertain, at each æra, the state of each edifice, would be an endless and a useless labor; and I shall content myself with two observations, which will introduce a short inquiry into the general causes and effects. 1. Two hundred years before the eloquent complaint of Poggius, an anonymous writer composed a description of Rome. 6 His ignorance may repeat the same objects under strange and fabulous names. Yet this barbarous topographer had eyes and ears; he could observe the visible remains; he could listen to the tradition of the people; and he distinctly enumerates seven theatres, eleven baths, twelve arches, and eighteen palaces, of which many had disappeared before the time of Poggius. It is apparent, that many stately monuments of antiquity survived till a late period, 7 and that the principles of destruction acted with vigorous and increasing energy in the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries. 2. The same reflection must be applied to the three last ages; and we should vainly seek the Septizonium of Severus; 8 which is celebrated by Petrarch and the antiquarians of the sixteenth century. While the Roman edifices were still entire, the first blows, however weighty and impetuous, were resisted by the solidity of the mass and the harmony of the parts; but the slightest touch would precipitate the fragments of arches and columns, that already nodded to their fall.
这幅凄凉的图景,是在西罗马帝国乃至意大利哥特王国覆亡九百多年之后才描绘出来的。在这漫长的困顿与无政府岁月里,帝国、艺术与财富都已从台伯河畔迁徙他方,再无力修复或装点这座城市;而世间万物凡不进则退,因此每过一代,古代遗构的败坏便又加快一分。若要一一衡量衰败的进程、逐一考订各座建筑在各个时代的状况,那将是无穷无尽而又徒劳无益的苦差;我只满足于提出两点观察,借此引出一番对总体成因与后果的简短探讨。其一,早在波焦发此雄辩的悲叹之前两百年,一位佚名作者已写下一部罗马城的描述。6 他孤陋寡闻,往往以怪异荒诞的名目重复述及同一些遗物。然而这位粗陋的方志作者毕竟长着眼睛与耳朵:他能观察那些尚存可见的遗迹,也能倾听民间的口耳相传;他清清楚楚地列举出七座剧场、十一座浴场、十二道拱门、十八座宫殿,而其中许多在波焦之世以前便已不复存在。由此可见,许多雄伟的古代遗迹一直存续到相当晚近的年代,7 而那些致其毁灭的力量,则在十三与十四世纪愈演愈烈、来势愈猛。其二,同样的道理也适用于最近这三百年:我们如今再也遍寻不见塞维鲁的塞普提佐尼乌姆,8 而它曾为彼特拉克以及十六世纪的古物学家所津津乐道。当罗马的建筑尚且完好时,最初的打击无论多么沉重猛烈,都会被那庞大坚实的整体和各部分的匀称结构所抵住;可一旦拱券与廊柱残破不堪、摇摇欲坠,那么再轻微的一碰,也足以使它轰然坍落。
¶
After a diligent inquiry, I can discern four principal causes of the ruin of Rome, which continued to operate in a period of more than a thousand years. I. The injuries of time and nature. II. The hostile attacks of the Barbarians and Christians. III. The use and abuse of the materials. And, IV. The domestic quarrels of the Romans.
经过一番细致的考察,我辨识出致使罗马毁灭的四大主因,它们在一千余年间持续发挥着作用:一、光阴与自然的侵损;二、蛮族与基督徒的敌意攻击;三、建材的取用与滥用;四、罗马人自身的内争。
¶
I. The art of man is able to construct monuments far more permanent than the narrow span of his own existence; yet these monuments, like himself, are perishable and frail; and in the boundless annals of time, his life and his labors must equally be measured as a fleeting moment. Of a simple and solid edifice, it is not easy, however, to circumscribe the duration. As the wonders of ancient days, the pyramids 9 attracted the curiosity of the ancients: a hundred generations, the leaves of autumn, have dropped 10 into the grave; and after the fall of the Pharaohs and Ptolemies, the Cæsars and caliphs, the same pyramids stand erect and unshaken above the floods of the Nile. A complex figure of various and minute parts to more accessible to injury and decay; and the silent lapse of time is often accelerated by hurricanes and earthquakes, by fires and inundations. The air and earth have doubtless been shaken; and the lofty turrets of Rome have tottered from their foundations; but the seven hills do not appear to be placed on the great cavities of the globe; nor has the city, in any age, been exposed to the convulsions of nature, which, in the climate of Antioch, Lisbon, or Lima, have crumbled in a few moments the works of ages into dust. Fire is the most powerful agent of life and death: the rapid mischief may be kindled and propagated by the industry or negligence of mankind; and every period of the Roman annals is marked by the repetition of similar calamities. A memorable conflagration, the guilt or misfortune of Nero’s reign, continued, though with unequal fury, either six or nine days. 11 Innumerable buildings, crowded in close and crooked streets, supplied perpetual fuel for the flames; and when they ceased, four only of the fourteen regions were left entire; three were totally destroyed, and seven were deformed by the relics of smoking and lacerated edifices. 12 In the full meridian of empire, the metropolis arose with fresh beauty from her ashes; yet the memory of the old deplored their irreparable losses, the arts of Greece, the trophies of victory, the monuments of primitive or fabulous antiquity. In the days of distress and anarchy, every wound is mortal, every fall irretrievable; nor can the damage be restored either by the public care of government, or the activity of private interest. Yet two causes may be alleged, which render the calamity of fire more destructive to a flourishing than a decayed city. 1. The more combustible materials of brick, timber, and metals, are first melted or consumed; but the flames may play without injury or effect on the naked walls, and massy arches, that have been despoiled of their ornaments. 2. It is among the common and plebeian habitations, that a mischievous spark is most easily blown to a conflagration; but as soon as they are devoured, the greater edifices, which have resisted or escaped, are left as so many islands in a state of solitude and safety. From her situation, Rome is exposed to the danger of frequent inundations. Without excepting the Tyber, the rivers that descend from either side of the Apennine have a short and irregular course; a shallow stream in the summer heats; an impetuous torrent, when it is swelled in the spring or winter, by the fall of rain, and the melting of the snows. When the current is repelled from the sea by adverse winds, when the ordinary bed is inadequate to the weight of waters, they rise above the banks, and overspread, without limits or control, the plains and cities of the adjacent country. Soon after the triumph of the first Punic war, the Tyber was increased by unusual rains; and the inundation, surpassing all former measure of time and place, destroyed all the buildings that were situated below the hills of Rome. According to the variety of ground, the same mischief was produced by different means; and the edifices were either swept away by the sudden impulse, or dissolved and undermined by the long continuance, of the flood. 13 Under the reign of Augustus, the same calamity was renewed: the lawless river overturned the palaces and temples on its banks; 14 and, after the labors of the emperor in cleansing and widening the bed that was encumbered with ruins, 15 the vigilance of his successors was exercised by similar dangers and designs. The project of diverting into new channels the Tyber itself, or some of the dependent streams, was long opposed by superstition and local interests; 16 nor did the use compensate the toil and cost of the tardy and imperfect execution. The servitude of rivers is the noblest and most important victory which man has obtained over the licentiousness of nature; 17 and if such were the ravages of the Tyber under a firm and active government, what could oppose, or who can enumerate, the injuries of the city, after the fall of the Western empire? A remedy was at length produced by the evil itself: the accumulation of rubbish and the earth, that has been washed down from the hills, is supposed to have elevated the plain of Rome, fourteen or fifteen feet, perhaps, above the ancient level; 18 and the modern city is less accessible to the attacks of the river. 19
一、人的技艺所建的丰碑,其存续远比人自身短促的一生长久得多;然而这些丰碑也和人一样,终归易朽而脆弱;在无垠的时间长河里,人的生命与人的功业同样只算得上转瞬即逝的一刻。不过,对于一座构造简单而坚实的建筑,要划定它究竟能存续多久却并不容易。金字塔身为远古的奇迹,9 早在古人眼中便已引人称奇:此后一百代人如秋叶般纷纷凋落 10 入土,法老与托勒密诸王、诸位恺撒与哈里发相继湮灭,而那同样的金字塔,却依旧巍然屹立、纹丝不动,俯临着尼罗河的泛滥。至于一件由种种细小部件构成的复杂造物,则更易遭受损坏与朽坏;时间无声的流逝,又往往因飓风与地震、火灾与洪水而加快。罗马的天空与大地无疑也曾震动,高耸的塔楼也曾从根基上摇晃;然而那七座山丘似乎并不坐落在地球的巨大空洞之上,这座城市也从未在任何时代遭遇过那种天翻地覆的自然剧变——在安条克、里斯本或利马那样的地方,此类剧变曾在顷刻之间把历经世代的工程夷为齑粉。火乃是主宰生死最强大的力量:这种迅疾的祸患,可因人的经营或疏忽而燃起、蔓延;罗马编年史的每一个时期,都留有此类灾祸一再重演的印记。有一场令人难忘的大火——它是尼禄一朝的罪愆抑或不幸——虽火势时强时弱,却延烧了六天,或说九天之久。11 无数房舍拥挤在逼仄曲折的街巷之间,为烈焰源源不断地提供着燃料;待火势平息,全城十四区中仅有四区安然无恙,三区被彻底焚毁,另有七区则满目疮痍,尽是冒着余烟、支离破碎的残垣。12 其时帝国正如日中天,这座都城遂从灰烬中以焕然一新的姿容重新崛起;然而老一辈人追怀往昔,仍为那些无可挽回的损失痛惜不已——希腊的艺术、胜利的战利品,以及那些属于太初或传说中远古的遗迹。可到了困顿与无政府的岁月,每一处创伤都是致命的,每一次倾倒都无从挽回;无论是官府的公共维护,还是私人逐利的经营,都再无力修复这般破坏。然而有两点理由或可解释:何以火灾对一座繁盛的城市,反比对一座衰败的城市为害更烈。其一,砖瓦、木料与金属这类更易受火的材料,最先被熔化或烧尽;可火焰在那些已被剥去装饰、赤裸裸的墙垣与厚重的拱券上肆虐,却既伤不到它们,也奈何它们不得。其二,一星为害的火花,最容易在寻常平民的屋舍之间被煽成熊熊大火;可这些屋舍一旦被吞噬殆尽,那些抵住了火势或侥幸幸免的大型建筑,便如一座座孤岛般兀立于空旷之中,反倒安然无恙。就其地势而言,罗马时常有遭受洪水泛滥之虞。包括台伯河在内,从亚平宁山脉两侧奔流而下的河流,河道都既短促又无常:盛夏酷暑时是一泓浅流,到了春冬两季,因雨水倾注、积雪消融而水位暴涨时,则化作一股汹涌的急流。每当逆风把水流从海口顶回,每当寻常的河床容纳不下这许多水量,河水便漫过堤岸,无边无际、无从遏止地淹没邻近乡野的平原与城镇。第一次布匿战争的凯旋庆典刚过不久,台伯河便因一场罕见的暴雨而水势大涨;那次泛滥无论持续之久还是波及之广,都超出了以往的一切限度,把罗马诸山脚下的一切房舍尽数摧毁。因地势不同,同一场祸患竟以不同方式肆虐:有的房舍被洪水骤然的冲击卷走,有的则因洪水久久不退而被泡塌、掏空根基。13 到奥古斯都在位时,这场灾祸又再度上演:这条不驯的河流冲毁了两岸的宫殿与神庙;14 皇帝费尽心力,把淤塞着瓦砾的河床清理拓宽,15 而其后继者也不得不同样警惕,为应付类似的险情、谋划类似的对策而操心。有人曾筹划为台伯河本身、或为其若干支流另辟新道,却长久受到迷信观念与地方利益的阻挠;16 况且工程迟缓而草率,其成效也抵不上所耗的辛劳与钱财。驯服江河,乃是人类制伏放纵无度的自然所取得的最崇高、最重要的胜利;17 既然在一个强有力而勤勉的政府治下,台伯河尚且为害如此,那么在西罗马帝国覆亡之后,又有什么能抵挡它、有谁能一一数尽它给这座城市造成的种种损害呢?然而祸患本身终究催生出一剂补救之方:瓦砾的堆积,再加上从山丘冲刷下来的泥土,据说已使罗马平原的地面比古时约莫抬高了十四五英尺;18 因而如今的城市,也就不那么容易遭到河水的侵袭了。19
¶
Vidimus flavum Tiberim, retortis Littore Etrusco violenter undis, Ire dejectum monumenta Regis Templaque Vestæ. (Horat. Carm. I. 2.)
Vidimus flavum Tiberim, retortis Littore Etrusco violenter undis, Ire dejectum monumenta Regis Templaque Vestæ. (Horat. Carm. I. 2.)
(大意:我们曾眼见那黄浊的台伯河,波涛被伊特鲁里亚的河岸猛然逼回,汹涌奔来,要冲垮努马王的宫室与维斯塔的神庙。——贺拉斯《颂歌集》第一卷第二首)
(大意:我们曾眼见那黄浊的台伯河,波涛被伊特鲁里亚的河岸猛然逼回,汹涌奔来,要冲垮努马王的宫室与维斯塔的神庙。——贺拉斯《颂歌集》第一卷第二首)
¶
If the palace of Numa and temple of Vesta were thrown down in Horace’s time, what was consumed of those buildings by Nero’s fire could hardly deserve the epithets of vetustissima or incorrupta.]
如果努马的宫殿与维斯塔的神庙早在贺拉斯的时代便已倾覆,那么尼禄的大火再怎么焚毁这些建筑,也难当“最古老”(vetustissima)或“未遭损毁”(incorrupta)之类的称誉了。
¶
II. The crowd of writers of every nation, who impute the destruction of the Roman monuments to the Goths and the Christians, have neglected to inquire how far they were animated by a hostile principle, and how far they possessed the means and the leisure to satiate their enmity. In the preceding volumes of this History, I have described the triumph of barbarism and religion; and I can only resume, in a few words, their real or imaginary connection with the ruin of ancient Rome. Our fancy may create, or adopt, a pleasing romance, that the Goths and Vandals sallied from Scandinavia, ardent to avenge the flight of Odin; 20 to break the chains, and to chastise the oppressors, of mankind; that they wished to burn the records of classic literature, and to found their national architecture on the broken members of the Tuscan and Corinthian orders. But in simple truth, the northern conquerors were neither sufficiently savage, nor sufficiently refined, to entertain such aspiring ideas of destruction and revenge. The shepherds of Scythia and Germany had been educated in the armies of the empire, whose discipline they acquired, and whose weakness they invaded: with the familiar use of the Latin tongue, they had learned to reverence the name and titles of Rome; and, though incapable of emulating, they were more inclined to admire, than to abolish, the arts and studies of a brighter period. In the transient possession of a rich and unresisting capital, the soldiers of Alaric and Genseric were stimulated by the passions of a victorious army; amidst the wanton indulgence of lust or cruelty, portable wealth was the object of their search; nor could they derive either pride or pleasure from the unprofitable reflection, that they had battered to the ground the works of the consuls and Cæsars. Their moments were indeed precious; the Goths evacuated Rome on the sixth, 21 the Vandals on the fifteenth, day: 22 and, though it be far more difficult to build than to destroy, their hasty assault would have made a slight impression on the solid piles of antiquity. We may remember, that both Alaric and Genseric affected to spare the buildings of the city; that they subsisted in strength and beauty under the auspicious government of Theodoric; 23 and that the momentary resentment of Totila 24 was disarmed by his own temper and the advice of his friends and enemies. From these innocent Barbarians, the reproach may be transferred to the Catholics of Rome. The statues, altars, and houses, of the dæmons, were an abomination in their eyes; and in the absolute command of the city, they might labor with zeal and perseverance to erase the idolatry of their ancestors. The demolition of the temples in the East 25 affords to them an example of conduct, and to us an argument of belief; and it is probable that a portion of guilt or merit may be imputed with justice to the Roman proselytes. Yet their abhorrence was confined to the monuments of heathen superstition; and the civil structures that were dedicated to the business or pleasure of society might be preserved without injury or scandal. The change of religion was accomplished, not by a popular tumult, but by the decrees of the emperors, of the senate, and of time. Of the Christian hierarchy, the bishops of Rome were commonly the most prudent and least fanatic; nor can any positive charge be opposed to the meritorious act of saving or converting the majestic structure of the Pantheon. 26 261
二、各国众多著述者纷纷把罗马遗迹的毁灭归咎于哥特人与基督徒,却疏于追问:这两者究竟在多大程度上怀着敌意行事,又在多大程度上真有闲暇与手段去发泄这份仇恨。在本书前几卷中,我已叙述过野蛮与宗教的得势;此处只能三言两语,重提它们与古罗马之毁灭究竟有着何种真实或想象的关联。我们的想象或许会编织、或采信这样一段动听的传奇:哥特人与汪达尔人从斯堪的纳维亚倾巢而出,急欲为奥丁的出奔复仇,20 要砸碎人类的锁链、惩治那些压迫者;他们一心要烧毁古典文学的典籍,并把托斯卡纳柱式与科林斯柱式的断件残段,用作本民族建筑的基石。但平心而论,这些来自北方的征服者,既不够野蛮,也不够文雅,尚不足以怀有如此宏大的破坏与复仇念头。这些出身斯基泰与日耳曼的牧人,曾在帝国的军队中受过磨炼:他们既习得了帝国的军纪,也乘虚而入、利用了帝国的虚弱。他们惯用拉丁语,因而学会了敬重罗马的名号与尊荣;对于那个更为辉煌的时代所留下的艺术与学问,他们纵然无力效仿,却也更倾向于赞叹,而非将其毁弃。阿拉里克与盖萨里克的士兵短暂占据这座富庶而不设防的都城时,受胜利之师的种种激情所鼓动;他们纵情恣意地施暴逞欲,所觊觎的却是那些能够随身带走的财物;至于把执政官与诸位恺撒的功业夷为平地,这种毫无实利的念头,既不能叫他们引以为傲,也不能叫他们从中取乐。他们逗留的每一刻确实都很宝贵:哥特人第六天便撤出了罗马,21 汪达尔人也不过第十五天离去;22 尽管建造远比破坏艰难,可他们那般仓促的劫掠,对古代那些坚实的巨构,也留不下多少痕迹。我们不妨记住:阿拉里克与盖萨里克都刻意表示要保全城中的建筑;在狄奥多里克那开明有为的统治之下,这些建筑依旧巍然壮丽;23 而托提拉一时的忿恨,24 也终因他自己的性情,以及友人与敌人的共同劝谏而消解了。既然这些蛮族其实无辜,那么这份罪责或许该转移到罗马的公教徒身上。在他们眼中,那些邪魔的雕像、祭坛与殿宇,无不可憎可厌;一旦大权在握、号令全城,他们便会满怀热忱、坚持不懈地去铲除祖先遗留的偶像崇拜。东方各地捣毁神庙之举,25 既为他们提供了效法的先例,也为我们提供了立论的依据;因此,把一部分罪责或功绩公允地归到罗马这些皈依者头上,大概是说得过去的。然而他们的憎恶只针对异教迷信的遗迹;至于那些供社会办理公务或供人游乐的世俗建筑,则尽可保全,既不必损毁,也无伤体面。宗教的更替并非靠一场民众骚乱来完成,而是凭着历代皇帝的敕令、元老院的决议,以及岁月的推移。在基督教教阶之中,罗马的主教通常最为审慎、最少狂热;至于把万神殿这座宏伟的建筑保全下来、改作教堂这一善举,更无从加以任何确凿的指摘。26 261
¶
III. The value of any object that supplies the wants or pleasures of mankind is compounded of its substance and its form, of the materials and the manufacture. Its price must depend on the number of persons by whom it may be acquired and used; on the extent of the market; and consequently on the ease or difficulty of remote exportation, according to the nature of the commodity, its local situation, and the temporary circumstances of the world. The Barbarian conquerors of Rome usurped in a moment the toil and treasure of successive ages; but, except the luxuries of immediate consumption, they must view without desire all that could not be removed from the city in the Gothic wagons or the fleet of the Vandals. 27 Gold and silver were the first objects of their avarice; as in every country, and in the smallest compass, they represent the most ample command of the industry and possessions of mankind. A vase or a statue of those precious metals might tempt the vanity of some Barbarian chief; but the grosser multitude, regardless of the form, was tenacious only of the substance; and the melted ingots might be readily divided and stamped into the current coin of the empire. The less active or less fortunate robbers were reduced to the baser plunder of brass, lead, iron, and copper: whatever had escaped the Goths and Vandals was pillaged by the Greek tyrants; and the emperor Constans, in his rapacious visit, stripped the bronze tiles from the roof of the Pantheon. 28 The edifices of Rome might be considered as a vast and various mine; the first labor of extracting the materials was already performed; the metals were purified and cast; the marbles were hewn and polished; and after foreign and domestic rapine had been satiated, the remains of the city, could a purchaser have been found, were still venal. The monuments of antiquity had been left naked of their precious ornaments; but the Romans would demolish with their own hands the arches and walls, if the hope of profit could surpass the cost of the labor and exportation. If Charlemagne had fixed in Italy the seat of the Western empire, his genius would have aspired to restore, rather than to violate, the works of the Cæsars; but policy confined the French monarch to the forests of Germany; his taste could be gratified only by destruction; and the new palace of Aix la Chapelle was decorated with the marbles of Ravenna 29 and Rome. 30 Five hundred years after Charlemagne, a king of Sicily, Robert, the wisest and most liberal sovereign of the age, was supplied with the same materials by the easy navigation of the Tyber and the sea; and Petrarch sighs an indignant complaint, that the ancient capital of the world should adorn from her own bowels the slothful luxury of Naples. 31 But these examples of plunder or purchase were rare in the darker ages; and the Romans, alone and unenvied, might have applied to their private or public use the remaining structures of antiquity, if in their present form and situation they had not been useless in a great measure to the city and its inhabitants. The walls still described the old circumference, but the city had descended from the seven hills into the Campus Martius; and some of the noblest monuments which had braved the injuries of time were left in a desert, far remote from the habitations of mankind. The palaces of the senators were no longer adapted to the manners or fortunes of their indigent successors: the use of baths 32 and porticos was forgotten: in the sixth century, the games of the theatre, amphitheatre, and circus, had been interrupted: some temples were devoted to the prevailing worship; but the Christian churches preferred the holy figure of the cross; and fashion, or reason, had distributed after a peculiar model the cells and offices of the cloister. Under the ecclesiastical reign, the number of these pious foundations was enormously multiplied; and the city was crowded with forty monasteries of men, twenty of women, and sixty chapters and colleges of canons and priests, 33 who aggravated, instead of relieving, the depopulation of the tenth century. But if the forms of ancient architecture were disregarded by a people insensible of their use and beauty, the plentiful materials were applied to every call of necessity or superstition; till the fairest columns of the Ionic and Corinthian orders, the richest marbles of Paros and Numidia, were degraded, perhaps to the support of a convent or a stable. The daily havoc which is perpetrated by the Turks in the cities of Greece and Asia may afford a melancholy example; and in the gradual destruction of the monuments of Rome, Sixtus the Fifth may alone be excused for employing the stones of the Septizonium in the glorious edifice of St. Peter’s. 34 A fragment, a ruin, howsoever mangled or profaned, may be viewed with pleasure and regret; but the greater part of the marble was deprived of substance, as well as of place and proportion; it was burnt to lime for the purpose of cement. 341 Since the arrival of Poggius, the temple of Concord, 35 and many capital structures, had vanished from his eyes; and an epigram of the same age expresses a just and pious fear, that the continuance of this practice would finally annihilate all the monuments of antiquity. 36 The smallness of their numbers was the sole check on the demands and depredations of the Romans. The imagination of Petrarch might create the presence of a mighty people; 37 and I hesitate to believe, that, even in the fourteenth century, they could be reduced to a contemptible list of thirty-three thousand inhabitants. From that period to the reign of Leo the Tenth, if they multiplied to the amount of eighty-five thousand, 38 the increase of citizens was in some degree pernicious to the ancient city.
三、任何满足人类需求或愉悦的物品,其价值都由两部分构成:一在其质料,一在其形制;一在原材料,一在制作工艺。其价格高低,取决于能够购置和使用它的人数多寡,取决于市场的大小,进而取决于运往远方的难易——而这又要看货物本身的性质、所处的地点,以及当时世上的种种情形。征服罗马的蛮族,一朝之间便攫取了历代积攒的辛劳与财富;然而除去那些可供即时享用的奢侈之物以外,凡是无法用哥特人的大车或汪达尔人的船队运出城去的东西,他们都只能视而不见、无从觊觎。27 金银是他们贪欲最先盯上的目标:因为无论在哪个国度,金银都能以最小的体积,代表着对人类劳作与财货最广泛的支配力。以这些贵金属铸成的花瓶或雕像,或许能撩起某个蛮族酋长的虚荣心;但更为粗鄙的众人根本不在乎其形制,一味看重的只是其质料;把它们熔成锭块,便可轻易分割,再铸成帝国通行的钱币。那些手脚较慢、时运较差的劫掠者,便只能退而求其次,去抢夺黄铜、铅、铁与紫铜这类下等之物;凡是躲过哥特人与汪达尔人之手的,又遭希腊暴君洗劫;君士坦斯皇帝那次贪婪的到访,甚至把万神殿屋顶上的青铜瓦片都剥了下来。28 罗马的建筑不妨看作一座巨大而品类繁多的矿藏:开采材料这道最初的工序早已完成——金属经过提纯浇铸,大理石经过凿削打磨;待内外的劫掠都餍足之后,只要还能找到买主,这座城市所剩的遗物仍是可以标价出售的。古代的遗迹早被剥去了珍贵的装饰,只剩下光秃秃的躯壳;然而只要获利的指望超过人工与运费的开销,罗马人便会亲手把那些拱门与墙垣拆毁。假使查理曼把西方帝国的都城定在意大利,以他的雄才,本会立志去修复、而非糟践诸位恺撒的功业;无奈政局所限,这位法兰克君主只能困守于日耳曼的密林之间,其审美之好也就唯有靠破坏来满足了;于是亚琛那座新建的宫殿,便用拉文纳 29 与罗马 30 的大理石装点起来。查理曼之后五百年,西西里国王罗伯特——当世最贤明、最慷慨的君主——又借着台伯河与海路的便利航运获取了同样的建材;彼特拉克为此愤然长叹:这座昔日的世界之都,竟要剖出自己的血肉,去点缀那不勒斯懒散的奢华。31 然而无论是劫掠还是收购,这类事例在更为黑暗的年代里都属罕见;罗马人独享这些古迹而无人来争,本可将它们挪作公私之用——若不是这些遗构就其现有的形制与位置而言,对城市及其居民大多已派不上什么用场的话。城墙依旧勾勒着旧日的周界,但城区却已从七座山丘迁下,移入战神广场一带;于是那些历经岁月摧残而巍然犹存的最宏伟的遗迹,有一些便被撇在一片荒地之中,远离人烟。元老们的宫邸,早已不合其穷困后人的生活方式与家境;浴场 32 与柱廊的用途也遭人遗忘;到六世纪,剧场、圆形剧场与竞技场的赛会都已中断;有些神庙被改作当时通行的礼拜之用,然而基督教的教堂更偏爱十字架这一神圣的形制;无论是出于风尚还是出于事理,修道院的居室与用房都按着一种别样的样式来布置。在教会统治之下,这类虔敬的宗教机构数目激增;城中挤满了四十座男修院、二十座女修院,以及六十处供教士与司铎聚居的教士团与学院,33 它们非但没有缓解、反而加剧了十世纪的人口凋零。既然古代建筑的形制不为一群既不解其用途、又不识其美感的人所看重,那么这些丰富的建材便被拿去应付各种实用或迷信的需求;到头来,爱奥尼亚柱式与科林斯柱式最秀美的柱子、帕罗斯与努米底亚出产的最华贵的大理石,也许都被贬到去撑一座修道院或马厩的地步。土耳其人在希腊与亚细亚各城中日复一日的肆意破坏,正可作一个令人痛心的例证;而在罗马遗迹渐次毁灭的过程中,或许唯有西克斯图斯五世尚可原谅——他把塞普提佐尼乌姆的石料用到了圣彼得大教堂那座辉煌的建筑上。34 一块残片、一处废墟,无论被损毁或亵渎到何等地步,仍能教人怀着欣悦与惋惜去观瞻;然而大部分大理石不但被移了位、失了比例,更连其质料本身也荡然无存——它们被烧成石灰,只为拿去调制灰泥。341 自波焦初到罗马以来,和谐女神庙 35 以及许多重要建筑,都已从他眼前消失不见;同一时代有一首讽喻短诗,道出了一种公允而虔敬的忧惧:倘若这般行径持续下去,终有一日会把所有的古代遗迹尽数毁灭。36 唯一约束罗马人这些索求与破坏的,便是他们人数的稀少。彼特拉克凭着想象,或许会虚构出一片人丁兴旺的景象;37 但要我相信即便到了十四世纪,这里的居民竟已萎缩到区区三万三千这一可怜的数目,我却仍心存迟疑。从那时起到利奥十世在位,即便人口增长到八万五千之多,38 这市民数目的增加,对这座古城而言在某种程度上反倒是有害的。
¶
IV. I have reserved for the last, the most potent and forcible cause of destruction, the domestic hostilities of the Romans themselves. Under the dominion of the Greek and French emperors, the peace of the city was disturbed by accidental, though frequent, seditions: it is from the decline of the latter, from the beginning of the tenth century, that we may date the licentiousness of private war, which violated with impunity the laws of the Code and the Gospel, without respecting the majesty of the absent sovereign, or the presence and person of the vicar of Christ. In a dark period of five hundred years, Rome was perpetually afflicted by the sanguinary quarrels of the nobles and the people, the Guelphs and Ghibelines, the Colonna and Ursini; and if much has escaped the knowledge, and much is unworthy of the notice, of history, I have exposed in the two preceding chapters the causes and effects of the public disorders. At such a time, when every quarrel was decided by the sword, and none could trust their lives or properties to the impotence of law, the powerful citizens were armed for safety, or offence, against the domestic enemies whom they feared or hated. Except Venice alone, the same dangers and designs were common to all the free republics of Italy; and the nobles usurped the prerogative of fortifying their houses, and erecting strong towers, 39 that were capable of resisting a sudden attack. The cities were filled with these hostile edifices; and the example of Lucca, which contained three hundred towers; her law, which confined their height to the measure of fourscore feet, may be extended with suitable latitude to the more opulent and populous states. The first step of the senator Brancaleone in the establishment of peace and justice, was to demolish (as we have already seen) one hundred and forty of the towers of Rome; and, in the last days of anarchy and discord, as late as the reign of Martin the Fifth, forty-four still stood in one of the thirteen or fourteen regions of the city. To this mischievous purpose the remains of antiquity were most readily adapted: the temples and arches afforded a broad and solid basis for the new structures of brick and stone; and we can name the modern turrets that were raised on the triumphal monuments of Julius Cæsar, Titus, and the Antonines. 40 With some slight alterations, a theatre, an amphitheatre, a mausoleum, was transformed into a strong and spacious citadel. I need not repeat, that the mole of Adrian has assumed the title and form of the castle of St. Angelo; 41 the Septizonium of Severus was capable of standing against a royal army; 42 the sepulchre of Metella has sunk under its outworks; 43 431 the theatres of Pompey and Marcellus were occupied by the Savelli and Ursini families; 44 and the rough fortress has been gradually softened to the splendor and elegance of an Italian palace. Even the churches were encompassed with arms and bulwarks, and the military engines on the roof of St. Peter’s were the terror of the Vatican and the scandal of the Christian world. Whatever is fortified will be attacked; and whatever is attacked may be destroyed. Could the Romans have wrested from the popes the castle of St. Angelo, they had resolved by a public decree to annihilate that monument of servitude. Every building of defence was exposed to a siege; and in every siege the arts and engines of destruction were laboriously employed. After the death of Nicholas the Fourth, Rome, without a sovereign or a senate, was abandoned six months to the fury of civil war. “The houses,” says a cardinal and poet of the times, 45 “were crushed by the weight and velocity of enormous stones; 46 the walls were perforated by the strokes of the battering-ram; the towers were involved in fire and smoke; and the assailants were stimulated by rapine and revenge.” The work was consummated by the tyranny of the laws; and the factions of Italy alternately exercised a blind and thoughtless vengeance on their adversaries, whose houses and castles they razed to the ground. 47 In comparing the days of foreign, with the ages of domestic, hostility, we must pronounce, that the latter have been far more ruinous to the city; and our opinion is confirmed by the evidence of Petrarch. “Behold,” says the laureate, “the relics of Rome, the image of her pristine greatness! neither time nor the Barbarian can boast the merit of this stupendous destruction: it was perpetrated by her own citizens, by the most illustrious of her sons; and your ancestors (he writes to a noble Annabaldi) have done with the battering-ram what the Punic hero could not accomplish with the sword.” 48 The influence of the two last principles of decay must in some degree be multiplied by each other; since the houses and towers, which were subverted by civil war, required by a new and perpetual supply from the monuments of antiquity. 481
四、我把最强大、最猛烈的一项破坏之因留到了最后,那便是罗马人彼此之间的内斗。在希腊皇帝与法兰克皇帝统治时期,城中的安宁虽屡遭叛乱侵扰,但这些叛乱终究只是偶发;而私斗横行、无法无天的局面,则可追溯到后者衰微之时,即十世纪之初。这种私斗肆意践踏《法典》与《福音书》的律条而不受惩处,既不把远在他方的君主的威严放在眼里,也无视基督在世代表的亲临与其人。在长达五百年的黑暗岁月里,罗马终年饱受种种血腥纷争的煎熬:贵族与平民之争、归尔甫派与吉伯林派之争、科隆纳家族与奥尔西尼家族之争;这其中固然有许多为史册所失载,也有许多不值一记,但这些公共动乱的前因后果,我已在前两章中详加剖陈。在这样的时世里,一切争端都凭刀剑裁决,谁也不敢把身家性命托付给软弱无力的法律;于是有权势的市民纷纷武装起来,或为自保,或为攻讦,以对付他们所畏惧、所憎恨的邻里仇敌。除威尼斯一地例外,意大利所有的自由城邦都同样面临这般险境、盘算这般对策;贵族们擅自把持起加固宅邸、修筑坚固塔楼的特权,39 好抵御突如其来的进攻。各城中都塞满了这类用于对抗的建筑;以卢卡为例,城内竟有三百座塔楼,其法令又规定塔高不得超过八十英尺——把这一情形按适当的比例推及那些更为富庶、人口更稠密的城邦,也未尝不可。元老布兰卡莱奥内为重建和平与公义所迈出的第一步(前文已述),便是拆毁了罗马的一百四十座塔楼;而直到无政府与纷争的末世,晚至马丁五世在位之时,全城十三或十四个区中,仅一个区内就仍矗立着四十四座塔楼。古代的遗构最容易被派上这般为害的用场:神庙与拱门为砖石垒成的新建筑提供了宽阔而坚实的基座;我们甚至能一一指出,哪些近世的塔楼是建在尤利乌斯·恺撒、提图斯与安敦尼诸帝的凯旋纪念物之上的。40 只需略加改造,一座剧场、一座圆形剧场、一座陵墓,便摇身变作一座坚固而宽敞的城堡。我无须再赘言:哈德良的陵台早已换上了圣天使堡的名号与形貌;41 塞维鲁的塞普提佐尼乌姆曾足以抵御一支王家大军;42 梅泰拉的陵墓则湮没在为它增筑的外围工事之下;43 431 庞培剧场与马塞勒斯剧场分别为萨韦利家族与奥尔西尼家族所占据;44 而这些粗陋的堡垒,也渐渐被雕琢得如意大利宫邸般华美而雅致了。甚至连教堂都被武器与壁垒团团围住;架在圣彼得大教堂屋顶上的攻城器械,既是梵蒂冈的心腹之患,也是基督教世界的一桩丑闻。凡设防之处,必遭攻击;凡遭攻击之处,皆可能被摧毁。罗马人倘能从教宗手中夺得圣天使堡,早已议决要以公开的法令,将这座象征奴役的建筑夷为平地。每一座防御工事都难免遭受围攻,而每一次围攻,各种破坏的技艺与器械又都被竭力施展。尼古拉四世死后,罗马既无君主,也无元老院,任由内战的狂暴肆虐了整整六个月。当时一位身兼枢机与诗人的人写道:45“一座座房屋,被那又重又急的巨石砸得粉碎;46 墙垣被攻城槌一下下撞穿;塔楼笼罩在烟火之中;而进攻者则被劫掠与复仇的欲念所驱使。”而这毁灭之功,最终竟由暴虐的法律来成全:意大利各派系轮番对其对手施以盲目而鲁莽的报复,把仇敌的宅邸与城堡尽数夷平。47 把外敌为祸的区区数日,同内争相残的漫漫数百年两相比照,我们不得不断言:后者对这座城市的破坏,远比前者惨烈得多;这一看法,又得到了彼特拉克的现身佐证。这位桂冠诗人说道:“请看罗马的遗迹,那昔日雄伟气象的写照!这般惊人的毁灭,无论是岁月还是蛮族,都不配将其归功于己:它出自罗马自己的市民之手,出自她最显赫的子孙之手;你们的先祖(他这是写给一位出身安尼巴尔迪家族的贵族的)用攻城槌所成就的,正是那位布匿英雄凭刀剑也未能做到的事。”48 这最后两项衰败之因,其影响想必还会相互叠加、彼此助长;因为那些在内战中被摧毁的房屋与塔楼,一经重建,便又需要源源不断地从古代遗迹中攫取新的建材。481
Notes 注释
101
↩
It should be Pope Martin the Fifth. See Gibbon’s own note, ch. lxv, note 51 and Hobhouse, Illustrations of Childe Harold, p. 155.—M.
此处应为教宗马丁五世。参见吉本本人的注释,第六十五章注51,以及霍布豪斯《〈恰尔德·哈罗尔德〉笺注》第155页。—M
1
↩
I have already (notes 50, 51, on chap. lxv.) mentioned the age, character, and writings of Poggius; and particularly noticed the date of this elegant moral lecture on the varieties of fortune.
我此前(第六十五章注50、51)已述及波焦的生平年代、性情与著述,并特别指明了这篇论命运无常的优雅道德讲辞的写作年份。
2
↩
Consedimus in ipsis Tarpeiæ arcis ruinis, pone ingens portæ cujusdam, ut puto, templi, marmoreum limen, plurimasque passim confractas columnas, unde magnâ ex parte prospectus urbis patet, (p. 5.)
Consedimus in ipsis Tarpeiæ arcis ruinis, pone ingens portæ cujusdam, ut puto, templi, marmoreum limen, plurimasque passim confractas columnas, unde magnâ ex parte prospectus urbis patet, (p. 5.)(大意:我们就坐在塔尔佩亚卫城的废墟之上,身后是某座——我想大概是神庙的——巨门的大理石门槛,四下里散落着许多断裂的柱子,从这里大半个罗马城尽收眼底。)
3
↩
Æneid viii. 97—369. This ancient picture, so artfully introduced, and so exquisitely finished, must have been highly interesting to an inhabitant of Rome; and our early studies allow us to sympathize in the feelings of a Roman.
《埃涅阿斯纪》第八卷97—369行。这幅古老的图景引入得如此巧妙、描摹得如此精美,对于一个罗马居民而言,想必兴味盎然;而我们早年所受的教育,也使我们能对一个罗马人的这份心境感同身受。
4
↩
Capitolium adeo.... immutatum ut vineæ in senatorum subsellia successerint, stercorum ac purgamentorum receptaculum factum. Respice ad Palatinum montem..... vasta rudera.... cæteros colles perlustra omnia vacua ædificiis, ruinis vineisque oppleta conspicies, (Poggius, de Varietat. Fortunæ p. 21.)
Capitolium adeo.... immutatum ut vineæ in senatorum subsellia successerint, stercorum ac purgamentorum receptaculum factum. Respice ad Palatinum montem..... vasta rudera.... cæteros colles perlustra omnia vacua ædificiis, ruinis vineisque oppleta conspicies, (Poggius, de Varietat. Fortunæ p. 21.)(大意:卡皮托利山变了模样,葡萄藤爬上了元老们的座席,此地竟成了堆放粪秽与污物之所。且看帕拉丁山……满目残砾……再遍览其余诸山,你会看到处处空无建筑,尽被废墟与葡萄园所占。语出波焦《论命运之无常》第21页。)
5
↩
See Poggius, p. 8—22.
见波焦,第8—22页。
501
↩
One was in the Via Nomentana; est alter præterea Gallieno principi dicatus, ut superscriptio indicat, Viâ Nomentana. Hobhouse, p. 154. Poggio likewise mentions the building which Gibbon ambiguously says be “might have overlooked.”—M.
其中一座在诺门塔纳大道上;est alter præterea Gallieno principi dicatus, ut superscriptio indicat, Viâ Nomentana(另有一座据铭文所示乃献给加里恩努斯皇帝,位于诺门塔纳大道)。霍布豪斯,第154页。波焦同样提到了这座建筑,而吉本却含糊其辞地说他“或许忽略了”它。—M
6
↩
Liber de Mirabilibus Romæ ex Registro Nicolai Cardinalis de Arragoniâ in Bibliothecâ St. Isidori Armario IV., No. 69. This treatise, with some short but pertinent notes, has been published by Montfaucon, (Diarium Italicum, p. 283—301,) who thus delivers his own critical opinion: Scriptor xiiimi. circiter sæculi, ut ibidem notatur; antiquariæ rei imperitus et, ut ab illo ævo, nugis et anilibus fabellis refertus: sed, quia monumenta, quæ iis temporibus Romæ supererant pro modulo recenset, non parum inde lucis mutuabitur qui Romanis antiquitatibus indagandis operam navabit, (p. 283.)
《罗马奇观志》(Liber de Mirabilibus Romæ),出自阿拉贡枢机尼古拉的登录簿,藏于圣依西多禄图书馆第四号书橱第69号。这部论著连同若干简短而中肯的注释,已由蒙福孔刊行(Diarium Italicum, p. 283—301),他还就此发表了自己的批评意见:Scriptor xiiimi. circiter sæculi, ut ibidem notatur; antiquariæ rei imperitus et, ut ab illo ævo, nugis et anilibus fabellis refertus: sed, quia monumenta, quæ iis temporibus Romæ supererant pro modulo recenset, non parum inde lucis mutuabitur qui Romanis antiquitatibus indagandis operam navabit(大意:此人约为十三世纪的作者,正如该处所注;他对古物之学一窍不通,且一如那个时代的风气,满纸荒诞无稽的琐谈与老妪村语;然而,正因为他多少记录下了当时罗马尚存的种种遗迹,凡有志于探究罗马古物者,仍可从中得到不少启发)(p. 283)。
7
↩
The Père Mabillon (Analecta, tom. iv. p. 502) has published an anonymous pilgrim of the ixth century, who, in his visit round the churches and holy places at Rome, touches on several buildings, especially porticos, which had disappeared before the xiiith century.
马比荣神父(Analecta, tom. iv. p. 502)刊布了一位九世纪佚名朝圣者的记述,此人巡访罗马各处教堂与圣地时,提到了若干在十三世纪以前便已消失的建筑,尤以柱廊为多。
8
↩
On the Septizonium, see the Mémoires sur Pétrarque, (tom. i. p. 325,) Donatus, (p. 338,) and Nardini, (p. 117, 414.)
关于塞普提佐尼乌姆,参见 Mémoires sur Pétrarque(tom. i. p. 325)、多纳图斯(p. 338)与纳尔迪尼(p. 117, 414)。
9
↩
The age of the pyramids is remote and unknown, since Diodorus Siculus (tom. i l. i. c. 44, p. 72) is unable to decide whether they were constructed 1000, or 3400, years before the clxxxth Olympiad. Sir John Marsham’s contracted scale of the Egyptian dynasties would fix them about 2000 years before Christ, (Canon. Chronicus, p. 47.)
金字塔的年代邈远难考:就连西西里的狄奥多罗斯(tom. i. l. i. c. 44, p. 72)也无法断定,它们究竟建于第一百八十届奥林匹亚赛会之前一千年,还是三千四百年。约翰·马香爵士为埃及诸王朝所拟的那套压缩年表,则将其建造定在公元前约两千年(Canon. Chronicus, p. 47)。
10
↩
See the speech of Glaucus in the Iliad, (Z. 146.) This natural but melancholy image is peculiar to Homer.
见《伊利亚特》中格劳科斯的那段话(Z. 146)。这一自然却又略带感伤的比喻,是荷马所独有的。
11
↩
The learning and criticism of M. des Vignoles (Histoire Critique de la République des Lettres, tom. viii. p. 47—118, ix. p. 172—187) dates the fire of Rome from A.D. 64, July 19, and the subsequent persecution of the Christians from November 15 of the same year.
德维尼奥勒先生以其博学与考辨(Histoire Critique de la République des Lettres, tom. viii. p. 47—118, ix. p. 172—187),把罗马大火的日期定在公元64年7月19日,把随之而来的迫害基督徒之事定在同年11月15日。
12
↩
Quippe in regiones quatuordecim Roma dividitur, quarum quatuor integræ manebant, tres solo tenus dejectæ: septem reliquis pauca testorum vestigia supererant, lacera et semiusta. Among the old relics that were irreparably lost, Tacitus enumerates the temple of the moon of Servius Tullius; the fane and altar consecrated by Evander præsenti Herculi; the temple of Jupiter Stator, a vow of Romulus; the palace of Numa; the temple of Vesta cum Penatibus populi Romani. He then deplores the opes tot victoriis quæsitæ et Græcarum artium decora.... multa quæ seniores meminerant, quæ reparari nequibant, (Annal. xv. 40, 41.)
Quippe in regiones quatuordecim Roma dividitur, quarum quatuor integræ manebant, tres solo tenus dejectæ: septem reliquis pauca testorum vestigia supererant, lacera et semiusta(大意:罗马全城分为十四个区,其中四区安然无恙,三区被夷为平地,其余七区只剩下少许残破而半焚的断壁遗迹)。在那些无可挽回、永远失去的古迹中,塔西佗一一列举道:塞尔维乌斯·图利乌斯所建的月神庙;埃万德尔为“在场的赫拉克勒斯”(præsenti Herculi)所奉献的神殿与祭坛;罗慕路斯还愿所建的“护佑者朱庇特”神庙(temple of Jupiter Stator);努马的宫殿;以及供奉“罗马人民家神”(cum Penatibus populi Romani)的维斯塔神庙。他继而痛惜那“历经无数次胜利换来的财富、希腊艺术的珍品……许多老一辈人尚能记得、却已无从修复之物”(opes tot victoriis quæsitæ et Græcarum artium decora.... multa quæ seniores meminerant, quæ reparari nequibant)(Annal. xv. 40, 41)。
13
↩
A. U. C. 507, repentina subversio ipsius Romæ prævenit triumphum Romanorum.... diversæ ignium aquarumque clades pene absumsere urbem Nam Tiberis insolitis auctus imbribus et ultra opinionem, vel diuturnitate vel maguitudine redundans, omnia Romæ ædificia in plano posita delevit. Diversæ qualitates locorum ad unam convenere perniciem: quoniam et quæ segnior inundatio tenuit madefacta dissolvit, et quæ cursus torrentis invenit impulsa dejecit, (Orosius, Hist. l. iv. c. 11, p. 244, edit. Havercamp.) Yet we may observe, that it is the plan and study of the Christian apologist to magnify the calamities of the Pagan world.
A. U. C. 507, repentina subversio ipsius Romæ prævenit triumphum Romanorum.... diversæ ignium aquarumque clades pene absumsere urbem Nam Tiberis insolitis auctus imbribus et ultra opinionem, vel diuturnitate vel maguitudine redundans, omnia Romæ ædificia in plano posita delevit. Diversæ qualitates locorum ad unam convenere perniciem: quoniam et quæ segnior inundatio tenuit madefacta dissolvit, et quæ cursus torrentis invenit impulsa dejecit, (Orosius, Hist. l. iv. c. 11, p. 244, edit. Havercamp.)(大意:罗马建城后507年,一场突如其来的灾祸赶在罗马人的凯旋之前降临了本城……水火交攻的种种灾害几乎将全城吞没。原来台伯河因罕见的暴雨而暴涨,其泛滥无论持续之久还是水势之大都出人意料,把罗马建在平地上的一切房舍尽数摧毁。地势各异,却同归于一场浩劫:凡被缓涨之水浸泡者,尽被泡塌;凡遭急流冲击者,尽被冲垮。)不过我们不妨留意:这位基督教护教者的一贯用意与用心,本就在于夸大异教世界所遭的灾祸。
14
↩
15
↩
Ad coercendas inundationes alveum Tiberis laxavit, ac repurgavit, completum olim ruderibus, et ædificiorum prolapsionibus coarctatum, (Suetonius in Augusto, c. 30.)
Ad coercendas inundationes alveum Tiberis laxavit, ac repurgavit, completum olim ruderibus, et ædificiorum prolapsionibus coarctatum, (Suetonius in Augusto, c. 30.)(大意:为遏止泛滥,他拓宽并疏浚了台伯河的河床——那河床早已淤满瓦砾,又被坍塌的建筑物挤得狭窄。)
16
↩
Tacitus (Annal. i. 79) reports the petitions of the different towns of Italy to the senate against the measure; and we may applaud the progress of reason. On a similar occasion, local interests would undoubtedly be consulted: but an English House of Commons would reject with contempt the arguments of superstition, “that nature had assigned to the rivers their proper course,” &c.
塔西佗(Annal. i. 79)记载了意大利各城镇为反对此项举措而向元老院递交的请愿;对此我们不妨为理性的进步喝彩。若逢类似情形,地方利益固然免不了要被顾及,但英国的下议院却会不屑一顾地驳回那套迷信的论调——什么“大自然早已为江河指定了各自应循的河道”云云。
17
↩
See the Epoques de la Nature of the eloquent and philosophic Buffon. His picture of Guyana, in South America, is that of a new and savage land, in which the waters are abandoned to themselves without being regulated by human industry, (p. 212, 561, quarto edition.)
参见文采斐然、富于哲思的布丰所著《自然的纪元》(Epoques de la Nature)。他笔下的南美洲圭亚那,是一片崭新而荒蛮的土地,那里的水流听其自然,从未经人力加以疏导(p. 212, 561, 四开本)。
18
↩
In his travels in Italy, Mr. Addison (his works, vol. ii. p. 98, Baskerville’s edition) has observed this curious and unquestionable fact.
艾迪生先生在其意大利游记中(其《文集》第二卷第98页,巴斯克维尔版)记录下了这一奇特而确凿无疑的事实。
19
↩
Yet in modern times, the Tyber has sometimes damaged the city, and in the years 1530, 1557, 1598, the annals of Muratori record three mischievous and memorable inundations, (tom. xiv. p. 268, 429, tom. xv. p. 99, &c.) * Note: The level of the Tyber was at one time supposed to be considerably raised: recent investigations seem to be conclusive against this supposition. See a brief, but satisfactory statement of the question in Bunsen and Platner, Roms Beschreibung. vol. i. p. 29.—M.
然而到了近代,台伯河仍时而为害城中;穆拉托里的编年史便记载了1530年、1557年、1598年三次为祸甚烈、令人难忘的洪灾(tom. xiv. p. 268, 429, tom. xv. p. 99, 等)。* 编者按:台伯河的水位一度被认为抬高了许多,但晚近的研究似乎足以推翻这一推断。关于此问题,本森与普拉特纳合著的《罗马志》(Roms Beschreibung)中有一段简明而令人信服的说明,见第一卷第29页。—M
20
↩
I take this opportunity of declaring, that in the course of twelve years, I have forgotten, or renounced, the flight of Odin from Azoph to Sweden, which I never very seriously believed, (vol. i. p. 283.) The Goths are apparently Germans: but all beyond Cæsar and Tacitus is darkness or fable, in the antiquities of Germany.
我借此机会声明:在这十二年间,我已淡忘、或者说放弃了奥丁从亚速海之滨逃往瑞典的那段说法——我本来也从未认真相信过(第一卷第283页)。哥特人显然属于日耳曼人;但在日耳曼的古史中,凡是恺撒与塔西佗记载之外的一切,都是一片晦暗,或纯属传说。
21
↩
History of the Decline, &c., vol. iii. p. 291.
《罗马帝国衰亡史》等,第三卷第291页。
22
↩
———————————vol. iii. p. 464.
同上,第三卷第464页。
23
↩
———————————vol. iv. p. 23—25.
同上,第四卷第23—25页。
24
↩
———————————vol. iv. p. 258.
同上,第四卷第258页。
25
↩
———————————vol. iii. c. xxviii. p. 139—148.
同上,第三卷第二十八章第139—148页。
26
↩
Eodem tempore petiit a Phocate principe templum, quod appellatur Pantheon, in quo fecit ecclesiam Sanctæ Mariæ semper Virginis, et omnium martyrum; in quâ ecclesiæ princeps multa bona obtulit, (Anastasius vel potius Liber Pontificalis in Bonifacio IV., in Muratori, Script. Rerum Italicarum, tom. iii. P. i. p. 135.) According to the anonymous writer in Montfaucon, the Pantheon had been vowed by Agrippa to Cybele and Neptune, and was dedicated by Boniface IV., on the calends of November, to the Virgin, quæ est mater omnium sanctorum, (p. 297, 298.)
Eodem tempore petiit a Phocate principe templum, quod appellatur Pantheon, in quo fecit ecclesiam Sanctæ Mariæ semper Virginis, et omnium martyrum; in quâ ecclesiæ princeps multa bona obtulit(大意:约在此时,他向福卡斯皇帝求得了那座名为“万神殿”的神庙,在其中兴建了一座奉献给永贞圣母马利亚及诸殉道者的教堂,并为此教堂捐赠了许多财物)(Anastasius,或不如说《历代教宗传》卜尼法斯四世条,见 Muratori, Script. Rerum Italicarum, tom. iii. P. i. p. 135)。据蒙福孔书中所引的那位佚名作者称,万神殿本是阿格里帕许愿献给库柏勒与尼普顿的,后由卜尼法斯四世在11月初一那天奉献给圣母,quæ est mater omnium sanctorum(她乃是众圣徒之母)(p. 297, 298)。
261
↩
The popes, under the dominion of the emperor and of the exarchs, according to Feas’s just observation, did not possess the power of disposing of the buildings and monuments of the city according to their own will. Bunsen and Platner, vol. i. p. 241.—M.
费亚(Fea)的观察颇为中肯:教宗们在皇帝与总督的统治之下,并无权按自己的意愿随意处置城中的建筑与遗迹。本森与普拉特纳,第一卷第241页。—M
27
↩
Flaminius Vacca (apud Montfaucon, p. 155, 156. His memoir is likewise printed, p. 21, at the end of the Roman Antica of Nardini) and several Romans, doctrinâ graves, were persuaded that the Goths buried their treasures at Rome, and bequeathed the secret marks filiis nepotibusque. He relates some anecdotes to prove, that in his own time, these places were visited and rifled by the Transalpine pilgrims, the heirs of the Gothic conquerors.
弗拉米尼奥·瓦卡(转引自蒙福孔,p. 155, 156;他的手记也印在纳尔迪尼《古罗马》一书末尾第21页)以及若干学问深厚(doctrinâ graves)的罗马人都深信:哥特人曾把财宝埋藏在罗马,并把秘密的标记传给子孙后代(filiis nepotibusque)。他讲了几则轶事,以证明在他那个时代,这些埋藏之处确曾被越过阿尔卑斯山而来的朝圣者——即哥特征服者的后裔——寻访并盗掘。
28
↩
Omnia quæ erant in ære ad ornatum civitatis deposuit, sed e ecclesiam B. Mariæ ad martyres quæ de tegulis æreis cooperta discooperuit, (Anast. in Vitalian. p. 141.) The base and sacrilegious Greek had not even the poor pretence of plundering a heathen temple, the Pantheon was already a Catholic church.
Omnia quæ erant in ære ad ornatum civitatis deposuit, sed e ecclesiam B. Mariæ ad martyres quæ de tegulis æreis cooperta discooperuit, (Anast. in Vitalian. p. 141.)(大意:凡城中用作装饰的青铜之物,他都拆卸带走,甚至连以青铜瓦覆盖的“诸殉道者圣母堂”也被他揭去了屋顶。)这个卑劣而亵渎神圣的希腊人,甚至连劫掠一座异教神庙这点可怜的借口都没有——因为万神殿早已是一座公教教堂了。
29
↩
For the spoils of Ravenna (musiva atque marmora) see the original grant of Pope Adrian I. to Charlemagne, (Codex Carolin. epist. lxvii. in Muratori, Script. Ital. tom. iii. P. ii. p. 223.)
关于取自拉文纳的战利品(musiva atque marmora,即镶嵌画与大理石),参见教宗阿德里安一世颁给查理曼的原始敕许(Codex Carolin. epist. lxvii. in Muratori, Script. Ital. tom. iii. P. ii. p. 223)。
30
↩
I shall quote the authentic testimony of the Saxon poet, (A.D. 887—899,) de Rebus gestis Caroli magni, l. v. 437—440, in the Historians of France, (tom. v. p. 180:)
Ad quæ marmoreas præstabat Roma columnas,
Quasdam præcipuas pulchra Ravenna dedit.
De tam longinquâ poterit regione vetustas
Illius ornatum, Francia, ferre tibi.
And I shall add from the Chronicle of Sigebert, (Historians of France, tom. v. p. 378,) extruxit etiam Aquisgrani basilicam plurimæ pulchritudinis, ad cujus structuram a Roma et Ravenna columnas et marmora devehi fecit.
Ad quæ marmoreas præstabat Roma columnas,
Quasdam præcipuas pulchra Ravenna dedit.
De tam longinquâ poterit regione vetustas
Illius ornatum, Francia, ferre tibi.
And I shall add from the Chronicle of Sigebert, (Historians of France, tom. v. p. 378,) extruxit etiam Aquisgrani basilicam plurimæ pulchritudinis, ad cujus structuram a Roma et Ravenna columnas et marmora devehi fecit.
我要引述那位撒克逊诗人(公元887—899年)的确凿记述,见《查理大帝功业录》第五卷437—440行,收于《法兰西史家丛编》(tom. v. p. 180):
Ad quæ marmoreas præstabat Roma columnas, Quasdam præcipuas pulchra Ravenna dedit. De tam longinquâ poterit regione vetustas Illius ornatum, Francia, ferre tibi.
(这是那位撒克逊诗人的诗句,大意是:为营造亚琛的宫室,罗马献出了自己的大理石廊柱,其中几根尤为精美的,则出自秀丽的拉文纳之手;法兰克啊,纵然相隔那样遥远的国度,那古老之邦也依旧能把它的珍饰运来,供你装点。诗人一面夸耀查理曼营建之宏丽,一面也在不经意间道出了古城的遗珍如何被一件件搬往北方。)
我还要从西吉贝尔特的《编年史》(Historians of France, tom. v. p. 378)中补录一段:extruxit etiam Aquisgrani basilicam plurimæ pulchritudinis, ad cujus structuram a Roma et Ravenna columnas et marmora devehi fecit.(大意是:他还在亚琛兴建了一座极为华美的大教堂,为营造此堂,特地命人从罗马与拉文纳两地运来石柱与大理石。)由此可见,早在加洛林时代,罗马与拉文纳的古代石料便已被成批北运,用以装点阿尔卑斯山以北新建的宫室与教堂;这正是吉本所说建材“取用与滥用”的一个显例,古城的瑰宝就此被拆解、迁移,一去不返。
Ad quæ marmoreas præstabat Roma columnas, Quasdam præcipuas pulchra Ravenna dedit. De tam longinquâ poterit regione vetustas Illius ornatum, Francia, ferre tibi.
(这是那位撒克逊诗人的诗句,大意是:为营造亚琛的宫室,罗马献出了自己的大理石廊柱,其中几根尤为精美的,则出自秀丽的拉文纳之手;法兰克啊,纵然相隔那样遥远的国度,那古老之邦也依旧能把它的珍饰运来,供你装点。诗人一面夸耀查理曼营建之宏丽,一面也在不经意间道出了古城的遗珍如何被一件件搬往北方。)
我还要从西吉贝尔特的《编年史》(Historians of France, tom. v. p. 378)中补录一段:extruxit etiam Aquisgrani basilicam plurimæ pulchritudinis, ad cujus structuram a Roma et Ravenna columnas et marmora devehi fecit.(大意是:他还在亚琛兴建了一座极为华美的大教堂,为营造此堂,特地命人从罗马与拉文纳两地运来石柱与大理石。)由此可见,早在加洛林时代,罗马与拉文纳的古代石料便已被成批北运,用以装点阿尔卑斯山以北新建的宫室与教堂;这正是吉本所说建材“取用与滥用”的一个显例,古城的瑰宝就此被拆解、迁移,一去不返。
31
↩
I cannot refuse to transcribe a long passage of Petrarch (Opp. p. 536, 537) in Epistolâ hortatoriâ ad Nicolaum Laurentium; it is so strong and full to the point: Nec pudor aut pietas continuit quominus impii spoliata Dei templa, occupatas arces, opes publicas, regiones urbis, atque honores magistratûum inter se divisos; (habeant?) quam unâ in re, turbulenti ac seditiosi homines et totius reliquæ vitæ consiliis et rationibus discordes, inhumani fderis stupendà societate convenirent, in pontes et mnia atque immeritos lapides desævirent. Denique post vi vel senio collapsa palatia, quæ quondam ingentes tenuerunt viri, post diruptos arcus triumphales, (unde majores horum forsitan corruerunt,) de ipsius vetustatis ac propriæ impietatis fragminibus vilem quæstum turpi mercimonio captare non puduit. Itaque nunc, heu dolor! heu scelus indignum! de vestris marmoreis columnis, de liminibus templorum, (ad quæ nuper ex orbe toto concursus devotissimus fiebat,) de imaginibus sepulchrorum sub quibus patrum vestrorum venerabilis civis (cinis?) erat, ut reliquas sileam, desidiosa Neapolis adornatur. Sic paullatim ruinæ ipsæ deficiunt. Yet King Robert was the friend of Petrarch.
我实在不忍不把彼特拉克的一大段话(Opp. p. 536, 537)抄录下来,它出自《致尼古拉·劳伦提乌斯的劝勉书》,说得如此有力、如此切中要害:Nec pudor aut pietas continuit quominus impii spoliata Dei templa, occupatas arces, opes publicas, regiones urbis, atque honores magistratûum inter se divisos; (habeant?) quam unâ in re, turbulenti ac seditiosi homines et totius reliquæ vitæ consiliis et rationibus discordes, inhumani fderis stupendà societate convenirent, in pontes et mnia atque immeritos lapides desævirent. Denique post vi vel senio collapsa palatia, quæ quondam ingentes tenuerunt viri, post diruptos arcus triumphales, (unde majores horum forsitan corruerunt,) de ipsius vetustatis ac propriæ impietatis fragminibus vilem quæstum turpi mercimonio captare non puduit. Itaque nunc, heu dolor! heu scelus indignum! de vestris marmoreis columnis, de liminibus templorum, (ad quæ nuper ex orbe toto concursus devotissimus fiebat,) de imaginibus sepulchrorum sub quibus patrum vestrorum venerabilis civis (cinis?) erat, ut reliquas sileam, desidiosa Neapolis adornatur. Sic paullatim ruinæ ipsæ deficiunt.(大意:无论羞耻还是虔敬,都拦不住这些不虔之徒——他们把被劫掠一空的神庙、被侵占的城堡、公共的财富、城中的各个区域以及各级官职都彼此瓜分了;这些平日搅扰生事、在其余一切事务的谋划与主张上都各执一词的人,竟在这一件事上结成骇人听闻的同盟,一齐向桥梁、城墙和那些无辜的石头肆虐。总之,那些曾为伟人所居、如今或因暴力或因年久而坍塌的宫殿,那些断裂的凯旋门——他们的先辈或许正是从这些拱门下走过——他们竟不以为耻,从这古老遗迹与自身不虔行径的碎片中做起卑污的买卖,牟取蝇头小利。于是如今,唉,可痛!唉,可耻的罪孽!懒散的那不勒斯,正用你们的大理石廊柱、用你们神庙的门槛——不久前全世界的人还虔诚地云集到那里去朝拜——用你们祖辈可敬的骸骨所安葬其下的墓上雕像来装点自己,其余的更不必细说。这些废墟就这样一点一点地消失殆尽。)不过罗伯特国王倒是彼特拉克的朋友。
32
↩
Yet Charlemagne washed and swam at Aix la Chapelle with a hundred of his courtiers, (Eginhart, c. 22, p. 108, 109,) and Muratori describes, as late as the year 814, the public baths which were built at Spoleto in Italy, (Annali, tom. vi. p. 416.)
不过查理曼倒是常与上百名侍臣一同在亚琛沐浴、游泳(Eginhart, c. 22, p. 108, 109);穆拉托里还记述了晚至公元814年意大利斯波莱托所建的公共浴场(Annali, tom. vi. p. 416)。
33
↩
See the Annals of Italy, A.D. 988. For this and the preceding fact, Muratori himself is indebted to the Benedictine history of Père Mabillon.
参见《意大利编年史》公元988年条。此事以及上一处史实,穆拉托里本人也是取材于马比荣神父所著的本笃会会史。
34
↩
Vita di Sisto Quinto, da Gregorio Leti, tom. iii. p. 50.
格雷戈里奥·莱蒂《西克斯图斯五世传》,第三卷第50页。
341
↩
From the quotations in Bunsen’s Dissertation, it may be suspected that this slow but continual process of destruction was the most fatal. Ancient Rome eas considered a quarry from which the church, the castle of the baron, or even the hovel of the peasant, might be repaired.—M.
从本森论文所引的种种材料来看,或许可以推断:这种缓慢却持续不断的破坏过程,才是最致命的。古罗马被人当成了一座采石场,无论是教堂、男爵的城堡,还是农夫的茅舍,都可从中取材加以修葺。—M
35
↩
Porticus ædis Concordiæ, quam cum primum ad urbem accessi vidi fere integram opere marmoreo admodum specioso: Romani postmodum ad calcem ædem totam et porticûs partem disjectis columnis sunt demoliti, (p. 12.) The temple of Concord was therefore not destroyed by a sedition in the xiiith century, as I have read in a MS. treatise del’ Governo civile di Rome, lent me formerly at Rome, and ascribed (I believe falsely) to the celebrated Gravina. Poggius likewise affirms that the sepulchre of Cæcilia Metella was burnt for lime, (p. 19, 20.)
Porticus ædis Concordiæ, quam cum primum ad urbem accessi vidi fere integram opere marmoreo admodum specioso: Romani postmodum ad calcem ædem totam et porticûs partem disjectis columnis sunt demoliti, (p. 12.)(大意:和谐女神庙的柱廊,我初到罗马时所见几近完好,其大理石工艺极为精美;后来罗马人为烧制石灰,竟推倒立柱,把整座神庙连同一部分柱廊都拆毁了。)可见,和谐女神庙并非如我在一部手稿论著《罗马的市政》(del' Governo civile di Rome)中所读到的那样,毁于十三世纪的一场叛乱——那部手稿是我早年在罗马借得的,据称(我相信是讹传)出自名家格拉维纳之手。波焦同样确证,切奇莉亚·梅泰拉的陵墓曾被焚以烧灰(p. 19, 20)。
36
↩
Composed by Æneas Sylvius, afterwards Pope Pius II., and published by Mabillon, from a MS. of the queen of Sweden, (Musæum Italicum, tom. i. p. 97.)
Oblectat me, Roma, tuas spectare ruinas:
Ex cujus lapsû gloria prisca patet.
Sed tuus hic populus muris defossa vetustis
Calcis in obsequium marmora dura coquit.
Impia tercentum si sic gens egerit annos
Nullum hinc indicium nobilitatis erit.
Oblectat me, Roma, tuas spectare ruinas:
Ex cujus lapsû gloria prisca patet.
Sed tuus hic populus muris defossa vetustis
Calcis in obsequium marmora dura coquit.
Impia tercentum si sic gens egerit annos
Nullum hinc indicium nobilitatis erit.
此诗为埃涅阿斯·西尔维乌斯(即后来的教宗庇护二世)所作,由马比荣据瑞典女王的一份手稿刊布(Musæum Italicum, tom. i. p. 97)。
Oblectat me, Roma, tuas spectare ruinas: Ex cujus lapsû gloria prisca patet. Sed tuus hic populus muris defossa vetustis Calcis in obsequium marmora dura coquit. Impia tercentum si sic gens egerit annos Nullum hinc indicium nobilitatis erit.
(这首讽喻短诗大意是:罗马啊,凝望你的废墟令我心醉神驰,因为正是从你的倾颓之中,昔日的荣光才愈发昭然可见。然而你这里的子民,却把从古老城墙里掘出的坚硬大理石投入窑火,烧成石灰。倘若这不虔的族类照此折腾上三百年,到那时,此地便再也寻不见半分昔日高贵的痕迹了。诗人借此发出警告:长此以往,罗马的古迹终将荡然无存。)西尔维乌斯后来贵为教宗庇护二世,此诗正流露出他早年对罗马古物的珍视,以及眼见其被焚为石灰时的那份痛惜;短短六行,既是叹惋,也是控诉。
Oblectat me, Roma, tuas spectare ruinas: Ex cujus lapsû gloria prisca patet. Sed tuus hic populus muris defossa vetustis Calcis in obsequium marmora dura coquit. Impia tercentum si sic gens egerit annos Nullum hinc indicium nobilitatis erit.
(这首讽喻短诗大意是:罗马啊,凝望你的废墟令我心醉神驰,因为正是从你的倾颓之中,昔日的荣光才愈发昭然可见。然而你这里的子民,却把从古老城墙里掘出的坚硬大理石投入窑火,烧成石灰。倘若这不虔的族类照此折腾上三百年,到那时,此地便再也寻不见半分昔日高贵的痕迹了。诗人借此发出警告:长此以往,罗马的古迹终将荡然无存。)西尔维乌斯后来贵为教宗庇护二世,此诗正流露出他早年对罗马古物的珍视,以及眼见其被焚为石灰时的那份痛惜;短短六行,既是叹惋,也是控诉。
37
↩
Vagabamur pariter in illâ urbe tam magnâ; quæ, cum propter spatium vacua videretur, populum habet immensum, (Opp p. 605 Epist. Familiares, ii. 14.)
Vagabamur pariter in illâ urbe tam magnâ; quæ, cum propter spatium vacua videretur, populum habet immensum, (Opp p. 605 Epist. Familiares, ii. 14.)(大意:我们一同漫步在那样宏大的城中——它因空间辽阔而显得空旷,实则人口极为众多。)
38
↩
These states of the population of Rome at different periods are derived from an ingenious treatise of the physician Lancisi, de Romani Cli Qualitatibus, (p. 122.)
罗马各个时期人口的这些数字,取自医生兰奇西一部见解精妙的论著《论罗马气候之性状》(de Romani Cli Qualitatibus, p. 122)。
39
↩
All the facts that relate to the towers at Rome, and in other free cities of Italy, may be found in the laborious and entertaining compilation of Muratori, Antiquitates Italiæ Medii Ævi, dissertat. xxvi., (tom. ii. p. 493—496, of the Latin, tom.. p. 446, of the Italian work.)
凡与罗马及意大利其他自由城邦的塔楼有关的种种史实,都可在穆拉托里那部辛勤纂成、饶有趣味的汇编《中世纪意大利古迹》第二十六论中找到(拉丁文本第二卷第493—496页,意大利文本第446页)。
40
↩
As for instance, templum Jani nunc dicitur, turris Centii Frangipanis; et sane Jano impositæ turris lateritiæ conspicua hodieque vestigia supersunt, (Montfaucon Diarium Italicum, p. 186.) The anonymous writer (p. 285) enumerates, arcus Titi, turris Cartularia; arcus Julii Cæsaris et Senatorum, turres de Bratis; arcus Antonini, turris de Cosectis, &c.
例如,templum Jani nunc dicitur, turris Centii Frangipanis; et sane Jano impositæ turris lateritiæ conspicua hodieque vestigia supersunt, (Montfaucon Diarium Italicum, p. 186.)(大意:雅努斯神庙如今被称作琴齐奥·弗兰吉帕尼之塔,而建在雅努斯神庙之上的那座砖塔,其显著的遗迹至今犹存。)那位佚名作者(p. 285)则一一列举道:arcus Titi, turris Cartularia(提图斯拱门,即卡尔图拉里塔);arcus Julii Cæsaris et Senatorum, turres de Bratis(尤利乌斯·恺撒与元老们的拱门,即德布拉蒂诸塔);arcus Antonini, turris de Cosectis(安敦尼拱门,即德科塞蒂塔),如此等等。
41
↩
Hadriani molem.... magna ex parte Romanorum injuria.... disturbavit; quod certe funditus evertissent, si eorum manibus pervia, absumptis grandibus saxis, reliqua moles exstisset, (Poggius de Varietate Fortunæ, p. 12.)
Hadriani molem.... magna ex parte Romanorum injuria.... disturbavit; quod certe funditus evertissent, si eorum manibus pervia, absumptis grandibus saxis, reliqua moles exstisset, (Poggius de Varietate Fortunæ, p. 12.)(大意:哈德良的陵台,大半毁于罗马人之手;他们若能搬走那些巨大的石块、拆动其余部分,必定会把它彻底夷平。)
42
↩
Against the emperor Henry IV., (Muratori, Annali d’ Italia, tom. ix. p. 147.)
此事发生在对抗皇帝亨利四世之时(Muratori, Annali d'Italia, tom. ix. p. 147)。
43
↩
I must copy an important passage of Montfaucon: Turris ingens rotunda.... Cæciliæ Metellæ.... sepulchrum erat, cujus muri tam solidi, ut spatium perquam minimum intus vacuum supersit; et Torre di Bove dicitur, a boum capitibus muro inscriptis. Huic sequiori ævo, tempore intestinorum bellorum, ceu urbecula adjuncta fuit, cujus mnia et turres etiamnum visuntur; ita ut sepulchrum Metellæ quasi arx oppiduli fuerit. Ferventibus in urbe partibus, cum Ursini atque Columnenses mutuis cladibus perniciem inferrent civitati, in utriusve partis ditionem cederet magni momenti erat, (p. 142.)
我必须抄录蒙福孔的一段重要文字:Turris ingens rotunda.... Cæciliæ Metellæ.... sepulchrum erat, cujus muri tam solidi, ut spatium perquam minimum intus vacuum supersit; et Torre di Bove dicitur, a boum capitibus muro inscriptis. Huic sequiori ævo, tempore intestinorum bellorum, ceu urbecula adjuncta fuit, cujus mnia et turres etiamnum visuntur; ita ut sepulchrum Metellæ quasi arx oppiduli fuerit. Ferventibus in urbe partibus, cum Ursini atque Columnenses mutuis cladibus perniciem inferrent civitati, in utriusve partis ditionem cederet magni momenti erat, (p. 142.)(大意:那座巨大的圆形塔楼,原是切奇莉亚·梅泰拉的陵墓,墙壁极为厚实,内里剩下的空间极小;因墙上刻有牛头,故俗称“牛塔”。到了后世内战之际,塔旁又添建起一座小城似的建筑群,其城墙与塔楼至今可见,以致梅泰拉的陵墓俨然成了这座小城的堡垒。当城中党争正炽、奥尔西尼与科隆纳两族以相互厮杀祸害全城之时,此地落入哪一方手中,便关系重大。)
431
↩
This is inaccurately expressed. The sepulchre is still standing See Hobhouse, p. 204.—M.
此处说法不确。这座陵墓至今仍矗立着。参见霍布豪斯,第204页。—M
44
↩
See the testimonies of Donatus, Nardini, and Montfaucon. In the Savelli palace, the remains of the theatre of Marcellus are still great and conspicuous.
参见多纳图斯、纳尔迪尼与蒙福孔的记述。在萨韦利宫中,马塞勒斯剧场的遗迹至今仍宏大而醒目。
45
↩
James, cardinal of St. George, ad velum aureum, in his metrical life of Pope Celestin V., (Muratori, Script. Ital. tom. i. P. iii. p. 621, l. i. c. l. ver. 132, &c.)
Hoc dixisse sat est, Romam caruisee Senatû
Mensibus exactis heu sex; belloque vocatum (vocatos)
In scelus, in socios fraternaque vulnera patres;
Tormentis jecisse viros immania saxa;
Perfodisse domus trabibus, fecisse ruinas
Ignibus; incensas turres, obscuraque fumo
Lumina vicino, quo sit spoliata supellex.
Hoc dixisse sat est, Romam caruisee Senatû
Mensibus exactis heu sex; belloque vocatum (vocatos)
In scelus, in socios fraternaque vulnera patres;
Tormentis jecisse viros immania saxa;
Perfodisse domus trabibus, fecisse ruinas
Ignibus; incensas turres, obscuraque fumo
Lumina vicino, quo sit spoliata supellex.
圣乔治堂枢机雅各布(其堂号为“金幔圣乔治”,ad velum aureum),在其为教宗塞莱斯廷五世所作的韵文传记中如是说(Muratori, Script. Ital. tom. i. P. iii. p. 621, l. i. c. l. ver. 132, 等)。
Hoc dixisse sat est, Romam caruisse Senatû Mensibus exactis heu sex; belloque vocatum (vocatos) In scelus, in socios fraternaque vulnera patres; Tormentis jecisse viros immania saxa; Perfodisse domus trabibus, fecisse ruinas Ignibus; incensas turres, obscuraque fumo Lumina vicino, quo sit spoliata supellex.
(这是那位枢机诗人所咏,大意是:只消说这样一句便足够了——罗马竟一连整整六个月没有元老院,唉!那些元老被战火裹挟着堕入罪恶,自相残杀、手足相戕;人们操起抛石机,掷出巨大的石块;又用粗大的梁木凿穿一座座房屋,纵起火来把它们烧成废墟;塔楼被点燃,浓烟弥漫,连邻近的天光都被遮得晦暗不明,家中的器物什具则被劫掠一空。诗人以短短数行,便把内战期间罗马自相残害、玉石俱焚的惨状和盘托出。)这位枢机既是教会显贵,又是当时的诗人,他以近乎亲历者的笔触,为尼古拉四世死后罗马陷入的那六个月无政府混战留下了沉痛的实录;石弹横飞、梁木穿墙、烈焰吞城,字字都是罗马人自戕其城的铁证。
Hoc dixisse sat est, Romam caruisse Senatû Mensibus exactis heu sex; belloque vocatum (vocatos) In scelus, in socios fraternaque vulnera patres; Tormentis jecisse viros immania saxa; Perfodisse domus trabibus, fecisse ruinas Ignibus; incensas turres, obscuraque fumo Lumina vicino, quo sit spoliata supellex.
(这是那位枢机诗人所咏,大意是:只消说这样一句便足够了——罗马竟一连整整六个月没有元老院,唉!那些元老被战火裹挟着堕入罪恶,自相残杀、手足相戕;人们操起抛石机,掷出巨大的石块;又用粗大的梁木凿穿一座座房屋,纵起火来把它们烧成废墟;塔楼被点燃,浓烟弥漫,连邻近的天光都被遮得晦暗不明,家中的器物什具则被劫掠一空。诗人以短短数行,便把内战期间罗马自相残害、玉石俱焚的惨状和盘托出。)这位枢机既是教会显贵,又是当时的诗人,他以近乎亲历者的笔触,为尼古拉四世死后罗马陷入的那六个月无政府混战留下了沉痛的实录;石弹横飞、梁木穿墙、烈焰吞城,字字都是罗马人自戕其城的铁证。
46
↩
Muratori (Dissertazione sopra le Antiquità Italiane, tom. i. p. 427—431) finds that stone bullets of two or three hundred pounds’ weight were not uncommon; and they are sometimes computed at xii. or xviii cantari of Genoa, each cantaro weighing 150 pounds.
穆拉托里(Dissertazione sopra le Antiquità Italiane, tom. i. p. 427—431)发现,重达两三百磅的石弹并不罕见;有时其重量以热那亚的“康塔罗”(cantaro)计,为十二或十八康塔罗,每康塔罗合150磅。
47
↩
The vith law of the Visconti prohibits this common and mischievous practice; and strictly enjoins, that the houses of banished citizens should be preserved pro communi utilitate, (Gualvancus de la Flamma in Muratori, Script. Rerum Italicarum, tom. xii. p. 1041.)
维斯孔蒂家族的第六条法令禁止这种普遍而为害的做法,并严令:被放逐者的宅邸应予保全,以供公用(pro communi utilitate)(Gualvancus de la Flamma in Muratori, Script. Rerum Italicarum, tom. xii. p. 1041)。
48
↩
Petrarch thus addresses his friend, who, with shame and tears had shown him the mnia, laceræ specimen miserable Romæ, and declared his own intention of restoring them, (Carmina Latina, l. ii. epist. Paulo Annibalensi, xii. p. 97, 98.)
Nec te parva manet servatis fama ruinis
Quanta quod integræ fuit olim gloria Romæ
Reliquiæ testantur adhuc; quas longior ætas
Frangere non valuit; non vis aut ira cruenti Hostis,
ab egregiis franguntur civibus, heu! heu’
————Quod ille nequivit (Hannibal.)
Perficit hic aries.
Nec te parva manet servatis fama ruinis
Quanta quod integræ fuit olim gloria Romæ
Reliquiæ testantur adhuc; quas longior ætas
Frangere non valuit; non vis aut ira cruenti Hostis,
ab egregiis franguntur civibus, heu! heu’
————Quod ille nequivit (Hannibal.)
Perficit hic aries.
彼特拉克这段话是写给他一位朋友的——那位朋友曾满怀羞愧、含泪指给他看那些城墙(mnia),即“残破而可怜的罗马之写照”(laceræ specimen miserabile Romæ),并表明自己有意加以修复(Carmina Latina, l. ii. epist. Paulo Annibalensi, xii. p. 97, 98)。
Nec te parva manet servatis fama ruinis Quanta quod integræ fuit olim gloria Romæ Reliquiæ testantur adhuc; quas longior ætas Frangere non valuit; non vis aut ira cruenti Hostis, ab egregiis franguntur civibus, heu! heu’ ————Quod ille nequivit (Hannibal.) Perficit hic aries.
(这是彼特拉克的诗句,大意是:单凭这些留存下来的废墟,你也自有一份不小的声名;昔日完好无损的罗马曾拥有过何等的荣光,如今的残迹仍在默默为之作证。这些遗迹,悠悠岁月都未能将其摧折,凶残敌人的暴力与愤怒也奈何它不得,到头来却毁在了她自己那些杰出市民的手里,唉!唉!——那位英雄(这里指的是汉尼拔)当年凭刀剑未能做到的事,如今竟由这一具攻城槌一一做成了。)彼特拉克借此痛陈:真正毁掉罗马的,既非悠悠岁月,也非外敌的刀兵,而是她自己那些显赫的子孙;一具攻城槌所成就的浩劫,竟远胜当年汉尼拔的刀剑之祸。
Nec te parva manet servatis fama ruinis Quanta quod integræ fuit olim gloria Romæ Reliquiæ testantur adhuc; quas longior ætas Frangere non valuit; non vis aut ira cruenti Hostis, ab egregiis franguntur civibus, heu! heu’ ————Quod ille nequivit (Hannibal.) Perficit hic aries.
(这是彼特拉克的诗句,大意是:单凭这些留存下来的废墟,你也自有一份不小的声名;昔日完好无损的罗马曾拥有过何等的荣光,如今的残迹仍在默默为之作证。这些遗迹,悠悠岁月都未能将其摧折,凶残敌人的暴力与愤怒也奈何它不得,到头来却毁在了她自己那些杰出市民的手里,唉!唉!——那位英雄(这里指的是汉尼拔)当年凭刀剑未能做到的事,如今竟由这一具攻城槌一一做成了。)彼特拉克借此痛陈:真正毁掉罗马的,既非悠悠岁月,也非外敌的刀兵,而是她自己那些显赫的子孙;一具攻城槌所成就的浩劫,竟远胜当年汉尼拔的刀剑之祸。
481
↩
Bunsen has shown that the hostile attacks of the emperor Henry the Fourth, but more particularly that of Robert Guiscard, who burned down whole districts, inflicted the worst damage on the ancient city Vol. i. p. 247.—M.
本森已经证明:皇帝亨利四世的进犯,尤其是罗伯特·吉斯卡尔那次——他把整片整片的城区都付之一炬——才给这座古城造成了最严重的破坏。第一卷第247页。—M