Chapter LXV: Elevation Of Timour Or Tamerlane, And His Death.—Part II. 第六十五章 帖木儿的崛起及其身后——第二节
¶
The military republic of the Mamalukes still reigned in Egypt and Syria: but the dynasty of the Turks was overthrown by that of the Circassians; 33 and their favorite Barkok, from a slave and a prisoner, was raised and restored to the throne. In the midst of rebellion and discord, he braved the menaces, corresponded with the enemies, and detained the ambassadors, of the Mogul, who patiently expected his decease, to revenge the crimes of the father on the feeble reign of his son Farage. The Syrian emirs 34 were assembled at Aleppo to repel the invasion: they confided in the fame and discipline of the Mamalukes, in the temper of their swords and lances of the purest steel of Damascus, in the strength of their walled cities, and in the populousness of sixty thousand villages; and instead of sustaining a siege, they threw open their gates, and arrayed their forces in the plain. But these forces were not cemented by virtue and union; and some powerful emirs had been seduced to desert or betray their more loyal companions. Timour’s front was covered with a line of Indian elephants, whose turrets were filled with archers and Greek fire: the rapid evolutions of his cavalry completed the dismay and disorder; the Syrian crowds fell back on each other: many thousands were stifled or slaughtered in the entrance of the great street; the Moguls entered with the fugitives; and after a short defence, the citadel, the impregnable citadel of Aleppo, was surrendered by cowardice or treachery. Among the suppliants and captives, Timour distinguished the doctors of the law, whom he invited to the dangerous honor of a personal conference. 35 The Mogul prince was a zealous Mussulman; but his Persian schools had taught him to revere the memory of Ali and Hosein; and he had imbibed a deep prejudice against the Syrians, as the enemies of the son of the daughter of the apostle of God. To these doctors he proposed a captious question, which the casuists of Bochara, Samarcand, and Herat, were incapable of resolving. “Who are the true martyrs, of those who are slain on my side, or on that of my enemies?” But he was silenced, or satisfied, by the dexterity of one of the cadhis of Aleppo, who replied in the words of Mahomet himself, that the motive, not the ensign, constitutes the martyr; and that the Moslems of either party, who fight only for the glory of God, may deserve that sacred appellation. The true succession of the caliphs was a controversy of a still more delicate nature; and the frankness of a doctor, too honest for his situation, provoked the emperor to exclaim, “Ye are as false as those of Damascus: Moawiyah was a usurper, Yezid a tyrant, and Ali alone is the lawful successor of the prophet.” A prudent explanation restored his tranquillity; and he passed to a more familiar topic of conversation. “What is your age?” said he to the cadhi. “Fifty years.”—“It would be the age of my eldest son: you see me here (continued Timour) a poor lame, decrepit mortal. Yet by my arm has the Almighty been pleased to subdue the kingdoms of Iran, Touran, and the Indies. I am not a man of blood; and God is my witness, that in all my wars I have never been the aggressor, and that my enemies have always been the authors of their own calamity.” During this peaceful conversation the streets of Aleppo streamed with blood, and reechoed with the cries of mothers and children, with the shrieks of violated virgins. The rich plunder that was abandoned to his soldiers might stimulate their avarice; but their cruelty was enforced by the peremptory command of producing an adequate number of heads, which, according to his custom, were curiously piled in columns and pyramids: the Moguls celebrated the feast of victory, while the surviving Moslems passed the night in tears and in chains. I shall not dwell on the march of the destroyer from Aleppo to Damascus, where he was rudely encountered, and almost overthrown, by the armies of Egypt. A retrograde motion was imputed to his distress and despair: one of his nephews deserted to the enemy; and Syria rejoiced in the tale of his defeat, when the sultan was driven by the revolt of the Mamalukes to escape with precipitation and shame to his palace of Cairo. Abandoned by their prince, the inhabitants of Damascus still defended their walls; and Timour consented to raise the siege, if they would adorn his retreat with a gift or ransom; each article of nine pieces. But no sooner had he introduced himself into the city, under color of a truce, than he perfidiously violated the treaty; imposed a contribution of ten millions of gold; and animated his troops to chastise the posterity of those Syrians who had executed, or approved, the murder of the grandson of Mahomet. A family which had given honorable burial to the head of Hosein, and a colony of artificers, whom he sent to labor at Samarcand, were alone reserved in the general massacre, and after a period of seven centuries, Damascus was reduced to ashes, because a Tartar was moved by religious zeal to avenge the blood of an Arab. The losses and fatigues of the campaign obliged Timour to renounce the conquest of Palestine and Egypt; but in his return to the Euphrates he delivered Aleppo to the flames; and justified his pious motive by the pardon and reward of two thousand sectaries of Ali, who were desirous to visit the tomb of his son. I have expatiated on the personal anecdotes which mark the character of the Mogul hero; but I shall briefly mention, 36 that he erected on the ruins of Bagdad a pyramid of ninety thousand heads; again visited Georgia; encamped on the banks of Araxes; and proclaimed his resolution of marching against the Ottoman emperor. Conscious of the importance of the war, he collected his forces from every province: eight hundred thousand men were enrolled on his military list; 37 but the splendid commands of five, and ten, thousand horse, may be rather expressive of the rank and pension of the chiefs, than of the genuine number of effective soldiers. 38 In the pillage of Syria, the Moguls had acquired immense riches: but the delivery of their pay and arrears for seven years more firmly attached them to the Imperial standard.
马穆鲁克(Mamalukes)这个军事共和国依旧统治着埃及与叙利亚,只是突厥人的王朝已为切尔克斯人(Circassians)的王朝所取代;33他们所拥立的巴尔库克(Barkok),本是奴隶、又曾沦为阶下囚,如今却被扶上宝座、复登大位。在叛乱与纷争之中,他公然藐视蒙古人(Mogul)的威胁,暗通其敌国,又扣留其使节;蒙古君主则耐心等他死去,好在他儿子法拉吉(Farage)孱弱的治下,清算父亲当年的罪愆。叙利亚的众埃米尔34齐集阿勒颇(Aleppo),以图抵御入侵:他们仗恃马穆鲁克的威名与纪律,仗恃大马士革精钢所铸刀枪的锋利,仗恃各座城池坚固的城墙,更仗恃六万座村庄的人烟稠密;他们不肯据城固守,反倒大开城门,把军队列阵于旷野。然而这支大军既无德义维系,也不同心协力;几位有势力的埃米尔已被收买,或临阵脱逃,或出卖了那些更为忠诚的同袍。帖木儿(Timour)阵前排开一列印度战象,象背的塔楼里满是弓箭手与希腊火;他的骑兵迅疾回旋,更把敌军的惊惶与混乱推到极点;叙利亚人潮自相践踏,成千上万的人在大街入口处,或被挤死,或遭砍杀;蒙古人随着溃逃者涌入城中;略作抵抗之后,阿勒颇的城堡——那座号称固若金汤的城堡——终因怯懦或背叛而告陷落。帖木儿从乞降者与俘虏中单单挑出几位教法学者,赐以当面问对的殊荣,只是这份殊荣凶险异常。35这位蒙古君主是个虔诚的穆斯林,但他所受的波斯学派熏陶,教他敬奉阿里(Ali)与侯赛因(Hosein)的英灵;因此他对叙利亚人怀有极深的成见,视之为真主使者外孙的仇敌。他向这几位学者抛出一个刁钻的难题,连布哈拉(Bochara)、撒马尔罕(Samarcand)、赫拉特(Herat)的决疑名家都无从解答:“阵亡于我方与阵亡于敌方者,究竟谁才是真正的殉教者?”然而阿勒颇的一位卡迪应对机敏,用穆罕默德本人的话作答,说:决定殉教与否的是动机,而非旗号;两军之中凡只为真主荣耀而战的穆斯林,都当得起这一圣名——帖木儿于是语塞,或者说心服了。至于哈里发的正统传承,那是比这还要微妙的争端;有一位学者过于耿直,全不顾自己的处境,惹得帝王厉声喝道:“你们和大马士革那些人一样虚伪:穆阿维叶(Moawiyah)是篡位者,叶齐德(Yezid)是暴君,唯有阿里才是先知的合法继承人。”一番审慎的解释过后,帖木儿才平息了怒气,转而闲谈起家常来。“你多大年纪了?”他问那卡迪。“五十岁。”“这该是我长子的年纪了。你看我(帖木儿接着说),不过是个又跛又衰的可怜人罢了。然而全能的真主竟乐于借我这条臂膀,征服了伊朗(Iran)、图兰(Touran)与印度诸邦(Indies)。我并非嗜血之人;真主为我作证:历次征战,我从不是挑起事端的一方,我的敌人从来都是自招其祸。”就在这番平和的交谈进行之际,阿勒颇的街巷正血流成河,回荡着母亲与孩童的哭喊,回荡着处女遭凌辱的尖叫。丰厚的财货听凭士卒劫掠,或许能激起他们的贪欲;但逼得他们大肆杀戮的,是一道不容违抗的命令:必须缴上足够数目的头颅。照他惯常的做法,这些头颅被别出心裁地垒成一根根柱子、一座座金字塔。蒙古人大摆庆功之宴,幸存的穆斯林却在泪水与镣铐中熬过长夜。这毁灭者从阿勒颇进军大马士革的一段,我不打算细说:他在那里遭到埃及大军迎头痛击,几乎溃败。他一度后撤,时人便以为他已陷入窘迫与绝望:他的一个侄儿投了敌,叙利亚人听到他战败的传闻,也欢欣鼓舞。然而正当此时,马穆鲁克起兵叛乱,苏丹(Sultan)只得仓皇又羞愧地逃回开罗(Cairo)的宫中。大马士革的居民虽被君主抛弃,仍死守城墙;帖木儿答应解围,条件是他们献上礼物或赎金,每样九件,为他的撤兵增光。然而他借停战之名一进城,便背信弃义地撕毁和约,强征一千万金币的贡赋,并鼓动部众去惩治那些叙利亚人的后裔:当年穆罕默德的外孙遇害,下手的或赞同的,正是他们的先人。唯有一个家族因曾以体面之礼安葬侯赛因的头颅而得免,还有一批工匠被他派往撒马尔罕做工而侥幸存活,此外一概难逃屠戮;事隔七百年,大马士革终成灰烬——只因一个鞑靼人(Tartar)出于宗教狂热,要为一个阿拉伯人复仇。这一仗兵马损耗、疲惫不堪,帖木儿只得放弃征服巴勒斯坦与埃及;但在回师幼发拉底河的途中,他把阿勒颇付之一炬;有两千名阿里的信徒想去朝拜阿里之子的陵墓,他赦免了他们,还厚加赏赐,借此表明自己的动机确是出于虔诚。足以见出这位蒙古英雄性格的种种个人轶事,我已详加铺陈;以下诸事,我只略提一笔:36他在巴格达的废墟上垒起一座九万颗头颅的金字塔;再度进兵格鲁吉亚(Georgia);驻营于阿拉克塞斯河(Araxes)畔;并宣布决意挥师讨伐奥斯曼(Ottoman)皇帝。他深知此战关系重大,遂从各行省征集兵力:军籍册上登录了八十万人;37不过所谓五千骑、一万骑之类的煊赫番号,与其说反映能战之兵的真实数目,不如说标示着各头目的品级与俸禄。38在劫掠叙利亚时,蒙古人已攫得巨额财富;而如今又发下他们七年的欠饷积俸,这便把他们更牢地系在了帝国的旗帜之下。
¶
During this diversion of the Mogul arms, Bajazet had two years to collect his forces for a more serious encounter. They consisted of four hundred thousand horse and foot, 39 whose merit and fidelity were of an unequal complexion. We may discriminate the Janizaries, who have been gradually raised to an establishment of forty thousand men; a national cavalry, the Spahis of modern times; twenty thousand cuirassiers of Europe, clad in black and impenetrable armor; the troops of Anatolia, whose princes had taken refuge in the camp of Timour, and a colony of Tartars, whom he had driven from Kipzak, and to whom Bajazet had assigned a settlement in the plains of Adrianople. The fearless confidence of the sultan urged him to meet his antagonist; and, as if he had chosen that spot for revenge, he displayed his banner near the ruins of the unfortunate Suvas. In the mean while, Timour moved from the Araxes through the countries of Armenia and Anatolia: his boldness was secured by the wisest precautions; his speed was guided by order and discipline; and the woods, the mountains, and the rivers, were diligently explored by the flying squadrons, who marked his road and preceded his standard. Firm in his plan of fighting in the heart of the Ottoman kingdom, he avoided their camp; dexterously inclined to the left; occupied Cæsarea; traversed the salt desert and the River Halys; and invested Angora: while the sultan, immovable and ignorant in his post, compared the Tartar swiftness to the crawling of a snail; 40 he returned on the wings of indignation to the relief of Angora: and as both generals were alike impatient for action, the plains round that city were the scene of a memorable battle, which has immortalized the glory of Timour and the shame of Bajazet. For this signal victory the Mogul emperor was indebted to himself, to the genius of the moment, and the discipline of thirty years. He had improved the tactics, without violating the manners, of his nation, 41 whose force still consisted in the missile weapons, and rapid evolutions, of a numerous cavalry. From a single troop to a great army, the mode of attack was the same: a foremost line first advanced to the charge, and was supported in a just order by the squadrons of the great vanguard. The general’s eye watched over the field, and at his command the front and rear of the right and left wings successively moved forwards in their several divisions, and in a direct or oblique line: the enemy was pressed by eighteen or twenty attacks; and each attack afforded a chance of victory. If they all proved fruitless or unsuccessful, the occasion was worthy of the emperor himself, who gave the signal of advancing to the standard and main body, which he led in person. 42 But in the battle of Angora, the main body itself was supported, on the flanks and in the rear, by the bravest squadrons of the reserve, commanded by the sons and grandsons of Timour. The conqueror of Hindostan ostentatiously showed a line of elephants, the trophies, rather than the instruments, of victory; the use of the Greek fire was familiar to the Moguls and Ottomans; but had they borrowed from Europe the recent invention of gunpowder and cannon, the artificial thunder, in the hands of either nation, must have turned the fortune of the day. 43 In that day Bajazet displayed the qualities of a soldier and a chief: but his genius sunk under a stronger ascendant; and, from various motives, the greatest part of his troops failed him in the decisive moment. His rigor and avarice 431 had provoked a mutiny among the Turks; and even his son Soliman too hastily withdrew from the field. The forces of Anatolia, loyal in their revolt, were drawn away to the banners of their lawful princes. His Tartar allies had been tempted by the letters and emissaries of Timour; 44 who reproached their ignoble servitude under the slaves of their fathers; and offered to their hopes the dominion of their new, or the liberty of their ancient, country. In the right wing of Bajazet the cuirassiers of Europe charged, with faithful hearts and irresistible arms: but these men of iron were soon broken by an artful flight and headlong pursuit; and the Janizaries, alone, without cavalry or missile weapons, were encompassed by the circle of the Mogul hunters. Their valor was at length oppressed by heat, thirst, and the weight of numbers; and the unfortunate sultan, afflicted with the gout in his hands and feet, was transported from the field on the fleetest of his horses. He was pursued and taken by the titular khan of Zagatai; and, after his capture, and the defeat of the Ottoman powers, the kingdom of Anatolia submitted to the conqueror, who planted his standard at Kiotahia, and dispersed on all sides the ministers of rapine and destruction. Mirza Mehemmed Sultan, the eldest and best beloved of his grandsons, was despatched to Boursa, with thirty thousand horse; and such was his youthful ardor, that he arrived with only four thousand at the gates of the capital, after performing in five days a march of two hundred and thirty miles. Yet fear is still more rapid in its course; and Soliman, the son of Bajazet, had already passed over to Europe with the royal treasure. The spoil, however, of the palace and city was immense: the inhabitants had escaped; but the buildings, for the most part of wood, were reduced to ashes. From Boursa, the grandson of Timour advanced to Nice, ever yet a fair and flourishing city; and the Mogul squadrons were only stopped by the waves of the Propontis. The same success attended the other mirzas and emirs in their excursions; and Smyrna, defended by the zeal and courage of the Rhodian knights, alone deserved the presence of the emperor himself. After an obstinate defence, the place was taken by storm: all that breathed was put to the sword; and the heads of the Christian heroes were launched from the engines, on board of two carracks, or great ships of Europe, that rode at anchor in the harbor. The Moslems of Asia rejoiced in their deliverance from a dangerous and domestic foe; and a parallel was drawn between the two rivals, by observing that Timour, in fourteen days, had reduced a fortress which had sustained seven years the siege, or at least the blockade, of Bajazet. 45
蒙古大军转战他方期间,巴耶济德(Bajazet)有两年工夫集结兵力,以应对一场更严峻的较量。他的军队计有四十万骑步之众,39其战力与忠诚却参差不齐。其中有:耶尼切里(Janizaries),已逐步扩充到四万人的定额;一支本土骑兵,即今日所称的西帕希(Spahis);两万名欧洲铁甲骑兵,身披坚不可透的黑色重甲;安纳托利亚(Anatolia)诸侯的军队,诸侯本人已逃到帖木儿营中避难;还有一批鞑靼人,本被帖木儿逐出钦察(Kipzak),巴耶济德把他们安置在阿德里安堡(Adrianople)平原上定居。苏丹无所畏惧、志在必得,急于与对手正面交锋;他在饱经劫难的锡瓦斯(Suvas)废墟近旁竖起战旗,仿佛特意选定此地以雪前耻。与此同时,帖木儿已从阿拉克塞斯河出发,穿越亚美尼亚与安纳托利亚地界:他行事大胆,却有最周密的戒备作保障;进军神速,却始终纪律严明、有条不紊;游骑四出,走在他的大旗之前,把沿途的林莽、山岭、河流一一仔细探查,为他标定道路。他既定下要在奥斯曼王国腹地决战之策,便避开对方营垒,巧妙地折向左方,占领了凯撒里亚(Cæsarea),横越盐碱荒漠与哈利斯河(Halys),进而围攻安卡拉(Angora);苏丹却守在原处按兵不动,茫然不觉,还把鞑靼人的神速比作蜗牛爬行。40及至醒悟,他愤然疾驰,回救安卡拉;两位统帅同样迫不及待要一决高下,于是那座城池周遭的平原,便成了一场名垂青史之战的舞台——此战让帖木儿声名不朽,也让巴耶济德蒙羞万世。这场辉煌的胜利,蒙古皇帝所倚仗的,是他自己,是临机的天才,是三十年磨砺出的纪律。他改良了本族的战法,却不曾背离本族的习俗;41蒙古军的力量,仍在于大批骑兵的弓矢与迅疾的回旋进退。无论是一支小队还是一支大军,攻击的方式都一样:先由最前一列发起冲锋,再由庞大前锋的各骑兵队按部就班地接应。主帅目光扫视全场,一声令下,左右两翼的前后各部便依其分队,或成直线、或成斜线,接续向前推进;敌军要承受十八到二十次冲击,每一次都可能带来胜机。倘若这些冲击尽皆落空、无一奏效,那便值得皇帝亲自出马了:他发出信号,令御旗与中军主力压上,由他亲自率领。42但在安卡拉一战中,中军主力本身还另有后援:预备队里最骁勇的几支骑兵护住它的两翼与后方,由帖木儿的诸子诸孙统率。这位印度斯坦(Hindostan)的征服者招摇地摆出一列战象,与其说是取胜的利器,不如说是得胜的战利品;蒙古人与奥斯曼人(Ottomans)都惯用希腊火;然而,倘若他们已从欧洲学来火药与火炮这项新近的发明,那么这人造的雷霆,不论握在哪一方手中,都必定会扭转当日的战局。43那一天,巴耶济德展现出一员战士与统帅应有的品格;然而他的天资终究不敌一股更强的气运;出于种种缘由,他麾下大部兵马在决定胜负的关头背弃了他。他的严苛与贪吝431早已在土耳其人中激起哗变;连他的儿子苏莱曼(Soliman)也过早地撤离了战场。安纳托利亚的军队叛离而去,却不失忠义:他们投向了自己合法君主的旗帜。他的鞑靼(Tartary)盟友则受了帖木儿书信与密使的引诱;44帖木儿斥责他们屈身为奴,何其卑贱:他们所侍奉的,不过是他们祖辈的奴隶;又许给他们希望:或是做新居之地的主人,或是重享故国的自由。在巴耶济德的右翼,欧洲铁甲骑兵以赤诚之心、无可抵挡之力发起冲锋;然而这些钢铁之人很快便中了佯退穷追之计而溃散;耶尼切里孤军无援,既无骑兵、又无投射兵器,被蒙古猎手围成的圈子团团困住。他们的勇武终究抵不过酷热、焦渴与人数的重压;那不幸的苏丹手足俱患痛风,被人扶上他最快的坐骑驮离战场。追上并擒获他的,是那位挂名的察合台(Zagatai)可汗;他既被俘、奥斯曼军力又告崩溃,安纳托利亚王国便向征服者俯首;帖木儿于是在屈塔希亚(Kiotahia)竖起旗帜,四面派出爪牙,劫掠破坏。他最年长、也最钟爱的孙儿米尔扎·穆罕默德·苏丹,奉命率三万骑直取布尔萨(Boursa);这少年锐气逼人,竟以五日行军二百三十英里,抵达都城城下时身边只剩四千人。然而恐惧的脚步比他更快:巴耶济德之子苏莱曼早已携王室珍宝渡海去了欧洲。饶是如此,宫殿与城中的战利品仍极为丰厚。居民已经逃散,大多是木造的房舍却尽数化为灰烬。帖木儿之孙又从布尔萨挺进至尼西亚(Nice)——一座至今仍算得上秀美繁华的城市;蒙古骑队直到普罗庞提斯(Propontis)的波涛之滨才停下脚步。其余诸位米尔扎与埃米尔四出征掠,也同样所向克捷;唯有士麦那(Smyrna)由罗得岛(Rhodian)骑士凭着热忱与勇气据守,才配得上皇帝御驾亲临。经过一番顽强的守御,此地终被强攻而下:凡有气息者一概被戮;抛石机把那些基督徒英雄的头颅,掷上了停泊在港内的两艘卡拉克,也就是欧洲的大帆船。亚洲的穆斯林除去了这个近在肘腋的危险劲敌,无不额手相庆;人们还拿这两个对手相比:一座堡垒,巴耶济德围攻了七年,至少也封锁了七年,帖木儿却只用十四天便攻了下来。45
¶
The iron cage in which Bajazet was imprisoned by Tamerlane, so long and so often repeated as a moral lesson, is now rejected as a fable by the modern writers, who smile at the vulgar credulity. 46 They appeal with confidence to the Persian history of Sherefeddin Ali, which has been given to our curiosity in a French version, and from which I shall collect and abridge a more specious narrative of this memorable transaction. No sooner was Timour informed that the captive Ottoman was at the door of his tent, than he graciously stepped forwards to receive him, seated him by his side, and mingled with just reproaches a soothing pity for his rank and misfortune. “Alas!” said the emperor, “the decree of fate is now accomplished by your own fault; it is the web which you have woven, the thorns of the tree which yourself have planted. I wished to spare, and even to assist, the champion of the Moslems; you braved our threats; you despised our friendship; you forced us to enter your kingdom with our invincible armies. Behold the event. Had you vanquished, I am not ignorant of the fate which you reserved for myself and my troops. But I disdain to retaliate: your life and honor are secure; and I shall express my gratitude to God by my clemency to man.” The royal captive showed some signs of repentance, accepted the humiliation of a robe of honor, and embraced with tears his son Mousa, who, at his request, was sought and found among the captives of the field. The Ottoman princes were lodged in a splendid pavilion; and the respect of the guards could be surpassed only by their vigilance. On the arrival of the harem from Boursa, Timour restored the queen Despina and her daughter to their father and husband; but he piously required, that the Servian princess, who had hitherto been indulged in the profession of Christianity, should embrace without delay the religion of the prophet. In the feast of victory, to which Bajazet was invited, the Mogul emperor placed a crown on his head and a sceptre in his hand, with a solemn assurance of restoring him with an increase of glory to the throne of his ancestors. But the effect of his promise was disappointed by the sultan’s untimely death: amidst the care of the most skilful physicians, he expired of an apoplexy at Akshehr, the Antioch of Pisidia, about nine months after his defeat. The victor dropped a tear over his grave: his body, with royal pomp, was conveyed to the mausoleum which he had erected at Boursa; and his son Mousa, after receiving a rich present of gold and jewels, of horses and arms, was invested by a patent in red ink with the kingdom of Anatolia.
至于帖木儿用铁笼囚禁巴耶济德一事,长久以来屡被援引为道德训诫,如今却已被近世著述家斥为无稽之谈,他们对俗众的轻信付之一笑。46他们满怀信心地援引沙拉夫丁·阿里(Sherefeddin Ali)的波斯语史著,此书已有法文译本,足供我们探究;我便从中采撷节述,讲一讲这桩难忘之事听来更为冠冕的一种说法。帖木儿一听说被俘的奥斯曼君主已到帐门口,便和颜悦色地趋前相迎,让他坐在自己身旁,一面正言相责,一面又怜他身份尊贵、遭逢不幸,好言宽慰。“唉!”这位皇帝说,“命运的裁决如今应验,全是你自己的过错;这是你亲手织就的网罗,是你亲手栽下之树上的荆棘。我本想放过、甚至扶助你这位穆斯林的斗士;是你藐视我的威胁,是你轻慢我的友谊,是你逼得我率领无敌之师踏进你的国土。且看这结局。倘使得胜的是你,你为我和我的将士备下的下场,我岂会不知。但我不屑报复:你的性命与荣誉都保得住;我要以对世人的宽仁,来向真主表达我的感恩。”这位王室俘虏面露悔意,接受了赐予荣袍这一屈辱之礼,又含泪拥抱了他的儿子穆萨(Mousa)——穆萨是应他之请,从战场的俘虏中寻得的。奥斯曼的诸位王子被安置在一座华美的营帐里;守卫对他们恭敬备至,而看守之严,更在恭敬之上。后宫从布尔萨送到后,帖木儿把德斯皮娜(Despina)王后和她的女儿交还给巴耶济德,让她们回到丈夫和父亲身边;德斯皮娜本是塞尔维亚(Servian)公主,此前一直获准信奉基督教,帖木儿却出于虔诚,要求她即刻皈依先知的宗教。在那场庆功宴上——巴耶济德也在受邀之列——蒙古皇帝亲手为他戴上王冠、递上权杖,并郑重许诺要让他重登祖先的宝座,且更添荣光。然而苏丹猝然离世,这番许诺终未兑现:尽管有最高明的医师悉心诊治,他仍在战败约九个月后,于阿克谢希尔(Akshehr)——即皮西迪亚(Pisidia)的安条克(Antioch)——因中风而气绝。胜利者在他墓前落下一滴泪;他的遗体以王家之礼,被送往他昔日在布尔萨营建的陵寝安葬;他的儿子穆萨则在收到黄金珠宝、马匹兵器的丰厚馈赠之后,凭一道朱笔诏书受封为安纳托利亚之王。
¶
Such is the portrait of a generous conqueror, which has been extracted from his own memorials, and dedicated to his son and grandson, nineteen years after his decease; 47 and, at a time when the truth was remembered by thousands, a manifest falsehood would have implied a satire on his real conduct. Weighty indeed is this evidence, adopted by all the Persian histories; 48 yet flattery, more especially in the East, is base and audacious; and the harsh and ignominious treatment of Bajazet is attested by a chain of witnesses, some of whom shall be produced in the order of their time and country. 1. The reader has not forgot the garrison of French, whom the marshal Boucicault left behind him for the defence of Constantinople. They were on the spot to receive the earliest and most faithful intelligence of the overthrow of their great adversary; and it is more than probable, that some of them accompanied the Greek embassy to the camp of Tamerlane. From their account, the hardships of the prison and death of Bajazet are affirmed by the marshal’s servant and historian, within the distance of seven years. 49 2. The name of Poggius the Italian 50 is deservedly famous among the revivers of learning in the fifteenth century. His elegant dialogue on the vicissitudes of fortune 51 was composed in his fiftieth year, twenty-eight years after the Turkish victory of Tamerlane; 52 whom he celebrates as not inferior to the illustrious Barbarians of antiquity. Of his exploits and discipline Poggius was informed by several ocular witnesses; nor does he forget an example so apposite to his theme as the Ottoman monarch, whom the Scythian confined like a wild beast in an iron cage, and exhibited a spectacle to Asia. I might add the authority of two Italian chronicles, perhaps of an earlier date, which would prove at least that the same story, whether false or true, was imported into Europe with the first tidings of the revolution. 53 3. At the time when Poggius flourished at Rome, Ahmed Ebn Arabshah composed at Damascus the florid and malevolent history of Timour, for which he had collected materials in his journeys over Turkey and Tartary. 54 Without any possible correspondence between the Latin and the Arabian writer, they agree in the fact of the iron cage; and their agreement is a striking proof of their common veracity. Ahmed Arabshah likewise relates another outrage, which Bajazet endured, of a more domestic and tender nature. His indiscreet mention of women and divorces was deeply resented by the jealous Tartar: in the feast of victory the wine was served by female cupbearers, and the sultan beheld his own concubines and wives confounded among the slaves, and exposed without a veil to the eyes of intemperance. To escape a similar indignity, it is said that his successors, except in a single instance, have abstained from legitimate nuptials; and the Ottoman practice and belief, at least in the sixteenth century, is asserted by the observing Busbequius, 55 ambassador from the court of Vienna to the great Soliman. 4. Such is the separation of language, that the testimony of a Greek is not less independent than that of a Latin or an Arab. I suppress the names of Chalcondyles and Ducas, who flourished in the latter period, and who speak in a less positive tone; but more attention is due to George Phranza, 56 protovestiare of the last emperors, and who was born a year before the battle of Angora. Twenty-two years after that event, he was sent ambassador to Amurath the Second; and the historian might converse with some veteran Janizaries, who had been made prisoners with the sultan, and had themselves seen him in his iron cage. 5. The last evidence, in every sense, is that of the Turkish annals, which have been consulted or transcribed by Leunclavius, Pocock, and Cantemir. 57 They unanimously deplore the captivity of the iron cage; and some credit may be allowed to national historians, who cannot stigmatize the Tartar without uncovering the shame of their king and country.
以上便是一位宽厚征服者的肖像。这幅肖像取材于帖木儿本人的实录,作者在帖木儿死后十九年,把它题献给了他的儿子与孙子;47当时记得真相的人数以千计,倘若公然说谎,便无异于讽刺他的实际所为。这一由波斯诸史一致采信的证据,分量确乎沉重;48然而阿谀之风——尤其在东方——向来卑鄙而放肆;巴耶济德所受的苛虐与凌辱,也有一连串证人为之作证,其中数位,我将按其时代与国别的先后一一列出。其一,读者当还记得布西科(Boucicault)元帅留下守卫君士坦丁堡的那支法兰西驻军。他们正在当地,得以最早、最可靠地获知这位大敌覆灭的消息;而且极有可能,其中若干人还随希腊使团去过帖木儿的营地。这位元帅的仆从兼史家根据他们的叙述,证实了巴耶济德狱中的苦难与他的死;他写下这些时,距事发不过七年。49 其二,意大利人波焦(Poggius)50之名,在十五世纪那批复兴学术的人物中当之无愧地享有盛誉。他那篇论命运无常的优雅对话录,51写于他五十岁那年,即帖木儿战胜土耳其人后二十八年;52他在文中盛赞帖木儿不逊于古代那些赫赫有名的蛮族英雄。帖木儿的功业与治军之道,波焦是从几位亲眼目睹者口中得知的;奥斯曼君主的遭遇正切合他的题旨,他也没有忘记:这斯基泰人(Scythian)把那位君主像野兽一样关进铁笼,向全亚洲示众。我还可以加上两部意大利编年史的佐证,其成书或许更早,至少足以证明:无论此事真伪,它都是随着这场剧变的最初消息一并传入欧洲的。53 其三,正当波焦在罗马声名鹊起之时,艾哈迈德·伊本·阿拉伯沙在大马士革撰成了一部辞藻华丽而心怀恶意的帖木儿史,其素材是他游历土耳其与鞑靼地方时搜集来的。54这位拉丁作家与这位阿拉伯作家之间绝无相通的可能,二人却在铁笼一事上不谋而合;这一吻合,正是他们各自诚实可信的有力佐证。伊本·阿拉伯沙(Arabshah)还记述了巴耶济德受过的另一桩凌辱,更关乎家室私情。巴耶济德不慎提及女眷与休妻之事,深深触怒了善妒的鞑靼人:在那场庆功宴上,斟酒的都是女侍,而苏丹眼睁睁看着自己的姬妾与妻室混杂在奴婢之间,不着面纱,暴露在恣意纵酒者的目光之下。据说,他的历代继承者为免受同样的羞辱,除一例外,都不再缔结正式婚姻;至少在十六世纪,奥斯曼人有此惯例,也持此信念,维也纳(Vienna)宫廷派往苏莱曼大帝处的使节、目光敏锐的布斯贝基乌斯(Busbequius)55可以为证。其四,各族语言隔阂极深,希腊人的证词因而同样独立,丝毫不逊于拉丁人或阿拉伯人的证词。哈尔科孔迪利斯(Chalcondyles)与杜卡斯(Ducas)活动于稍后的年代,语气也不那么斩钉截铁,他们的名字我略去不提;但乔治(George)·斯弗朗齐斯(Phranza)56更值得留意——他是末代诸帝的内廷总管,生于安卡拉之战的前一年。此役过后二十二年,他奉命出使穆拉德(Amurath)二世;这位史家想必能与几名年迈的耶尼切里交谈——他们当年与苏丹一同被俘,曾亲眼见他身陷铁笼。其五,也是无论就哪层意思而言都居末位的证据,是土耳其编年史,莱恩克拉维乌斯(Leunclavius)、波科克(Pocock)与坎特米尔(Cantemir)都曾参考或转录。57这些史书无不为铁笼之囚而悲叹;本国史家但凡要丑诋那鞑靼人,就不得不同时揭出其君其国之耻,因此他们的话也不无可信之处。
¶
From these opposite premises, a fair and moderate conclusion may be deduced. I am satisfied that Sherefeddin Ali has faithfully described the first ostentatious interview, in which the conqueror, whose spirits were harmonized by success, affected the character of generosity. But his mind was insensibly alienated by the unseasonable arrogance of Bajazet; the complaints of his enemies, the Anatolian princes, were just and vehement; and Timour betrayed a design of leading his royal captive in triumph to Samarcand. An attempt to facilitate his escape, by digging a mine under the tent, provoked the Mogul emperor to impose a harsher restraint; and in his perpetual marches, an iron cage on a wagon might be invented, not as a wanton insult, but as a rigorous precaution. Timour had read in some fabulous history a similar treatment of one of his predecessors, a king of Persia; and Bajazet was condemned to represent the person, and expiate the guilt, of the Roman Cæsar 58 581 But the strength of his mind and body fainted under the trial, and his premature death might, without injustice, be ascribed to the severity of Timour. He warred not with the dead: a tear and a sepulchre were all that he could bestow on a captive who was delivered from his power; and if Mousa, the son of Bajazet, was permitted to reign over the ruins of Boursa, the greatest part of the province of Anatolia had been restored by the conqueror to their lawful sovereigns.
从这些针锋相对的前提出发,我们可以推出一个公允而稳妥的结论。我确信,沙拉夫丁·阿里如实描摹了那第一次充满排场的会面——彼时征服者志得意满、心气平和,遂摆出一副慷慨大度的姿态。但巴耶济德不合时宜的傲慢,渐渐使他心生嫌隙;巴耶济德的那些敌人,即安纳托利亚诸侯,所诉的冤情既在理又激切;帖木儿也流露出要押着这位王室俘虏、凯旋回撒马尔罕示众的打算。有人在营帐下挖掘地道,图谋助巴耶济德脱逃,蒙古皇帝因此把他看管得更严;帖木儿行军连年不断,途中或许便想出了车上的铁笼,并非有意肆行羞辱,而是为了严加防范。帖木儿曾在某部荒诞的史书里读到,他的一位前辈、一位波斯王,也曾被一位罗马恺撒这般对待;于是巴耶济德便被判定要扮演那位罗马恺撒,替恺撒赎罪。58581但他身心的坚强都在这番磨难下垮了下来,他的早逝若归咎于帖木儿的严酷,也不能算冤枉。帖木儿不与死者为敌:俘虏既已脱离他的掌握,他所能给予的,不过一滴泪与一座坟茔。巴耶济德之子穆萨固然获准统治布尔萨的废墟,但安纳托利亚一省的大部分地方,征服者早已归还给了各自合法的君主。
¶
From the Irtish and Volga to the Persian Gulf, and from the Ganges to Damascus and the Archipelago, Asia was in the hand of Timour: his armies were invincible, his ambition was boundless, and his zeal might aspire to conquer and convert the Christian kingdoms of the West, which already trembled at his name. He touched the utmost verge of the land; but an insuperable, though narrow, sea rolled between the two continents of Europe and Asia; 59 and the lord of so many tomans, or myriads, of horse, was not master of a single galley. The two passages of the Bosphorus and Hellespont, of Constantinople and Gallipoli, were possessed, the one by the Christians, the other by the Turks. On this great occasion, they forgot the difference of religion, to act with union and firmness in the common cause: the double straits were guarded with ships and fortifications; and they separately withheld the transports which Timour demanded of either nation, under the pretence of attacking their enemy. At the same time, they soothed his pride with tributary gifts and suppliant embassies, and prudently tempted him to retreat with the honors of victory. Soliman, the son of Bajazet, implored his clemency for his father and himself; accepted, by a red patent, the investiture of the kingdom of Romania, which he already held by the sword; and reiterated his ardent wish, of casting himself in person at the feet of the king of the world. The Greek emperor 60 (either John or Manuel) submitted to pay the same tribute which he had stipulated with the Turkish sultan, and ratified the treaty by an oath of allegiance, from which he could absolve his conscience so soon as the Mogul arms had retired from Anatolia. But the fears and fancy of nations ascribed to the ambitious Tamerlane a new design of vast and romantic compass; a design of subduing Egypt and Africa, marching from the Nile to the Atlantic Ocean, entering Europe by the Straits of Gibraltar, and, after imposing his yoke on the kingdoms of Christendom, of returning home by the deserts of Russia and Tartary. This remote, and perhaps imaginary, danger was averted by the submission of the sultan of Egypt: the honors of the prayer and the coin attested at Cairo the supremacy of Timour; and a rare gift of a giraffe, or camelopard, and nine ostriches, represented at Samarcand the tribute of the African world. Our imagination is not less astonished by the portrait of a Mogul, who, in his camp before Smyrna, meditates, and almost accomplishes, the invasion of the Chinese empire. 61 Timour was urged to this enterprise by national honor and religious zeal. The torrents which he had shed of Mussulman blood could be expiated only by an equal destruction of the infidels; and as he now stood at the gates of paradise, he might best secure his glorious entrance by demolishing the idols of China, founding mosques in every city, and establishing the profession of faith in one God, and his prophet Mahomet. The recent expulsion of the house of Zingis was an insult on the Mogul name; and the disorders of the empire afforded the fairest opportunity for revenge. The illustrious Hongvou, founder of the dynasty of Ming, died four years before the battle of Angora; and his grandson, a weak and unfortunate youth, was burnt in his palace, after a million of Chinese had perished in the civil war. 62 Before he evacuated Anatolia, Timour despatched beyond the Sihoon a numerous army, or rather colony, of his old and new subjects, to open the road, to subdue the Pagan Calmucks and Mungals, and to found cities and magazines in the desert; and, by the diligence of his lieutenant, he soon received a perfect map and description of the unknown regions, from the source of the Irtish to the wall of China. During these preparations, the emperor achieved the final conquest of Georgia; passed the winter on the banks of the Araxes; appeased the troubles of Persia; and slowly returned to his capital, after a campaign of four years and nine months.
从额尔齐斯河(Irtish)、伏尔加河直到波斯湾(Persian Gulf),从恒河(Ganges)直到大马士革与爱琴海群岛(Archipelago),整个亚洲都握在帖木儿手中:他的军队所向无敌,他的野心漫无止境,他的宗教热忱更可能萌生出征服并归化西方基督教诸国的雄图——那些国度早已闻其名而战栗。他的兵锋已抵达陆地的最边缘;然而在欧、亚两大洲之间,横亘着一道虽窄却无法逾越的海;59这位坐拥无数“图曼”(tomans,即万骑)的雄主,却连一艘战船都没有。博斯普鲁斯与赫勒斯滂(Hellespont)两处海峡,也就是君士坦丁堡与加里波利(Gallipoli)两地,一处为基督徒所据,一处为土耳其人所控。值此紧要关头,双方竟撇开宗教的分歧,为共同的大业同心协力、坚定应对:两道海峡都以舰船与工事严加把守;帖木儿以进攻对方之敌为借口,向两国分别索要运兵的船只,两国也都各自拒绝。与此同时,他们又以纳贡的礼物和恳请的使节来抚慰他的骄矜,审慎地引他带着胜利者的荣光退兵。巴耶济德之子苏莱曼为父亲、也为自己恳求他的宽宥;他以一道朱笔诏书接受了对罗马尼亚(Romania)王国的册封——那本是他早已凭刀剑握在手中的疆土——并再三表达热切的心愿,要亲身拜倒在这位“世界之王”的脚下。那位希腊皇帝60(不是约翰便是曼努埃尔(Manuel))也答应缴纳他此前与土耳其苏丹议定的同一笔贡赋,并以效忠的誓言批准了这项条约;只待蒙古大军撤出安纳托利亚,他便可在良心上解除这一誓言。然而,列国的畏惧与臆想,却把一个规模宏大而离奇的新图谋加在了野心勃勃的帖木儿身上:说他要征服埃及与阿非利加,从尼罗河一路进军至大西洋,取道直布罗陀(Gibraltar)海峡进入欧洲,待把基督教世界诸国踏在轭下之后,再经由俄罗斯与鞑靼的荒漠返回本土。这一遥远、或许纯属虚构的威胁,随着埃及苏丹的臣服而消弭:开罗的祈祷词与钱币都昭示着帖木儿的至尊,而一头珍奇的长颈鹿(giraffe,即驼豹)与九只鸵鸟这样罕见的贡品,则在撒马尔罕代表着非洲世界的进献。同样令我们瞠目的,是这样一个蒙古人:他身在士麦那城下的营中,竟盘算着入侵中华帝国,而且几乎付诸实行。61促使帖木儿动此念的,是民族的荣誉与宗教的热忱。他倾泻的穆斯林之血如洪流,唯有对异教徒同等规模的杀戮方能赎清;而如今他既已站在天堂的门口,最稳妥的入门之途,莫过于捣毁中国的偶像、在每一座城池兴建清真寺、确立独一真主及其先知穆罕默德的信仰。成吉思汗(Zingis)的家族新近被逐,实为蒙古之名所蒙的奇耻;而中华帝国的动乱,又提供了复仇的绝佳良机。明朝(Ming)的开国之君、赫赫有名的洪武帝(Hongvou),死于安卡拉之战前四年;他的孙子——一个孱弱而不幸的少年——在百万华人殒命于内战之后,被烧死在自己的宫殿里。62在撤离安纳托利亚之前,帖木儿已派遣一支庞大的军队——毋宁说是一批由新旧臣民组成的移民——越过锡尔河(Sihoon),去开辟道路、征服异教的卡尔梅克人(Calmucks)与蒙古人,并在荒漠中建立城镇与仓廪;凭着麾下将领的勤勉,他不久便得到了一份完整的地图与志略,详载从额尔齐斯河源头直到中国长城的未知地域。在筹备这一切的同时,皇帝完成了对格鲁吉亚的最后征服,在阿拉克塞斯河畔度过冬季,平息了波斯的动乱,然后经过四年零九个月的征战,缓缓返回都城。
Notes 注释
33
↩
See the reigns of Barkok and Pharadge, in M. De Guignes, (tom. iv. l. xxii.,) who, from the Arabic texts of Aboulmahasen, Ebn (Schounah, and Aintabi, has added some facts to our common stock of materials.)
关于巴尔库克与法拉吉两朝,参看德经(tom. iv. l. xxii.);他依据阿布尔马哈辛(Aboulmahasen)、伊本·舒纳(Schounah)与艾因塔比(Aintabi)的阿拉伯语文本,为我们共有的史料库增补了若干事实。
34
↩
For these recent and domestic transactions, Arabshah, though a partial, is a credible, witness, (tom. i. c. 64—68, tom. ii. c. 1—14.) Timour must have been odious to a Syrian; but the notoriety of facts would have obliged him, in some measure, to respect his enemy and himself. His bitters may correct the luscious sweets of Sherefeddin, (l. v. c. 17—29.)
对这些新近而切身的事件,伊本·阿拉伯沙虽有偏见,却是可信的证人(tom. i. c. 64—68, tom. ii. c. 1—14)。帖木儿在一个叙利亚人眼中必定可憎;但这些事实尽人皆知,多少会迫使他尊重敌人,也保持自重。他那些苦涩之词,或可用来中和沙拉夫丁(Sherefeddin)甜得发腻的溢美(l. v. c. 17—29)。
35
↩
These interesting conversations appear to have been copied by Arabshah (tom. i. c. 68, p. 625—645) from the cadhi and historian Ebn Schounah, a principal actor. Yet how could he be alive seventy-five years afterwards? (D’Herbelot, p. 792.)
这些饶有趣味的对话,伊本·阿拉伯沙(tom. i. c. 68, p. 625—645)似乎是从身为当事要角的卡迪兼史家伊本·舒纳那里转录来的。可是,七十五年之后他怎么可能还活着呢?(D'Herbelot, p. 792。)
36
↩
The marches and occupations of Timour between the Syrian and Ottoman wars are represented by Sherefeddin (l. v. c. 29—43) and Arabshah, (tom. ii. c. 15—18.)
帖木儿在叙利亚战争与奥斯曼战争之间的行军与征伐,见于沙拉夫丁(l. v. c. 29—43)与伊本·阿拉伯沙(tom. ii. c. 15—18)的记述。
37
↩
This number of 800,000 was extracted by Arabshah, or rather by Ebn Schounah, ex rationario Timuri, on the faith of a Carizmian officer, (tom. i. c. 68, p. 617;) and it is remarkable enough, that a Greek historian (Phranza, l. i. c. 29) adds no more than 20,000 men. Poggius reckons 1,000,000; another Latin contemporary (Chron. Tarvisianum, apud Muratori, tom. xix. p. 800) 1,100,000; and the enormous sum of 1,600,000 is attested by a German soldier, who was present at the battle of Angora, (Leunclav. ad Chalcondyl. l. iii. p. 82.) Timour, in his Institutions, has not deigned to calculate his troops, his subjects, or his revenues.
八十万这个数字,是伊本·阿拉伯沙、或毋宁说是伊本·舒纳,根据一名花剌子模军官的说法,从帖木儿的簿册(ex rationario Timuri)中摘出的(tom. i. c. 68, p. 617);颇值一提的是,一位希腊史家(Phranza, l. i. c. 29)给出的不过两万人。波焦估作一百万;另一位拉丁同时代人(Chron. Tarvisianum, apud Muratori, tom. xix. p. 800)作一百一十万;而一百六十万这个惊人的数目,则有一名亲历安卡拉之战的德意志士兵为证(Leunclav. ad Chalcondyl. l. iii. p. 82)。帖木儿在其《帖木儿制度》(Institutions)中,对自己的军队、臣民或岁入都不屑一算。
38
↩
A wide latitude of non-effectives was allowed by the Great Mogul for his own pride and the benefit of his officers. Bernier’s patron was Penge-Hazari, commander of 5000 horse; of which he maintained no more than 500, (Voyages, tom. i. p. 288, 289.)
莫卧儿大帝为自己的体面、也为麾下军官的私利,容许有大量的空额。贝尼耶(Bernier)的东家便是潘杰-哈扎里(Penge-Hazari),名义上统领五千骑,实际维持的却不过五百(Voyages, tom. i. p. 288, 289)。
39
↩
Timour himself fixes at 400,000 men the Ottoman army, (Institutions, p. 153,) which is reduced to 150,000 by Phranza, (l. i. c. 29,) and swelled by the German soldier to 1,400,000. It is evident that the Moguls were the more numerous.
帖木儿本人(《帖木儿制度》第153页)把奥斯曼军队定为四十万,斯弗朗齐斯(l. i. c. 29)则减为十五万,而那名德意志士兵又夸大到一百四十万。显然蒙古人这一方人数更多。
40
↩
It may not be useless to mark the distances between Angora and the neighboring cities, by the journeys of the caravans, each of twenty or twenty-five miles; to Smyrna xx., to Kiotahia x., to Boursa x., to Cæsarea, viii., to Sinope x., to Nicomedia ix., to Constantinople xii. or xiii., (see Tournefort, Voyage au Levant, tom. ii. lettre xxi.)
不妨以商队的行程(每程二十或二十五英里)来标明安卡拉与邻近各城之间的距离:至士麦那 xx,至屈塔希亚 x,至布尔萨 x,至凯撒里亚 viii,至锡诺普(Sinope) x,至尼科米底亚(Nicomedia) ix,至君士坦丁堡 xii 或 xiii(参看 Tournefort, Voyage au Levant, tom. ii. lettre xxi)。
41
↩
See the Systems of Tactics in the Institutions, which the English editors have illustrated with elaborate plans, (p. 373—407.)
参看《帖木儿制度》中的战术体系,英文版编者以详尽的图解作了阐明(p. 373—407)。
42
↩
The sultan himself (says Timour) must then put the foot of courage into the stirrup of patience. A Tartar metaphor, which is lost in the English, but preserved in the French, version of the Institutes, (p. 156, 157.)
(帖木儿说)到那时,苏丹本人也须把勇气之足踏进忍耐之镫。这是一个鞑靼式的比喻,英文译本失落了它,法文译本却把它保留了下来(《帖木儿制度》,p. 156, 157)。
43
↩
The Greek fire, on Timour’s side, is attested by Sherefeddin, (l. v. c. 47;) but Voltaire’s strange suspicion, that some cannon, inscribed with strange characters, must have been sent by that monarch to Delhi, is refuted by the universal silence of contemporaries.
帖木儿一方使用希腊火,有沙拉夫丁为证(l. v. c. 47);但伏尔泰有个离奇的臆测,说这位君主必定曾把若干刻着奇异文字的火炮送往德里(Delhi);同时代人对此一概只字未提,足以驳倒此说。
431
↩
See V. Hammer, vol. i. p. 310, for the singular hints which were conveyed to him of the wisdom of unlocking his hoarded treasures.—M.
关于有人向他暗示、劝他明智地开启窖藏之财这一奇特情节,参看冯·哈默(Von Hammer),vol. i. p. 310。—M
44
↩
Timour has dissembled this secret and important negotiation with the Tartars, which is indisputably proved by the joint evidence of the Arabian, (tom. i. c. 47, p. 391,) Turkish, (Annal. Leunclav. p. 321,) and Persian historians, (Khondemir, apud d’Herbelot, p. 882.)
帖木儿对这桩与鞑靼人之间秘密而重要的交涉讳莫如深,然而阿拉伯(tom. i. c. 47, p. 391)、土耳其(Annal. Leunclav. p. 321)与波斯史家(Khondemir, apud d'Herbelot, p. 882)的联合证据,已把此事证得确凿无疑。
45
↩
For the war of Anatolia or Roum, I add some hints in the Institutions, to the copious narratives of Sherefeddin (l. v. c. 44—65) and Arabshah, (tom. ii. c. 20—35.) On this part only of Timour’s history it is lawful to quote the Turks, (Cantemir, p. 53—55, Annal. Leunclav. p. 320—322,) and the Greeks, (Phranza, l. i. c. 59, Ducas, c. 15—17, Chalcondyles, l. iii.)
关于安纳托利亚(即罗姆)之战,除沙拉夫丁(l. v. c. 44—65)与伊本·阿拉伯沙(tom. ii. c. 20—35)的详尽叙述外,我还从《帖木儿制度》中补入若干线索。唯有在帖木儿这一段历史上,援引土耳其史家(Cantemir, p. 53—55, Annal. Leunclav. p. 320—322)与希腊史家(Phranza, l. i. c. 59, Ducas, c. 15—17, Chalcondyles, l. iii)才是妥当的。
46
↩
The scepticism of Voltaire (Essai sur l’Histoire Générale, c. 88) is ready on this, as on every occasion, to reject a popular tale, and to diminish the magnitude of vice and virtue; and on most occasions his incredulity is reasonable.
伏尔泰(Essai sur l'Histoire Générale, c. 88)在此事上一如既往地多疑,随时准备否弃流行的传说,把善恶都往小里说;不过在多数情形下,他的不轻信是有道理的。
47
↩
See the History of Sherefeddin, (l. v. c. 49, 52, 53, 59, 60.) This work was finished at Shiraz, in the year 1424, and dedicated to Sultan Ibrahim, the son of Sharokh, the son of Timour, who reigned in Farsistan in his father’s lifetime.
参看沙拉夫丁的史著(l. v. c. 49, 52, 53, 59, 60)。此书于1424年在设拉子(Shiraz)完成,题献给苏丹易卜拉欣(Ibrahim)——他是沙鲁克(Sharokh)之子、帖木儿之孙,在其父在世时便治理法尔斯坦(Farsistan)。
48
↩
After the perusal of Khondemir, Ebn Schounah, &c., the learned D’Herbelot (Bibliot. Orientale, p. 882) may affirm, that this fable is not mentioned in the most authentic histories; but his denial of the visible testimony of Arabshah leaves some room to suspect his accuracy.
博学的埃尔布洛(Herbelot)在通读了洪德米尔(Khondemir)、伊本·舒纳等人之后,或可断言(Bibliot. Orientale, p. 882):最可信的史书里并未提及这则传说;但伊本·阿拉伯沙的证词明明白白,他却予以否认,这就不免让人对他的考证是否精确有几分怀疑。
49
↩
Et fut lui-même (Bajazet) pris, et mené en prison, en laquelle mourut de dure mort! Mémoires de Boucicault, P. i. c. 37. These Memoirs were composed while the marshal was still governor of Genoa, from whence he was expelled in the year 1409, by a popular insurrection, (Muratori, Annali d’Italia, tom. xii. p. 473, 474.)
Et fut lui-même (Bajazet) pris, et mené en prison, en laquelle mourut de dure mort!(他本人〔巴耶济德〕被擒,押入牢狱,惨死其中!)Mémoires de Boucicault, P. i. c. 37。这部回忆录写成时,这位元帅尚任热那亚总督,1409年因一场民众暴动被逐出该城(Muratori, Annali d'Italia, tom. xii. p. 473, 474)。
50
↩
The reader will find a satisfactory account of the life and writings of Poggius in the Poggiana, an entertaining work of M. Lenfant, and in the Bibliotheca Latina Mediæ et Infimæ Ætatis of Fabricius, (tom. v. p. 305—308.) Poggius was born in the year 1380, and died in 1459.
关于波焦的生平与著作,读者可在朗方(Lenfant)那部饶有趣味的《波焦志》(Poggiana)中,以及法布里丘斯(Fabricius)的《中世纪与晚期拉丁文献库》(Bibliotheca Latina Mediæ et Infimæ Ætatis, tom. v. p. 305—308)中找到满意的介绍。波焦生于1380年,卒于1459年。
51
↩
The dialogue de Varietate Fortunæ, (of which a complete and elegant edition has been published at Paris in 1723, in 4to.,) was composed a short time before the death of Pope Martin V., (p. 5,) and consequently about the end of the year 1430.
《命运之无常》对话录(de Varietate Fortunæ,1723年在巴黎刊出过一部完整而精美的四开本),成书于教宗马丁五世去世前不久(p. 5),因而约在1430年年底。
52
↩
See a splendid and eloquent encomium of Tamerlane, p. 36—39 ipse enim novi (says Poggius) qui fuere in ejus castris.... Regem vivum cepit, caveâque in modum feræ inclusum per omnem Asian circumtulit egregium admirandumque spectaculum fortunæ.
见其中对帖木儿一段辉煌雄辩的颂词,p. 36—39:ipse enim novi (says Poggius) qui fuere in ejus castris.... Regem vivum cepit, caveâque in modum feræ inclusum per omnem Asian circumtulit egregium admirandumque spectaculum fortunæ.(波焦自称:那些曾在他营中的人,我都认得……他生擒国王,像关野兽一样把他锁进笼中,遍游全亚洲示众,成为命运女神一桩奇异可叹的景象。)
53
↩
The Chronicon Tarvisianum, (in Muratori, Script. Rerum Italicarum tom. xix. p. 800,) and the Annales Estenses, (tom. xviii. p. 974.) The two authors, Andrea de Redusiis de Quero, and James de Delayto, were both contemporaries, and both chancellors, the one of Trevigi, the other of Ferrara. The evidence of the former is the most positive.
《特雷维索编年史》(Chronicon Tarvisianum, in Muratori, Script. Rerum Italicarum tom. xix. p. 800)与《埃斯特编年史》(Annales Estenses, tom. xviii. p. 974)。两位作者安德烈亚·德·雷杜西斯·德·奎罗与雅各布·德·德拉伊托均系同时代人,且都任书记官(chancellor)——前者在特雷维索,后者在费拉拉(Ferrara)。前者的证词最为确凿。
54
↩
See Arabshah, tom. ii. c. 28, 34. He travelled in regiones Rumæas, A. H. 839, (A.D. 1435, July 27,) tom. i. c. 2, p. 13.
参看伊本·阿拉伯沙,tom. ii. c. 28, 34。他于伊斯兰历839年(即公元 1435 年 7 月 27 日)游历罗姆地方(in regiones Rumæas),见 tom. i. c. 2, p. 13。
55
↩
Busbequius in Legatione Turcicâ, epist. i. p. 52. Yet his respectable authority is somewhat shaken by the subsequent marriages of Amurath II. with a Servian, and of Mahomet II. with an Asiatic, princess, (Cantemir, p. 83, 93.)
Busbequius in Legatione Turcicâ, epist. i. p. 52。不过,他这份可敬的证词,多少被后来两桩联姻所动摇:穆拉德二世娶了一位塞尔维亚公主,穆罕默德二世娶了一位亚洲公主(Cantemir, p. 83, 93)。
56
↩
See the testimony of George Phranza, (l. i. c. 29,) and his life in Hanckius (de Script. Byzant. P. i. c. 40.) Chalcondyles and Ducas speak in general terms of Bajazet’s chains.
参看乔治·斯弗朗齐斯的证词(l. i. c. 29),其生平见 Hanckius(de Script. Byzant. P. i. c. 40)。哈尔科孔迪利斯与杜卡斯只是笼统地提到巴耶济德的“锁链”。
57
↩
Annales Leunclav. p. 321. Pocock, Prolegomen. ad Abulpharag Dynast. Cantemir, p. 55. * Note: Von Hammer, p. 318, cites several authorities unknown to Gibbon.—M.
Annales Leunclav. p. 321。Pocock, Prolegomen. ad Abulpharag Dynast.。Cantemir, p. 55。* 编者按:冯·哈默(p. 318)列举了若干为吉本所不知的出处。—M
58
↩
Sapor, king of Persia, had been made prisoner, and enclosed in the figure of a cow’s hide by Maximian or Galerius Cæsar. Such is the fable related by Eutychius, (Annal. tom. i. p. 421, vers. Pocock). The recollection of the true history (Decline and Fall, &c., vol. ii. p 140—152) will teach us to appreciate the knowledge of the Orientals of the ages which precede the Hegira.
波斯王沙普尔(Sapor)曾被马克西米安(Maximian)(或伽勒里乌斯(Galerius)·恺撒)俘虏,并被缝进一张牛皮之中。这则寓言出自欧提基乌斯(Eutychius, Annal. tom. i. p. 421, vers. Pocock)。只要回想一下真实的历史(《罗马帝国衰亡史》,vol. ii. p. 140—152),我们便能掂量出,东方人对希吉拉(Hegira)之前那些时代究竟知道多少。
581
↩
Von Hammer’s explanation of this contested point is both simple and satisfactory. It originates in a mistake in the meaning of the Turkish word kafe, which means a covered litter or palanquin drawn by two horses, and is generally used to convey the harem of an Eastern monarch. In such a litter, with the lattice-work made of iron, Bajazet either chose or was constrained to travel. This was either mistaken for, or transformed by, ignorant relaters into a cage. The European Schiltberger, the two oldest of the Turkish historians, and the most valuable of the later compilers, Seadeddin, describe this litter. Seadeddin discusses the question with some degree of historical criticism, and ascribes the choice of such a vehicle to the indignant state of Bajazet’s mind, which would not brook the sight of his Tartar conquerors. Von Hammer, p. 320.—M.
冯·哈默对这一争议之点的解释既简明又令人信服。此说的根源,在于对土耳其语词 kafe 含义的误解:kafe 本指一种由两马牵引、有篷的舆轿,通常用来载送东方君主的后宫。巴耶济德所乘的,正是这样一顶格窗以铁制成的舆轿——或出于自愿,或出于被迫。无知的传述者要么把它误认作、要么把它讹传成了一只笼子。欧洲人席尔特贝格尔(Schiltberger)、两位最古老的土耳其史家,以及后世编纂者中最有价值的萨阿德丁(Seadeddin),都描述过这顶舆轿。萨阿德丁以某种历史考据的态度讨论此事,把选用这种代步工具的缘由,归于巴耶济德愤懑的心境——他实在不忍见到那些鞑靼征服者。冯·哈默,p. 320。—M
59
↩
Arabshah (tom. ii. c. 25) describes, like a curious traveller, the Straits of Gallipoli and Constantinople. To acquire a just idea of these events, I have compared the narratives and prejudices of the Moguls, Turks, Greeks, and Arabians. The Spanish ambassador mentions this hostile union of the Christians and Ottomans, (Vie de Timour, p. 96.)
伊本·阿拉伯沙(tom. ii. c. 25)像一位好奇的旅人那样,描述了加里波利与君士坦丁堡的海峡。为求对这些事件有一个公允的认识,我比对了蒙古人、土耳其人、希腊人与阿拉伯人各自的叙述与偏见。那位西班牙使节提到,基督徒与奥斯曼人本是仇敌,此时却联起手来(Vie de Timour, p. 96)。
60
↩
Since the name of Cæsar had been transferred to the sultans of Roum, the Greek princes of Constantinople (Sherefeddin, l. v. c. 54) were confounded with the Christian lords of Gallipoli, Thessalonica, &c. under the title of Tekkur, which is derived by corruption from the genitive tou kuriou, (Cantemir, p. 51.)
自从“恺撒”之名转归罗姆的苏丹之后,君士坦丁堡的希腊君主(Sherefeddin, l. v. c. 54)便与加里波利、塞萨洛尼卡(Thessalonica)等地的基督教“领主”相混,一并冠以 Tekkur 之号;此号乃由希腊语属格 tou kuriou(τοῦ κυρίου,意即“主上的”)讹变而来(Cantemir, p. 51)。
61
↩
See Sherefeddin, l. v. c. 4, who marks, in a just itinerary, the road to China, which Arabshah (tom. ii. c. 33) paints in vague and rhetorical colors.
参看沙拉夫丁,l. v. c. 4——他以一份准确的行程录标明了通往中国的道路;而伊本·阿拉伯沙(tom. ii. c. 33)对此路的描绘则含糊而浮夸。
62
↩
Synopsis Hist. Sinicæ, p. 74—76, (in the ivth part of the Relations de Thevenot,) Duhalde, Hist. de la Chine, (tom. i. p. 507, 508, folio edition;) and for the Chronology of the Chinese emperors, De Guignes, Hist. des Huns, (tom. i. p. 71, 72.)
Synopsis Hist. Sinicæ, p. 74—76(见 Relations de Thevenot 第四部分);Duhalde, Hist. de la Chine(tom. i. p. 507, 508, 对开本);至于中国历代皇帝的纪年,参看德经,Hist. des Huns(tom. i. p. 71, 72)。