Chapter XLVII: Ecclesiastical Discord.—Part V. 第四十七章 教会的纷争——第五节
¶
I. Both in his native and his episcopal province, the heresy of the unfortunate Nestorius was speedily obliterated. The Oriental bishops, who at Ephesus had resisted to his face the arrogance of Cyril, were mollified by his tardy concessions. The same prelates, or their successors, subscribed, not without a murmur, the decrees of Chalcedon; the power of the Monophysites reconciled them with the Catholics in the conformity of passion, of interest, and, insensibly, of belief; and their last reluctant sigh was breathed in the defence of the three chapters. Their dissenting brethren, less moderate, or more sincere, were crushed by the penal laws; and, as early as the reign of Justinian, it became difficult to find a church of Nestorians within the limits of the Roman empire. Beyond those limits they had discovered a new world, in which they might hope for liberty, and aspire to conquest. In Persia, notwithstanding the resistance of the Magi, Christianity had struck a deep root, and the nations of the East reposed under its salutary shade. The catholic, or primate, resided in the capital: in his synods, and in their dioceses, his metropolitans, bishops, and clergy, represented the pomp and order of a regular hierarchy: they rejoiced in the increase of proselytes, who were converted from the Zendavesta to the gospel, from the secular to the monastic life; and their zeal was stimulated by the presence of an artful and formidable enemy. The Persian church had been founded by the missionaries of Syria; and their language, discipline, and doctrine, were closely interwoven with its original frame. The catholics were elected and ordained by their own suffragans; but their filial dependence on the patriarchs of Antioch is attested by the canons of the Oriental church. 113 In the Persian school of Edessa, 114 the rising generations of the faithful imbibed their theological idiom: they studied in the Syriac version the ten thousand volumes of Theodore of Mopsuestia; and they revered the apostolic faith and holy martyrdom of his disciple Nestorius, whose person and language were equally unknown to the nations beyond the Tigris. The first indelible lesson of Ibas, bishop of Edessa, taught them to execrate the Egyptians, who, in the synod of Ephesus, had impiously confounded the two natures of Christ. The flight of the masters and scholars, who were twice expelled from the Athens of Syria, dispersed a crowd of missionaries inflamed by the double zeal of religion and revenge. And the rigid unity of the Monophysites, who, under the reigns of Zeno and Anastasius, had invaded the thrones of the East, provoked their antagonists, in a land of freedom, to avow a moral, rather than a physical, union of the two persons of Christ. Since the first preaching of the gospel, the Sassanian kings beheld with an eye of suspicion a race of aliens and apostates, who had embraced the religion, and who might favor the cause, of the hereditary foes of their country. The royal edicts had often prohibited their dangerous correspondence with the Syrian clergy: the progress of the schism was grateful to the jealous pride of Perozes, and he listened to the eloquence of an artful prelate, who painted Nestorius as the friend of Persia, and urged him to secure the fidelity of his Christian subjects, by granting a just preference to the victims and enemies of the Roman tyrant. The Nestorians composed a large majority of the clergy and people: they were encouraged by the smile, and armed with the sword, of despotism; yet many of their weaker brethren were startled at the thought of breaking loose from the communion of the Christian world, and the blood of seven thousand seven hundred Monophysites, or Catholics, confirmed the uniformity of faith and discipline in the churches of Persia. 115 Their ecclesiastical institutions are distinguished by a liberal principle of reason, or at least of policy: the austerity of the cloister was relaxed and gradually forgotten; houses of charity were endowed for the education of orphans and foundlings; the law of celibacy, so forcibly recommended to the Greeks and Latins, was disregarded by the Persian clergy; and the number of the elect was multiplied by the public and reiterated nuptials of the priests, the bishops, and even the patriarch himself. To this standard of natural and religious freedom, myriads of fugitives resorted from all the provinces of the Eastern empire; the narrow bigotry of Justinian was punished by the emigration of his most industrious subjects; they transported into Persia the arts both of peace and war: and those who deserved the favor, were promoted in the service, of a discerning monarch. The arms of Nushirvan, and his fiercer grandson, were assisted with advice, and money, and troops, by the desperate sectaries who still lurked in their native cities of the East: their zeal was rewarded with the gift of the Catholic churches; but when those cities and churches were recovered by Heraclius, their open profession of treason and heresy compelled them to seek a refuge in the realm of their foreign ally. But the seeming tranquillity of the Nestorians was often endangered, and sometimes overthrown. They were involved in the common evils of Oriental despotism: their enmity to Rome could not always atone for their attachment to the gospel: and a colony of three hundred thousand Jacobites, the captives of Apamea and Antioch, was permitted to erect a hostile altar in the face of the catholic, and in the sunshine of the court. In his last treaty, Justinian introduced some conditions which tended to enlarge and fortify the toleration of Christianity in Persia. The emperor, ignorant of the rights of conscience, was incapable of pity or esteem for the heretics who denied the authority of the holy synods: but he flattered himself that they would gradually perceive the temporal benefits of union with the empire and the church of Rome; and if he failed in exciting their gratitude, he might hope to provoke the jealousy of their sovereign. In a later age the Lutherans have been burnt at Paris, and protected in Germany, by the superstition and policy of the most Christian king.
一、无论在聂斯脱利的故乡行省,还是在他任主教的教区,这位不幸者的异端都迅速被扫荡一空。东方主教们当年在以弗所曾当面顶撞西里尔的骄横,如今被他迟来的让步安抚了下去。这些主教(或其继任者)虽不无怨言,终究还是在卡尔西顿会议的教令上签了字;一性论派的势力,使他们与大公教徒因共同的激愤、共同的利害而重修旧好,甚至在不知不觉间连信仰也趋于一致;而他们最后一声不情愿的叹息,是为“三章案”辩护时发出的。至于那些持异见的弟兄,或因不够温和、或因更为真诚,则被刑律碾得粉碎;早在查士丁尼在位之时,罗马帝国境内便已难觅一座聂斯脱利派的教堂。然而在帝国疆界之外,他们却发现了一个新天地,在那里既可指望自由,又能企望开拓。在波斯,尽管有麻葛的抵制,基督教仍深深扎下了根,东方各族都在它那有益的荫庇下安栖。大公牧首(或称首席主教)驻于都城;无论在他主持的教务会议上,还是在各自的教区里,隶属于他的都主教、主教与教士,都俨然有正规教阶的威仪与秩序。他们为皈依者的增多而欢欣——这些人有的从《阿维斯塔》改宗福音,有的从俗世走入修道;而一个诡诈可畏的强敌近在眼前,更激起了他们的热忱。波斯教会本是叙利亚的传教士所创建,其语言、规制与教义,都与它最初的骨架紧紧交织在一起。历任大公牧首虽由本地的副主教们推选并祝圣,然而东方教会的教规仍表明,他们对安条克历任牧首怀有儿子对父亲般的依附。113 在埃德萨的波斯学校里,114 一代代新起的信徒濡染了本派的神学语汇:他们研读叙利亚文译本中摩普绥提亚的狄奥多尔那一万卷著作,敬奉其门徒聂斯脱利那使徒般的信仰与神圣的殉道——尽管底格里斯河彼岸的各族,对聂斯脱利其人其说其实一无所知。埃德萨主教伊巴斯给他们上的第一课,便如烙印般教他们诅咒埃及人——正是这些埃及人,在以弗所会议上大逆不道地把基督的两性混为一谈。这批师生两度被逐出“叙利亚的雅典”,其流亡驱散出一大群传教士,胸中同时燃烧着宗教与复仇的双重热忱。而一性论派那种严苛的划一——他们在芝诺与阿纳斯塔修斯两朝曾侵夺东方各主教之位——更逼得对手在这片自由的土地上,公然主张基督那两个位格之间乃是道德上的结合,而非形体上的结合。自福音初传以来,萨珊诸王便以猜疑的目光打量着这样一个由异族与叛教者组成的群体:他们信奉的,正是波斯世仇之敌的宗教,说不定也会倒向那一边去。王室屡颁诏令,禁止他们与叙利亚教士危险的往来;而这场分裂的进展,恰合卑路斯猜忌而骄矜的心意。他听信了一位诡诈主教的花言巧语——此人把聂斯脱利描绘成波斯的朋友,力劝国王给予罗马暴君的受害者与仇敌以应有的偏袒,借此确保基督徒臣民的忠诚。聂斯脱利派在教士与民众中占了绝大多数,既有专制君权的笑脸为鼓励,又有它的刀剑为凭仗;然而一想到要与整个基督教世界断绝共融,许多较软弱的弟兄仍不免心惊,直到七千七百名一性论派(或大公教派)信徒的鲜血,才把波斯各教会信仰与规制的划一坐实下来。115 聂斯脱利派的教会制度,有一条开明的原则可作标志——若非出于理性,至少也出于权谋:隐修院的清苦先是放宽,进而渐被遗忘;他们兴办慈善之家,收养并教育孤儿弃婴;对希腊、拉丁两派教士谆谆劝行的独身戒律,波斯教士置之不理;司铎、主教、乃至大公牧首本人都公然一再婚娶,蒙拣选者的人数便由此倍增。这面自然与信仰之自由并举的旗帜,招来东部帝国各行省成千上万的逃亡者;查士丁尼那狭隘的偏执,正因他最勤勉的臣民纷纷外迁而受了惩罚。这些人把和平与战争两方面的技艺一并带入波斯,其中有才可用者,便在一位慧眼识人的君主麾下得到擢升。努希尔万及其更为凶暴的孙子用兵之际,那些至今仍潜伏在东方故城中、走投无路的教派信众,为他们出谋献策、输财助饷、乃至提供兵员;他们的热忱,换来了大公教会一座座教堂的赏赐。可等到希拉克略收复这些城池与教堂,他们公然叛国、公然持异端,只好逃往那位异邦盟友的国土上避难。不过,聂斯脱利派表面的安宁时常受到威胁,有时甚至倾覆。东方专制的种种祸患,他们也难以幸免;他们对罗马的敌意,并不总能抵偿他们对福音的执守。有一批多达三十万的雅各派——阿帕米亚与安条克的俘虏——获准就在大公牧首眼皮底下、在朝廷的照拂之中,另立起一座敌对的祭坛。查士丁尼在他最后一纸和约中,添入若干条款,意在扩大并巩固基督教在波斯所享的宽容。这位皇帝既不懂良心自由的权利,对那些否认历次神圣会议权威的异端,也谈不上怜悯或敬重;他只是自鸣得意地以为,这些人渐渐会看出与帝国、与罗马教会联合所带来的现世好处,而即便激不起他们的感恩,他也指望能挑动他们君主的猜忌。到了后世,路德派曾在巴黎被付之一炬,又在德意志受到庇护,这同出于那位“最虔诚的基督教国王”的迷信与权谋。
¶
The desire of gaining souls for God and subjects for the church, has excited in every age the diligence of the Christian priests. From the conquest of Persia they carried their spiritual arms to the north, the east, and the south; and the simplicity of the gospel was fashioned and painted with the colors of the Syriac theology. In the sixth century, according to the report of a Nestorian traveller, 116 Christianity was successfully preached to the Bactrians, the Huns, the Persians, the Indians, the Persarmenians, the Medes, and the Elamites: the Barbaric churches, from the Gulf of Persia to the Caspian Sea, were almost infinite; and their recent faith was conspicuous in the number and sanctity of their monks and martyrs. The pepper coast of Malabar, and the isles of the ocean, Socotora and Ceylon, were peopled with an increasing multitude of Christians; and the bishops and clergy of those sequestered regions derived their ordination from the Catholic of Babylon. In a subsequent age the zeal of the Nestorians overleaped the limits which had confined the ambition and curiosity both of the Greeks and Persians. The missionaries of Balch and Samarcand pursued without fear the footsteps of the roving Tartar, and insinuated themselves into the camps of the valleys of Imaus and the banks of the Selinga. They exposed a metaphysical creed to those illiterate shepherds: to those sanguinary warriors, they recommended humanity and repose. Yet a khan, whose power they vainly magnified, is said to have received at their hands the rites of baptism, and even of ordination; and the fame of Prester or Presbyter John 117 has long amused the credulity of Europe. The royal convert was indulged in the use of a portable altar; but he despatched an embassy to the patriarch, to inquire how, in the season of Lent, he should abstain from animal food, and how he might celebrate the Eucharist in a desert that produced neither corn nor wine. In their progress by sea and land, the Nestorians entered China by the port of Canton and the northern residence of Sigan. Unlike the senators of Rome, who assumed with a smile the characters of priests and augurs, the mandarins, who affect in public the reason of philosophers, are devoted in private to every mode of popular superstition. They cherished and they confounded the gods of Palestine and of India; but the propagation of Christianity awakened the jealousy of the state, and, after a short vicissitude of favor and persecution, the foreign sect expired in ignorance and oblivion. 118 Under the reign of the caliphs, the Nestorian church was diffused from China to Jerusalem and Cyrus; and their numbers, with those of the Jacobites, were computed to surpass the Greek and Latin communions. 119 Twenty-five metropolitans or archbishops composed their hierarchy; but several of these were dispensed, by the distance and danger of the way, from the duty of personal attendance, on the easy condition that every six years they should testify their faith and obedience to the catholic or patriarch of Babylon, a vague appellation which has been successively applied to the royal seats of Seleucia, Ctesiphon, and Bagdad. These remote branches are long since withered; and the old patriarchal trunk 120 is now divided by the Elijahs of Mosul, the representatives almost on lineal descent of the genuine and primitive succession; the Josephs of Amida, who are reconciled to the church of Rome: 121 and the Simeons of Van or Ormia, whose revolt, at the head of forty thousand families, was promoted in the sixteenth century by the Sophis of Persia. The number of three hundred thousand is allowed for the whole body of the Nestorians, who, under the name of Chaldeans or Assyrians, are confounded with the most learned or the most powerful nation of Eastern antiquity.
为上帝赢得灵魂、为教会赢得臣民,这一心愿在任何时代都激励着基督教士的勤勉。他们从征服波斯起,便把属灵的兵锋伸向北方、东方与南方;而福音那份质朴,经叙利亚神学一番裁剪涂饰,也染上了它的色彩。据一位聂斯脱利派旅行家记述,116 六世纪时,基督教已成功传给巴克特里亚人、匈人、波斯人、印度人、波斯亚美尼亚人、米底人与埃兰人;从波斯湾直到里海,蛮族的教会几乎多得数不清,而他们新近的信仰,从修士与殉道者之众多、之圣洁上便清晰可见。马拉巴尔的胡椒海岸,以及大洋中的岛屿——索科特拉与锡兰——都住着日渐增多的基督徒;这些僻远地区的主教与教士,其圣职都出自巴比伦的大公牧首之手。到后来一个时代,聂斯脱利派的热忱甚至越过了希腊人与波斯人的野心和好奇都不曾逾越的界限。巴尔赫与撒马尔罕的传教士,无所畏惧地追随着游荡的鞑靼人的足迹,悄然潜入伊茂斯山谷地与色楞格河两岸的营帐之间。他们把一套形而上的信条摆在这些目不识丁的牧人面前,又向这些嗜血的武士劝说仁爱与安息之道。据说,有一位可汗——他们徒然夸大其权势——竟从他们手中领受了洗礼、甚至受了圣职;而“祭司王”或曰“长老”约翰117的名声,也长久地逗弄着欧洲人的轻信。这位皈依的君王获准使用一座便携祭坛;但他派出一个使团去见牧首,请教在四旬斋期间该如何戒食荤腥,又该如何在一片既不产五谷、也不产葡萄酒的荒漠里举行圣餐礼。聂斯脱利派水陆并进,经广州港与北方的驻地西安进入中国。罗马的元老曾含笑兼领祭司与占卜官之职,中国的大臣却与之不同:他们在人前标榜哲人的理性,私底下却对民间种种迷信无不虔奉。他们既供奉、又混淆巴勒斯坦与印度的诸神;然而基督教的传播终究惊动了朝廷的猜忌,几经宠幸与迫害的交替之后,这个外来教派便在无知与遗忘中湮灭了。118 到哈里发在位的时代,聂斯脱利派教会已从中国一直播散到耶路撒冷与库鲁斯;据估算,他们连同雅各派的人数,已超过希腊与拉丁两派信众的总和。119 他们的教阶由二十五位都主教(即大主教)构成;不过其中好几位因路途遥远艰险,得以免去亲自与会的义务,只需每隔六年向巴比伦的大公牧首表明一次自己的信仰与顺服即可——“巴比伦”这一含糊的称谓,先后加诸塞琉西亚、泰西封与巴格达这几处王都。这些遥远的枝条早已枯萎,而那古老的牧首主干,120 如今分作三系:摩苏尔的历代以利亚,几乎是那纯正而原初之世系的嫡传代表;阿米达的历代约瑟,则已与罗马教会和解;121 还有凡城(或奥尔米亚)的历代西门——十六世纪时,波斯的萨非王朝曾怂恿这一系率四万户人家反叛。聂斯脱利派全体的人数,一般认作三十万;他们以“迦勒底人”或“亚述人”之名为世所知,遂与古代东方那个最有学问、或最为强盛的民族混为一谈。
¶
According to the legend of antiquity, the gospel was preached in India by St. Thomas. 122 At the end of the ninth century, his shrine, perhaps in the neighborhood of Madras, was devoutly visited by the ambassadors of Alfred; and their return with a cargo of pearls and spices rewarded the zeal of the English monarch, who entertained the largest projects of trade and discovery. 123 When the Portuguese first opened the navigation of India, the Christians of St. Thomas had been seated for ages on the coast of Malabar, and the difference of their character and color attested the mixture of a foreign race. In arms, in arts, and possibly in virtue, they excelled the natives of Hindostan; the husbandmen cultivated the palm-tree, the merchants were enriched by the pepper trade, the soldiers preceded the nairs or nobles of Malabar, and their hereditary privileges were respected by the gratitude or the fear of the king of Cochin and the Zamorin himself. They acknowledged a Gentoo of sovereign, but they were governed, even in temporal concerns, by the bishop of Angamala. He still asserted his ancient title of metropolitan of India, but his real jurisdiction was exercised in fourteen hundred churches, and he was intrusted with the care of two hundred thousand souls. Their religion would have rendered them the firmest and most cordial allies of the Portuguese; but the inquisitors soon discerned in the Christians of St. Thomas the unpardonable guilt of heresy and schism. Instead of owning themselves the subjects of the Roman pontiff, the spiritual and temporal monarch of the globe, they adhered, like their ancestors, to the communion of the Nestorian patriarch; and the bishops whom he ordained at Mosul, traversed the dangers of the sea and land to reach their diocese on the coast of Malabar. In their Syriac liturgy the names of Theodore and Nestorius were piously commemorated: they united their adoration of the two persons of Christ; the title of Mother of God was offensive to their ear, and they measured with scrupulous avarice the honors of the Virgin Mary, whom the superstition of the Latins had almost exalted to the rank of a goddess. When her image was first presented to the disciples of St. Thomas, they indignantly exclaimed, “We are Christians, not idolaters!” and their simple devotion was content with the veneration of the cross. Their separation from the Western world had left them in ignorance of the improvements, or corruptions, of a thousand years; and their conformity with the faith and practice of the fifth century would equally disappoint the prejudices of a Papist or a Protestant. It was the first care of the ministers of Rome to intercept all correspondence with the Nestorian patriarch, and several of his bishops expired in the prisons of the holy office.
依古老的传说,福音是由使徒圣多马传入印度的。122 九世纪末,阿尔弗雷德的使节曾虔诚地拜谒过他的圣祠——那圣祠或许就在马德拉斯附近;他们满载珍珠与香料而归,酬答了这位英格兰君王的热忱,此人怀有最宏大的通商与探险计划。123 当葡萄牙人初次开辟通往印度的航路时,圣多马名下的基督徒早已在马拉巴尔海岸定居了好几个世纪;他们的相貌与肤色与众不同,正证明其中掺入了外来种族的血脉。论武艺、论技艺、或许连论德行,他们都胜过印度斯坦的土著:种田的栽培棕榈,经商的靠胡椒贸易致富,当兵的位在奈尔人(即马拉巴尔的贵族)之上,而他们世袭的特权,也因科钦王乃至扎莫林本人的感激或畏惧而受到尊重。他们名义上臣服于一位印度教君主,实际上却连世俗事务也归安加马拉的主教管辖。这位主教仍以印度都主教的古老头衔自居,其真正的教权则施行于一千四百座教堂之间,二十万信众的照管之责,都托付在他手上。他们的宗教,本可使他们成为葡萄牙人最坚定、最亲厚的盟友;可宗教裁判官很快便在圣多马名下的基督徒身上,看出了异端与分裂这不可饶恕的罪。他们非但不肯承认自己是罗马教宗——那位统辖普世灵魂与肉体的君主——的臣属,反倒像其祖先一样,固守着与聂斯脱利派牧首的共融;而这位牧首在摩苏尔祝圣的主教,历尽海陆的凶险,才抵达他们在马拉巴尔海岸的教区。在他们的叙利亚语礼拜仪式中,狄奥多尔与聂斯脱利之名受到虔诚的记念;他们把对基督两位格的崇拜合而奉行;“上帝之母”这一称号在他们听来刺耳,对于童贞马利亚的种种尊荣,他们更是斤斤计较、吝于给予——而拉丁人的迷信,却几乎把她抬举到女神的地位。当马利亚的圣像最初呈到圣多马门徒面前时,他们愤然叫道:“我们是基督徒,不是拜偶像的人!”他们那份质朴的虔敬,只须敬礼十字架便已满足。他们与西方世界隔绝已久,对这一千年间的种种改良或败坏一概不知;而他们与五世纪的信仰和惯例如出一辙,无论落在天主教徒还是新教徒眼里,都同样会叫其成见落空。罗马的教士首先着手切断他们与聂斯脱利派牧首的一切往来,那牧首手下好几位主教,就死在了宗教裁判所的牢狱之中。
¶
The flock, without a shepherd, was assaulted by the power of the Portuguese, the arts of the Jesuits, and the zeal of Alexis de Menezes, archbishop of Goa, in his personal visitation of the coast of Malabar. The synod of Diamper, at which he presided, consummated the pious work of the reunion; and rigorously imposed the doctrine and discipline of the Roman church, without forgetting auricular confession, the strongest engine of ecclesiastical torture. The memory of Theodore and Nestorius was condemned, and Malabar was reduced under the dominion of the pope, of the primate, and of the Jesuits who invaded the see of Angamala or Cranganor. Sixty years of servitude and hypocrisy were patiently endured; but as soon as the Portuguese empire was shaken by the courage and industry of the Dutch, the Nestorians asserted, with vigor and effect, the religion of their fathers. The Jesuits were incapable of defending the power which they had abused; the arms of forty thousand Christians were pointed against their falling tyrants; and the Indian archdeacon assumed the character of bishop till a fresh supply of episcopal gifts and Syriac missionaries could be obtained from the patriarch of Babylon. Since the expulsion of the Portuguese, the Nestorian creed is freely professed on the coast of Malabar. The trading companies of Holland and England are the friends of toleration; but if oppression be less mortifying than contempt, the Christians of St. Thomas have reason to complain of the cold and silent indifference of their brethren of Europe. 124
这群失去牧人的羊,遭到了三重夹击:葡萄牙人的武力、耶稣会士的手腕,以及果阿大主教阿莱克西斯·德梅内塞斯亲自巡视马拉巴尔海岸时的热忱。他主持召开的迪安佩尔会议,成全了这桩“重归合一”的虔诚事业,严令推行罗马教会的教义与规制,其中自然少不了私下告解——这教会施刑最有力的机括。狄奥多尔与聂斯脱利的名字遭到谴责,马拉巴尔被压服在教宗、首席主教以及那些侵占了安加马拉(又名克兰加诺尔)主教区的耶稣会士治下。六十年的奴役与虚伪,他们都隐忍了下来;可是荷兰人以勇武与勤勉撼动了葡萄牙帝国,聂斯脱利派便强硬而有力地重申祖先的信仰。耶稣会士既已滥用手中权柄,便再也无力守护它;四万名基督徒的刀锋直指这群行将垮台的暴君,而印度的会吏长便暂摄主教之职,直到能从巴比伦的大公牧首那里,重新求得授予主教圣职的恩典与叙利亚语的传教士。自葡萄牙人被逐之后,聂斯脱利派信条便在马拉巴尔海岸得以自由传布。荷兰与英格兰的贸易公司,本是宽容的朋友;然而,若说压迫尚不及轻蔑那般伤人,那么圣多马名下的基督徒倒有理由抱怨:欧洲的弟兄对他们,只是一味冷淡而无声的漠然。124
¶
II. The history of the Monophysites is less copious and interesting than that of the Nestorians. Under the reigns of Zeno and Anastasius, their artful leaders surprised the ear of the prince, usurped the thrones of the East, and crushed on its native soil the school of the Syrians. The rule of the Monophysite faith was defined with exquisite discretion by Severus, patriarch of Antioch: he condemned, in the style of the Henoticon, the adverse heresies of Nestorius; and Eutyches maintained against the latter the reality of the body of Christ, and constrained the Greeks to allow that he was a liar who spoke truth. 125 But the approximation of ideas could not abate the vehemence of passion; each party was the more astonished that their blind antagonist could dispute on so trifling a difference; the tyrant of Syria enforced the belief of his creed, and his reign was polluted with the blood of three hundred and fifty monks, who were slain, not perhaps without provocation or resistance, under the walls of Apamea. 126 The successor of Anastasius replanted the orthodox standard in the East; Severus fled into Egypt; and his friend, the eloquent Xenaias, 127 who had escaped from the Nestorians of Persia, was suffocated in his exile by the Melchites of Paphlagonia. Fifty-four bishops were swept from their thrones, eight hundred ecclesiastics were cast into prison, 128 and notwithstanding the ambiguous favor of Theodora, the Oriental flocks, deprived of their shepherds, must insensibly have been either famished or poisoned. In this spiritual distress, the expiring faction was revived, and united, and perpetuated, by the labors of a monk; and the name of James Baradaeus 129 has been preserved in the appellation of Jacobites, a familiar sound, which may startle the ear of an English reader. From the holy confessors in their prison of Constantinople, he received the powers of bishop of Edessa and apostle of the East, and the ordination of fourscore thousand bishops, priests, and deacons, is derived from the same inexhaustible source. The speed of the zealous missionary was promoted by the fleetest dromedaries of a devout chief of the Arabs; the doctrine and discipline of the Jacobites were secretly established in the dominions of Justinian; and each Jacobite was compelled to violate the laws and to hate the Roman legislator. The successors of Severus, while they lurked in convents or villages, while they sheltered their proscribed heads in the caverns of hermits, or the tents of the Saracens, still asserted, as they now assert, their indefeasible right to the title, the rank, and the prerogatives of patriarch of Antioch: under the milder yoke of the infidels, they reside about a league from Merdin, in the pleasant monastery of Zapharan, which they have embellished with cells, aqueducts, and plantations. The secondary, though honorable, place is filled by the maphrian, who, in his station at Mosul itself, defies the Nestorian catholic with whom he contests the primacy of the East. Under the patriarch and the maphrian, one hundred and fifty archbishops and bishops have been counted in the different ages of the Jacobite church; but the order of the hierarchy is relaxed or dissolved, and the greater part of their dioceses is confined to the neighborhood of the Euphrates and the Tigris. The cities of Aleppo and Amida, which are often visited by the patriarch, contain some wealthy merchants and industrious mechanics, but the multitude derive their scanty sustenance from their daily labor: and poverty, as well as superstition, may impose their excessive fasts: five annual lents, during which both the clergy and laity abstain not only from flesh or eggs, but even from the taste of wine, of oil, and of fish. Their present numbers are esteemed from fifty to fourscore thousand souls, the remnant of a populous church, which was gradually decreased under the impression of twelve centuries. Yet in that long period, some strangers of merit have been converted to the Monophysite faith, and a Jew was the father of Abulpharagius, 130 primate of the East, so truly eminent both in his life and death. In his life he was an elegant writer of the Syriac and Arabic tongues, a poet, physician, and historian, a subtile philosopher, and a moderate divine. In his death, his funeral was attended by his rival the Nestorian patriarch, with a train of Greeks and Armenians, who forgot their disputes, and mingled their tears over the grave of an enemy. The sect which was honored by the virtues of Abulpharagius appears, however, to sink below the level of their Nestorian brethren. The superstition of the Jacobites is more abject, their fasts more rigid, 131 their intestine divisions are more numerous, and their doctors (as far as I can measure the degrees of nonsense) are more remote from the precincts of reason. Something may possibly be allowed for the rigor of the Monophysite theology; much more for the superior influence of the monastic order. In Syria, in Egypt, in Ethiopia, the Jacobite monks have ever been distinguished by the austerity of their penance and the absurdity of their legends. Alive or dead, they are worshipped as the favorites of the Deity; the crosier of bishop and patriarch is reserved for their venerable hands; and they assume the government of men, while they are yet reeking with the habits and prejudices of the cloister. 132
二、一性论派的历史,不像聂斯脱利派那般丰富而引人入胜。在芝诺与阿纳斯塔修斯两朝,他们那些工于心计的首领哄住了君主的耳朵,篡夺了东方各主教之位,并在叙利亚学派的故土上将其碾碎。一性论派的信条,由安条克牧首塞维鲁以极精细的斟酌加以厘定:他仿照《合一诏书》的口吻,谴责聂斯脱利那与己相反的异端;而针对后者,欧迪奇则坚称基督身体的真实性,逼得希腊人不得不承认:一个说了真话的人,竟也可以是个说谎者。125 然而两种观念的接近,丝毫压不住激情的猛烈;双方反倒愈发惊诧:自己那盲目的对手,竟会为如此微末的分歧争执不休。叙利亚的这位暴君强令众人信奉他的信条,其治下沾满了三百五十名修士的鲜血——这些人在阿帕米亚城下被杀,或许也曾有所挑衅或抵抗,才招来此祸。126 阿纳斯塔修斯的继任者,在东方重新竖起了正统的旗帜;塞维鲁逃往埃及,他的朋友、那位口才出众的克塞纳伊阿斯127——此人曾从波斯的聂斯脱利派手中脱身——却在流放之地被帕夫拉戈尼亚的麦尔基派活活闷死。五十四名主教被逐出教座,八百名教士被投入牢狱;128 尽管有狄奥多拉那暧昧的庇护,东方那群失了牧人的信众,也势必要在不知不觉间,或饿死,或被毒害殆尽。就在这场属灵的困厄之中,这个奄奄一息的派别,却靠一位修士的辛劳得以复苏、聚拢并延续下去;而雅各·巴拉戴乌斯129之名,也保留在“雅各派”这一称谓里——这名字听来耳熟,或会叫英国读者吃一惊。他从君士坦丁堡狱中那几位神圣的信德坚守者手里,领受了埃德萨主教兼东方使徒的权柄;而八万名主教、司铎与执事的圣职,都出自这同一个取之不竭的源头。一位虔诚的阿拉伯酋长献出麾下最快的单峰骆驼,助这位热忱的传教士加快脚程;雅各派的教义与规制,就这样在查士丁尼的领土上暗中确立起来,而每一个雅各派信徒,都不得不去违犯律法、痛恨那位罗马立法者。塞维鲁的历任继承者,或潜身于隐修院与村落,或把遭到通缉的头颅藏进隐士的岩穴、萨拉森人的帐篷,却始终坚称——他们如今仍这样坚称——自己对安条克牧首的名号、品级与特权拥有不可剥夺的权利。在异教徒较为宽和的枷锁之下,他们住在距梅尔丁约一里格处、风景宜人的扎法兰隐修院里,用修士居室、引水渠与园圃把它装点起来。次一等却仍属荣显的位置,则由玛弗里安(雅各派驻东方之首席主教)担任;他就驻在摩苏尔本地,与聂斯脱利派大公牧首争夺东方的首席之权,公然与之叫板。在雅各派教会不同的时代,牧首与玛弗里安之下曾数出一百五十位大主教与主教;然而其教阶秩序或已松弛、或已瓦解,他们大部分教区如今都局促于幼发拉底河与底格里斯河一带。牧首常去巡视的阿勒颇与阿米达两城,虽有几家殷实的商贾与勤勉的工匠,多数人却只能靠每日劳作勉强糊口;而贫困加上迷信,或许正是他们那些过度斋戒的由来:每年五次大斋期,其间无论教士还是俗众,不但戒绝肉、蛋,连酒、油、鱼的滋味也一概不沾。他们如今的人数,估计在五万到八万之间,是一个昔日人丁兴旺的教会所余下的残部——十二个世纪的重压,使它一步步凋零。然而在这漫长的岁月里,仍有一些出众的外人皈依了一性论;东方首席主教阿布·法拉杰130的父亲便是个犹太人,此人无论生前身后都真正卓尔不群。生前,他是叙利亚语与阿拉伯语的一位典雅作家,是诗人、医生兼史家,是精微的哲人、持平的神学家。身后,为他送葬的行列里,竟有他的对头——聂斯脱利派牧首——以及一队希腊人与亚美尼亚人;他们放下彼此的争执,在一位仇敌的墓前一同洒泪。不过,这个曾因阿布·法拉杰之德行而增光的派别,看来终究要沉沦到聂斯脱利派弟兄之下。雅各派的迷信更为卑下,斋戒更为严苛,131 内部的分裂更为繁多,而他们的博士们(就我所能衡量荒谬之高下而言),距理性的门墙更为遥远。这其中,一性论神学的严苛或许难辞其咎,而修道会那更大的势力,责任还要重得多。在叙利亚、在埃及、在埃塞俄比亚,雅各派修士向来以苦修之酷烈、传说之荒诞著称。无论生前死后,他们都被当作神的宠儿而受人崇拜;主教与牧首的权杖,只留给他们那双可敬的手;而他们一面还带着隐修院里那套习气与偏见、浑身仿佛尚在冒着热气,一面便揽起了治人的权柄。132
¶
III. In the style of the Oriental Christians, the Monothelites of every age are described under the appellation of Maronites, 133 a name which has been insensibly transferred from a hermit to a monastery, from a monastery to a nation. Maron, a saint or savage of the fifth century, displayed his religious madness in Syria; the rival cities of Apamea and Emesa disputed his relics, a stately church was erected on his tomb, and six hundred of his disciples united their solitary cells on the banks of the Orontes. In the controversies of the incarnation they nicely threaded the orthodox line between the sects of Nestorians and Eutyches; but the unfortunate question of one will or operation in the two natures of Christ, was generated by their curious leisure. Their proselyte, the emperor Heraclius, was rejected as a Maronite from the walls of Emesa, he found a refuge in the monastery of his brethren; and their theological lessons were repaid with the gift a spacious and wealthy domain. The name and doctrine of this venerable school were propagated among the Greeks and Syrians, and their zeal is expressed by Macarius, patriarch of Antioch, who declared before the synod of Constantinople, that sooner than subscribe the two wills of Christ, he would submit to be hewn piecemeal and cast into the sea. 134 A similar or a less cruel mode of persecution soon converted the unresisting subjects of the plain, while the glorious title of Mardaites, 135 or rebels, was bravely maintained by the hardy natives of Mount Libanus. John Maron, one of the most learned and popular of the monks, assumed the character of patriarch of Antioch; his nephew, Abraham, at the head of the Maronites, defended their civil and religious freedom against the tyrants of the East. The son of the orthodox Constantine pursued with pious hatred a people of soldiers, who might have stood the bulwark of his empire against the common foes of Christ and of Rome. An army of Greeks invaded Syria; the monastery of St. Maron was destroyed with fire; the bravest chieftains were betrayed and murdered, and twelve thousand of their followers were transplanted to the distant frontiers of Armenia and Thrace. Yet the humble nation of the Maronites had survived the empire of Constantinople, and they still enjoy, under their Turkish masters, a free religion and a mitigated servitude. Their domestic governors are chosen among the ancient nobility: the patriarch, in his monastery of Canobin, still fancies himself on the throne of Antioch: nine bishops compose his synod, and one hundred and fifty priests, who retain the liberty of marriage, are intrusted with the care of one hundred thousand souls. Their country extends from the ridge of Mount Libanus to the shores of Tripoli; and the gradual descent affords, in a narrow space, each variety of soil and climate, from the Holy Cedars, erect under the weight of snow, 136 to the vine, the mulberry, and the olive-trees of the fruitful valley. In the twelfth century, the Maronites, abjuring the Monothelite error were reconciled to the Latin churches of Antioch and Rome, 137 and the same alliance has been frequently renewed by the ambition of the popes and the distress of the Syrians. But it may reasonably be questioned, whether their union has ever been perfect or sincere; and the learned Maronites of the college of Rome have vainly labored to absolve their ancestors from the guilt of heresy and schism. 138
三、依东方基督徒的说法,历代一志论派都被冠以“马龙派”之名,133 这名字不知不觉间,先由一位隐士移到一座隐修院,再由隐修院移到一个民族头上。马龙,是五世纪一位圣徒——或不如说狂人——在叙利亚显露其宗教癫狂;阿帕米亚与埃梅萨两城争相抢夺他的遗骸,他墓上建起一座巍峨的教堂,他的六百名门徒则把各自离群索居的斗室聚拢到奥龙特斯河畔。在道成肉身的种种争论里,他们小心翼翼地在聂斯脱利派与欧迪奇派之间,沿着正统的那条细线穿行;然而,“基督两性之中究竟只有一个意志、还是一种运作”这一不祥的问题,却是由他们那份好奇的闲暇孕育出来的。他们的皈依者、皇帝希拉克略,被埃梅萨城斥为马龙派、拒之门外,只好躲进他弟兄们的隐修院;而他们的神学教诲,也为他们换来一片宽广而富饶的领地作为酬报。这所可敬学派的名号与教义,在希腊人与叙利亚人中间传扬开来;安条克牧首马卡里乌斯把他们的热忱表露无遗——他在君士坦丁堡会议上当众声明:他宁可被人碎尸万段、投入海中,也决不肯在“基督有两个意志”的信条上签字。134 不久,用同样残酷、或稍稍收敛些的迫害手段,便把平原上那些俯首帖耳的臣民逐一改宗;而黎巴嫩山那些强悍的土著,却英勇地保住了“马尔达人”(意即反叛者)135这一光荣的称号。约翰·马龙,修士中最有学问、也最得人心的一位,自任安条克牧首;他的侄子亚伯拉罕,则率领马龙派,起而捍卫本族在政治与宗教上的自由,对抗东方的暴君。正统皇帝君士坦丁之子,怀着虔诚的憎恨,穷追这样一个由士兵组成的民族——他们本可充当帝国的壁垒,抵御基督与罗马共同的敌人。一支希腊军队侵入叙利亚,圣马龙隐修院被付之一炬,最骁勇的首领遭到出卖、被人谋杀,他们的部众有一万二千人被迁往亚美尼亚与色雷斯遥远的边地。然而,这个卑微的马龙派民族,竟比君士坦丁堡的帝国还活得长久;如今他们在土耳其主子治下,仍享有自由的宗教与减轻了的奴役。他们本乡的治理者,从古老的贵族中选出;牧首则在他卡诺宾的隐修院里,仍自以为端坐于安条克的宝座之上;九名主教组成他的教务会议,一百五十名保留了婚娶自由的司铎,受托照管十万信众。他们的国土,从黎巴嫩山的山脊一直延展到的黎波里的海滨;地势层层而下,在这狭小的一隅之内,便囊括了各样的水土与气候——从那些在积雪重压下依然挺立的神圣雪松,136 到那富饶谷地里的葡萄、桑树与橄榄。到十二世纪,马龙派宣布弃绝一志论的谬误,与安条克和罗马的拉丁教会重归于好;137 此后教宗的野心与叙利亚人的困厄,又屡屡促使这一同盟得以重续。不过,人们大可质疑:他们的联合是否当真完美、当真出于真心;而罗马学院里那些博学的马龙派学者,费尽气力想为其祖先洗脱异端与分裂之罪,也终归徒劳。138
¶
IV. Since the age of Constantine, the Armenians 139 had signalized their attachment to the religion and empire of the Christians. 1391 The disorders of their country, and their ignorance of the Greek tongue, prevented their clergy from assisting at the synod of Chalcedon, and they floated eighty-four years 140 in a state of indifference or suspense, till their vacant faith was finally occupied by the missionaries of Julian of Halicarnassus, 141 who in Egypt, their common exile, had been vanquished by the arguments or the influence of his rival Severus, the Monophysite patriarch of Antioch. The Armenians alone are the pure disciples of Eutyches, an unfortunate parent, who has been renounced by the greater part of his spiritual progeny. They alone persevere in the opinion, that the manhood of Christ was created, or existed without creation, of a divine and incorruptible substance. Their adversaries reproach them with the adoration of a phantom; and they retort the accusation, by deriding or execrating the blasphemy of the Jacobites, who impute to the Godhead the vile infirmities of the flesh, even the natural effects of nutrition and digestion. The religion of Armenia could not derive much glory from the learning or the power of its inhabitants. The royalty expired with the origin of their schism; and their Christian kings, who arose and fell in the thirteenth century on the confines of Cilicia, were the clients of the Latins and the vassals of the Turkish sultan of Iconium. The helpless nation has seldom been permitted to enjoy the tranquillity of servitude. From the earliest period to the present hour, Armenia has been the theatre of perpetual war: the lands between Tauris and Erivan were dispeopled by the cruel policy of the Sophis; and myriads of Christian families were transplanted, to perish or to propagate in the distant provinces of Persia. Under the rod of oppression, the zeal of the Armenians is fervent and intrepid; they have often preferred the crown of martyrdom to the white turban of Mahomet; they devoutly hate the error and idolatry of the Greeks; and their transient union with the Latins is not less devoid of truth, than the thousand bishops, whom their patriarch offered at the feet of the Roman pontiff. 142 The catholic, or patriarch, of the Armenians resides in the monastery of Ekmiasin, three leagues from Erivan. Forty-seven archbishops, each of whom may claim the obedience of four or five suffragans, are consecrated by his hand; but the far greater part are only titular prelates, who dignify with their presence and service the simplicity of his court. As soon as they have performed the liturgy, they cultivate the garden; and our bishops will hear with surprise, that the austerity of their life increases in just proportion to the elevation of their rank.
四、自君士坦丁时代以来,亚美尼亚人139便一直以对基督徒之宗教与帝国的忠诚而著称。1391 然而本国的动荡,加上不通希腊语,使他们的教士未能出席卡尔西顿会议;此后他们在漠然与观望之中飘荡了八十四年,140 直到哈利卡纳苏斯的尤利安141的传教士,最终占据了他们那片空悬的信仰——此人在埃及这处两派共同的流放地,曾被其对手、安条克的一性论派牧首塞维鲁以论辩或声势压倒。唯有亚美尼亚人,才是欧迪奇纯正的门徒;而欧迪奇这位不幸的祖师,反倒被他大多数属灵的子孙所弃绝。也唯有他们,始终固执一说:基督的人性乃是受造的、或未经受造便已存在的,其质料属神而不朽坏。他们的论敌指责他们崇拜一个幻影;他们则反唇相讥,讥笑乃至诅咒雅各派的亵渎——雅各派竟把肉身种种卑下的孱弱,连同摄食消化这类自然而然的作用,一并归于神性。亚美尼亚的宗教,本无从借其国民的学问或权势增添多少光彩。王权随着这场教派分裂的肇端而消亡;他们那些于十三世纪在奇里乞亚边境上兴而复灭的基督徒国王,不过是拉丁人的门客、伊科尼乌姆的土耳其苏丹的附庸。这个孤苦无依的民族,就连奴役下的安宁也难得享有。从最早的年代直到此刻,亚美尼亚一直是连绵战火的舞台:大不里士与埃里温之间的土地,因萨非王朝的残忍政策而变得渺无人烟;成千上万的基督徒家庭被强行迁走,或死于途中,或在波斯遥远的行省里繁衍生息。在压迫的鞭挞之下,亚美尼亚人的热忱炽烈而无畏;他们往往宁取殉道的冠冕,也不肯戴上穆罕默德的白头巾;他们由衷地憎恶希腊人的谬误与偶像崇拜;而他们与拉丁人那昙花一现的联合,也丝毫不比其牧首献于罗马教宗脚下的那一千名主教来得真实。142 亚美尼亚人的大公牧首,驻在距埃里温三里格的埃奇米阿津隐修院。四十七位大主教——其中每一位都可要求四五名副主教的服从——都由他亲手祝圣;但绝大多数不过是挂名的高级教士,以自己的在场与效劳,为他那简朴的宫廷平添几分体面。这些人一做完礼拜,便去侍弄园圃;而我们的主教们听了想必要大吃一惊:他们生活的清苦,竟与品级的高低恰成正比,愈是位高,愈是苦修。
¶
In the fourscore thousand towns or villages of his spiritual empire, the patriarch receives a small and voluntary tax from each person above the age of fifteen; but the annual amount of six hundred thousand crowns is insufficient to supply the incessant demands of charity and tribute. Since the beginning of the last century, the Armenians have obtained a large and lucrative share of the commerce of the East: in their return from Europe, the caravan usually halts in the neighborhood of Erivan, the altars are enriched with the fruits of their patient industry; and the faith of Eutyches is preached in their recent congregations of Barbary and Poland. 143
在他属灵疆域内那八万座城镇村庄中,牧首向每个十五岁以上的人征收一笔微薄而自愿的税;然而每年六十万克朗的进项,仍不足以应付施济与贡赋那没完没了的索求。自上个世纪初以来,亚美尼亚人已在东方贸易中占得一大份丰厚的利益:他们从欧洲返程时,商队通常在埃里温附近歇脚,一座座祭坛便因他们辛勤经营的成果而愈发充盈;而欧迪奇的信仰,如今也在他们于巴巴里与波兰新建的会众中传讲开来。143
¶
V. In the rest of the Roman empire, the despotism of the prince might eradicate or silence the sectaries of an obnoxious creed. But the stubborn temper of the Egyptians maintained their opposition to the synod of Chalcedon, and the policy of Justinian condescended to expect and to seize the opportunity of discord. The Monophysite church of Alexandria 144 was torn by the disputes of the corruptibles and incorruptibles, and on the death of the patriarch, the two factions upheld their respective candidates. 145 Gaian was the disciple of Julian, Theodosius had been the pupil of Severus: the claims of the former were supported by the consent of the monks and senators, the city and the province; the latter depended on the priority of his ordination, the favor of the empress Theodora, and the arms of the eunuch Narses, which might have been used in more honorable warfare. The exile of the popular candidate to Carthage and Sardinia inflamed the ferment of Alexandria; and after a schism of one hundred and seventy years, the Gaianites still revered the memory and doctrine of their founder. The strength of numbers and of discipline was tried in a desperate and bloody conflict; the streets were filled with the dead bodies of citizens and soldiers; the pious women, ascending the roofs of their houses, showered down every sharp or ponderous utensil on the heads of the enemy; and the final victory of Narses was owing to the flames, with which he wasted the third capital of the Roman world. But the lieutenant of Justinian had not conquered in the cause of a heretic; Theodosius himself was speedily, though gently, removed; and Paul of Tanis, an orthodox monk, was raised to the throne of Athanasius. The powers of government were strained in his support; he might appoint or displace the dukes and tribunes of Egypt; the allowance of bread, which Diocletian had granted, was suppressed, the churches were shut, and a nation of schismatics was deprived at once of their spiritual and carnal food. In his turn, the tyrant was excommunicated by the zeal and revenge of the people: and none except his servile Melchites would salute him as a man, a Christian, or a bishop. Yet such is the blindness of ambition, that, when Paul was expelled on a charge of murder, he solicited, with a bribe of seven hundred pounds of gold, his restoration to the same station of hatred and ignominy. His successor Apollinaris entered the hostile city in military array, alike qualified for prayer or for battle. His troops, under arms, were distributed through the streets; the gates of the cathedral were guarded, and a chosen band was stationed in the choir, to defend the person of their chief. He stood erect on his throne, and, throwing aside the upper garment of a warrior, suddenly appeared before the eyes of the multitude in the robes of patriarch of Alexandria. Astonishment held them mute; but no sooner had Apollinaris begun to read the tome of St. Leo, than a volley of curses, and invectives, and stones, assaulted the odious minister of the emperor and the synod. A charge was instantly sounded by the successor of the apostles; the soldiers waded to their knees in blood; and two hundred thousand Christians are said to have fallen by the sword: an incredible account, even if it be extended from the slaughter of a day to the eighteen years of the reign of Apollinaris. Two succeeding patriarchs, Eulogius 146 and John, 147 labored in the conversion of heretics, with arms and arguments more worthy of their evangelical profession. The theological knowledge of Eulogius was displayed in many a volume, which magnified the errors of Eutyches and Severus, and attempted to reconcile the ambiguous language of St. Cyril with the orthodox creed of Pope Leo and the fathers of Chalcedon. The bounteous alms of John the eleemosynary were dictated by superstition, or benevolence, or policy. Seven thousand five hundred poor were maintained at his expense; on his accession he found eight thousand pounds of gold in the treasury of the church; he collected ten thousand from the liberality of the faithful; yet the primate could boast in his testament, that he left behind him no more than the third part of the smallest of the silver coins. The churches of Alexandria were delivered to the Catholics, the religion of the Monophysites was proscribed in Egypt, and a law was revived which excluded the natives from the honors and emoluments of the state.
五、在罗马帝国其余各地,君主的专制或可铲除、或可噤住某个可憎信条的教派信众。可埃及人那副执拗的脾性,却使他们对卡尔西顿会议的抵制始终不改;而查士丁尼的权谋,便屈尊静候、伺机利用他们的内讧。亚历山大里亚的一性论派教会144,正被“可朽派”与“不朽派”之争闹得四分五裂;牧首一死,两派便各自拥立自己的候选人。145 盖亚努斯是尤利安的门徒,狄奥多西则受业于塞维鲁:前者的诉求,得到修士与元老、城市与行省的一致拥护;后者所倚仗的,则是自己受职在先,是狄奥多拉皇后的宠眷,还有宦官纳尔塞斯的刀兵——那本可用在更体面的战事上。众望所归的那位候选人被流放到迦太基与撒丁岛,反倒把亚历山大里亚的骚动煽得更旺;即便过了一百七十年,历经这场分裂,盖亚努斯派仍尊崇其创始人的音容与教义。数量与纪律的较量,在一场殊死而血腥的冲突中见了分晓:街道上堆满市民与士兵的尸首,虔诚的妇人爬上自家屋顶,把一切锋利或沉重的家什劈头盖脸地朝敌人砸去;而纳尔塞斯最终之所以获胜,全靠一把大火——罗马世界这第三大都会,就这样被他付之一炬。然而,查士丁尼的这位副手并非为一个异端而征战:狄奥多西本人不久也遭撤换,手段虽还算温和;塔尼斯的保罗,一位正统的修士,被扶上了阿塔纳修斯的宝座。政府倾尽全力支持他:他可任免埃及的督军与军事保民官;戴克里先当年恩准的面包配给被取消,教堂被封,一个持异见的民族,一下子既断了属灵的粮,也断了肉身的食。可这暴君转过头来,又被民众满腔的热忱与复仇逐出了教门:除了他那帮唯命是从的麦尔基派,再没有人肯把他当作一个人、一个基督徒、或一位主教来致意。然而野心的盲目竟至于此:当保罗因一桩谋杀指控被逐时,他还拿出七百磅黄金行贿,只求官复原职,重回那个招人恨、遭人辱的位子。他的继任者阿波利纳里斯,是以军阵之势开进这座敌意之城的,既能祈祷,也能打仗。他的兵士全副武装,散布于街巷之间;大教堂的门户由人把守,一支精选的卫队驻在唱诗席上,护卫他们首领的安全。他直挺挺立于宝座之上,猛地掀开身上武士的外袍,蓦然以亚历山大里亚牧首的法衣现身于众人眼前。惊愕使人群哑然无声;然而阿波利纳里斯一开口诵读圣利奥的《大卷》,一片咒骂、痛斥与石块,便劈头砸向这个皇帝与会议的可憎爪牙。这位使徒的继承人当即下令冲锋,士兵们蹚着没膝的血水前进;据说有二十万基督徒死于刀下——这数字实在难以置信,纵使把它从一日的屠戮摊到阿波利纳里斯在位的十八年,也仍嫌夸张。此后两任牧首,尤洛吉乌斯146与约翰,147则以更配得上其福音志业的武器与论辩,致力于感化异端。尤洛吉乌斯的神学造诣,展露在一卷卷著作之中:这些书极力张扬欧迪奇与塞维鲁的谬误,又试图把圣西里尔那含混的措辞,与教宗利奥及卡尔西顿诸教父的正统信条调和起来。至于施赈者约翰那慷慨的赒济,则或出于迷信,或出于仁爱,或出于权谋:七千五百名穷人靠他供养;他就任时,发现教会金库里存有八千磅黄金,又从信徒的慷慨解囊中募得一万磅;然而这位牧首在遗嘱里却可以自夸:他身后所留,不过是那最小的银币的三分之一。亚历山大里亚各教堂被交还给大公教徒,一性论的宗教在埃及遭到取缔,一条旧法也重新起用,将本地人摒于国家的荣衔与俸禄之外。
Notes 注释
113
↩
See the Arabic canons of Nice in the translation of Abraham Ecchelensis, No. 37, 38, 39, 40. Concil. tom. ii. p. 335, 336, edit. Venet. These vulgar titles, Nicene and Arabic, are both apocryphal. The council of Nice enacted no more than twenty canons, (Theodoret. Hist. Eccles. l. i. c. 8;) and the remainder, seventy or eighty, were collected from the synods of the Greek church. The Syriac edition of Maruthas is no longer extant, (Asseman. Bibliot. Oriental. tom. i. p. 195, tom. iii. p. 74,) and the Arabic version is marked with many recent interpolations. Yet this Code contains many curious relics of ecclesiastical discipline; and since it is equally revered by all the Eastern communions, it was probably finished before the schism of the Nestorians and Jacobites, (Fabric. Bibliot. Graec. tom. xi. p. 363—367.)
参见亚伯拉罕·埃凯伦西斯所译的尼西亚阿拉伯教规,第37、38、39、40条(Concil. tom. ii. p. 335, 336, edit. Venet.)。“尼西亚的”与“阿拉伯的”这两个俗称,都属伪托。尼西亚公会议所颁教规不过二十条(Theodoret. Hist. Eccles. l. i. c. 8),其余七八十条,都是从希腊教会历次会议中辑来的。马鲁塔斯的叙利亚文本已不复存世(Asseman. Bibliot. Oriental. tom. i. p. 195, tom. iii. p. 74),而阿拉伯译本又留有许多晚近的窜入之处。然而这部法典中,仍保存着不少关于教会规制的珍奇遗存;既然东方各宗派对它一体尊崇,那么它多半是在聂斯脱利派与雅各派分裂之前便已成书的(Fabric. Bibliot. Graec. tom. xi. p. 363—367.)。
114
↩
Theodore the Reader (l. ii. c. 5, 49, ad calcem Hist. Eccles.) has noticed this Persian school of Edessa. Its ancient splendor, and the two aeras of its downfall, (A.D. 431 and 489) are clearly discussed by Assemanni, (Biblioth. Orient. tom. ii. p. 402, iii. p. 376, 378, iv. p. 70, 924.)
“读经者”狄奥多尔(l. ii. c. 5, 49, ad calcem Hist. Eccles.)曾提到埃德萨这所波斯学校。它昔日的辉煌,以及它两度衰亡的年代(公元431年与489年),阿塞马尼都有清晰的论述(Biblioth. Orient. tom. ii. p. 402, iii. p. 376, 378, iv. p. 70, 924.)。
115
↩
A dissertation on the state of the Nestorians has swelled in the bands of Assemanni to a folio volume of 950 pages, and his learned researches are digested in the most lucid order. Besides this ivth volume of the Bibliotheca Orientalis, the extracts in the three preceding tomes (tom. i. p. 203, ii. p. 321-463, iii. 64—70, 378—395, &c., 405—408, 580—589) may be usefully consulted.
一篇论聂斯脱利派状况的专论,在阿塞马尼手里膨胀成了一册九百五十页的对开本巨帙,而他那渊博的考据被梳理得井井有条。除《东方文库》这第四卷外,前三卷中的辑录(tom. i. p. 203, ii. p. 321-463, iii. 64—70, 378—395, &c., 405—408, 580—589)也大可一并参阅。
116
↩
See the Topographia Christiana of Cosmas, surnamed Indicopleustes, or the Indian navigator, l. iii. p. 178, 179, l. xi. p. 337. The entire work, of which some curious extracts may be found in Photius, (cod. xxxvi. p. 9, 10, edit. Hoeschel,) Thevenot, (in the 1st part of his Relation des Voyages, &c.,) and Fabricius, (Bibliot. Graec. l. iii. c. 25, tom. ii. p. 603-617,) has been published by Father Montfaucon at Paris, 1707, in the Nova Collectio Patrum, (tom. ii. p. 113—346.) It was the design of the author to confute the impious heresy of those who maintained that the earth is a globe, and not a flat, oblong table, as it is represented in the Scriptures, (l. ii. p. 138.) But the nonsense of the monk is mingled with the practical knowledge of the traveller, who performed his voyage A.D. 522, and published his book at Alexandria, A.D. 547, (l. ii. p. 140, 141. Montfaucon, Praefat. c. 2.) The Nestorianism of Cosmas, unknown to his learned editor, was detected by La Croze, (Christianisme des Indes, tom. i. p. 40—55,) and is confirmed by Assemanni, (Bibliot. Orient. tom. iv. p. 605, 606.)
参见科斯马斯——绰号“印度航行者”(Indicopleustes)——的《基督教地形志》(Topographia Christiana,l. iii. p. 178, 179, l. xi. p. 337)。此书全帙,一些有趣的片段可见于佛提乌(cod. xxxvi. p. 9, 10, edit. Hoeschel)、泰夫诺(其《游记》〔Relation des Voyages〕第一部)与法布里丘斯(Bibliot. Graec. l. iii. c. 25, tom. ii. p. 603-617),后由蒙福孔神父于1707年在巴黎刊入《教父著作新集》(Nova Collectio Patrum,tom. ii. p. 113—346)。作者的用意,本在于驳斥那种大逆不道的异端——他们竟主张大地是个球体,而非如《圣经》所描绘的那样,是一张扁平的长桌(l. ii. p. 138)。不过,这修士的胡言乱语里,也掺杂着一位旅行家的实见实闻:他于公元522年成行,公元547年在亚历山大里亚刊出此书(l. ii. p. 140, 141. Montfaucon, Praefat. c. 2)。科斯马斯的聂斯脱利派立场,为其博学的编者所不知,却被拉克罗兹识破(Christianisme des Indes, tom. i. p. 40—55),并经阿塞马尼证实(Bibliot. Orient. tom. iv. p. 605, 606)。
117
↩
In its long progress to Mosul, Jerusalem, Rome, &c., the story of Prester John evaporated in a monstrous fable, of which some features have been borrowed from the Lama of Thibet, (Hist. Genealogique des Tartares, P. ii. p. 42. Hist. de Gengiscan, p. 31, &c.,) and were ignorantly transferred by the Portuguese to the emperor of Abyssinia, (Ludolph. Hist. Aethiop. Comment. l. ii. c. 1.) Yet it is probable that in the xith and xiith centuries, Nestorian Christianity was professed in the horde of the Keraites, (D’Herbelot, p. 256, 915, 959. Assemanni, tom. iv. p. 468—504.) Note: The extent to which Nestorian Christianity prevailed among the Tartar tribes is one of the most curious questions in Oriental history. M. Schmidt (Geschichte der Ost Mongolen, notes, p. 383) appears to question the Christianity of Ong Chaghan, and his Keraite subjects.—M.
在传往摩苏尔、耶路撒冷、罗马等地的漫长途中,祭司王约翰的故事渐渐化作一则荒诞不经的传说,其中若干细节借自西藏的喇嘛(Hist. Genealogique des Tartares, P. ii. p. 42. Hist. de Gengiscan, p. 31, &c.),又被葡萄牙人懵懵懂懂地安到了阿比西尼亚皇帝头上(Ludolph. Hist. Aethiop. Comment. l. ii. c. 1)。不过,在十一、十二世纪,克烈部中很可能确曾信奉聂斯脱利派的基督教(D'Herbelot, p. 256, 915, 959. Assemanni, tom. iv. p. 468—504)。编者按:聂斯脱利派基督教在鞑靼诸部中流行到何种程度,乃东方史上最耐人寻味的问题之一。施密特先生(Geschichte der Ost Mongolen, notes, p. 383)似乎怀疑王汗及其克烈部臣民究竟是否信奉过基督教。—M
118
↩
The Christianity of China, between the seventh and the thirteenth century, is invincibly proved by the consent of Chinese, Arabian, Syriac, and Latin evidence, (Assemanni, Biblioth. Orient. tom. iv. p. 502—552. Mem. de l’Academie des Inscript. tom. xxx. p. 802—819.) The inscription of Siganfu which describes the fortunes of the Nestorian church, from the first mission, A.D. 636, to the current year 781, is accused of forgery by La Croze, Voltaire, &c., who become the dupes of their own cunning, while they are afraid of a Jesuitical fraud. * Note: This famous monument, the authenticity of which many have attempted to impeach, rather from hatred to the Jesuits, by whom it was made known, than by a candid examination of its contents, is now generally considered above all suspicion. The Chinese text and the facts which it relates are equally strong proofs of its authenticity. This monument was raised as a memorial of the establishment of Christianity in China. It is dated the year 1092 of the era of the Greeks, or the Seleucidae, A.D. 781, in the time of the Nestorian patriarch Anan-jesu. It was raised by Iezdbouzid, priest and chorepiscopus of Chumdan, that is, of the capital of the Chinese empire, and the son of a priest who came from Balkh in Tokharistan. Among the various arguments which may be urged in favor of the authenticity of this monument, and which has not yet been advanced, may be reckoned the name of the priest by whom it was raised. The name is Persian, and at the time the monument was discovered, it would have been impossible to have imagined it; for there was no work extant from whence the knowledge of it could be derived. I do not believe that ever since this period, any book has been published in which it can be found a second time. It is very celebrated amongst the Armenians, and is derived from a martyr, a Persian by birth, of the royal race, who perished towards the middle of the seventh century, and rendered his name celebrated among the Christian nations of the East. St. Martin, vol. i. p. 69. M. Remusat has also strongly expressed his conviction of the authenticity of this monument. Melanges Asiatiques, P. i. p. 33. Yet M. Schmidt (Geschichte der Ost Mongolen, p. 384) denies that there is any satisfactory proof that much a monument was ever found in China, or that it was not manufactured in Europe. But if the Jesuits had attempted such a forgery, would it not have been more adapted to further their peculiar views?—M.
从七世纪到十三世纪,中国确曾有过基督教,这一点有中文、阿拉伯文、叙利亚文与拉丁文诸般证据一致印证,铁案如山(Assemanni, Biblioth. Orient. tom. iv. p. 502—552. Mem. de l'Academie des Inscript. tom. xxx. p. 802—819)。西安府碑记述了景教教会自公元636年初传、直到立碑当年781年的兴衰际遇;拉克罗兹、伏尔泰等人斥其为伪造,可他们一味提防耶稣会士的骗局,反倒落入了自己那点小聪明的圈套。* 编者按:这座著名的碑石,其真实性屡遭质疑,然而质疑者多半是出于对使它为世人所知的耶稣会士的仇恨,而非出于对碑文内容的公允考察;如今它已被普遍认为无可置疑。中文碑文及其所述史实,都同样有力地证明了它的真确。此碑是为纪念基督教在中国的确立而立的,碑上纪年为希腊纪元(即塞琉古纪元)1092年,亦即公元781年,值聂斯脱利派牧首亚南·耶稣在位之时。立碑者名伊兹德布兹德,乃楚姆丹(即中华帝国京城)的司铎兼乡区主教,其父是一位来自吐火罗斯坦巴尔赫的司铎。在种种可用来佐证此碑真实性、而至今尚未有人提出的论据中,还可举出立碑司铎的名字:这是个波斯名字,在碑石被发现的当时,根本无从凭空臆想出来,因为那时并无任何现存著作可供推知此名。我相信,自那以后,也不曾有哪本书里第二次出现过这个名字。此名在亚美尼亚人中间极负盛名,源自一位殉道者——他生为波斯人,出自王室血统,于七世纪中叶前后罹难,其名遂在东方各基督教民族中传扬开来。圣马丁,卷一,第69页。雷慕沙先生也曾极力表明他对此碑真实性的确信(Melanges Asiatiques, P. i. p. 33)。然而施密特先生(Geschichte der Ost Mongolen, p. 384)却否认有任何确凿证据可证明此碑当真在中国被发现过,或它并非在欧洲伪造而成。可是,倘若耶稣会士真要炮制这样一桩伪作,难道不会做得更贴合他们自身的用意吗?—M
119
↩
Jacobitae et Nestorianae plures quam Graeci et Latini Jacob a Vitriaco, Hist. Hierosol. l. ii. c. 76, p. 1093, in the Gesta Dei per Francos. The numbers are given by Thomassin, Discipline de l’Eglise, tom. i. p. 172.
“雅各派与聂斯脱利派多于希腊人与拉丁人”(拉丁:Jacobitae et Nestorianae plures quam Graeci et Latini),语出雅克·德维特里,Hist. Hierosol. l. ii. c. 76, p. 1093,收于《法兰克人所行的上帝伟业》(Gesta Dei per Francos)。具体数目见托马桑《教会规制》(Discipline de l'Eglise,tom. i. p. 172)。
120
↩
The division of the patriarchate may be traced in the Bibliotheca Orient. of Assemanni, tom. i. p. 523—549, tom. ii. p. 457, &c., tom. iii. p. 603, p. 621—623, tom. iv. p. 164-169, p. 423, p. 622—629, &c.
这一牧首辖统的分裂,可在阿塞马尼的《东方文库》中查其源流(tom. i. p. 523—549, tom. ii. p. 457, &c., tom. iii. p. 603, p. 621—623, tom. iv. p. 164-169, p. 423, p. 622—629, &c.)。
121
↩
The pompous language of Rome on the submission of a Nestorian patriarch, is elegantly represented in the viith book of Fra Paola, Babylon, Nineveh, Arbela, and the trophies of Alexander, Tauris, and Ecbatana, the Tigris and Indus.
罗马方面在一位聂斯脱利派牧首归顺时那套冠冕堂皇的辞令,在保罗修士著作第七卷中有典雅的呈现——巴比伦、尼尼微、阿贝拉,亚历山大的种种战利品,大不里士与埃克巴塔纳,底格里斯河与印度河。
122
↩
The Indian missionary, St. Thomas, an apostle, a Manichaean, or an Armenian merchant, (La Croze, Christianisme des Indes, tom. i. p. 57—70,) was famous, however, as early as the time of Jerom, (ad Marcellam, epist. 148.) Marco-Polo was informed on the spot that he suffered martyrdom in the city of Malabar, or Meliapour, a league only from Madras, (D’Anville, Eclaircissemens sur l’Inde, p. 125,) where the Portuguese founded an episcopal church under the name of St. Thome, and where the saint performed an annual miracle, till he was silenced by the profane neighborhood of the English, (La Croze, tom. ii. p. 7-16.)
这位印度的传教士圣多马——究竟是使徒、摩尼教徒、还是亚美尼亚商人,尚无定论(La Croze, Christianisme des Indes, tom. i. p. 57—70)——早在哲罗姆的时代便已名声在外(ad Marcellam, epist. 148)。马可·波罗在当地听闻,他是在马拉巴尔(又名梅利亚普尔)城殉道的,此城距马德拉斯仅一里格(D'Anville, Eclaircissemens sur l'Inde, p. 125);葡萄牙人在那里以“圣多马”之名建起一座主教座堂,而这位圣徒每年都要显一次神迹,直到英国人亵渎的邻近把他噤了声(La Croze, tom. ii. p. 7-16)。
123
↩
Neither the author of the Saxon Chronicle (A.D. 833) not William of Malmesbury (de Gestis Regum Angliae, l. ii. c. 4, p. 44) were capable, in the twelfth century, of inventing this extraordinary fact; they are incapable of explaining the motives and measures of Alfred; and their hasty notice serves only to provoke our curiosity. William of Malmesbury feels the difficulty of the enterprise, quod quivis in hoc saeculo miretur; and I almost suspect that the English ambassadors collected their cargo and legend in Egypt. The royal author has not enriched his Orosius (see Barrington’s Miscellanies) with an Indian, as well as a Scandinavian, voyage.
无论是《撒克逊编年史》的作者(公元833年),还是马姆斯伯里的威廉(de Gestis Regum Angliae, l. ii. c. 4, p. 44),身处十二世纪,都无从凭空杜撰出这样一桩离奇的史实;他们既解释不了阿尔弗雷德的动机与举措,那匆匆一笔,也只够勾起我们的好奇。马姆斯伯里的威廉深感此举之难,称之为“凡此世之人无不惊异之事”(拉丁:quod quivis in hoc saeculo miretur);而我几乎要疑心,那些英格兰使节的货物与传说,其实是在埃及搜罗来的。这位身为国王的作者,并未在自己那部《奥罗修斯》(见巴林顿《杂纂》〔Miscellanies〕)里,于一段斯堪的纳维亚的航程之外,再添上一段印度的航程。
124
↩
Concerning the Christians of St. Thomas, see Assemann. Bibliot Orient. tom. iv. p. 391—407, 435—451; Geddes’s Church History of Malabar; and, above all, La Croze, Histoire du Christianisme des Indes, in 2 vols. 12mo., La Haye, 1758, a learned and agreeable work. They have drawn from the same source, the Portuguese and Italian narratives; and the prejudices of the Jesuits are sufficiently corrected by those of the Protestants. Note: The St. Thome Christians had excited great interest in the ancient mind of the admirable Bishop Heber. See his curious and, to his friends, highly characteristic letter to Mar Athanasius, Appendix to Journal. The arguments of his friend and coadjutor, Mr. Robinson, (Last Days of Bishop Heber,) have not convinced me that the Christianity of India is older than the Nestorian dispersion.—M
关于圣多马名下的基督徒,参见 Assemann. Bibliot Orient. tom. iv. p. 391—407, 435—451;格迪斯《马拉巴尔教会史》(Church History of Malabar);而尤以拉克罗兹《印度基督教史》(Histoire du Christianisme des Indes,两卷,十二开本,海牙,1758年)为最,此书博学而可喜。他们所本的都是同一批材料,即葡萄牙与意大利人的记述;而耶稣会士的偏见,也足以由新教徒的偏见来纠偏。编者按:圣多马名下的基督徒,曾极大地引起了可敬的赫伯主教那颗好古之心的兴趣。参见他致玛尔·阿塔纳修斯那封别致的信——在他友人看来,此信极能见其性情——载于其《日记》附录。至于他的友人兼副手罗宾逊先生(《赫伯主教的最后岁月》〔Last Days of Bishop Heber〕)所持的论点,并未能说服我相信印度的基督教比聂斯脱利派的四散传布更为古老。—M
125
↩
Is the expression of Theodore, in his Treatise of the Incarnation, p. 245, 247, as he is quoted by La Croze, (Hist. du Christianisme d’Ethiopie et d’Armenie, p. 35,) who exclaims, perhaps too hastily, “Quel pitoyable raisonnement!” Renaudot has touched (Hist. Patriarch. Alex. p. 127—138) the Oriental accounts of Severus; and his authentic creed may be found in the epistle of John the Jacobite patriarch of Antioch, in the xth century, to his brother Mannas of Alexandria, (Asseman. Bibliot. Orient. tom. ii. p. 132—141.)
这是狄奥多尔在其《论道成肉身》(Treatise of the Incarnation,p. 245, 247)中的说法,由拉克罗兹(Hist. du Christianisme d'Ethiopie et d'Armenie, p. 35)转引;拉克罗兹或许过于性急地惊呼道:“Quel pitoyable raisonnement!”(法语,大意:好一套可怜的推理!)勒诺多曾论及东方对塞维鲁的种种记述(Hist. Patriarch. Alex. p. 127—138);而塞维鲁真正的信条,可见于十世纪雅各派安条克牧首约翰致其兄弟、亚历山大里亚的曼纳斯的书信中(Asseman. Bibliot. Orient. tom. ii. p. 132—141)。
126
↩
Epist. Archimandritarum et Monachorum Syriae Secundae ad Papam Hormisdam, Concil. tom. v. p. 598—602. The courage of St. Sabas, ut leo animosus, will justify the suspicion that the arms of these monks were not always spiritual or defensive, (Baronius, A.D. 513, No. 7, &c.)
见《第二叙利亚省隐修院长与修士致教宗霍尔米斯达斯书》(Epist. Archimandritarum et Monachorum Syriae Secundae ad Papam Hormisdam,Concil. tom. v. p. 598—602)。圣萨巴斯的勇武——“如猛狮”(拉丁:ut leo animosus)——足以令人生疑:这些修士所持的武器,未必总是属灵的、或仅供自卫的(Baronius, A.D. 513, No. 7, &c.)。
127
↩
Assemanni (Bibliot. Orient. tom. ii. p. 10—46) and La Croze (Christianisme d’Ethiopie, p. 36—40) will supply the history of Xenaias, or Philoxenus, bishop of Mabug, or Hierapolis, in Syria. He was a perfect master of the Syriac language, and the author or editor of a version of the New Testament.
克塞纳伊阿斯(又名菲洛克塞努斯)——叙利亚马布格(即希拉波利斯)的主教——其生平可见于阿塞马尼(Bibliot. Orient. tom. ii. p. 10—46)与拉克罗兹(Christianisme d'Ethiopie, p. 36—40)。他精通叙利亚语,是一部《新约》译本的作者或编订者。
128
↩
The names and titles of fifty-four bishops who were exiled by Justin, are preserved in the Chronicle of Dionysius, (apud Asseman. tom. ii. p. 54.) Severus was personally summoned to Constantinople—for his trial, says Liberatus (Brev. c. 19)—that his tongue might be cut out, says Evagrius, (l. iv. c. iv.) The prudent patriarch did not stay to examine the difference. This ecclesiastical revolution is fixed by Pagi to the month of September of the year 518, (Critica, tom. ii. p. 506.)
被查士丁流放的五十四名主教,其姓名与头衔保存在狄奥尼修斯的《编年史》中(apud Asseman. tom. ii. p. 54)。塞维鲁本人被传召至君士坦丁堡——利贝拉图斯说是去受审(Brev. c. 19),埃瓦格里乌斯却说是要割掉他的舌头(l. iv. c. iv)。这位精明的牧首没有留下来细究二者的分别。这场教会剧变,帕吉将其定在518年九月(Critica, tom. ii. p. 506)。
129
↩
The obscure history of James or Jacobus Baradaeus, or Zanzalust may be gathered from Eutychius, (Annal. tom. ii. p. 144, 147,) Renau dot, (Hist. Patriarch. Alex. p. 133,) and Assemannus, (Bibliot. Orient. tom. i. p. 424, tom. ii. p. 62-69, 324—332, 414, tom. iii. p. 385—388.) He seems to be unknown to the Greeks. The Jacobites themselves had rather deduce their name and pedigree from St. James the apostle.
雅各·巴拉戴乌斯(又拼作 Jacobus Baradaeus 或 Zanzalus)那段隐晦的生平,可从欧提基乌斯(Annal. tom. ii. p. 144, 147)、勒诺多(Hist. Patriarch. Alex. p. 133)与阿塞马尼(Bibliot. Orient. tom. i. p. 424, tom. ii. p. 62-69, 324—332, 414, tom. iii. p. 385—388)处拼凑而得。希腊人似乎并不知道此人。雅各派自己则宁愿把本派之名与谱系,上溯至使徒圣雅各。
130
↩
The account of his person and writings is perhaps the most curious article in the Bibliotheca of Assemannus, (tom. ii. p. 244—321, under the name of Gregorius Bar-Hebroeus.) La Croze (Christianisme d’Ethiopie, p. 53—63) ridicules the prejudice of the Spaniards against the Jewish blood which secretly defiles their church and state.
关于他其人及其著述的记述,或许是阿塞马尼《文库》中最耐人寻味的一条(tom. ii. p. 244—321,列于“格列高利·巴尔·希伯来乌斯”名下)。拉克罗兹(Christianisme d'Ethiopie, p. 53—63)讥讽西班牙人的偏见——他们总疑心有犹太血统在暗中玷污着他们的教会与国家。
131
↩
This excessive abstinence is censured by La Croze, (p. 352,) and even by the Syrian Assemannus, (tom. i. p. 226, tom. ii. p. 304, 305.)
这种过度的禁食,连拉克罗兹(p. 352)、乃至身为叙利亚人的阿塞马尼(tom. i. p. 226, tom. ii. p. 304, 305)都加以谴责。
132
↩
The state of the Monophysites is excellently illustrated in a dissertation at the beginning of the iid volume of Assemannus, which contains 142 pages. The Syriac Chronicle of Gregory Bar-Hebraeus, or Abulpharagius, (Bibliot. Orient. tom. ii. p. 321—463,) pursues the double series of the Nestorian Catholics and the Maphrians of the Jacobites.
一性论派的状况,在阿塞马尼第二卷卷首那篇长达一百四十二页的专论中得到了极好的阐明。格列高利·巴尔·希伯来乌斯(又名阿布·法拉杰)的《叙利亚编年史》(Bibliot. Orient. tom. ii. p. 321—463),则并行追溯了聂斯脱利派历任大公牧首与雅各派历任玛弗里安这两条世系。
133
↩
The synonymous use of the two words may be proved from Eutychius, (Annal. tom. ii. p. 191, 267, 332,) and many similar passages which may be found in the methodical table of Pocock. He was not actuated by any prejudice against the Maronites of the xth century; and we may believe a Melchite, whose testimony is confirmed by the Jacobites and Latins.
这两个词可以互训,从欧提基乌斯(Annal. tom. ii. p. 191, 267, 332)以及波科克那份条理井然的索引表中许多类似段落,都可得证。此人对十世纪的马龙派并无成见;而我们大可采信一位麦尔基派人士——其证词又得到雅各派与拉丁人的印证。
134
↩
Concil. tom. vii. p. 780. The Monothelite cause was supported with firmness and subtilty by Constantine, a Syrian priest of Apamea, (p. 1040, &c.)
Concil. tom. vii. p. 780。一志论派的主张,由阿帕米亚的叙利亚司铎君士坦丁坚定而巧妙地加以维护(p. 1040, &c.)。
135
↩
Theophanes (Chron. p. 295, 296, 300, 302, 306) and Cedrenus (p. 437, 440) relates the exploits of the Mardaites: the name (Mard, in Syriac, rebellavit) is explained by La Roque, (Voyage de la Syrie, tom. ii. p. 53;) and dates are fixed by Pagi, (A.D. 676, No. 4—14, A.D. 685, No. 3, 4;) and even the obscure story of the patriarch John Maron (Asseman. Bibliot. Orient. tom. i. p. 496—520) illustrates from the year 686 to 707, the troubles of Mount Libanus. * Note: Compare on the Mardaites Anquetil du Perron, in the fiftieth volume of the Mem. de l’Acad. des Inscriptions; and Schlosser, Bildersturmendes Kaiser, p. 100.—M
塞奥法尼斯(Chron. p. 295, 296, 300, 302, 306)与塞德雷努斯(p. 437, 440)记述了马尔达人的事迹;这名字(叙利亚语 Mard,意为“反叛”)由拉罗克作了解释(Voyage de la Syrie, tom. ii. p. 53),年代则由帕吉考定(A.D. 676, No. 4—14, A.D. 685, No. 3, 4);甚至连牧首约翰·马龙那段隐晦的事迹(Asseman. Bibliot. Orient. tom. i. p. 496—520),也为公元686至707年间黎巴嫩山的种种乱局提供了印证。* 编者按:关于马尔达人,可参照昂克蒂尔·迪佩龙载于《铭文学院论丛》第五十卷之文,以及施洛塞尔《破坏圣像的皇帝》(Bildersturmendes Kaiser,p. 100)。—M
136
↩
In the last century twenty large cedars still remained, (Voyage de la Roque, tom. i. p. 68—76;) at present they are reduced to four or five, (Volney, tom. i. p. 264.) These trees, so famous in Scripture, were guarded by excommunication: the wood was sparingly borrowed for small crosses, &c.; an annual mass was chanted under their shade; and they were endowed by the Syrians with a sensitive power of erecting their branches to repel the snow, to which Mount Libanus is less faithful than it is painted by Tacitus: inter ardores opacum fidumque nivibus—a daring metaphor, (Hist. v. 6.) Note: Of the oldest and best looking trees, I counted eleven or twelve twenty-five very large ones; and about fifty of middling size; and more than three hundred smaller and young ones. Burckhardt’s Travels in Syria p. 19.—M
上个世纪,还留有二十棵高大的雪松(Voyage de la Roque, tom. i. p. 68—76);如今只剩四五棵了(Volney, tom. i. p. 264)。这些在《圣经》中赫赫有名的树,受着开除教籍之罚的守护:只有做小十字架之类才准俭省地取用一点它们的木料;每年都在它们的荫下咏唱一台弥撒;叙利亚人还赋予它们一种感应之力,说它们能昂起枝条以抖落积雪——而黎巴嫩山之常有积雪,其实并不像塔西佗所描绘的那般名副其实:“inter ardores opacum fidumque nivibus”(拉丁,大意:在炎热之中荫翳宜人,且积雪长存),实在是个大胆的比喻(Hist. v. 6)。编者按:在最古老、模样最好的树中,我数出十一二棵;此外有二十五棵极其高大的,约五十棵中等大小的,还有三百多棵较小的与幼树。布克哈特《叙利亚游记》第19页。—M
137
↩
The evidence of William of Tyre (Hist. in Gestis Dei per Francos, l. xxii. c. 8, p. 1022) is copied or confirmed by Jacques de Vitra, (Hist. Hierosolym. l. ii. c. 77, p. 1093, 1094.) But this unnatural league expired with the power of the Franks; and Abulpharagius (who died in 1286) considers the Maronites as a sect of Monothelites, (Bibliot. Orient. tom. ii. p. 292.)
提尔的威廉的记载(Hist. in Gestis Dei per Francos, l. xxii. c. 8, p. 1022),被雅克·德维特里所转录或印证(Hist. Hierosolym. l. ii. c. 77, p. 1093, 1094)。然而这桩违逆本性的同盟,随着法兰克人势力的消亡而告终;而阿布·法拉杰(1286年卒)仍把马龙派视为一志论派的一支(Bibliot. Orient. tom. ii. p. 292)。
138
↩
I find a description and history of the Maronites in the Voyage de la Syrie et du Mont Liban par la Roque, (2 vols. in 12mo., Amsterdam, 1723; particularly tom. i. p. 42—47, p. 174—184, tom. ii. p. 10—120.) In the ancient part, he copies the prejudices of Nairon and the other Maronites of Rome, which Assemannus is afraid to renounce and ashamed to support. Jablonski, (Institut. Hist. Christ. tom. iii. p. 186.) Niebuhr, (Voyage de l’Arabie, &c., tom. ii. p. 346, 370—381,) and, above all, the judicious Volney, (Voyage en Egypte et en Syrie, tom. ii. p. 8—31, Paris, 1787,) may be consulted.
关于马龙派的描述与历史,我见于拉罗克《叙利亚与黎巴嫩山游记》(Voyage de la Syrie et du Mont Liban,两卷,十二开本,阿姆斯特丹,1723年;尤见 tom. i. p. 42—47, p. 174—184, tom. ii. p. 10—120)。在讲述古代的部分,他照搬了奈龙以及罗马其他马龙派学者的偏见——这些偏见,阿塞马尼既不敢弃绝,又羞于维护。此外可参阅亚布隆斯基(Institut. Hist. Christ. tom. iii. p. 186)、尼布尔(Voyage de l'Arabie, &c., tom. ii. p. 346, 370—381),而尤以明达的沃尔内为最(Voyage en Egypte et en Syrie, tom. ii. p. 8—31, Paris, 1787)。
139
↩
The religion of the Armenians is briefly described by La Croze, (Hist. du Christ. de l’Ethiopie et de l’Armenie, p. 269—402.) He refers to the great Armenian History of Galanus, (3 vols. in fol. Rome, 1650—1661,) and commends the state of Armenia in the iiid volume of the Nouveaux Memoires des Missions du Levant. The work of a Jesuit must have sterling merit when it is praised by La Croze.
亚美尼亚人的宗教,拉克罗兹有过简要的描述(Hist. du Christ. de l'Ethiopie et de l'Armenie, p. 269—402)。他援引了加拉努斯那部宏富的《亚美尼亚史》(三卷,对开本,罗马,1650—1661年),又称赏《黎凡特传教新志》(Nouveaux Memoires des Missions du Levant)第三卷中关于亚美尼亚状况的记述。一部耶稣会士的著作,若能得到拉克罗兹的称许,其价值必定货真价实。
1391
↩
See vol. iii. ch. xx. p. 271.—M.
参见第三卷第二十章第271页。—M
140
↩
The schism of the Armenians is placed 84 years after the council of Chalcedon, (Pagi, Critica, ad A.D. 535.) It was consummated at the end of seventeen years; and it is from the year of Christ 552 that we date the aera of the Armenians, (L’Art de verifier les Dates, p. xxxv.)
亚美尼亚人的这场教派分裂,被定在卡尔西顿公会议之后八十四年(Pagi, Critica, ad A.D. 535)。它历经十七年方告完成;而我们把亚美尼亚纪元的起点,定在公元552年(L'Art de verifier les Dates, p. xxxv)。
141
↩
The sentiments and success of Julian of Halicarnassus may be seen in Liberatus, (Brev. c. 19,) Renaudot, (Hist. Patriarch. Alex. p. 132, 303,) and Assemannus, (Bibliot. Orient. tom. ii. Dissertat. Monophysitis, l. viii. p. 286.)
哈利卡纳苏斯的尤利安的观点与际遇,可见于利贝拉图斯(Brev. c. 19)、勒诺多(Hist. Patriarch. Alex. p. 132, 303)与阿塞马尼(Bibliot. Orient. tom. ii. Dissertat. Monophysitis, l. viii. p. 286)。
142
↩
See a remarkable fact of the xiith century in the History of Nicetas Choniates, (p. 258.) Yet three hundred years before, Photius (Epistol. ii. p. 49, edit. Montacut.) had gloried in the conversion of the Armenians.
十二世纪一桩耐人寻味的史实,见于尼基塔斯·侯尼雅迪斯的《历史》(p. 258)。然而早在三百年前,佛提乌(Epistol. ii. p. 49, edit. Montacut.)便曾为亚美尼亚人的归信而自夸。
143
↩
The travelling Armenians are in the way of every traveller, and their mother church is on the high road between Constantinople and Ispahan; for their present state, see Fabricius, (Lux Evangelii, &c., c. xxxviii. p. 40—51,) Olearius, (l. iv. c. 40,) Chardin, (vol. ii. p. 232,) Teurnefort, (lettre xx.,) and, above all, Tavernier, (tom. i. p. 28—37, 510-518,) that rambling jeweller, who had read nothing, but had seen so much and so well
四处经商的亚美尼亚人,是每一个旅行者都会遇上的;他们的母会正坐落在君士坦丁堡与伊斯法罕之间的大道旁。关于他们如今的状况,可参见法布里丘斯(Lux Evangelii, &c., c. xxxviii. p. 40—51)、奥莱亚里乌斯(l. iv. c. 40)、夏尔丹(vol. ii. p. 232)、图尔内福尔(lettre xx.),而尤以塔韦尼耶为最(tom. i. p. 28—37, 510-518)——那位四处游荡的珠宝商,什么书都没读过,却见识极广、观察极精。
144
↩
The history of the Alexandrian patriarchs, from Dioscorus to Benjamin, is taken from Renaudot, (p. 114—164,) and the second tome of the Annals of Eutychius.
亚历山大里亚历任牧首,自迪奥斯科鲁斯至本雅明的历史,取自勒诺多(p. 114—164)与欧提基乌斯《编年史》第二卷。
145
↩
Liberat. Brev. c. 20, 23. Victor. Chron. p. 329 330. Procop. Anecdot. c. 26, 27.
Liberat. Brev. c. 20, 23. Victor. Chron. p. 329, 330. Procop. Anecdot. c. 26, 27.
146
↩
Eulogius, who had been a monk of Antioch, was more conspicuous for subtilty than eloquence. He proves that the enemies of the faith, the Gaianites and Theodosians, ought not to be reconciled; that the same proposition may be orthodox in the mouth of St. Cyril, heretical in that of Severus; that the opposite assertions of St. Leo are equally true, &c. His writings are no longer extant except in the Extracts of Photius, who had perused them with care and satisfaction, ccviii. ccxxv. ccxxvi. ccxxvii. ccxxx. cclxxx.
尤洛吉乌斯本是安条克的一名修士,其见长之处在于机辩,而非辞采。他力证:信仰之敌盖亚努斯派与狄奥多西派,绝不该与之和解;同一个命题,出自圣西里尔之口可能是正统的,出自塞维鲁之口却成了异端;圣利奥两相对立的论断,也可以同样为真,如此等等。他的著作如今已荡然无存,仅赖佛提乌的《书目辑要》得以留存片段——佛提乌曾细心而满意地披阅过它们(ccviii. ccxxv. ccxxvi. ccxxvii. ccxxx. cclxxx)。
147
↩
See the Life of John the eleemosynary by his contemporary Leontius, bishop of Neapolis in Cyrus, whose Greek text, either lost or hidden, is reflected in the Latin version of Baronius, (A.D. 610, No.9, A.D. 620, No. 8.) Pagi (Critica, tom. ii. p. 763) and Fabricius (l. v c. 11, tom. vii. p. 454) have made some critical observations
参见施赈者约翰的传记,作者是与他同时代的莱昂提乌斯,即库鲁斯地方内亚波利斯的主教;其希腊文原本或已散佚、或已湮没,如今反映在巴罗尼乌斯的拉丁译文中(A.D. 610, No.9, A.D. 620, No. 8)。帕吉(Critica, tom. ii. p. 763)与法布里丘斯(l. v c. 11, tom. vii. p. 454)对此作过一些考订。