Chapter XXXIX: Gothic Kingdom Of Italy.—Part I. 第三十九章 意大利的哥特王国——第一节
VOLUME FOUR
第四卷
¶
Zeno And Anastasius, Emperors Of The East.—Birth, Education, And First Exploits Of Theodoric The Ostrogoth.—His Invasion And Conquest Of Italy.—The Gothic Kingdom Of Italy.—State Of The West.—Military And Civil Government.—The Senator Boethius.—Last Acts And Death Of Theodoric.
东部帝国皇帝芝诺与阿纳斯塔修斯。——东哥特人狄奥多里克的出身、教养与初露锋芒。——他对意大利的入侵与征服。——意大利的哥特王国。——西部的局势。——军政与民政。——元老波爱修斯。——狄奥多里克晚年的作为与死亡。
¶
After the fall of the Roman empire in the West, an interval of fifty years, till the memorable reign of Justinian, is faintly marked by the obscure names and imperfect annals of Zeno, Anastasius, and Justin, who successively ascended to the throne of Constantinople. During the same period, Italy revived and flourished under the government of a Gothic king, who might have deserved a statue among the best and bravest of the ancient Romans.
西部的罗马帝国覆亡之后,直到查士丁尼那段令人难忘的治世为止,中间隔着约莫五十年。这半个世纪,只由芝诺、阿纳斯塔修斯与查士丁三人黯淡的名字和残缺的编年史草草记下——他们先后登上君士坦丁堡的皇位。而在同一时期,意大利却在一位哥特国王的治理下重获生机、日趋繁盛;这位君主的功业,纵使置于古罗马最贤明、最英勇的人物之列,也当得起一座塑像。
¶
Theodoric the Ostrogoth, the fourteenth in lineal descent of the royal line of the Amali, 1 was born in the neighborhood of Vienna 2 two years after the death of Attila. 2111 A recent victory had restored the independence of the Ostrogoths; and the three brothers, Walamir, Theodemir, and Widimir, who ruled that warlike nation with united counsels, had separately pitched their habitations in the fertile though desolate province of Pannonia. The Huns still threatened their revolted subjects, but their hasty attack was repelled by the single forces of Walamir, and the news of his victory reached the distant camp of his brother in the same auspicious moment that the favorite concubine of Theodemir was delivered of a son and heir. In the eighth year of his age, Theodoric was reluctantly yielded by his father to the public interest, as the pledge of an alliance which Leo, emperor of the East, had consented to purchase by an annual subsidy of three hundred pounds of gold. The royal hostage was educated at Constantinople with care and tenderness. His body was formed to all the exercises of war, his mind was expanded by the habits of liberal conversation; he frequented the schools of the most skilful masters; but he disdained or neglected the arts of Greece, and so ignorant did he always remain of the first elements of science, that a rude mark was contrived to represent the signature of the illiterate king of Italy. 3 As soon as he had attained the age of eighteen, he was restored to the wishes of the Ostrogoths, whom the emperor aspired to gain by liberality and confidence. Walamir had fallen in battle; the youngest of the brothers, Widimir, had led away into Italy and Gaul an army of Barbarians, and the whole nation acknowledged for their king the father of Theodoric. His ferocious subjects admired the strength and stature of their young prince; 4 and he soon convinced them that he had not degenerated from the valor of his ancestors. At the head of six thousand volunteers, he secretly left the camp in quest of adventures, descended the Danube as far as Singidunum, or Belgrade, and soon returned to his father with the spoils of a Sarmatian king whom he had vanquished and slain. Such triumphs, however, were productive only of fame, and the invincible Ostrogoths were reduced to extreme distress by the want of clothing and food. They unanimously resolved to desert their Pannonian encampments, and boldly to advance into the warm and wealthy neighborhood of the Byzantine court, which already maintained in pride and luxury so many bands of confederate Goths. After proving, by some acts of hostility, that they could be dangerous, or at least troublesome, enemies, the Ostrogoths sold at a high price their reconciliation and fidelity, accepted a donative of lands and money, and were intrusted with the defence of the Lower Danube, under the command of Theodoric, who succeeded after his father’s death to the hereditary throne of the Amali. 5
东哥特人狄奥多里克,乃阿马利王族嫡系的第十四代1,生于维也纳近郊2,其时阿提拉去世已有两年2111。此前不久的一场胜仗,刚为东哥特人赢回了独立。瓦拉米尔、狄奥德米尔与维迪米尔三兄弟同心协力,共同统治着这个尚武的民族,各自在潘诺尼亚安家立寨——那是一片虽然荒凉、却颇为肥沃的行省。匈人仍在威胁这些背叛了他们的臣属;然而匈人仓促来袭,单凭瓦拉米尔一路兵马便将其击退。捷报传到远处狄奥德米尔的营地时,恰逢他所宠爱的姬妾诞下一子——一位王位的继承人;这一巧合,真可谓吉兆。狄奥多里克八岁那年,父亲为顾全大局,忍痛把他交了出去,充作盟约的人质:东部皇帝利奥情愿以每年三百磅黄金的岁贡,来换取这一同盟。这位王室人质在君士坦丁堡受到悉心而慈爱的教养。各种战阵操演,把他的体魄锤炼得强健;高谈阔论的熏陶,又开阔了他的心胸。他常出入名师门下求学,却对希腊的学艺不屑一顾、任其荒废;他对学问的入门功夫始终一窍不通,以致后来人们不得不替这位目不识丁的意大利国王另想出一个粗陋的记号,权当他的签名3。他一满十八岁,便被送还给了朝思暮想的东哥特人——皇帝有意以慷慨和信任来笼络这个民族。此时瓦拉米尔已阵亡;三兄弟中最年幼的维迪米尔,则率一支蛮族大军远征意大利与高卢去了;于是举族都推奉狄奥多里克的父亲为王。这群凶悍的臣民,无不惊叹于自家少年王子的魁伟与膂力4;而他很快就让他们信服:祖辈的骁勇在他身上丝毫未减。他率六千名志愿追随的勇士,悄然离营,去闯荡一番;顺多瑙河而下,直抵辛吉杜努姆,即今日的贝尔格莱德,不久便满载战利品回到父亲身边——那是他击败并杀死的一位萨尔马提亚国王的财货。然而这类凯旋,除了赢得声名之外别无所获;所向无敌的东哥特人,反倒因衣食匮乏而陷入了极度的困窘。他们一致决意抛弃潘诺尼亚的营地,大胆挺进拜占庭朝廷附近那片温暖而富庶的地方——那里早已豢养着许多结盟的哥特部众,任其骄纵奢靡。东哥特人先以几番敌对之举证明:自己足以成为危险的强敌,至少也是难缠的祸患。随后,他们把和解与效忠高价售出,接受了土地与金钱的赏赐,受命镇守多瑙河下游。此时统领他们的,正是狄奥多里克——父亲死后,他继承了阿马利世代相传的王位5。
¶
A hero, descended from a race of kings, must have despised the base Isaurian who was invested with the Roman purple, without any endowment of mind or body, without any advantages of royal birth, or superior qualifications. After the failure of the Theodosian line, the choice of Pulcheria and of the senate might be justified in some measure by the characters of Martin and Leo, but the latter of these princes confirmed and dishonored his reign by the perfidious murder of Aspar and his sons, who too rigorously exacted the debt of gratitude and obedience. The inheritance of Leo and of the East was peaceably devolved on his infant grandson, the son of his daughter Ariadne; and her Isaurian husband, the fortunate Trascalisseus, exchanged that barbarous sound for the Grecian appellation of Zeno. After the decease of the elder Leo, he approached with unnatural respect the throne of his son, humbly received, as a gift, the second rank in the empire, and soon excited the public suspicion on the sudden and premature death of his young colleague, whose life could no longer promote the success of his ambition. But the palace of Constantinople was ruled by female influence, and agitated by female passions: and Verina, the widow of Leo, claiming his empire as her own, pronounced a sentence of deposition against the worthless and ungrateful servant on whom she alone had bestowed the sceptre of the East. 6 As soon as she sounded a revolt in the ears of Zeno, he fled with precipitation into the mountains of Isauria, and her brother Basiliscus, already infamous by his African expedition, 7 was unanimously proclaimed by the servile senate. But the reign of the usurper was short and turbulent. Basiliscus presumed to assassinate the lover of his sister; he dared to offend the lover of his wife, the vain and insolent Harmatius, who, in the midst of Asiatic luxury, affected the dress, the demeanor, and the surname of Achilles. 8 By the conspiracy of the malcontents, Zeno was recalled from exile; the armies, the capital, the person, of Basiliscus, were betrayed; and his whole family was condemned to the long agony of cold and hunger by the inhuman conqueror, who wanted courage to encounter or to forgive his enemies. 811 The haughty spirit of Verina was still incapable of submission or repose. She provoked the enmity of a favorite general, embraced his cause as soon as he was disgraced, created a new emperor in Syria and Egypt, 812 raised an army of seventy thousand men, and persisted to the last moment of her life in a fruitless rebellion, which, according to the fashion of the age, had been predicted by Christian hermits and Pagan magicians. While the East was afflicted by the passions of Verina, her daughter Ariadne was distinguished by the female virtues of mildness and fidelity; she followed her husband in his exile, and after his restoration, she implored his clemency in favor of her mother. On the decease of Zeno, Ariadne, the daughter, the mother, and the widow of an emperor, gave her hand and the Imperial title to Anastasius, an aged domestic of the palace, who survived his elevation above twenty-seven years, and whose character is attested by the acclamation of the people, “Reign as you have lived!” 9 912
狄奥多里克出身于世代为王的家族,堪称一代英雄;对那位卑微的伊苏里亚人,他必定满心鄙夷——那人既无过人的才智体魄,又无王室血统或任何出众的资历,却披上了罗马的紫袍。狄奥多西一系绝嗣之后,普尔喀丽亚与元老院所拣选的两位君主——马尔西安与利奥——就其人品而言,这一选择尚可说勉强得当。然而后一位君主利奥,虽借一桩背信弃义的凶杀坐稳了帝位,却也因此玷污了自己的治世:他谋害了阿斯帕尔及其诸子,只因这几人向他讨还感恩戴德、俯首听命的旧账,讨得太过急迫苛刻。利奥身后,东部帝国的基业平稳地传给了他尚在襁褓的外孙,也就是他女儿阿里阿德涅之子;而阿里阿德涅那位伊苏里亚丈夫,交了好运的特拉斯卡利塞乌斯,则把这个粗蛮拗口的名字换成了希腊味的称号——芝诺。老利奥一死,芝诺便以一副不合常情的恭顺姿态,趋奉自己儿子的皇位,卑躬屈膝地把帝国第二把交椅当作恩赐领受下来。可不久,他那位年幼的共治者便暴亡夭折——既然这孩子的性命再也无助于他野心的得逞,此事自然招来了众人的疑窦。然而君士坦丁堡的宫廷,向来受制于女人的势力,也为女人的爱憎所搅动。利奥的遗孀维丽娜自认帝国本是她一人之物,遂下诏废黜芝诺这个既无德又忘恩的仆从——毕竟东部的权柄,当初本是她一手授予的6。叛乱的风声刚一传进芝诺耳中,他便仓皇逃入伊苏里亚的山中;维丽娜的兄弟巴西利斯库斯——此人早已因那场远征非洲之役而声名狼藉7——则被卑躬屈膝的元老院一致拥立为帝。但这个僭位者在位既短,又动荡不宁。巴西利斯库斯竟敢刺杀他妹妹的情人;又胆敢开罪于他妻子的情人——那个虚荣而骄横的阿尔马提乌斯。此人身处亚洲式的豪奢当中,偏要在衣着、举止乃至名号上,都摹仿阿喀琉斯8。一群心怀不满者密谋起事,把芝诺从流放地召了回来。巴西利斯库斯的军队、都城乃至他本人,都遭到背弃;这位得胜者残忍无情,既没有勇气正面迎击仇敌,也没有胸襟宽赦他们,竟把巴西利斯库斯满门老小统统投入饥寒交迫的漫长折磨,任其慢慢死去811。维丽娜秉性高傲,仍旧既不肯低头,也不甘罢休。她先是招惹了一位宠将的敌意,待到那人失势蒙羞,又转而拥护他的事业;她在叙利亚和埃及另立了一位新皇帝812,纠集起七万大军,直到咽气的那一刻,仍旧顽固地坚持着这场徒劳无功的叛乱——依当时的风尚,基督教的隐修士与异教的术士早已预言过此事。维丽娜的爱憎搅得东方不得安宁,她的女儿阿里阿德涅却以温婉和贞顺这两样妇德见称:丈夫流亡,她一路相随;丈夫复位,她又替母亲向他恳求宽宥。芝诺一死,阿里阿德涅——她是一位皇帝的女儿、一位皇帝的母亲、又是一位皇帝的遗孀——便把自己的手连同帝号,一并许给了阿纳斯塔修斯,一个上了年纪的宫廷侍臣。此人登基后又活了二十七年有余;他的为人如何,从万民那一声欢呼里便可见分晓:“愿你怎样为人,便怎样为君!”9912
¶
Whatever fear or affection could bestow, was profusely lavished by Zeno on the king of the Ostrogoths; the rank of patrician and consul, the command of the Palatine troops, an equestrian statue, a treasure in gold and silver of many thousand pounds, the name of son, and the promise of a rich and honorable wife. As long as Theodoric condescended to serve, he supported with courage and fidelity the cause of his benefactor; his rapid march contributed to the restoration of Zeno; and in the second revolt, the Walamirs, as they were called, pursued and pressed the Asiatic rebels, till they left an easy victory to the Imperial troops. 10 But the faithful servant was suddenly converted into a formidable enemy, who spread the flames of war from Constantinople to the Adriatic; many flourishing cities were reduced to ashes, and the agriculture of Thrace was almost extirpated by the wanton cruelty of the Goths, who deprived their captive peasants of the right hand that guided the plough. 11 On such occasions, Theodoric sustained the loud and specious reproach of disloyalty, of ingratitude, and of insatiate avarice, which could be only excused by the hard necessity of his situation. He reigned, not as the monarch, but as the minister of a ferocious people, whose spirit was unbroken by slavery, and impatient of real or imaginary insults. Their poverty was incurable; since the most liberal donatives were soon dissipated in wasteful luxury, and the most fertile estates became barren in their hands; they despised, but they envied, the laborious provincials; and when their subsistence had failed, the Ostrogoths embraced the familiar resources of war and rapine. It had been the wish of Theodoric (such at least was his declaration) to lead a peaceful, obscure, obedient life on the confines of Scythia, till the Byzantine court, by splendid and fallacious promises, seduced him to attack a confederate tribe of Goths, who had been engaged in the party of Basiliscus. He marched from his station in Maesia, on the solemn assurance that before he reached Adrianople, he should meet a plentiful convoy of provisions, and a reenforcement of eight thousand horse and thirty thousand foot, while the legions of Asia were encamped at Heraclea to second his operations. These measures were disappointed by mutual jealousy. As he advanced into Thrace, the son of Theodemir found an inhospitable solitude, and his Gothic followers, with a heavy train of horses, of mules, and of wagons, were betrayed by their guides among the rocks and precipices of Mount Sondis, where he was assaulted by the arms and invectives of Theodoric the son of Triarius. From a neighboring height, his artful rival harangued the camp of the Walamirs, and branded their leader with the opprobrious names of child, of madman, of perjured traitor, the enemy of his blood and nation. “Are you ignorant,” exclaimed the son of Triarius, “that it is the constant policy of the Romans to destroy the Goths by each other’s swords? Are you insensible that the victor in this unnatural contest will be exposed, and justly exposed, to their implacable revenge? Where are those warriors, my kinsmen and thy own, whose widows now lament that their lives were sacrificed to thy rash ambition? Where is the wealth which thy soldiers possessed when they were first allured from their native homes to enlist under thy standard? Each of them was then master of three or four horses; they now follow thee on foot, like slaves, through the deserts of Thrace; those men who were tempted by the hope of measuring gold with a bushel, those brave men who are as free and as noble as thyself.” A language so well suited to the temper of the Goths excited clamor and discontent; and the son of Theodemir, apprehensive of being left alone, was compelled to embrace his brethren, and to imitate the example of Roman perfidy. 12 1211
凡是畏惧或情谊所能给予的,芝诺都毫不吝惜地倾注在这位东哥特王身上:贵族与执政官的品位、统率宫廷卫队的兵权、一座骑马的雕像、数千磅金银的厚赐、义子的名分,还有许配一位富贵而尊显之妻的承诺。只要狄奥多里克还肯屈尊效力,他便以勇武和忠诚支撑着这位恩主的大业:他挥师疾进,助芝诺重登皇位;到了第二次叛乱时,人称“瓦拉米尔部”的这支哥特人一路追击、紧逼那些亚洲的叛党,直到把一场唾手可得的胜利拱手让给了帝国的官军10。然而这忠仆转眼之间又变作了可畏的强敌,把战火从君士坦丁堡一直烧到亚得里亚海:多少繁华的城市化为灰烬,色雷斯的农耕也几近断绝。哥特人肆意逞凶,竟把俘获的农夫那只扶犁的右手一一砍去11。每逢此时,狄奥多里克便背上不忠、忘恩、贪得无厌这些响亮而振振有词的骂名;而唯一能替他开脱的,只有他处境上那种迫不得已的苦衷。他与其说是这个凶悍民族的君主,不如说是它的执事:这个民族的意气不曾被奴役折断,无论真受了欺侮,还是自以为受了欺侮,都一样按捺不住。他们的穷困是无药可救的:再优厚的赏赐,转眼就在挥霍无度中花光;再肥沃的田产,一落到他们手里也会变得荒芜。他们瞧不起那些辛勤耕作的行省居民,心里却又暗自艳羡;一旦生计断绝,东哥特人便重操战争与劫掠这门熟稔的旧业。狄奥多里克本来一心只想(至少他自己是这么说的)在斯基泰边地过一种太平、低调、安分守己的日子;后来是拜占庭朝廷以种种华美而虚妄的许诺引诱他,才唆使他去攻打另一支结盟的哥特部落——那支哥特人曾投在巴西利斯库斯一党。他从驻地默西亚出发,行前得到郑重的保证:在他抵达阿德里安堡之前,途中会有一支满载粮秣的辎重队来接应,另加骑兵八千、步兵三万的援军;与此同时,亚洲的军团也将在赫拉克利亚扎营,以策应他的行动。然而这一切安排,都因彼此的猜忌而落了空。他挺进色雷斯,狄奥德米尔之子迎面遇到的却是一片荒凉无人的旷野;他麾下的哥特随众,赶着一长列马匹、骡子和大车,被向导诱入松迪斯山的乱石与悬崖之间,在那里遭到特里阿里乌斯之子狄奥多里克的刀兵袭击和恶言辱骂。这位诡诈的对手站在近旁的高地上,对着瓦拉米尔部的营垒大声演说,把他们的首领痛骂一通,斥之为乳臭未干的小儿、疯子、背誓的叛徒,是本族血亲的仇敌。“难道你们不知道,”特里阿里乌斯之子高声喝道,“罗马人一贯的伎俩,就是要借哥特人自相残杀的刀剑来铲除哥特人?难道你们竟不明白,在这场骨肉相残的争斗里,谁赢了,谁就要——而且是理所当然地要——去承受他们那种绝不留情的报复?我的族人,也是你的族人——那些战士如今安在?他们的遗孀正在哀号,只因这些人的性命,白白葬送在了你那轻率的野心上。你的士卒当初被人引诱着离开故乡、投到你旗下时,他们的财货又都到哪里去了?那时他们每人都有三四匹马;如今却像奴隶一样,徒步跟着你,穿行在色雷斯的荒野之中——这些人当初曾被‘论斗量金’的指望所诱,这些勇士,本和你一样自由、一样高贵。”这番话正说中了哥特人的心性,营中顿时鼓噪不满;狄奥德米尔之子唯恐落得孤家寡人,只得与本族兄弟握手言和,反过来仿效罗马人那套背信弃义的把戏121211。
¶
In every state of his fortune, the prudence and firmness of Theodoric were equally conspicuous; whether he threatened Constantinople at the head of the confederate Goths, or retreated with a faithful band to the mountains and sea-coast of Epirus. At length the accidental death of the son of Triarius 13 destroyed the balance which the Romans had been so anxious to preserve, the whole nation acknowledged the supremacy of the Amali, and the Byzantine court subscribed an ignominious and oppressive treaty. 14 The senate had already declared, that it was necessary to choose a party among the Goths, since the public was unequal to the support of their united forces; a subsidy of two thousand pounds of gold, with the ample pay of thirteen thousand men, were required for the least considerable of their armies; 15 and the Isaurians, who guarded not the empire but the emperor, enjoyed, besides the privilege of rapine, an annual pension of five thousand pounds. The sagacious mind of Theodoric soon perceived that he was odious to the Romans, and suspected by the Barbarians: he understood the popular murmur, that his subjects were exposed in their frozen huts to intolerable hardships, while their king was dissolved in the luxury of Greece, and he prevented the painful alternative of encountering the Goths, as the champion, or of leading them to the field, as the enemy, of Zeno. Embracing an enterprise worthy of his courage and ambition, Theodoric addressed the emperor in the following words: “Although your servant is maintained in affluence by your liberality, graciously listen to the wishes of my heart! Italy, the inheritance of your predecessors, and Rome itself, the head and mistress of the world, now fluctuate under the violence and oppression of Odoacer the mercenary. Direct me, with my national troops, to march against the tyrant. If I fall, you will be relieved from an expensive and troublesome friend: if, with the divine permission, I succeed, I shall govern in your name, and to your glory, the Roman senate, and the part of the republic delivered from slavery by my victorious arms.” The proposal of Theodoric was accepted, and perhaps had been suggested, by the Byzantine court. But the forms of the commission, or grant, appear to have been expressed with a prudent ambiguity, which might be explained by the event; and it was left doubtful, whether the conqueror of Italy should reign as the lieutenant, the vassal, or the ally, of the emperor of the East.16
狄奥多里克无论际遇顺逆,其深谋与坚毅都同样惹人瞩目:他或统率结盟的哥特大军兵临君士坦丁堡城下,或率一支忠心的部众退守伊庇鲁斯的山地与海滨,皆是如此。后来,特里阿里乌斯之子意外身亡13,罗马人苦心维系的那种均势就此瓦解:举族都承认了阿马利家族的至尊地位,拜占庭朝廷也只得签下一纸既屈辱又苛刻的条约14。元老院此前早已声言:既然国库无力同时供养哥特人合在一处的全部兵力,就非得在他们中间择一派加以扶持不可。单是其中最不起眼的一支军队,就要索取两千磅黄金的岁贡,外加一万三千人的丰厚军饷15;而那些伊苏里亚人,护卫的并非帝国而是皇帝本人,除了纵情劫掠的特权之外,每年还坐享五千磅的年金。狄奥多里克心思敏锐,很快便看清:罗马人厌恶他,蛮族又猜忌他。他也听懂了民间的怨言——说他的臣民蜷缩在冰冷的棚屋里,饱受难以忍受的苦楚,他们的君王却沉溺在希腊的奢华里不能自拔。他要为芝诺出力,就得作芝诺的斗士去迎击哥特人;要率哥特人出征,就得作芝诺的仇敌——他索性避开了这道两难的苦局。于是狄奥多里克着手筹划一桩与他的胆识和抱负相称的大业,向皇帝进言道:“承蒙陛下慷慨,您的臣仆得以坐享富足;然而还望陛下垂听臣的一点心愿!意大利本是历代先帝的遗产,罗马更是天下的首邑与主母,如今却在雇佣兵奥多亚克的暴虐压迫之下动荡飘摇。请陛下降旨,命臣率本族大军讨伐这个暴君。倘若臣战死,陛下便可摆脱一个既费钱又麻烦的朋友;倘若上天垂佑、臣得成功,臣必以陛下之名、为陛下增光,替您治理罗马元老院,以及那片由臣战胜之师从奴役中解救出来的国土。”狄奥多里克这一提议,拜占庭朝廷欣然接纳——说不定当初本就是朝廷授意的。不过,这道委任状——或者说敕许——的措辞,似乎是有意含糊其辞,好留待日后凭结果来解释:这位意大利的征服者,将来究竟是以东部皇帝的代理人、附庸,还是盟友的身份君临其地,始终是个悬而未决的疑问16。
¶
The reputation both of the leader and of the war diffused a universal ardor; the Walamirs were multiplied by the Gothic swarms already engaged in the service, or seated in the provinces, of the empire; and each bold Barbarian, who had heard of the wealth and beauty of Italy, was impatient to seek, through the most perilous adventures, the possession of such enchanting objects. The march of Theodoric must be considered as the emigration of an entire people; the wives and children of the Goths, their aged parents, and most precious effects, were carefully transported; and some idea may be formed of the heavy baggage that now followed the camp, by the loss of two thousand wagons, which had been sustained in a single action in the war of Epirus. For their subsistence, the Goths depended on the magazines of corn which was ground in portable mills by the hands of their women; on the milk and flesh of their flocks and herds; on the casual produce of the chase, and upon the contributions which they might impose on all who should presume to dispute the passage, or to refuse their friendly assistance. Notwithstanding these precautions, they were exposed to the danger, and almost to the distress, of famine, in a march of seven hundred miles, which had been undertaken in the depth of a rigorous winter. Since the fall of the Roman power, Dacia and Pannonia no longer exhibited the rich prospect of populous cities, well-cultivated fields, and convenient highways: the reign of barbarism and desolation was restored, and the tribes of Bulgarians, Gepidae, and Sarmatians, who had occupied the vacant province, were prompted by their native fierceness, or the solicitations of Odoacer, to resist the progress of his enemy. In many obscure though bloody battles, Theodoric fought and vanquished; till at length, surmounting every obstacle by skilful conduct and persevering courage, he descended from the Julian Alps, and displayed his invincible banners on the confines of Italy. 17
无论是这位统帅的威名,还是这场战争本身的声势,都激起了普遍的热忱。原本在帝国军中效力、或已在各行省安居的成群哥特人,纷纷来投,使瓦拉米尔部的人马大为膨胀;每一个听说过意大利之富庶与秀美的悍勇蛮族,都迫不及待地想历尽千难万险,去把那令人神往的一切据为己有。狄奥多里克的这次进军,须当作举族的大迁徙来看:哥特人的妻儿老小、他们年迈的双亲,还有最珍贵的家当,都被小心翼翼地一并带上。至于这支大军如今拖着何等沉重的辎重,只要想想他们在伊庇鲁斯之战中一役便折损了两千辆大车,也就可想而知了。至于口粮,哥特人所仰仗的,一是储备的谷物——由妇人们用随身携带的手磨磨成;二是牛羊的乳与肉;三是打猎偶得的收获;此外,凡有胆敢阻拦他们通行、或不肯友善相助的人,都得向他们交纳一份贡赋。尽管有这些防备,他们在这七百英里的行军途中,仍旧险些陷入饥荒的绝境——何况这一路是在严冬最酷寒的时节踏上的。自从罗马的国势倾覆,达契亚和潘诺尼亚再也见不到从前那般富庶的景象——城邑稠密、田畴丰美、大道通达都成了往事;蛮荒与荒凉重新君临此地。保加利亚人、格皮德人和萨尔马提亚人几个部族,趁虚占据了这片空旷的行省;如今,他们或出于天性中的凶悍,或受了奥多亚克的怂恿,纷纷起来阻挡这位敌人的前进。在一连串虽不见经传却血流成河的战斗中,狄奥多里克且战且胜;终于,他凭着高明的指挥和百折不挠的勇气扫平了一切障碍,翻越尤利安阿尔卑斯山而下,把他那面所向无敌的战旗,插上了意大利的边境17。
¶
Odoacer, a rival not unworthy of his arms, had already occupied the advantageous and well-known post of the River Sontius, near the ruins of Aquileia, at the head of a powerful host, whose independent kings 18 or leaders disdained the duties of subordination and the prudence of delays. No sooner had Theodoric gained a short repose and refreshment to his wearied cavalry, than he boldly attacked the fortifications of the enemy; the Ostrogoths showed more ardor to acquire, than the mercenaries to defend, the lands of Italy; and the reward of the first victory was the possession of the Venetian province as far as the walls of Verona. In the neighborhood of that city, on the steep banks of the rapid Adige, he was opposed by a new army, reenforced in its numbers, and not impaired in its courage: the contest was more obstinate, but the event was still more decisive; Odoacer fled to Ravenna, Theodoric advanced to Milan, and the vanquished troops saluted their conqueror with loud acclamations of respect and fidelity. But their want either of constancy or of faith soon exposed him to the most imminent danger; his vanguard, with several Gothic counts, which had been rashly intrusted to a deserter, was betrayed and destroyed near Faenza by his double treachery; Odoacer again appeared master of the field, and the invader, strongly intrenched in his camp of Pavia, was reduced to solicit the aid of a kindred nation, the Visigoths of Gaul. In the course of this History, the most voracious appetite for war will be abundantly satiated; nor can I much lament that our dark and imperfect materials do not afford a more ample narrative of the distress of Italy, and of the fierce conflict, which was finally decided by the abilities, experience, and valor of the Gothic king. Immediately before the battle of Verona, he visited the tent of his mother 19 and sister, and requested, that on a day, the most illustrious festival of his life, they would adorn him with the rich garments which they had worked with their own hands. “Our glory,” said he, “is mutual and inseparable. You are known to the world as the mother of Theodoric; and it becomes me to prove, that I am the genuine offspring of those heroes from whom I claim my descent.” The wife or concubine of Theodemir was inspired with the spirit of the German matrons, who esteemed their sons’ honor far above their safety; and it is reported, that in a desperate action, when Theodoric himself was hurried along by the torrent of a flying crowd, she boldly met them at the entrance of the camp, and, by her generous reproaches, drove them back on the swords of the enemy. 20
奥多亚克这个对手,倒也配得上与他一较高下。此时他已亲率一支劲旅,抢占了阿奎莱亚废墟附近松提乌斯河那处地利优越、素来知名的阵地;然而他麾下那些各自称王18、互不统属的首领,既不屑于服从号令,也不肯审慎地按兵持重。狄奥多里克刚让疲惫的骑兵略作休整、稍稍恢复元气,便大胆地向敌人的工事发起进攻。东哥特人急于攫取意大利的土地,其锐气远胜过那些雇佣兵守土的斗志;头一场胜仗的报偿,便是把威尼提亚行省一直到维罗纳城下的地方收入囊中。就在维罗纳近旁、湍急的阿迪杰河那陡峭的岸边,一支新的军队挡住了他的去路——这支人马数量补足,斗志也丝毫未减。这一仗打得更为顽强,结局却更加干脆:奥多亚克逃往拉文纳,狄奥多里克则挥师进抵米兰,被击败的士卒纷纷高呼着敬服与效忠,向他们的征服者致意。然而这些人要么没个定性,要么信不过,很快就把他推到了火烧眉毛的险境:他的前锋部队,连同几位哥特伯爵,被轻率地托付给了一个降将,结果这人再度反水、出卖了他们,使这支前锋在法恩扎附近覆没。奥多亚克再度成了战场的主宰;这位入侵者只得深沟高垒,退守帕维亚的营地,转而去向一个血脉相连的民族——高卢的西哥特人——求援。在这部史书的进程中,纵是嗜战成癖的人,也尽可以饱餍其欲;因此,我们所依凭的史料虽然晦暗残缺,无从对意大利的苦难、对那场鏖战——它最终凭哥特王的才略、经验与勇武方见分晓——作更翔实的记述,我倒也不甚惋惜。维罗纳一战前夕,他来到母亲19和妹妹的帐中,请求她们:在这一天——他一生中最荣耀的盛典之日——为他披上她们亲手缝制的华服。“我们的荣耀,”他说,“是彼此相连、不可分割的。世人都知道您是狄奥多里克的母亲;而我,也理应证明自己确是那些英雄的嫡传后裔——我正以他们的血脉自诩。”狄奥德米尔的这位妻子(也可能只是姬妾),身上凛然有日耳曼主妇的气概——那些主妇看重儿子的荣誉,远在他们的安危之上。据说在一次凶险的战斗中,狄奥多里克本人也被溃逃人潮的洪流裹挟着往回涌,她却大胆地在营门口迎住众人,以慷慨激昂的斥责,硬是把他们赶回去,重新迎向敌人的刀锋20。
¶
From the Alps to the extremity of Calabria, Theodoric reigned by the right of conquest; the Vandal ambassadors surrendered the Island of Sicily, as a lawful appendage of his kingdom; and he was accepted as the deliverer of Rome by the senate and people, who had shut their gates against the flying usurper. 21 Ravenna alone, secure in the fortifications of art and nature, still sustained a siege of almost three years; and the daring sallies of Odoacer carried slaughter and dismay into the Gothic camp. At length, destitute of provisions and hopeless of relief, that unfortunate monarch yielded to the groans of his subjects and the clamors of his soldiers. A treaty of peace was negotiated by the bishop of Ravenna; the Ostrogoths were admitted into the city, and the hostile kings consented, under the sanction of an oath, to rule with equal and undivided authority the provinces of Italy. The event of such an agreement may be easily foreseen. After some days had been devoted to the semblance of joy and friendship, Odoacer, in the midst of a solemn banquet, was stabbed by the hand, or at least by the command, of his rival. Secret and effectual orders had been previously despatched; the faithless and rapacious mercenaries, at the same moment, and without resistance, were universally massacred; and the royalty of Theodoric was proclaimed by the Goths, with the tardy, reluctant, ambiguous consent of the emperor of the East. The design of a conspiracy was imputed, according to the usual forms, to the prostrate tyrant; but his innocence, and the guilt of his conqueror, 22 are sufficiently proved by the advantageous treaty which force would not sincerely have granted, nor weakness have rashly infringed. The jealousy of power, and the mischiefs of discord, may suggest a more decent apology, and a sentence less rigorous may be pronounced against a crime which was necessary to introduce into Italy a generation of public felicity. The living author of this felicity was audaciously praised in his own presence by sacred and profane orators; 23 but history (in his time she was mute and inglorious) has not left any just representation of the events which displayed, or of the defects which clouded, the virtues of Theodoric. 24 One record of his fame, the volume of public epistles composed by Cassiodorus in the royal name, is still extant, and has obtained more implicit credit than it seems to deserve. 25 They exhibit the forms, rather than the substance, of his government; and we should vainly search for the pure and spontaneous sentiments of the Barbarian amidst the declamation and learning of a sophist, the wishes of a Roman senator, the precedents of office, and the vague professions, which, in every court, and on every occasion, compose the language of discreet ministers. The reputation of Theodoric may repose with more confidence on the visible peace and prosperity of a reign of thirty-three years; the unanimous esteem of his own times, and the memory of his wisdom and courage, his justice and humanity, which was deeply impressed on the minds of the Goths and Italians.
从阿尔卑斯山直到卡拉布里亚的尽头,狄奥多里克都凭征服之权而君临。汪达尔人的使节献出了西西里岛,承认它是他王国名正言顺的附属;罗马的元老院与人民早已闭门把那逃亡的僭主拒之城外,如今也把他奉为罗马的解救者21。唯有拉文纳一城,仗着人工与天然的双重屏障固若金汤,硬是撑住了将近三年的围攻;奥多亚克屡屡大胆出击,把杀戮与惊惶带进了哥特人的营中。终于,粮草断绝、援兵无望,这位不幸的君主抵不住臣民的呻吟和士卒的鼓噪,只得让步。拉文纳的主教出面斡旋,议定了一纸和约:东哥特人获准入城,两位敌对的国王也立誓约定,以对等而不加分割的权柄,共同统治意大利各行省。这样一桩约定会有怎样的下场,不难预料。几天里彼此还装出一副欢欣友好的模样;随后,在一场隆重的宴席之上,奥多亚克便死于对手之手——纵不是狄奥多里克亲手所刺,至少也是出自他的号令。此前早已密令布置停当:就在同一时刻,那些既不忠又贪婪的雇佣兵未及抵抗,便被斩尽杀绝。哥特人随即拥立狄奥多里克为王,而东部皇帝则迟迟才勉强、含糊地表示了默许。按惯常的一套说法,密谋的罪名被扣在了这个已然倒下的暴君头上;然而他其实是清白的,有罪的倒是他的征服者22——单看那纸于己有利的和约便足以证明:占上风的一方本不会真心让出这样的条件,处下风的一方也决不会贸然去撕毁它。权力上的猜忌、纷争所酿的祸患,或许可以为这桩罪行提供一个稍体面些的辩解;而这罪行既是为意大利换来一代太平盛世所不可少的,人们对它的裁断,或许也可以从宽一些。这太平盛世的缔造者尚在人世之时,教俗两界的演说家便当着他的面肆意颂扬23;然而史册(在他那个时代,史神本是喑哑而黯淡的)却不曾为后人留下一份公允的记载——既没有写下那些足以彰显狄奥多里克德行的事迹,也没有记下那些遮蔽其德行的瑕疵24。有一部见证他声名的文献留存至今,那就是卡西奥多鲁斯奉王命起草的官方书信集;世人对它的采信,实在超过了它应得的分量25。这些书信所呈现的,不过是他这套统治的表面形式,而非其实质。其中满是诡辩家的铺陈辞藻与卖弄学问、一位罗马元老的意愿、官府的先例陈规,还有那种无论哪个朝廷、无论什么场合都用得上、构成谨慎大臣一贯口吻的含糊表态——想从这堆东西里,寻出这位蛮族君主纯真自然的本心,只是枉费气力。要评判狄奥多里克的声誉,倒不如更放心地凭靠这些实实在在的凭据:他在位三十三年间那有目共睹的太平与繁荣、当世众口一词的敬重,以及他的睿智与勇武、公正与仁厚——这一切都深深铭刻在哥特人和意大利人的心里。
¶
The partition of the lands of Italy, of which Theodoric assigned the third part to his soldiers, is honorably arraigned as the sole injustice of his life. 2511 And even this act may be fairly justified by the example of Odoacer, the rights of conquest, the true interest of the Italians, and the sacred duty of subsisting a whole people, who, on the faith of his promises, had transported themselves into a distant land. 26 Under the reign of Theodoric, and in the happy climate of Italy, the Goths soon multiplied to a formidable host of two hundred thousand men, 27 and the whole amount of their families may be computed by the ordinary addition of women and children. Their invasion of property, a part of which must have been already vacant, was disguised by the generous but improper name of hospitality; these unwelcome guests were irregularly dispersed over the face of Italy, and the lot of each Barbarian was adequate to his birth and office, the number of his followers, and the rustic wealth which he possessed in slaves and cattle. The distinction of noble and plebeian were acknowledged; 28 but the lands of every freeman were exempt from taxes, 2811 and he enjoyed the inestimable privilege of being subject only to the laws of his country. 29 Fashion, and even convenience, soon persuaded the conquerors to assume the more elegant dress of the natives, but they still persisted in the use of their mother-tongue; and their contempt for the Latin schools was applauded by Theodoric himself, who gratified their prejudices, or his own, by declaring, that the child who had trembled at a rod, would never dare to look upon a sword. 30 Distress might sometimes provoke the indigent Roman to assume the ferocious manners which were insensibly relinquished by the rich and luxurious Barbarian; 31 but these mutual conversions were not encouraged by the policy of a monarch who perpetuated the separation of the Italians and Goths; reserving the former for the arts of peace, and the latter for the service of war. To accomplish this design, he studied to protect his industrious subjects, and to moderate the violence, without enervating the valor, of his soldiers, who were maintained for the public defence. They held their lands and benefices as a military stipend: at the sound of the trumpet, they were prepared to march under the conduct of their provincial officers; and the whole extent of Italy was distributed into the several quarters of a well-regulated camp. The service of the palace and of the frontiers was performed by choice or by rotation; and each extraordinary fatigue was recompensed by an increase of pay and occasional donatives. Theodoric had convinced his brave companions, that empire must be acquired and defended by the same arts. After his example, they strove to excel in the use, not only of the lance and sword, the instruments of their victories, but of the missile weapons, which they were too much inclined to neglect; and the lively image of war was displayed in the daily exercise and annual reviews of the Gothic cavalry. A firm though gentle discipline imposed the habits of modesty, obedience, and temperance; and the Goths were instructed to spare the people, to reverence the laws, to understand the duties of civil society, and to disclaim the barbarous license of judicial combat and private revenge. 32
狄奥多里克把意大利的土地划出三分之一分给他的士卒;世人指摘这场分地,说它是他一生唯一的一桩不义之举——这样的责难,本身倒也不失体面2511。然而即便是这一举动,也大可为之辩白:有奥多亚克的先例可援,有征服者的权利为凭,更关乎意大利人自身的真正利益,以及一桩神圣的责任——须得养活整整一个民族,这些人正是凭信他的许诺,才拖家带口迁到了这遥远的异乡26。在狄奥多里克治下,又得意大利宜人水土之利,哥特人很快便繁衍成一支多达二十万人的可畏大军27;至于连同妇孺在内的举族总数,照通常添上妻子儿女来推算,也就不难估出。他们侵夺产业——其中想必有一部分本已无主——却以“借宿款待”这个说得好听却名不副实的名目加以粉饰。这些不速之客零零散散地铺开在意大利各处;每个蛮族所分得的份额,都同他的出身、职任、随从的多寡,以及他在奴隶和牲畜上所拥有的那份乡野家财相称。贵族与平民之分依然获得承认28;不过凡自由人的田产一律免税2811,而且他还享有一项无从估价的特权:只受本族法律的管辖29。风尚所趋,兼图便利,很快就使这些征服者换上了当地人那身更为雅致的衣装;然而他们仍旧固执地讲着自己的母语。他们瞧不起拉丁学校,狄奥多里克本人还为此叫好——他说过一句话,既迎合了他们的成见,也许也迎合了他自己的偏见:一个在教鞭下瑟瑟发抖的孩子,长大了绝不敢正眼去看一把刀剑30。困顿有时会逼得穷苦的罗马人染上那种凶悍的做派,而那种做派,富足奢靡的蛮族反倒在不知不觉间渐渐丢掉了31。不过这种双向的转化,并不合这位君主的心意:他有意让意大利人与哥特人始终泾渭分明,前者专事和平的技艺,后者专司战争的职役。为达此目的,他一面用心护佑那些勤于生产的臣民,一面又设法约束士卒的暴戾,却不使他们的勇武因此消磨——这些士卒本是为公共防务而供养的。他们所持有的田产与采邑,就是他们的军饷;号角一响,他们便随时在本行省长官的率领下开拔。整个意大利,俨然是一座规制井然的大营,划分为一个个营区。宫廷的宿卫与边境的戍守,或凭自愿,或按轮值来担当;凡有额外的辛劳,都以加饷和不时的犒赏来酬报。狄奥多里克早已让他那些勇敢的伙伴信服:打江山与守江山,靠的原是同一套本领。在他的表率之下,他们力求精熟各般武艺:不仅是长枪与刀剑这些为他们赢得胜利的利器,也包括那些他们素来太过轻忽的投射兵器。哥特骑兵每日操演、每年校阅,把战阵的鲜活景象活脱脱地演示了出来。军纪虽严明,却也不失宽和,就此养成了他们谦抑、顺从、节制的习性。哥特人受到这样的教诲:要体恤百姓、敬畏律法,要懂得作为文明社会一员应尽的本分,并摒弃司法决斗与私相仇杀这类野蛮的放纵之举32。
Notes 注释
1
↩
Jornandes (de Rebus Geticis, c. 13, 14, p. 629, 630, edit. Grot.) has drawn the pedigree of Theodoric from Gapt, one of the Anses or Demigods, who lived about the time of Domitian. Cassiodorus, the first who celebrates the royal race of the Amali, (Viriar. viii. 5, ix. 25, x. 2, xi. 1,) reckons the grandson of Theodoric as the xviith in descent. Peringsciold (the Swedish commentator of Cochloeus, Vit. Theodoric. p. 271, &c., Stockholm, 1699) labors to connect this genealogy with the legends or traditions of his native country. * Note: Amala was a name of hereditary sanctity and honor among the Visigoths. It enters into the names of Amalaberga, Amala suintha, (swinther means strength,) Amalafred, Amalarich. In the poem of the Nibelungen written three hundred years later, the Ostrogoths are called the Amilungen. According to Wachter it means, unstained, from the privative a, and malo a stain. It is pure Sanscrit, Amala, immaculatus. Schlegel. Indische Bibliothek, 1. p. 233.—M.
约达尼斯(de Rebus Geticis, c. 13, 14, p. 629, 630, edit. Grot.)把狄奥多里克的世系一直上溯到加普特——安瑟斯(即半神)中的一位,约生活在图密善时代。卡西奥多鲁斯是最早颂扬阿马利王族的人(Variar. viii. 5, ix. 25, x. 2, xi. 1),他把狄奥多里克的孙子算作这一世系的第十七代。佩林斯希尔德(科赫劳斯《狄奥多里克传》的瑞典注释者,Vit. Theodoric. p. 271, &c., Stockholm, 1699)则煞费苦心,想把这份家谱同他本国的传说掌故牵连起来。*编者按:在西哥特人中,阿马拉(Amala)是一个世代相传、含有神圣与尊荣之意的名字。它进入了阿马拉贝尔加、阿马拉苏因塔(swinther 意为“力量”)、阿马拉弗雷德、阿马拉里克等诸多名字之中。在三百年后写成的《尼伯龙根之歌》里,东哥特人被称作阿米隆根(Amilungen)。据瓦赫特考证,此名意为“无瑕”,由表否定的前缀 a 与表“污点”的 malo 合成。它其实是纯正的梵语:Amala,意即 immaculatus(洁白无瑕)。见施莱格尔《印度文库》,1. p. 233。—M
2
↩
More correctly on the banks of the Lake Pelso, (Nieusiedler-see,) near Carnuntum, almost on the same spot where Marcus Antoninus composed his meditations, Jornandes, c. 52, p. 659. Severin. Pannonia Illustrata, p. 22. Cellarius, Geograph. Antiq. (tom. i. p. 350.)
更确切地说,他生在佩尔索湖(即诺伊西德勒湖)畔、卡尔农图姆附近,几乎正是马可·奥勒留当年写下《沉思录》的那处地方。见约达尼斯,c. 52, p. 659;Severin. Pannonia Illustrata, p. 22;Cellarius, Geograph. Antiq.(tom. i. p. 350)。
2111
↩
The date of Theodoric’s birth is not accurately determined. We can hardly err, observes Manso, in placing it between the years 453 and 455, Manso, Geschichte des Ost Gothischen Reichs, p. 14.—M.
狄奥多里克的确切生年已无从考定。曼索指出,把它定在公元 453 年至 455 年之间,大抵不会有错。见曼索《东哥特王国史》,p. 14。—M
3
↩
The four first letters of his name were inscribed on a gold plate, and when it was fixed on the paper, the king drew his pen through the intervals (Anonym. Valesian. ad calcem Amm. Marcellin p. 722.) This authentic fact, with the testimony of Procopius, or at least of the contemporary Goths, (Gothic. 1. i. c. 2, p. 311,) far outweighs the vague praises of Ennodius (Sirmond Opera, tom. i. p. 1596) and Theophanes, (Chronograph. p. 112.) * Note: Le Beau and his Commentator, M. St. Martin, support, though with no very satisfactory evidence, the opposite opinion. But Lord Mahon (Life of Belisarius, p. 19) urges the much stronger argument, the Byzantine education of Theodroic.—M.
他名字的头四个字母被镌在一块金板上;把金板按在纸上时,这位国王便提笔在字母的空隙间描画(Anonym. Valesian. ad calcem Amm. Marcellin p. 722)。这一确凿的事实,加上普罗柯比——或者至少是当时哥特人——的佐证(Gothic. l. i. c. 2, p. 311),其分量远远压过恩诺迪乌斯(Sirmond Opera, tom. i. p. 1596)与塞奥法尼斯(Chronograph. p. 112)那些含糊的溢美之词。*编者按:勒博及其注释者圣马丁先生虽持相反看法,所据却并不足以令人信服。而马洪勋爵(《贝利撒留传》,p. 19)则提出了一个有力得多的论据,即狄奥多里克所受的乃是拜占庭式的教育。—M
4
↩
Statura est quae resignet proceritate regnantem, (Ennodius, p. 1614.) The bishop of Pavia (I mean the ecclesiastic who wished to be a bishop) then proceeds to celebrate the complexion, eyes, hands, &c, of his sovereign.
“Statura est quae resignet proceritate regnantem”(其身量之魁伟,一望便知有王者之相),见恩诺迪乌斯,p. 1614。这位帕维亚主教(我是说那位一心想当主教的教士),接着又对他君主的肤色、眼睛、双手等等一一称颂了一番。
5
↩
The state of the Ostrogoths, and the first years of Theodoric, are found in Jornandes, (c. 52—56, p. 689—696) and Malchus, (Excerpt. Legat. p. 78—80,) who erroneously styles him the son of Walamir.
关于东哥特人的境况以及狄奥多里克早年的事迹,见约达尼斯(c. 52—56, p. 689—696)与马尔胡斯(Excerpt. Legat. p. 78—80)——后者误把他称作瓦拉米尔之子。
6
↩
Theophanes (p. 111) inserts a copy of her sacred letters to the provinces. Such female pretensions would have astonished the slaves of the first Caesars.
塞奥法尼斯(p. 111)录入了她致各行省的一份御札抄件。这样一位女子竟摆出如此君临天下的架势,若让最初几位恺撒治下的奴仆见了,怕是要瞠目结舌。
7
↩
Vol. iii. p. 504—508.
见第三卷,p. 504—508。
8
↩
Suidas, tom. i. p. 332, 333, edit. Kuster.
苏达斯,tom. i. p. 332, 333, edit. Kuster。
811
↩
Joannes Lydus accuses Zeno of timidity, or, rather, of cowardice; he purchased an ignominious peace from the enemies of the empire, whom he dared not meet in battle; and employed his whole time at home in confiscations and executions. Lydus, de Magist. iii. 45, p. 230.—M.
约翰·吕多斯指责芝诺胆怯,或者不如说怯懦:他不敢与帝国的敌人沙场相见,只肯出钱换取一纸屈辱的和约;在国内则成天忙于抄没家产、诛戮臣民。见吕多斯,de Magist. iii. 45, p. 230。—M
812
↩
Named Illus.—M.
此人名叫伊卢斯。—M
9
↩
The contemporary histories of Malchus and Candidus are lost; but some extracts or fragments have been saved by Photius, (lxxviii. lxxix. p. 100—102,) Constantine Porphyrogenitus, (Excerpt. Leg. p. 78—97,) and in various articles of the Lexicon of Suidas. The Chronicles of Marcellinus (Imago Historiae) are originals for the reigns of Zeno and Anastasius; and I must acknowledge, almost for the last time, my obligations to the large and accurate collections of Tillemont, (Hist. des Emp. tom. vi. p. 472—652).
马尔胡斯与坎迪杜斯的当代史著均已失传;不过佛提乌(lxxviii. lxxix. p. 100—102)、君士坦丁·波菲罗格尼图斯(Excerpt. Leg. p. 78—97)以及《苏达斯辞书》的各条目中,尚保存了一些节录或残篇。马尔切利努斯的《编年史》(Imago Historiae)是记述芝诺与阿纳斯塔修斯两朝的第一手资料。我还须在此——几乎是最后一次——申明我受惠于蒂耶蒙那部浩繁而精审的辑录(Hist. des Emp. tom. vi. p. 472—652)。
912
↩
The Panegyric of Procopius of Gaza, (edited by Villoison in his Anecdota Graeca, and reprinted in the new edition of the Byzantine historians by Niebuhr, in the same vol. with Dexippus and Eunapius, viii. p. 488 516,) was unknown to Gibbon. It is vague and pedantic, and contains few facts. The same criticism will apply to the poetical panegyric of Priscian edited from the Ms. of Bobbio by Ang. Mai. Priscian, the gram marian, Niebuhr argues from this work, must have been born in the African, not in either of the Asiatic Caesareas. Pref. p. xi.—M.
加沙的普罗柯比所作的颂词(由维卢瓦松收入其《希腊佚文集》Anecdota Graeca,尼布尔重编拜占庭史家丛书时又将它与德克西普斯、欧纳皮乌斯合刊于同一卷中,viii. p. 488—516),吉本当年并未得见。此文空泛而迂腐,所载史实寥寥。同样的评语也适用于普里西安那篇诗体颂词——它由安杰洛·迈据博比奥的抄本校订刊行。尼布尔从这篇作品推断:文法家普里西安想必生在非洲的那座凯撒里亚,而非亚洲的两座凯撒里亚中的任何一座。见序言 p. xi。—M
10
↩
In ipsis congressionis tuae foribus cessit invasor, cum profugo per te sceptra redderentur de salute dubitanti. Ennodius then proceeds (p. 1596, 1597, tom. i. Sirmond.) to transport his hero (on a flying dragon?) into Aethiopia, beyond the tropic of Cancer. The evidence of the Valesian Fragment, (p. 717,) Liberatus, (Brev. Eutych. c. 25 p. 118,) and Theophanes, (p. 112,) is more sober and rational.
“In ipsis congressionis tuae foribus cessit invasor, cum profugo per te sceptra redderentur de salute dubitanti”(一交锋,侵犯者便退避了;那流亡之君连自己性命尚且未卜,却靠着你重获了王权)。接着恩诺迪乌斯(p. 1596, 1597, tom. i. Sirmond.)竟把他笔下的英雄(莫非是骑着飞龙?)一路送进埃塞俄比亚,直抵北回归线以南。相比之下,瓦莱西乌斯残卷(p. 717)、利贝拉图斯(Brev. Eutych. c. 25 p. 118)与塞奥法尼斯(p. 112)的记载要冷静、合理得多。
11
↩
This cruel practice is specially imputed to the Triarian Goths, less barbarous, as it should seem, than the Walamirs; but the son of Theodemir is charged with the ruin of many Roman cities, (Malchus, Excerpt. Leg. p. 95.)
这种残忍的做法,尤其被归到特里阿里乌斯一系的哥特人头上——照说他们本该比瓦拉米尔一系更少几分野蛮;不过,狄奥德米尔之子也同样被指摘毁灭了许多罗马城市(Malchus, Excerpt. Leg. p. 95)。
12
↩
Jornandes (c. 56, 57, p. 696) displays the services of Theodoric, confesses his rewards, but dissembles his revolt, of which such curious details have been preserved by Malchus, (Excerpt. Legat. p. 78—97.) Marcellinus, a domestic of Justinian, under whose ivth consulship (A.D. 534) he composed his Chronicle, (Scaliger, Thesaurus Temporum, P. ii, p. 34—57,) betrays his prejudice and passion: in Graeciam debacchantem ...Zenonis munificentia pene pacatus...beneficiis nunquam satiatus, &c.
约达尼斯(c. 56, 57, p. 696)铺陈了狄奥多里克的功劳,也承认他所得的赏赐,却掩饰了他的叛乱——而关于这场叛乱,马尔胡斯(Excerpt. Legat. p. 78—97)倒保存了不少耐人寻味的细节。马尔切利努斯是查士丁尼的家臣,他的《编年史》正是在查士丁尼第四次任执政官(公元 534 年)期间写成的(Scaliger, Thesaurus Temporum, P. ii, p. 34—57);他的成见与意气,从这些字句中不难窥见:in Graeciam debacchantem……Zenonis munificentia pene pacatus……beneficiis nunquam satiatus, &c.(他在希腊肆意横行……全靠芝诺的慷慨才勉强安抚下来……种种恩赐从未使他餍足,云云)。
1211
↩
Gibbon has omitted much of the complicated intrigues of the Byzantine court with the two Theodorics. The weak emperor attempted to play them one against the other, and was himself in turn insulted, and the empire ravaged, by both. The details of the successive alliance and revolt, of hostility and of union, between the two Gothic chieftains, to dictate terms to the emperor, may be found in Malchus.—M.
拜占庭朝廷与两位狄奥多里克之间那些错综复杂的勾心斗角,吉本略去了大半。这位软弱的皇帝企图挑动二人相互倾轧,结果反倒轮番受二人的羞辱,帝国也遭他们两下里蹂躏。这两位哥特首领时而结盟、时而反叛,时而反目、时而联手,好向皇帝逼取条件——其中种种曲折,均可在马尔胡斯书中找到。—M
13
↩
As he was riding in his own camp, an unruly horse threw him against the point of a spear which hung before a tent, or was fixed on a wagon, (Marcellin. in Chron. Evagrius, l. iii. c. 25.)
他在自家营中骑行时,坐骑桀骜不驯,把他掀了下来,正撞在一杆长矛的尖锋上——那矛或是悬在帐前,或是插在大车上(Marcellin. in Chron.;Evagrius, l. iii. c. 25)。
14
↩
See Malchus (p. 91) and Evagrius, (l. iii. c. 35.)
见马尔胡斯(p. 91)与埃瓦格里乌斯(l. iii. c. 35)。
15
↩
Malchus, p. 85. In a single action, which was decided by the skill and discipline of Sabinian, Theodoric could lose 5000 men.] [Footnote 16: Jornandes (c. 57, p. 696, 697) has abridged the great history of Cassiodorus. See, compare, and reconcile Procopius, (Gothic. l. i. c. i.,) the Valesian Fragment, (p. 718,) Theophanes, (p. 113,) and Marcellinus, (in Chron.)
马尔胡斯,p. 85。在一次全凭萨比尼安努斯的用兵之能与严整纪律才见分晓的战斗中,狄奥多里克一役竟折损了五千人。] [Footnote 16: 约达尼斯(c. 57, p. 696, 697)节略了卡西奥多鲁斯那部宏富的史著。可参较、比对并调和普罗柯比(Gothic. l. i. c. i.)、瓦莱西乌斯残卷(p. 718)、塞奥法尼斯(p. 113)与马尔切利努斯(in Chron.)诸家之说。
16
↩
Jordanes (c. 57, p. 696, 697) has abridged the great history of Cassiodorus. See, compare, and reconcile, Procopius (Gothic. 1. i. c. i.), the Valesian Fragment (p.718), Theophanes (p. 113), and Marcellinus (in Chron.).
约达尼斯(c. 57, p. 696, 697)节略了卡西奥多鲁斯那部宏富的史著。可参较、比对并调和普罗柯比(Gothic. l. i. c. i.)、瓦莱西乌斯残卷(p. 718)、塞奥法尼斯(p. 113)与马尔切利努斯(in Chron.)诸家之说。
17
↩
Theodoric’s march is supplied and illustrated by Ennodius, (p. 1598—1602,) when the bombast of the oration is translated into the language of common sense.
狄奥多里克这次进军的详情,可由恩诺迪乌斯(p. 1598—1602)补足并印证——只要把他那篇演说里的浮夸辞令,还原成寻常人话即可。
18
↩
Tot reges, &c., (Ennodius, p. 1602.) We must recollect how much the royal title was multiplied and degraded, and that the mercenaries of Italy were the fragments of many tribes and nations.
“Tot reges”云云(如此众多的国王,见恩诺迪乌斯,p. 1602)。我们须记得,“王”这个称号当时已被滥用得何等泛滥、何等贬值;何况意大利那些雇佣兵,本就是许多部族、许多民族的零散碎片凑起来的。
19
↩
See Ennodius, p. 1603, 1604. Since the orator, in the king’s presence, could mention and praise his mother, we may conclude that the magnanimity of Theodoric was not hurt by the vulgar reproaches of concubine and bastard. * Note: Gibbon here assumes that the mother of Theodoric was the concubine of Theodemir, which he leaves doubtful in the text.—M.
见恩诺迪乌斯,p. 1603, 1604。既然这位演说家能当着国王的面提起并颂扬他的母亲,我们便可断定:“姬妾”与“私生子”这类市井的讥诮,并未伤及狄奥多里克那份豁达的气度。*编者按:吉本在此认定狄奥多里克之母是狄奥德米尔的姬妾,而这一点,他在正文中却是含糊其辞、未下定论的。—M
20
↩
This anecdote is related on the modern but respectable authority of Sigonius, (Op. tom. i. p. 580. De Occident. Impl. l. xv.:) his words are curious: “Would you return?” &c. She presented and almost displayed the original recess. * Note: The authority of Sigonius would scarcely have weighed with Gibbon except for an indecent anecdote. I have a recollection of a similar story in some of the Italian wars.—M.
这则轶事出自西戈尼乌斯——虽属晚近,却也不失为可敬的依据(Op. tom. i. p. 580. De Occident. Impl. l. xv.)。他的措辞颇为奇特:“你们莫非想钻回去不成?”云云——她一面说,一面撩起衣裳,几乎把当初孕育他们的那处隐秘之所都袒露了出来。*编者按:若非贪图这则有伤大雅的轶闻,西戈尼乌斯这点分量的依据,吉本本是断不会采信的。我依稀记得,在某几场意大利战争里也有过类似的故事。—M
21
↩
Hist. Miscell. l. xv., a Roman history from Janus to the ixth century, an Epitome of Eutropius, Paulus Diaconus, and Theophanes which Muratori has published from a Ms. in the Ambrosian library, (Script. Rerum Italicarum, tom. i. p. 100.)
见 Hist. Miscell. l. xv.——这是一部自雅努斯直叙到九世纪的罗马史,实为欧特罗皮乌斯、执事保罗(Paulus Diaconus)与塞奥法尼斯诸书的节略本;穆拉托里据安布罗西亚图书馆的一部抄本将其刊行(Script. Rerum Italicarum, tom. i. p. 100)。
22
↩
Procopius (Gothic. l. i. c. i.) approves himself an impartial sceptic. Cassiodorus (in Chron.) and Ennodius (p. 1604) are loyal and credulous, and the testimony of the Valesian Fragment (p. 718) may justify their belief. Marcellinus spits the venom of a Greek subject—perjuriis illectus, interfectusque est, (in Chron.)
普罗柯比(Gothic. l. i. c. i.)表明自己是个不偏不倚的怀疑论者。卡西奥多鲁斯(in Chron.)与恩诺迪乌斯(p. 1604)则既忠顺又轻信,而瓦莱西乌斯残卷(p. 718)的佐证,或许能为他们的采信撑撑腰。马尔切利努斯发泄的,则是一个希腊臣民的刻毒之词:perjuriis illectus, interfectusque est(他中了背誓之计,遂遭杀害;in Chron.)。
23
↩
The sonorous and servile oration of Ennodius was pronounced at Milan or Ravenna in the years 507 or 508, (Sirmond, tom. i. p. 615.) Two or three years afterwards, the orator was rewarded with the bishopric of Pavia, which he held till his death in the year 521. (Dupin, Bibliot. Eccles. tom. v. p. 11-14. See Saxii Onomasticon, tom. ii. p. 12.)
恩诺迪乌斯那篇辞藻铿锵、谄媚十足的演说,于公元 507 或 508 年在米兰或拉文纳发表(Sirmond, tom. i. p. 615)。两三年后,这位演说家便以帕维亚主教之位为酬,一直任职到公元 521 年去世(Dupin, Bibliot. Eccles. tom. v. p. 11-14;另见 Saxii Onomasticon, tom. ii. p. 12)。
24
↩
Our best materials are occasional hints from Procopius and the Valesian Fragment, which was discovered by Sirmond, and is published at the end of Ammianus Marcellinus. The author’s name is unknown, and his style is barbarous; but in his various facts he exhibits the knowledge, without the passions, of a contemporary. The president Montesquieu had formed the plan of a history of Theodoric, which at a distance might appear a rich and interesting subject.
我们最好的材料,不过是普罗柯比偶尔透露的只言片语,以及那部瓦莱西乌斯残卷——此卷由西尔蒙发现,附刊在阿米阿努斯·马尔切利努斯书末。其作者姓名不详,文笔粗陋;但他所记的种种史实,却显出一个当代人所具的见识,而无当代人所有的偏激。孟德斯鸠院长曾拟就一部狄奥多里克史的构想——这题目远远望去,倒像是一桩丰赡而饶有趣味的题材。
25
↩
The best edition of the Variarum Libri xii. is that of Joh. Garretius, (Rotomagi, 1679, in Opp. Cassiodor. 2 vols. in fol.;) but they deserved and required such an editor as the Marquis Scipio Maffei, who thought of publishing them at Verona. The Barbara Eleganza (as it is ingeniously named by Tiraboschi) is never simple, and seldom perspicuous
《杂纂十二卷》(Variarum Libri xii.)最佳的版本,是约翰·加雷提乌斯所编(Rotomagi[鲁昂], 1679,收于《卡西奥多鲁斯全集》,对开本两卷);不过这部书原该由西皮奥内·马费伊侯爵这样的编者来整理才配得上——他曾打算在维罗纳将其刊行。这种“蛮族式的典雅”(Barbara Eleganza,蒂拉博斯基给它起的这个名号颇为巧妙),从来不显质朴,也难得清通。
2511
↩
Compare Gibbon, ch. xxxvi. vol. iii. p. 459, &c.—Manso observes that this division was conducted not in a violent and irregular, but in a legal and orderly, manner. The Barbarian, who could not show a title of grant from the officers of Theodoric appointed for the purpose, or a prescriptive right of thirty years, in case he had obtained the property before the Ostrogothic conquest, was ejected from the estate. He conceives that estates too small to bear division paid a third of their produce.—Geschichte des Os Gothischen Reiches, p. 82.—M.
参较吉本本书第三十六章,第三卷 p. 459 及以下。——曼索指出,这次分地并非以强横无序的方式进行,而是循着合法而井然的章程办理的。凡蛮族若拿不出狄奥多里克为此专设的官员所颁发的授予凭据,又或者——倘他是在东哥特征服之前便已取得地产——拿不出三十年的时效之权,便要被逐出田产之外。他还推想:那些田产过小、不便再行分割的,就折收其出产的三分之一。见《东哥特王国史》,p. 82。—M
26
↩
Procopius, Gothic, l. i. c. i. Variarum, ii. Maffei (Verona Illustrata, P. i. p. 228) exaggerates the injustice of the Goths, whom he hated as an Italian noble. The plebeian Muratori crouches under their oppression.
普罗柯比,Gothic. l. i. c. i.;《杂纂》ii。马费伊(Verona Illustrata, P. i. p. 228)夸大了哥特人的不义之处——身为意大利贵族,他对哥特人满怀憎恨。而出身平民的穆拉托里,则在他们的压迫下屈身忍气。
27
↩
Procopius, Goth. l. iii. c. 421. Ennodius describes (p. 1612, 1613) the military arts and increasing numbers of the Goths.
普罗柯比,Goth. l. iii. c. 421。恩诺迪乌斯(p. 1612, 1613)描述了哥特人的兵法武艺,以及他们日渐增多的人数。
28
↩
When Theodoric gave his sister to the king of the Vandals she sailed for Africa with a guard of 1000 noble Goths, each of whom was attended by five armed followers, (Procop. Vandal. l. i. c. 8.) The Gothic nobility must have been as numerous as brave.
狄奥多里克把妹妹许配给汪达尔王时,她带着一千名哥特贵族充作护卫,渡海前往非洲,而这些贵族每人又各带五名武装随从(Procop. Vandal. l. i. c. 8)。可见哥特人的贵族之众,正与其勇武相当。
2811
↩
Manso (p. 100) quotes two passages from Cassiodorus to show that the Goths were not exempt from the fiscal claims.—Cassiodor, i. 19, iv. 14—M.
曼索(p. 100)引卡西奥多鲁斯书中两处文字,以证哥特人并未免于赋税之征。见 Cassiodor, i. 19, iv. 14。—M
29
↩
See the acknowledgment of Gothic liberty, (Var. v. 30.)
关于对哥特人这份自由特权的确认,见《杂纂》v. 30。
30
↩
Procopius, Goth. l. i. c. 2. The Roman boys learnt the language (Var. viii. 21) of the Goths. Their general ignorance is not destroyed by the exceptions of Amalasuntha, a female, who might study without shame, or of Theodatus, whose learning provoked the indignation and contempt of his countrymen.
普罗柯比,Goth. l. i. c. 2。罗马的男孩要学哥特人的语言(Var. viii. 21)。哥特人普遍不学无术,这一点并不因少数例外而改观——阿马拉逊塔是个女子,读书识字于她并不算羞事;至于狄奥达图斯,他那点学问反倒招来了同胞的愤慨与鄙夷。
31
↩
A saying of Theodoric was founded on experience: “Romanus miser imitatur Gothum; ut utilis (dives) Gothus imitatur Romanum.” (See the Fragment and Notes of Valesius, p. 719.)
狄奥多里克有一句话,是从阅历中得来的:“Romanus miser imitatur Gothum; ut utilis (dives) Gothus imitatur Romanum.”(穷苦的罗马人摹仿哥特人;正如殷实[富足]的哥特人摹仿罗马人。)见瓦莱西乌斯所辑残卷及注释,p. 719。
32
↩
The view of the military establishment of the Goths in Italy is collected from the Epistles of Cassiodorus (Var. i. 24, 40; iii. 3, 24, 48; iv. 13, 14; v. 26, 27; viii. 3, 4, 25.) They are illustrated by the learned Mascou, (Hist. of the Germans, l. xi. 40—44, Annotation xiv.) Note: Compare Manso, Geschichte des Ost Gothischen Reiches, p. 114.—M.
关于哥特人在意大利军事制度的概貌,系从卡西奥多鲁斯的书信中辑录而来(Var. i. 24, 40; iii. 3, 24, 48; iv. 13, 14; v. 26, 27; viii. 3, 4, 25)。博学的马斯科夫对此作了阐发(《日耳曼人史》,l. xi. 40—44,注释十四)。编者按:另可参较曼索《东哥特王国史》,p. 114。