Chapter LVI: The Saracens, The Franks And The Normans.—Part I. 第五十六章 萨拉森人、法兰克人与诺曼人——第一节
¶
The Saracens, Franks, And Greeks, In Italy.—First Adventures And Settlement Of The Normans.—Character And Conquest Of Robert Guiscard, Duke Of Apulia—Deliverance Of Sicily By His Brother Roger.—Victories Of Robert Over The Emperors Of The East And West.—Roger, King Of Sicily, Invades Africa And Greece.—The Emperor Manuel Comnenus.— Wars Of The Greeks And Normans.—Extinction Of The Normans.
意大利境内的萨拉森人、法兰克人与希腊人。——诺曼人最初的冒险与定居。——阿普利亚公爵罗伯特·吉斯卡尔的品格与征服。——其弟罗杰光复西西里。——罗伯特战胜东、西两位皇帝。——西西里国王罗杰入侵非洲与希腊。——皇帝曼努埃尔·科穆宁。——希腊人与诺曼人之战。——诺曼人的绝灭。
¶
The three great nations of the world, the Greeks, the Saracens, and the Franks, encountered each other on the theatre of Italy. 1 The southern provinces, which now compose the kingdom of Naples, were subject, for the most part, to the Lombard dukes and princes of Beneventum; 2 so powerful in war, that they checked for a moment the genius of Charlemagne; so liberal in peace, that they maintained in their capital an academy of thirty-two philosophers and grammarians. The division of this flourishing state produced the rival principalities of Benevento, Salerno, and Capua; and the thoughtless ambition or revenge of the competitors invited the Saracens to the ruin of their common inheritance. During a calamitous period of two hundred years, Italy was exposed to a repetition of wounds, which the invaders were not capable of healing by the union and tranquility of a perfect conquest. Their frequent and almost annual squadrons issued from the port of Palermo, and were entertained with too much indulgence by the Christians of Naples: the more formidable fleets were prepared on the African coast; and even the Arabs of Andalusia were sometimes tempted to assist or oppose the Moslems of an adverse sect. In the revolution of human events, a new ambuscade was concealed in the Caudine Forks, the fields of Cannae were bedewed a second time with the blood of the Africans, and the sovereign of Rome again attacked or defended the walls of Capua and Tarentum. A colony of Saracens had been planted at Bari, which commands the entrance of the Adriatic Gulf; and their impartial depredations provoked the resentment, and conciliated the union of the two emperors. An offensive alliance was concluded between Basil the Macedonian, the first of his race, and Lewis the great-grandson of Charlemagne; 3 and each party supplied the deficiencies of his associate. It would have been imprudent in the Byzantine monarch to transport his stationary troops of Asia to an Italian campaign; and the Latin arms would have been insufficient if his superior navy had not occupied the mouth of the Gulf. The fortress of Bari was invested by the infantry of the Franks, and by the cavalry and galleys of the Greeks; and, after a defence of four years, the Arabian emir submitted to the clemency of Lewis, who commanded in person the operations of the siege. This important conquest had been achieved by the concord of the East and West; but their recent amity was soon imbittered by the mutual complaints of jealousy and pride. The Greeks assumed as their own the merit of the conquest and the pomp of the triumph; extolled the greatness of their powers, and affected to deride the intemperance and sloth of the handful of Barbarians who appeared under the banners of the Carlovingian prince. His reply is expressed with the eloquence of indignation and truth: “We confess the magnitude of your preparation,” says the great-grandson of Charlemagne. “Your armies were indeed as numerous as a cloud of summer locusts, who darken the day, flap their wings, and, after a short flight, tumble weary and breathless to the ground. Like them, ye sunk after a feeble effort; ye were vanquished by your own cowardice; and withdrew from the scene of action to injure and despoil our Christian subjects of the Sclavonian coast. We were few in number, and why were we few? Because, after a tedious expectation of your arrival, I had dismissed my host, and retained only a chosen band of warriors to continue the blockade of the city. If they indulged their hospitable feasts in the face of danger and death, did these feasts abate the vigor of their enterprise? Is it by your fasting that the walls of Bari have been overturned? Did not these valiant Franks, diminished as they were by languor and fatigue, intercept and vanish the three most powerful emirs of the Saracens? and did not their defeat precipitate the fall of the city? Bari is now fallen; Tarentum trembles; Calabria will be delivered; and, if we command the sea, the Island of Sicily may be rescued from the hands of the infidels. My brother,” accelerate (a name most offensive to the vanity of the Greek,) “accelerate your naval succors, respect your allies, and distrust your flatterers.” 4
当时世上三大民族——希腊人、萨拉森人和法兰克人——在意大利这座舞台上狭路相逢。1意大利南部诸行省,即今日那不勒斯王国之地,大部分臣属于贝内文图姆的伦巴第公爵与亲王;2这些伦巴第君主战时兵强,一度竟遏止了查理曼的雄才;平时又雅好文教,在都城供养着一所由三十二位哲人与文法家组成的学园。这个繁盛之邦后来分裂,衍生出贝内文图姆、萨莱诺、卡普亚三个彼此争雄的亲王国;而诸邦相争,或出于轻率的野心,或出于报复之念,竟引萨拉森人入境,同毁这份共有的基业。在长达两百年的灾难岁月里,意大利屡遭创伤而不得愈合:侵略者既无力彻底征服全境,也就无从以统一与安宁来收拾这残破的局面。他们的舰队几乎年年从巴勒莫港出动,而那不勒斯的基督徒对之未免过于纵容优待;更可畏的舰队则在非洲海岸集结;甚至安达卢西亚的阿拉伯人,有时也不免受诱而来,去援助或攻打敌对教派的穆斯林。世事轮回:卡夫丁峡谷中再度暗设伏兵,坎尼的原野第二次浸染非洲人的鲜血,罗马的君主也又一次或攻或守于卡普亚和塔兰图姆的城下。萨拉森人曾在巴里建立据点,此城扼守着亚得里亚湾的入口;他们四出劫掠,不分敌友,遂激起两位皇帝的共愤,也促成了二人的联合。于是马其顿人巴西尔(其家族的第一位皇帝)与查理曼的曾孙路易,缔结了联合进攻的同盟;3双方各以己之所长,补对方之所短。对拜占庭君主而言,把常驻亚洲的戍军调来意大利作战,本属失策;而拉丁一方的兵力,若无那支强大的希腊海军封锁海湾口,也断难济事。巴里要塞遂遭围攻:法兰克人出步兵,希腊人出骑兵与战船;苦守四年之后,那位阿拉伯埃米尔终于向亲自督师攻城的路易乞降,听凭其宽宥。这一重大战果,本是东西双方同心协力所得;然而两家新结的情谊,不久便因双方猜忌傲慢、互相埋怨而渐生嫌隙。希腊人把这场胜利的全部功劳、连同凯旋的荣耀,都揽到自己身上;他们夸耀本国军威之盛,又故作姿态,嘲笑加洛林君主麾下那一小撮蛮族既纵酒无度、又疏懒怠惰。路易的回敬,则义正词严、慷慨激昂。查理曼的这位曾孙说道:“你们备战规模之大,我们并不否认。你们的大军确实多如夏日的蝗群,遮天蔽日,鼓翼而飞,可飞不多远,便困乏得喘不上气,纷纷坠地。你们正如这蝗群,稍一用力便颓然不支;打败你们的,正是你们自己的怯懦;你们撤离战场,反倒去侵害、劫掠斯拉夫海岸上我们的基督徒臣民。我方人数确实不多,可为何不多?只因苦候你们迟迟不至,我早已遣散大军,只留下一支精选的劲旅,继续封锁那座城池。他们纵然在生死危难当前仍纵情设宴款待,难道这等宴饮就消磨了他们进取的锐气?巴里的城墙,难道是靠你们的斋戒才推倒的吗?这些骁勇的法兰克人,纵然已因困乏疲惫而减员,不还是拦截并歼灭了萨拉森人麾下最强的三位埃米尔?而这三人的败亡,不正加速了该城的陷落?如今巴里已下,塔兰图姆震恐,卡拉布里亚指日可复;只要我们掌握了制海权,西西里岛也能从异教徒手中夺回。我的兄弟啊”——“兄弟”这一称呼,最能刺痛希腊人的虚荣——“望你从速增派海上援军,敬重你的盟友,切莫轻信身边的谄谀之徒。”4
¶
The revolution of human affairs had produced in Apulia and Calabria a melancholy contrast between the age of Pythagoras and the tenth century of the Christian aera. At the former period, the coast of Great Greece (as it was then styled) was planted with free and opulent cities: these cities were peopled with soldiers, artists, and philosophers; and the military strength of Tarentum; Sybaris, or Crotona, was not inferior to that of a powerful kingdom. At the second aera, these once flourishing provinces were clouded with ignorance impoverished by tyranny, and depopulated by Barbarian war; nor can we severely accuse the exaggeration of a contemporary, that a fair and ample district was reduced to the same desolation which had covered the earth after the general deluge. 9 Among the hostilities of the Arabs, the Franks, and the Greeks, in the southern Italy, I shall select two or three anecdotes expressive of their national manners. 1. It was the amusement of the Saracens to profane, as well as to pillage, the monasteries and churches. At the siege of Salerno, a Mussulman chief spread his couch on the communion-table, and on that altar sacrificed each night the virginity of a Christian nun. As he wrestled with a reluctant maid, a beam in the roof was accidentally or dexterously thrown down on his head; and the death of the lustful emir was imputed to the wrath of Christ, which was at length awakened to the defence of his faithful spouse. 10 2. The Saracens besieged the cities of Beneventum and Capua: after a vain appeal to the successors of Charlemagne, the Lombards implored the clemency and aid of the Greek emperor. 11 A fearless citizen dropped from the walls, passed the intrenchments, accomplished his commission, and fell into the hands of the Barbarians as he was returning with the welcome news. They commanded him to assist their enterprise, and deceive his countrymen, with the assurance that wealth and honors should be the reward of his falsehood, and that his sincerity would be punished with immediate death. He affected to yield, but as soon as he was conducted within hearing of the Christians on the rampart, “Friends and brethren,” he cried with a loud voice, “be bold and patient, maintain the city; your sovereign is informed of your distress, and your deliverers are at hand. I know my doom, and commit my wife and children to your gratitude.” The rage of the Arabs confirmed his evidence; and the self-devoted patriot was transpierced with a hundred spears. He deserves to live in the memory of the virtuous, but the repetition of the same story in ancient and modern times, may sprinkle some doubts on the reality of this generous deed. 12 3. The recital of a third incident may provoke a smile amidst the horrors of war. Theobald, marquis of Camerino and Spoleto, 13 supported the rebels of Beneventum; and his wanton cruelty was not incompatible in that age with the character of a hero. His captives of the Greek nation or party were castrated without mercy, and the outrage was aggravated by a cruel jest, that he wished to present the emperor with a supply of eunuchs, the most precious ornaments of the Byzantine court. The garrison of a castle had been defeated in a sally, and the prisoners were sentenced to the customary operation. But the sacrifice was disturbed by the intrusion of a frantic female, who, with bleeding cheeks dishevelled hair, and importunate clamors, compelled the marquis to listen to her complaint. “Is it thus,” she cried, “ye magnanimous heroes, that ye wage war against women, against women who have never injured ye, and whose only arms are the distaff and the loom?” Theobald denied the charge, and protested that, since the Amazons, he had never heard of a female war. “And how,” she furiously exclaimed, “can you attack us more directly, how can you wound us in a more vital part, than by robbing our husbands of what we most dearly cherish, the source of our joys, and the hope of our posterity? The plunder of our flocks and herds I have endured without a murmur, but this fatal injury, this irreparable loss, subdues my patience, and calls aloud on the justice of heaven and earth.” A general laugh applauded her eloquence; the savage Franks, inaccessible to pity, were moved by her ridiculous, yet rational despair; and with the deliverance of the captives, she obtained the restitution of her effects. As she returned in triumph to the castle, she was overtaken by a messenger, to inquire, in the name of Theobald, what punishment should be inflicted on her husband, were he again taken in arms. “Should such,” she answered without hesitation, “be his guilt and misfortune, he has eyes, and a nose, and hands, and feet. These are his own, and these he may deserve to forfeit by his personal offences. But let my lord be pleased to spare what his little handmaid presumes to claim as her peculiar and lawful property.” 14
沧海桑田,阿普利亚与卡拉布里亚一带,毕达哥拉斯的时代与基督纪元十世纪之间,竟形成一种令人怅惘的对照。在前一时代,这片当时被称作“大希腊”的海岸上,遍布着自由而富庶的城邦;城中住着战士、艺术家和哲学家;塔兰图姆、锡巴里斯或克罗托纳的军力,都不亚于一个强盛的王国。到了后一时代,这些昔日繁华的行省,却陷于愚昧,困于暴政而民穷财尽,又经蛮族战乱而人烟凋敝;当时有人说,这一片富饶广袤的土地,已荒凉得如同大洪水过后的大地——这话纵有夸张,我们也不忍苛责。9在意大利南部,阿拉伯人、法兰克人与希腊人之间战乱不断;我且从中拣出两三则轶事,以见各族的民风。一、萨拉森人以劫掠并亵渎修道院和教堂为乐。围攻萨莱诺时,一位穆斯林首领竟把卧榻铺在圣餐桌上,夜夜在那祭坛上玷污一名基督教修女的贞操。一次他正与一名不从的少女相扭,屋梁忽然坠落——或是偶然,或是有人巧手为之——正砸在他头上;人们便把这荒淫埃米尔之死,归于基督的震怒——基督终于醒来,护卫他忠贞的新妇。10二、萨拉森人围攻贝内文图姆和卡普亚二城;伦巴第人向查理曼的后嗣求援无果,只得转而恳求希腊皇帝施恩相救。11一位无畏的市民缒城而下,穿越敌垒,完成了使命,正带着喜讯归来,却落入蛮族之手。蛮人命他助其行事、欺骗同胞,并许诺:若肯撒谎,便以财富荣华相酬;若敢吐实,则立即处死。他佯装应允,可一被带到城头基督徒听得见的地方,便高声呼喊:“朋友们,弟兄们,要勇敢,要坚忍,务必守住此城!你们的君主已知你们危难,援兵旦夕将至。我自知必死,唯将妻儿托付于你们的恩义。”阿拉伯人勃然大怒,恰好印证了他的话;这位舍身报国的义士,当即被上百支长矛刺穿。他理应为后世贤者所铭记;只是古今类似的故事屡屡重演,未免令人对这桩义举的真实性稍存疑虑。12三、第三件事说来,或能在战争的恐怖中博人一笑。卡梅里诺与斯波莱托侯爵西奥博尔德13曾支持贝内文图姆的叛党;他恣意残暴,可在那个时代,这与英雄的名号却并不相悖。凡落入他手的希腊人、或希腊一党之人,皆遭无情阉割;他还以一句残忍的戏言火上浇油,说要给皇帝进献一批阉人,好充作拜占庭宫廷最珍贵的点缀。某座城堡的守军出击失利,被俘者照例都要挨那一刀。不料行刑之际,一个疯了似的女人闯了进来:她双颊抓破渗血,披头散发,纠缠不休地叫喊,逼得侯爵不得不听她申诉。她嚷道:“你们这些气度不凡的英雄,就是这样打仗的吗?——竟对妇人开战!我们这些妇人从未伤过你们分毫,手中的兵器不过是纺锤和织机罢了!”西奥博尔德矢口否认,声称自亚马逊人以来,他从未听说过什么对妇人的战争。她怒不可遏地喊道:“你们夺去我们丈夫身上我们最珍爱之物——那是我们欢乐的源泉,是我们子嗣的指望——还有什么攻击比这更直截,还有什么伤害能戳在比这更要命的地方?你们抢走我们的牛羊,我尚且默然忍受、一声不吭;可这致命的戕害、这无可弥补的损失,却叫我再难隐忍,只得向天地间的公道大声疾呼!”众人哄然大笑,为她这番口才喝彩;这些野蛮的法兰克人本铁石心肠、不为怜悯所动,却被她这份既可笑又在理的绝望打动了;于是俘虏获释,她也讨回了自己的“财物”。她正得意洋洋地返回城堡,一名使者追上来,奉西奥博尔德之命发问:倘若她丈夫再度持械被擒,该当何罪?她毫不迟疑地答道:“他若真有此罪、遭此不幸,那么——他有眼睛,有鼻子,有手,也有脚。这些都是他自己的,凭他自身的过犯,尽可拿去。只求侯爵大人开恩,饶过那一件——那是他卑微的婢子斗胆声言、属于自己名下的合法私产。”14
¶
The establishment of the Normans in the kingdoms of Naples and Sicily 15 is an event most romantic in its origin, and in its consequences most important both to Italy and the Eastern empire. The broken provinces of the Greeks, Lombards, and Saracens, were exposed to every invader, and every sea and land were invaded by the adventurous spirit of the Scandinavian pirates. After a long indulgence of rapine and slaughter, a fair and ample territory was accepted, occupied, and named, by the Normans of France: they renounced their gods for the God of the Christians; 16 and the dukes of Normandy acknowledged themselves the vassals of the successors of Charlemagne and Capet. The savage fierceness which they had brought from the snowy mountains of Norway was refined, without being corrupted, in a warmer climate; the companions of Rollo insensibly mingled with the natives; they imbibed the manners, language, 17 and gallantry, of the French nation; and in a martial age, the Normans might claim the palm of valor and glorious achievements. Of the fashionable superstitions, they embraced with ardor the pilgrimages of Rome, Italy, and the Holy Land. 171 In this active devotion, the minds and bodies were invigorated by exercise: danger was the incentive, novelty the recompense; and the prospect of the world was decorated by wonder, credulity, and ambitious hope. They confederated for their mutual defence; and the robbers of the Alps, who had been allured by the garb of a pilgrim, were often chastised by the arm of a warrior. In one of these pious visits to the cavern of Mount Garganus in Apulia, which had been sanctified by the apparition of the archangel Michael, 18 they were accosted by a stranger in the Greek habit, but who soon revealed himself as a rebel, a fugitive, and a mortal foe of the Greek empire. His name was Melo; a noble citizen of Bari, who, after an unsuccessful revolt, was compelled to seek new allies and avengers of his country. The bold appearance of the Normans revived his hopes and solicited his confidence: they listened to the complaints, and still more to the promises, of the patriot. The assurance of wealth demonstrated the justice of his cause; and they viewed, as the inheritance of the brave, the fruitful land which was oppressed by effeminate tyrants. On their return to Normandy, they kindled a spark of enterprise, and a small but intrepid band was freely associated for the deliverance of Apulia. They passed the Alps by separate roads, and in the disguise of pilgrims; but in the neighborhood of Rome they were saluted by the chief of Bari, who supplied the more indigent with arms and horses, and instantly led them to the field of action. In the first conflict, their valor prevailed; but in the second engagement they were overwhelmed by the numbers and military engines of the Greeks, and indignantly retreated with their faces to the enemy. 1811 The unfortunate Melo ended his life a suppliant at the court of Germany: his Norman followers, excluded from their native and their promised land, wandered among the hills and valleys of Italy, and earned their daily subsistence by the sword. To that formidable sword the princes of Capua, Beneventum, Salerno, and Naples, alternately appealed in their domestic quarrels; the superior spirit and discipline of the Normans gave victory to the side which they espoused; and their cautious policy observed the balance of power, lest the preponderance of any rival state should render their aid less important, and their service less profitable. Their first asylum was a strong camp in the depth of the marshes of Campania: but they were soon endowed by the liberality of the duke of Naples with a more plentiful and permanent seat. Eight miles from his residence, as a bulwark against Capua, the town of Aversa was built and fortified for their use; and they enjoyed as their own the corn and fruits, the meadows and groves, of that fertile district. The report of their success attracted every year new swarms of pilgrims and soldiers: the poor were urged by necessity; the rich were excited by hope; and the brave and active spirits of Normandy were impatient of ease and ambitious of renown. The independent standard of Aversa afforded shelter and encouragement to the outlaws of the province, to every fugitive who had escaped from the injustice or justice of his superiors; and these foreign associates were quickly assimilated in manners and language to the Gallic colony. The first leader of the Normans was Count Rainulf; and, in the origin of society, preeminence of rank is the reward and the proof of superior merit. 19 1911
诺曼人在那不勒斯与西西里两国的立足,15其缘起极富传奇色彩,其后果又对意大利和东部帝国都关系重大。希腊人、伦巴第人与萨拉森人的领地支离破碎,谁都可以来犯;而斯堪的纳维亚海盗那股冒险的劲头,则四海八荒、无处不至。他们纵情劫掠杀伐许久,最终接纳并占据了一片富饶广袤的疆土,还以自己的族名为它命名;从此,法兰西便有了“诺曼人”。他们抛弃了本族的诸神,改奉基督徒的上帝;16诺曼底的历代公爵,则自认是查理曼与卡佩两系后嗣的封臣。他们从挪威的雪山带来的那股野蛮凶悍,在较温暖的气候里渐渐磨去了粗粝,却不曾因此萎靡;罗洛的伙伴们不知不觉与土著相融合;他们习染了法兰西人的举止、语言17与豪侠之风;而在那尚武的年代,论勇武、论功业之辉煌,诺曼人足可拔得头筹。在当时流行的种种迷信中,他们尤其热衷于罗马、意大利与圣地的朝圣。171这种劳筋动骨的虔诚,使身心都因历练而强健:危险成了激励,新奇便是酬报;而眼前展开的大千世界,又经惊奇、轻信与勃勃野心的点染,显得五光十色。他们彼此结盟,以求互卫;阿尔卑斯山中的盗匪见朝圣者的装束便动了觊觎之心,却往往尝到武士拳脚的教训。阿普利亚的加尔加努斯山有一处岩洞,曾因天使长米迦勒显圣而被奉为圣地;18一回,他们虔诚造访此洞,一个身着希腊装束的陌生人上前搭话,但此人旋即表明:他是个叛乱者、逃亡者,是希腊帝国不共戴天的仇敌。他名叫梅洛,是巴里城的一位贵族,起兵失败后,不得不四处寻觅新的盟友,为祖国复仇。诺曼人那副悍勇的模样,重新点燃了他的希望,也博得了他的信任;他们倾听这位爱国者的诉苦,而对他许下的种种好处,则听得更为入神。有财富作保证,他那番大义便显得格外正当;在他们眼里,这片沃土正受着一群孱弱暴君的欺压,理应归勇者所有。回到诺曼底后,他们点燃了这桩事业的星火,一支人数不多却无所畏惧的队伍自愿结伙,去解救阿普利亚。他们乔装成朝圣者,分头翻越阿尔卑斯山;到罗马近郊,巴里那位首领前来相迎,给其中较贫困者配备了兵器和马匹,随即领他们奔赴战场。首战,他们凭勇武取胜;次战,却敌不过希腊人的众多兵力和攻战器械,只得且战且退,始终以正面对敌,愤然而归。1811不幸的梅洛,最终以乞求者的身份客死于日耳曼宫廷;他麾下的诺曼人,既回不了故土,又进不了那片许给他们的乐土,只得在意大利的山谷间流浪,靠刀剑挣一日的口粮。卡普亚、贝内文图姆、萨莱诺、那不勒斯的诸侯,每逢内讧,便轮番来求助于这可畏的刀锋;诺曼人斗志高昂、纪律严明,凡他们所助的一方,无不获胜;而他们又老谋深算,留意维持列邦的均势,唯恐哪一方独大,使自己的援手不再举足轻重,效劳也不再有利可图。他们最初的栖身之所,是坎帕尼亚沼泽深处一座坚固的营寨;但不久,那不勒斯公爵慷慨相赠,给了他们一处更丰饶、更长久的居地。在离公爵府邸八英里处,为抵御卡普亚,修筑并加固了阿韦尔萨城,供他们居用;那一带土地肥沃,田里的谷物瓜果、成片的草地林木,从此都归他们享用。他们成功的消息传开,年年都招来成群结队的朝圣者和士兵:穷人为生计所迫,富人受希望所激;而诺曼底那些勇武好动之辈,本就耐不住安逸,一心渴慕功名。阿韦尔萨那面独立的旗帜,为本省的亡命之徒、为一切逃脱了上司的冤枉或制裁的逃亡者,提供了庇护与鼓舞;这些外来的伙伴,风俗语言很快便同化于这片高卢人的殖民地。诺曼人的第一任首领是赖努尔夫伯爵;而在社会草创之初,地位的尊显,正是过人才德的酬报和明证。19 1911
¶
Since the conquest of Sicily by the Arabs, the Grecian emperors had been anxious to regain that valuable possession; but their efforts, however strenuous, had been opposed by the distance and the sea. Their costly armaments, after a gleam of success, added new pages of calamity and disgrace to the Byzantine annals: twenty thousand of their best troops were lost in a single expedition; and the victorious Moslems derided the policy of a nation which intrusted eunuchs not only with the custody of their women, but with the command of their men 20 After a reign of two hundred years, the Saracens were ruined by their divisions. 21 The emir disclaimed the authority of the king of Tunis; the people rose against the emir; the cities were usurped by the chiefs; each meaner rebel was independent in his village or castle; and the weaker of two rival brothers implored the friendship of the Christians. In every service of danger the Normans were prompt and useful; and five hundred knights, or warriors on horseback, were enrolled by Arduin, the agent and interpreter of the Greeks, under the standard of Maniaces, governor of Lombardy. Before their landing, the brothers were reconciled; the union of Sicily and Africa was restored; and the island was guarded to the water’s edge. The Normans led the van and the Arabs of Messina felt the valor of an untried foe. In a second action the emir of Syracuse was unhorsed and transpierced by the iron arm of William of Hauteville. In a third engagement, his intrepid companions discomfited the host of sixty thousand Saracens, and left the Greeks no more than the labor of the pursuit: a splendid victory; but of which the pen of the historian may divide the merit with the lance of the Normans. It is, however, true, that they essentially promoted the success of Maniaces, who reduced thirteen cities, and the greater part of Sicily, under the obedience of the emperor. But his military fame was sullied by ingratitude and tyranny. In the division of the spoils, the deserts of his brave auxiliaries were forgotten; and neither their avarice nor their pride could brook this injurious treatment. They complained by the mouth of their interpreter: their complaint was disregarded; their interpreter was scourged; the sufferings were his; the insult and resentment belonged to those whose sentiments he had delivered. Yet they dissembled till they had obtained, or stolen, a safe passage to the Italian continent: their brethren of Aversa sympathized in their indignation, and the province of Apulia was invaded as the forfeit of the debt. 22 Above twenty years after the first emigration, the Normans took the field with no more than seven hundred horse and five hundred foot; and after the recall of the Byzantine legions 23 from the Sicilian war, their numbers are magnified to the amount of threescore thousand men. Their herald proposed the option of battle or retreat; “of battle,” was the unanimous cry of the Normans; and one of their stoutest warriors, with a stroke of his fist, felled to the ground the horse of the Greek messenger. He was dismissed with a fresh horse; the insult was concealed from the Imperial troops; but in two successive battles they were more fatally instructed of the prowess of their adversaries. In the plains of Cannae, the Asiatics fled before the adventurers of France; the duke of Lombardy was made prisoner; the Apulians acquiesced in a new dominion; and the four places of Bari, Otranto, Brundusium, and Tarentum, were alone saved in the shipwreck of the Grecian fortunes. From this aera we may date the establishment of the Norman power, which soon eclipsed the infant colony of Aversa. Twelve counts 24 were chosen by the popular suffrage; and age, birth, and merit, were the motives of their choice. The tributes of their peculiar districts were appropriated to their use; and each count erected a fortress in the midst of his lands, and at the head of his vassals. In the centre of the province, the common habitation of Melphi was reserved as the metropolis and citadel of the republic; a house and separate quarter was allotted to each of the twelve counts: and the national concerns were regulated by this military senate. The first of his peers, their president and general, was entitled count of Apulia; and this dignity was conferred on William of the iron arm, who, in the language of the age, is styled a lion in battle, a lamb in society, and an angel in council. 25 The manners of his countrymen are fairly delineated by a contemporary and national historian. 26 “The Normans,” says Malaterra, “are a cunning and revengeful people; eloquence and dissimulation appear to be their hereditary qualities: they can stoop to flatter; but unless they are curbed by the restraint of law, they indulge the licentiousness of nature and passion. Their princes affect the praises of popular munificence; the people observe the medium, or rather blond the extremes, of avarice and prodigality; and in their eager thirst of wealth and dominion, they despise whatever they possess, and hope whatever they desire. Arms and horses, the luxury of dress, the exercises of hunting and hawking 27 are the delight of the Normans; but, on pressing occasions, they can endure with incredible patience the inclemency of every climate, and the toil and absence of a military life.” 28
自阿拉伯人征服西西里以来,历代希腊皇帝无不急于收回这块宝贵的属地;无奈路途遥远,又隔着大海,任他们如何竭力,也难成事。他们耗费巨资打造的远征军,纵有一时的得手,终究只为拜占庭的史册又添了几页灾难与耻辱:一次远征就折损了两万名精锐;得胜的穆斯林更讥笑这个民族的做法——竟把宦官既用来看守女眷,又派去统领男丁。20萨拉森人统治两百年后,却因内部分裂而一败涂地。21埃米尔不再听命于突尼斯国王;百姓起而反抗埃米尔;各城则为大小首领所窃据;就连微不足道的叛党,也各霸一村一堡,自成一方;而一对争位的兄弟中,势弱的那个竟去乞求基督徒的援手。但凡有危险的差事,诺曼人总是应命迅捷、堪当大用;于是希腊人的代理兼翻译阿尔杜因,在伦巴第总督马尼阿克斯的旗下,招募了五百名骑士,即马上的武士。不料他们尚未登陆,那两兄弟已重归于好,西西里与非洲复归一统,全岛戒备森严,直守到海边。诺曼人一马当先,墨西拿的阿拉伯人这才尝到这支素未交手的劲敌的厉害。第二仗,欧特维尔的威廉挥其铁臂,将叙拉古的埃米尔挑落马下,当场刺穿。第三仗,他那些无畏的同伴击溃了六万萨拉森大军,留给希腊人的,不过是追杀溃兵的力气活罢了:好一场辉煌的大捷——只是这功劳,史家的笔怕是得同诺曼人的长矛平分。不过话说回来,马尼阿克斯攻取十三座城池、拿下西西里大半疆土,使之尽归皇帝治下,而诺曼人对他的成功实在出力甚多。然而,他的赫赫武功,却为忘恩负义与专横暴虐所玷污。分配战利品时,他把这些骁勇助战者应得的一份忘得一干二净;而这般欺辱,无论就其贪财还是骄傲而言,都断难容忍。他们借翻译之口提出抗议,抗议却被置之不理,翻译反遭鞭笞;皮肉之苦由翻译一人受了,而受辱与愤懑,却归于借他之口发声的那些人。他们却隐忍不发,直到弄到——或者说盗得——一条安然渡往意大利大陆的通路;阿韦尔萨的诺曼同胞也同仇敌忾,于是他们侵入阿普利亚一省,权当抵偿这笔欠账。22首批诺曼人迁来二十余年后,他们出征时也不过七百骑兵、五百步卒;而据传,拜占庭各军团23自西西里战场撤回之后,希腊一方的兵力竟号称多达六万之众。希腊人的使者传话,让诺曼人在开战与撤退之间择一而行;“开战!”诺曼人异口同声地喊道;他们中一名最壮健的武士,一拳便把希腊使者的坐骑打倒在地。使者换了匹马被打发回去;这桩羞辱,对帝国军队则秘而不宣;但接连两仗,他们付出了更惨痛的代价,才算领教了对手的骁勇。在坎尼平原上,这些亚细亚人望风而逃,败于法兰西的冒险者之手;伦巴第督军被俘,阿普利亚人只得默认了新的统治;希腊人的气运一败涂地,如舟覆海中,仅有巴里、奥特朗托、布伦迪西乌姆和塔兰图姆四地得以保全。诺曼势力的确立,可从这一时期算起;它不久便使阿韦尔萨那个初创的殖民地相形失色。众人公推出十二位伯爵,24推选的依据是年资、门第与才德。各伯爵所辖专区的贡赋,都拨归本人享用;每位伯爵都在自己领地的中心筑起一座城堡,统率麾下的封臣。在这一省的中心,梅尔菲留作公众共居之地,充当这个共和邦的都城与堡垒;十二位伯爵每人分得一宅一区;举国大事,皆由这个军人议事会裁定。这些同侪之首,既是他们的会长,又是他们的统帅,受封为阿普利亚伯爵;这一尊位授予了铁臂威廉;用当时的话说,他“临阵如狮,交际如羊,议事如天使”。25关于他同胞的习性,一位与之同时代的本族史家有过一段中肯的描摹。26马拉泰拉写道:“诺曼人生性狡诈,睚眦必报;能言善辩、工于掩饰,似乎是他们与生俱来的秉性:他们可以低声下气地阿谀奉承;可一旦没有法律的约束,便任凭本性与情欲恣意放纵。他们的君主一味贪图慷慨大方的美名;而百姓则在吝啬与挥霍两个极端之间取其中道,或不如说,将二者调和于一身;他们贪求财富与权势,如饥似渴,故凡已到手的都不放在眼里,凡心中所欲的则无不指望得到。兵器骏马、华服盛装、狩猎与放鹰27,都是诺曼人的乐事;但每逢危急关头,无论气候何等恶劣,无论军旅生涯何等劳苦、何等远离家园,他们都能以惊人的坚忍熬过去。”28
Notes 注释
1
↩
For the general history of Italy in the ixth and xth centuries, I may properly refer to the vth, vith, and viith books of Sigonius de Regno Italiae, (in the second volume of his works, Milan, 1732;) the Annals of Baronius, with the criticism of Pagi; the viith and viiith books of the Istoria Civile del Regno di Napoli of Giannone; the viith and viiith volumes (the octavo edition) of the Annali d’ Italia of Muratori, and the 2d volume of the Abrege Chronologique of M. de St. Marc, a work which, under a superficial title, contains much genuine learning and industry. But my long-accustomed reader will give me credit for saying, that I myself have ascended to the fountain head, as often as such ascent could be either profitable or possible; and that I have diligently turned over the originals in the first volumes of Muratori’s great collection of the Scriptores Rerum Italicarum.
关于九、十世纪意大利的通史,我不妨请读者参看西戈尼乌斯《意大利王国史》(Sigonius de Regno Italiae,见其文集第二卷,米兰,1732年)第五、六、七卷;巴罗尼乌斯的《编年史》(Annals),连同帕吉的考订;詹诺内《那不勒斯王国民政史》(Istoria Civile del Regno di Napoli)第七、八卷;穆拉托里《意大利编年史》(Annali d'Italia,八开本)第七、八卷;以及圣马尔克先生《编年概要》(Abrege Chronologique)第二卷——此书标题虽浅,内里却颇见真才实学与勤勉之功。不过,久已熟悉我的读者当会相信:但凡溯本求源既有益又可行之处,我总是亲自追溯到源头;穆拉托里那部宏富的汇编《意大利史料集成》(Scriptores Rerum Italicarum)头几卷中的原始文献,我也都逐一细加披阅过。
2
↩
Camillo Pellegrino, a learned Capuan of the last century, has illustrated the history of the duchy of Beneventum, in his two books Historia Principum Longobardorum, in the Scriptores of Muratori tom. ii. pars i. p. 221-345, and tom. v. p 159-245.
卡米洛·佩莱格里诺是上个世纪一位博学的卡普亚人,他在两卷本《伦巴第诸君史》(Historia Principum Longobardorum)中阐述了贝内文图姆公国的历史;该书收入穆拉托里《史料集成》第二卷第一分册第221—345页,及第五卷第159—245页。
3
↩
See Constantin. Porphyrogen. de Thematibus, l. ii. c xi. in Vit Basil. c. 55, p. 181.
见君士坦丁·波菲罗格尼图斯《论军区》(de Thematibus)第二卷第11章;又《巴西尔传》(in Vit. Basil.)第55章,第181页。
4
↩
The oriental epistle of the emperor Lewis II. to the emperor Basil, a curious record of the age, was first published by Baronius, (Annal. Eccles. A.D. 871, No. 51-71,) from the Vatican Ms. of Erchempert, or rather of the anonymous historian of Salerno.] These lofty hopes were soon extinguished by the death of Lewis, and the decay of the Carlovingian house; and whoever might deserve the honor, the Greek emperors, Basil, and his son Leo, secured the advantage, of the reduction of Bari. The Italians of Apulia and Calabria were persuaded or compelled to acknowledge their supremacy, and an ideal line from Mount Garganus to the Bay of Salerno, leaves the far greater part of the kingdom of Naples under the dominion of the Eastern empire. Beyond that line, the dukes or republics of Amalfi 5 and Naples, who had never forfeited their voluntary allegiance, rejoiced in the neighborhood of their lawful sovereign; and Amalfi was enriched by supplying Europe with the produce and manufactures of Asia. But the Lombard princes of Benevento, Salerno, and Capua, 6 were reluctantly torn from the communion of the Latin world, and too often violated their oaths of servitude and tribute. The city of Bari rose to dignity and wealth, as the metropolis of the new theme or province of Lombardy: the title of patrician, and afterwards the singular name of Catapan, 7 was assigned to the supreme governor; and the policy both of the church and state was modelled in exact subordination to the throne of Constantinople. As long as the sceptre was disputed by the princes of Italy, their efforts were feeble and adverse; and the Greeks resisted or eluded the forces of Germany, which descended from the Alps under the Imperial standard of the Othos. The first and greatest of those Saxon princes was compelled to relinquish the siege of Bari: the second, after the loss of his stoutest bishops and barons, escaped with honor from the bloody field of Crotona. On that day the scale of war was turned against the Franks by the valor of the Saracens. 8 These corsairs had indeed been driven by the Byzantine fleets from the fortresses and coasts of Italy; but a sense of interest was more prevalent than superstition or resentment, and the caliph of Egypt had transported forty thousand Moslems to the aid of his Christian ally. The successors of Basil amused themselves with the belief, that the conquest of Lombardy had been achieved, and was still preserved by the justice of their laws, the virtues of their ministers, and the gratitude of a people whom they had rescued from anarchy and oppression. A series of rebellions might dart a ray of truth into the palace of Constantinople; and the illusions of flattery were dispelled by the easy and rapid success of the Norman adventurers.
路易二世皇帝致巴西尔皇帝的这封东方式书信,是那个时代一份奇特的记录,最早由巴罗尼乌斯依梵蒂冈所藏埃尔坎佩尔特——或不如说萨莱诺那位佚名史家——的抄本刊布(《教会编年史》Annal. Eccles. 公元871年,第51—71条)。然而路易一死,加洛林王室日渐衰微,这些高远的指望很快便化为泡影;且不论攻下巴里的荣誉该归谁,得利的却是希腊皇帝——巴西尔及其子利奥。阿普利亚和卡拉布里亚的意大利人,或被劝服,或被逼迫,都承认了他们的宗主地位;从加尔加努斯山到萨莱诺湾划一条假想的界线,那不勒斯王国绝大部分的疆土都落在东部帝国的治下。界线之外,阿马尔菲5与那不勒斯的公爵,或者说这两个共和邦,从不曾背弃自愿效忠的誓约,如今得与合法的君主为邻,无不欣喜;阿马尔菲更因向欧洲供应亚洲的物产与制品而日益富庶。但贝内文图姆、萨莱诺和卡普亚的伦巴第亲王,6却是被硬生生从拉丁世界的共同体中扯出去的,因而屡屡背弃他们称臣纳贡的誓言。巴里城则作为新设的伦巴第军区(或曰行省)的首府,声望财富与日俱增;那里的最高长官起先获封“贵族”(patrician)的头衔,后来又冠以“卡塔潘”(Catapan)这一奇特的名号;7教会与国家的一切举措,无不严格照着君士坦丁堡宝座的意旨来定夺。只要意大利诸侯仍在争夺权柄,他们的力量便既孱弱又彼此掣肘;希腊人于是得以抵挡或避开日耳曼的大军——那是打着奥托诸帝的皇旗、翻越阿尔卑斯山南下的。这几位撒克逊君主中头一位、也是最伟大的一位,被迫放弃了对巴里的围攻;第二位则在损失了麾下最骁勇的主教和男爵之后,才勉强体面地逃离克罗托纳那血染的战场。那一天,全靠萨拉森人的骁勇,战局的天平才倒向了法兰克人的对面。8这些海盗确曾被拜占庭舰队逐出意大利的要塞与海岸;但利害的考量终究压过了宗教的成见与旧日的仇怨,埃及的哈里发竟运来四万穆斯林,去援助他那位基督徒盟友。巴西尔的后嗣却自欺欺人,一味相信:伦巴第之所以被征服、又之所以能保住,全靠他们律法的公正、大臣的贤能,以及一国百姓——他们把这些人从无政府的动乱与压迫中拯救出来——的感恩戴德。一连串的叛乱,或许能把一线真相射进君士坦丁堡的宫殿;而诺曼冒险者那般轻易而迅捷的成功,终于戳破了谄媚织成的幻梦。
5
See an excellent Dissertation de Republica Amalphitana, in the Appendix (p. 1-42) of Henry Brencman’s Historia Pandectarum, (Trajecti ad Rhenum, 1722, in 4to.)
参看亨利·布伦克曼《学说汇纂史》(Historia Pandectarum,乌得勒支,1722年,四开本)附录(第1—42页)中一篇出色的论文《论阿马尔菲共和国》(de Republica Amalphitana)。
6
Your master, says Nicephorus, has given aid and protection prinminibus Capuano et Beneventano, servis meis, quos oppugnare dispono.... Nova (potius nota) res est quod eorum patres et avi nostro Imperio tributa dederunt, (Liutprand, in Legat. p. 484.) Salerno is not mentioned, yet the prince changed his party about the same time, and Camillo Pellegrino (Script. Rer. Ital. tom. ii. pars i. p. 285) has nicely discerned this change in the style of the anonymous Chronicle. On the rational ground of history and language, Liutprand (p. 480) had asserted the Latin claim to Apulia and Calabria.
尼基弗鲁斯说,你的主上曾向“卡普亚与贝内文图姆的君主,我的臣仆,我正打算征讨的那些人”提供援助与庇护——prinminibus Capuano et Beneventano, servis meis, quos oppugnare dispono……又说:“他们的父祖曾向我大帝国纳贡,这可算桩新奇事(不如说是桩人所共知的事)”——Nova (potius nota) res est quod eorum patres et avi nostro Imperio tributa dederunt(柳特普兰德《出使记》in Legat.,第484页)。文中未提萨莱诺,然而那位亲王约在同时也倒戈易帜;卡米洛·佩莱格里诺(《意大利史料集成》第二卷第一分册第285页)从佚名《编年史》的笔法中,精准地察觉出了这一变化。柳特普兰德(第480页)还本着史实与语言上的合理依据,申明了拉丁一方对阿普利亚与卡拉布里亚的领属主张。
7
See the Greek and Latin Glossaries of Ducange (catapanus,) and his notes on the Alexias, (p. 275.) Against the contemporary notion, which derives it from juxta omne, he treats it as a corruption of the Latin capitaneus. Yet M. de St. Marc has accurately observed (Abrege Chronologique, tom. ii. p. 924) that in this age the capitanei were not captains, but only nobles of the first rank, the great valvassors of Italy.
参看杜康热的希腊语和拉丁语词汇集(catapanus 条),以及他为《阿莱克修斯传》(Alexias)所作的注释(第275页)。当时有一种说法,把这个词溯源于希腊语 juxta omne,杜康热则不以为然,认为它是拉丁语 capitaneus 的讹变。不过圣马尔克先生(《编年概要》第二卷第924页)却精确地指出:在那个时代,capitanei 并非“队长”,而只是头等贵族,即意大利的大陪臣(valvassors)。
8
(the Lombards), (Leon. Tactic. c. xv. p. 741.) The little Chronicle of Beneventum (tom. ii. pars i. p. 280) gives a far different character of the Greeks during the five years (A.D. 891-896) that Leo was master of the city.
(指伦巴第人)(利奥《战术》Leon. Tactic. 第15章第741页)。那部贝内文图姆的小《编年史》(第二卷第一分册第280页),对利奥据有该城那五年间(公元891—896年)希腊人的品性,给出了截然不同的评说。
9
↩
Calabriam adeunt, eamque inter se divisam reperientes funditus depopulati sunt, (or depopularunt,) ita ut deserta sit velut in diluvio. Such is the text of Herempert, or Erchempert, according to the two editions of Carraccioli (Rer. Italic. Script. tom. v. p. 23) and of Camillo Pellegrino, (tom. ii. pars i. p. 246.) Both were extremely scarce, when they were reprinted by Muratori.
“Calabriam adeunt, eamque inter se divisam reperientes funditus depopulati sunt(或作 depopularunt), ita ut deserta sit velut in diluvio.”(大意:他们进入卡拉布里亚,见其内部四分五裂,便将其彻底洗劫一空,弄得那地方荒凉得如同大洪水过后一般。)这是赫雷姆佩尔特(或作埃尔坎佩尔特)的原文,据卡拉乔利(《意大利史料集成》第五卷第23页)和卡米洛·佩莱格里诺(第二卷第一分册第246页)两种版本。二者在穆拉托里重印之前,都极为罕见。
10
↩
Baronius (Annal. Eccles. A.D. 874, No. 2) has drawn this story from a Ms. of Erchempert, who died at Capua only fifteen years after the event. But the cardinal was deceived by a false title, and we can only quote the anonymous Chronicle of Salerno, (Paralipomena, c. 110,) composed towards the end of the xth century, and published in the second volume of Muratori’s Collection. See the Dissertations of Camillo Pellegrino, tom. ii. pars i. p. 231-281, &c.
巴罗尼乌斯(《教会编年史》公元874年,第2条)从埃尔坎佩尔特的一份抄本中取得此事;埃尔坎佩尔特在事发仅十五年后便死于卡普亚。但这位枢机主教被一个伪题名所误导,我们其实只能引用那部萨莱诺佚名《编年史》(《补遗》Paralipomena,第110章)——它约成书于十世纪末,收在穆拉托里汇编的第二卷中。另参卡米洛·佩莱格里诺的诸篇论文,第二卷第一分册第231—281页等处。
11
↩
Constantine Porphyrogenitus (in Vit. Basil. c. 58, p. 183) is the original author of this story. He places it under the reigns of Basil and Lewis II.; yet the reduction of Beneventum by the Greeks is dated A.D. 891, after the decease of both of those princes.
此事的最初记述者是君士坦丁·波菲罗格尼图斯(《巴西尔传》第58章第183页)。他把这件事系于巴西尔与路易二世在位之时;然而希腊人攻取贝内文图姆一事,实定于公元891年,那已在这两位君主故去之后。
12
↩
In the year 663, the same tragedy is described by Paul the Deacon, (de Gestis Langobard. l. v. c. 7, 8, p. 870, 871, edit. Grot.,) under the walls of the same city of Beneventum. But the actors are different, and the guilt is imputed to the Greeks themselves, which in the Byzantine edition is applied to the Saracens. In the late war in Germany, M. D’Assas, a French officer of the regiment of Auvergne, is said to have devoted himself in a similar manner. His behavior is the more heroic, as mere silence was required by the enemy who had made him prisoner, (Voltaire, Siecle de Louis XV. c. 33, tom. ix. p. 172.)
执事保罗(《伦巴第人事迹》de Gestis Langobard. 第五卷第7、8章,第870、871页,格劳秀斯校订本)记载:公元663年,同一出悲剧曾在同一座贝内文图姆城下上演。只是剧中人物不同,罪责被归到希腊人自己头上,而在拜占庭的版本里,这罪责却安在了萨拉森人身上。据说在不久前的德国战事中,奥弗涅团的法国军官达萨斯先生也以类似的方式舍身取义。他的举动尤为壮烈,因为俘获他的敌人本只要他保持沉默即可(伏尔泰《路易十五时代》Siecle de Louis XV 第33章,第九卷第172页)。
13
↩
Theobald, who is styled Heros by Liutprand, was properly duke of Spoleto and marquis of Camerino, from the year 926 to 935. The title and office of marquis (commander of the march or frontier) was introduced into Italy by the French emperors, (Abrege Chronologique, tom. ii. p. 545-732 &c.)
西奥博尔德被柳特普兰德誉为“英雄”(Heros),确切说来,他自926年至935年是斯波莱托公爵兼卡梅里诺侯爵。侯爵(意即边区或边境的统帅)这一头衔和职务,是由法兰克诸帝引入意大利的(《编年概要》第二卷第545—732页等处)。
14
↩
Liutprand, Hist. l. iv. c. iv. in the Rerum Italic. Script. tom. i. pars i. p. 453, 454. Should the licentiousness of the tale be questioned, I may exclaim, with poor Sterne, that it is hard if I may not transcribe with caution what a bishop could write without scruple What if I had translated, ut viris certetis testiculos amputare, in quibus nostri corporis refocillatio, &c.?
柳特普兰德《历史》第四卷第4章,见《意大利史料集成》第一卷第一分册第453、454页。倘若有人质疑这故事伤风败俗,我大可学可怜的斯特恩那样感叹一句:一位主教都能毫无顾忌地写下的东西,我若谨慎地照抄一遍,竟也要遭非议,未免太苛了。何况我若当真把这句 ut viris certetis testiculos amputare, in quibus nostri corporis refocillatio, &c. 译了出来,那又当如何?
15
↩
The original monuments of the Normans in Italy are collected in the vth volume of Muratori; and among these we may distinguish the poems of William Appulus (p. 245-278) and the history of Galfridus (Jeffrey) Malaterra, (p. 537-607.) Both were natives of France, but they wrote on the spot, in the age of the first conquerors (before A.D. 1100,) and with the spirit of freemen. It is needless to recapitulate the compilers and critics of Italian history, Sigonius, Baronius, Pagi, Giannone, Muratori, St. Marc, &c., whom I have always consulted, and never copied. * Note: M. Goutier d’Arc has discovered a translation of the Chronicle of Aime, monk of Mont Cassino, a contemporary of the first Norman invaders of Italy. He has made use of it in his Histoire des Conquetes des Normands, and added a summary of its contents. This work was quoted by later writers, but was supposed to have been entirely lost.—M.
有关意大利诺曼人的原始文献,都汇集在穆拉托里的第五卷里;其中尤可举出阿普利亚的威廉的诗篇(第245—278页)和加尔弗里杜斯(即杰弗里)·马拉泰拉的史书(第537—607页)。两人都是法兰西人,却身临其境,在最初那批征服者的时代(公元1100年以前)执笔,且怀着自由人的胸襟。至于意大利史的编纂家和批评家——西戈尼乌斯、巴罗尼乌斯、帕吉、詹诺内、穆拉托里、圣马尔克等人,我向来参考,却从不因袭,这里无须一一列举。*编者按:戈蒂耶·达尔克先生发现了卡西诺山修士艾梅所撰《编年史》的一个译本;艾梅与最初侵入意大利的诺曼人属同时代人。达尔克在其《诺曼人征服史》(Histoire des Conquetes des Normands)中采用了此书,并附上了内容提要。此书曾为后世作者所征引,一向被认为已彻底散佚。—M
16
↩
Some of the first converts were baptized ten or twelve times, for the sake of the white garment usually given at this ceremony. At the funeral of Rollo, the gifts to monasteries for the repose of his soul were accompanied by a sacrifice of one hundred captives. But in a generation or two, the national change was pure and general.
最初的一些皈依者受洗竟达十次乃至十二次,只为贪图每次仪式上照例发放的那件白袍。罗洛下葬时,人们为他灵魂的安息向修道院献上礼物,同时还杀了一百名俘虏作为祭品。不过一两代人之后,这场全民族的宗教转变便变得纯粹而普遍了。
17
↩
The Danish language was still spoken by the Normans of Bayeux on the sea-coast, at a time (A.D. 940) when it was already forgotten at Rouen, in the court and capital. Quem (Richard I.) confestim pater Baiocas mittens Botoni militiae suae principi nutriendum tradidit, ut, ibi lingua eruditus Danica, suis exterisque hominibus sciret aperte dare responsa, (Wilhelm. Gemeticensis de Ducibus Normannis, l. iii. c. 8, p. 623, edit. Camden.) Of the vernacular and favorite idiom of William the Conqueror, (A.D. 1035,) Selden (Opera, tom. ii. p. 1640-1656) has given a specimen, obsolete and obscure even to antiquarians and lawyers.
到公元940年,鲁昂的宫廷与都城早已把丹麦语忘得一干二净,而沿海巴约的诺曼人却仍操此语。“Quem (Richard I.) confestim pater Baiocas mittens Botoni militiae suae principi nutriendum tradidit, ut, ibi lingua eruditus Danica, suis exterisque hominibus sciret aperte dare responsa.”(大意:其父随即把理查一世送往巴约,托付给自己的军事统领博托抚养,好让他在那里学会丹麦语,日后无论对本族人还是外族人,都能应答自如。)——于米耶日的威廉《诺曼底诸公爵传》(Wilhelm. Gemeticensis de Ducibus Normannis)第三卷第8章第623页,卡姆登校订本。至于征服者威廉(公元1035年)日常喜用的方言,塞尔登(《文集》Opera 第二卷第1640—1656页)曾录有一份样本,其语之古奥晦涩,纵是好古之士与法学家也难以索解。
171
↩
A band of Normans returning from the Holy Land had rescued the city of Salerno from the attack of a numerous fleet of Saracens. Gainar, the Lombard prince of Salerno wished to retain them in his service and take them into his pay. They answered, “We fight for our religion, and not for money.” Gaimar entreated them to send some Norman knights to his court. This seems to have been the origin of the connection of the Normans with Italy. See Histoire des Conquetes des Normands par Goutier d’Arc, l. i. c. i., Paris, 1830.—M.
一队从圣地归来的诺曼人,曾把萨莱诺城从萨拉森人一支庞大舰队的进攻中解救出来。萨莱诺的伦巴第亲王盖马尔想把他们留在麾下、给以军饷,他们却答道:“我们为信仰而战,不为钱财而战。”盖马尔于是恳请他们派几位诺曼骑士到他的宫廷来。这似乎便是诺曼人与意大利结缘的开端。参看戈蒂耶·达尔克《诺曼人征服史》第一卷第一章,巴黎,1830年。—M
18
↩
See Leandro Alberti (Descrizione d’Italia, p. 250) and Baronius, (A.D. 493, No. 43.) If the archangel inherited the temple and oracle, perhaps the cavern, of old Calchas the soothsayer, (Strab. Geograph l. vi. p. 435, 436,) the Catholics (on this occasion) have surpassed the Greeks in the elegance of their superstition.
参看莱安德罗·阿尔贝蒂(《意大利志》Descrizione d'Italia 第250页)和巴罗尼乌斯(公元493年,第43条)。倘若这位天使长承继了古时占卜者卡尔卡斯的神庙与神谕之所——或许还有那处岩洞(斯特拉波《地理志》第六卷第435、436页)——那么就这一桩而论,天主教徒在迷信的雅致上,已然胜过了希腊人。
1811
↩
Nine out of ten perished in the field. Chronique d’Aime, tom. i. p. 21 quoted by M Goutier d’Arc, p. 42.—M.
十人中有九人殒命疆场。《艾梅编年史》(Chronique d'Aime)第一卷第21页,转引自戈蒂耶·达尔克先生,第42页。—M
19
↩
See the first book of William Appulus. His words are applicable to every swarm of Barbarians and freebooters:—
Si vicinorum quis pernitiosus ad illos
Confugiebat eum gratanter suscipiebant:
Moribus et lingua quoscumque venire videbant
Informant propria; gens efficiatur ut una.
And elsewhere, of the native adventurers of Normandy:—
Pars parat, exiguae vel opes aderant quia nullae:
Pars, quia de magnis majora subire volebant.
Si vicinorum quis pernitiosus ad illos
Confugiebat eum gratanter suscipiebant:
Moribus et lingua quoscumque venire videbant
Informant propria; gens efficiatur ut una.
And elsewhere, of the native adventurers of Normandy:—
Pars parat, exiguae vel opes aderant quia nullae:
Pars, quia de magnis majora subire volebant.
参看阿普利亚的威廉的第一卷。他这几句话,用在任何一群蛮族与亡命之徒身上都恰如其分:——
Si vicinorum quis pernitiosus ad illos / Confugiebat eum gratanter suscipiebant: / Moribus et lingua quoscumque venire videbant / Informant propria; gens efficiatur ut una.(其诗大意是:邻近各邦但凡有作恶之徒走投无路、逃奔而来,他们无不欣然收留、以礼相待;无论何人前来投奔,他们都以本族的风俗与言语加以教习陶染,务使新来者与旧部日渐相同,终至融合成同一个民族。)此外另有一处,说到诺曼底本土那些出外闯荡的冒险者时,他又写道:Pars parat, exiguae vel opes aderant quia nullae: / Pars, quia de magnis majora subire volebant.(其诗大意是:其中一部分人之所以整装远行,是因为家道贫寒、资财微薄,甚至一无所有,不得不另谋生路;而另一部分人则并非出于穷困,只因不甘心守着已有的丰厚家业,还想凭一己之力去博取更大的功名、更多的财富。)
Si vicinorum quis pernitiosus ad illos / Confugiebat eum gratanter suscipiebant: / Moribus et lingua quoscumque venire videbant / Informant propria; gens efficiatur ut una.(其诗大意是:邻近各邦但凡有作恶之徒走投无路、逃奔而来,他们无不欣然收留、以礼相待;无论何人前来投奔,他们都以本族的风俗与言语加以教习陶染,务使新来者与旧部日渐相同,终至融合成同一个民族。)此外另有一处,说到诺曼底本土那些出外闯荡的冒险者时,他又写道:Pars parat, exiguae vel opes aderant quia nullae: / Pars, quia de magnis majora subire volebant.(其诗大意是:其中一部分人之所以整装远行,是因为家道贫寒、资财微薄,甚至一无所有,不得不另谋生路;而另一部分人则并非出于穷困,只因不甘心守着已有的丰厚家业,还想凭一己之力去博取更大的功名、更多的财富。)
1911
↩
This account is not accurate. After the retreat of the emperor Henry II. the Normans, united under the command of Rainulf, had taken possession of Aversa, then a small castle in the duchy of Naples. They had been masters of it a few years when Pandulf IV., prince of Capua, found means to take Naples by surprise. Sergius, master of the soldiers, and head of the republic, with the principal citizens, abandoned a city in which he could not behold, without horror, the establishment of a foreign dominion he retired to Aversa; and when, with the assistance of the Greeks and that of the citizens faithful to their country, he had collected money enough to satisfy the rapacity of the Norman adventurers, he advanced at their head to attack the garrison of the prince of Capua, defeated it, and reentered Naples. It was then that he confirmed the Normans in the possession of Aversa and its territory, which he raised into a count’s fief, and granted the investiture to Rainulf. Hist. des Rep. Ital. tom. i. p. 267
此段记述并不确切。亨利二世皇帝撤退之后,诺曼人在赖努尔夫统率下联合起来,占据了阿韦尔萨——那当时不过是那不勒斯公国内的一座小城堡。他们据有此地才几年,卡普亚亲王潘杜尔夫四世便设法出其不意地夺取了那不勒斯。塞尔吉乌斯身为军队统帅、共和邦之首,眼见外族的统治即将确立而不寒而栗,遂与城中显要弃城而去,退往阿韦尔萨;后来他借助希腊人及忠于祖国的市民之力,凑足了银钱去餍足诺曼冒险者的贪欲,便率领他们前去攻打卡普亚亲王的守军,将其击败,重新进驻那不勒斯。也正是在那时,他确认诺曼人对阿韦尔萨及其属地的占有,将其升格为一处伯爵采邑,并把册封授予了赖努尔夫。见《意大利诸共和国史》(Hist. des Rep. Ital.)第一卷第267页。
20
↩
Liutprand, in Legatione, p. 485. Pagi has illustrated this event from the Ms. history of the deacon Leo, (tom. iv. A.D. 965, No. 17-19.)
柳特普兰德《出使记》(in Legatione)第485页。帕吉依据执事利奥的手稿史书阐明了此事(第四卷,公元965年,第17—19条)。
21
↩
See the Arabian Chronicle of Sicily, apud Muratori, Script. Rerum Ital. tom. i. p. 253.
参看《西西里阿拉伯编年史》,见穆拉托里《意大利史料集成》第一卷第253页。
22
↩
Jeffrey Malaterra, who relates the Sicilian war, and the conquest of Apulia, (l. i. c. 7, 8, 9, 19.) The same events are described by Cedrenus (tom. ii. p. 741-743, 755, 756) and Zonaras, (tom. ii. p. 237, 238;) and the Greeks are so hardened to disgrace, that their narratives are impartial enough.
杰弗里·马拉泰拉记述了西西里战争与阿普利亚的征服(第一卷第7、8、9、19章)。同样的事件,塞德雷努斯(第二卷第741—743、755、756页)和佐纳拉斯(第二卷第237、238页)也有描述;希腊人对耻辱早已麻木不仁,故其叙事倒还算公允。
23
↩
Lydia: consult Constantine de Thematibus, i. 3, 4, with Delisle’s map.
吕底亚:参看君士坦丁《论军区》第一卷第3、4章,并对照德利斯尔的地图。
24
↩
Omnes conveniunt; et bis sex nobiliores,
Quos genus et gravitas morum decorabat et aetas,
Elegere duces. Provectis ad comitatum
His alii parent. Comitatus nomen honoris
Quo donantur erat. Hi totas undique terras
Divisere sibi, ni sors inimica repugnet;
Singula proponunt loca quae contingere sorte
Cuique duci debent, et quaeque tributa locorum.
And after speaking of Melphi, William Appulus adds,
Pro numero comitum bis sex statuere plateas,
Atque domus comitum totidem fabricantur in urbe.
Leo Ostiensis (l. ii. c. 67) enumerates the divisions of the Apulian cities, which it is needless to repeat.
Quos genus et gravitas morum decorabat et aetas,
Elegere duces. Provectis ad comitatum
His alii parent. Comitatus nomen honoris
Quo donantur erat. Hi totas undique terras
Divisere sibi, ni sors inimica repugnet;
Singula proponunt loca quae contingere sorte
Cuique duci debent, et quaeque tributa locorum.
And after speaking of Melphi, William Appulus adds,
Pro numero comitum bis sex statuere plateas,
Atque domus comitum totidem fabricantur in urbe.
Leo Ostiensis (l. ii. c. 67) enumerates the divisions of the Apulian cities, which it is needless to repeat.
Omnes conveniunt; et bis sex nobiliores,(大意:众人齐集;其中十二位较为尊贵者……)
Quos genus et gravitas morum decorabat et aetas, / Elegere duces. Provectis ad comitatum / His alii parent. Comitatus nomen honoris / Quo donantur erat. Hi totas undique terras / Divisere sibi, ni sors inimica repugnet; / Singula proponunt loca quae contingere sorte / Cuique duci debent, et quaeque tributa locorum.(这几句诗的大意是:凡门第高贵、举止庄重、又年高德劭而足为众人表率的人,大家便公推他们出任首领;凡是晋升到“伯”这一位阶的人,其余的人都须听命于他、唯其马首是瞻。“伯”便是他们所领受的这份尊荣的名号。这些人把四方各处的土地尽数瓜分归于自己名下,除非命运与之作对、中途另生变故;他们还逐一议定:哪一处地方应当凭抽签的运数归属哪一位首领,各地又该缴纳何种贡赋、按什么章程分派。)说到梅尔菲这座城时,阿普利亚的威廉又补上了这样两句:Pro numero comitum bis sex statuere plateas, / Atque domus comitum totidem fabricantur in urbe.(这两句的大意是:他们按照伯爵的人数,在城中开辟出十二条街衢,又依同样的数目建起十二座伯爵的府邸。)此外,奥斯蒂亚的利奥(第二卷第67章)还曾一一列举阿普利亚各城的区划详情,这里就无须再逐条赘述了。
Quos genus et gravitas morum decorabat et aetas, / Elegere duces. Provectis ad comitatum / His alii parent. Comitatus nomen honoris / Quo donantur erat. Hi totas undique terras / Divisere sibi, ni sors inimica repugnet; / Singula proponunt loca quae contingere sorte / Cuique duci debent, et quaeque tributa locorum.(这几句诗的大意是:凡门第高贵、举止庄重、又年高德劭而足为众人表率的人,大家便公推他们出任首领;凡是晋升到“伯”这一位阶的人,其余的人都须听命于他、唯其马首是瞻。“伯”便是他们所领受的这份尊荣的名号。这些人把四方各处的土地尽数瓜分归于自己名下,除非命运与之作对、中途另生变故;他们还逐一议定:哪一处地方应当凭抽签的运数归属哪一位首领,各地又该缴纳何种贡赋、按什么章程分派。)说到梅尔菲这座城时,阿普利亚的威廉又补上了这样两句:Pro numero comitum bis sex statuere plateas, / Atque domus comitum totidem fabricantur in urbe.(这两句的大意是:他们按照伯爵的人数,在城中开辟出十二条街衢,又依同样的数目建起十二座伯爵的府邸。)此外,奥斯蒂亚的利奥(第二卷第67章)还曾一一列举阿普利亚各城的区划详情,这里就无须再逐条赘述了。
25
↩
Gulielm. Appulus, l. ii. c 12, according to the reference of Giannone, (Istoria Civile di Napoli, tom. ii. p. 31,) which I cannot verify in the original. The Apulian praises indeed his validas vires, probitas animi, and vivida virtus; and declares that, had he lived, no poet could have equalled his merits, (l. i. p. 258, l. ii. p. 259.) He was bewailed by the Normans, quippe qui tanti consilii virum, (says Malaterra, l. i. c. 12, p. 552,) tam armis strenuum, tam sibi munificum, affabilem, morigeratum, ulterius se habere diffidebant.
阿普利亚的威廉,第二卷第12章,据詹诺内所引(《那不勒斯民政史》Istoria Civile di Napoli 第二卷第31页),此处我无从核对原文。这位阿普利亚诗人确曾称颂他“体力强健”(validas vires)、“心地正直”(probitas animi)、“英气勃勃”(vivida virtus),并声言倘他不死,任何诗人都无从匹敌其功业(第一卷第258页,第二卷第259页)。诺曼人也为他痛哭哀悼,因为——用马拉泰拉的话说(第一卷第12章第552页)——他们深恐此后再难得到这样一位人物:谋略如此深远,武艺如此精强,待人如此慷慨、和蔼而恭谨(quippe qui tanti consilii virum ... tam armis strenuum, tam sibi munificum, affabilem, morigeratum, ulterius se habere diffidebant)。
26
↩
The gens astutissima, injuriarum ultrix.... adulari sciens.... eloquentiis inserviens, of Malaterra, (l. i. c. 3, p. 550,) are expressive of the popular and proverbial character of the Normans.
马拉泰拉笔下的那几句——gens astutissima, injuriarum ultrix……adulari sciens……eloquentiis inserviens(大意:一个极其狡黠、睚眦必报……善于逢迎……巧于辞令的民族)(第一卷第3章第550页)——很能道出诺曼人那尽人皆知、几成谚语的秉性。
27
↩
The hunting and hawking more properly belong to the descendants of the Norwegian sailors; though they might import from Norway and Iceland the finest casts of falcons.
狩猎与放鹰,其实更该算是那些挪威水手后裔的本色;不过他们也可能从挪威和冰岛引进最上乘的猎鹰。
28
↩
We may compare this portrait with that of William of Malmsbury, (de Gestis Anglorum, l. iii. p. 101, 102,) who appreciates, like a philosophic historian, the vices and virtues of the Saxons and Normans. England was assuredly a gainer by the conquest.
我们不妨把这幅画像与马姆斯伯里的威廉那一幅(《英格兰人事迹》de Gestis Anglorum 第三卷第101、102页)相比照;他像一位富于哲思的史家,对撒克逊人与诺曼人的善恶得失都作了品评。英格兰经这场征服,确乎是得大于失。