Chapter XLIX: Conquest Of Italy By The Franks.—Part II. 第四十九章 法兰克人征服意大利——第二节

Two original epistles, from Gregory the Second to the emperor Leo, are still extant; 33 and if they cannot be praised as the most perfect models of eloquence and logic, they exhibit the portrait, or at least the mask, of the founder of the papal monarchy. “During ten pure and fortunate years,” says Gregory to the emperor, “we have tasted the annual comfort of your royal letters, subscribed in purple ink, with your own hand, the sacred pledges of your attachment to the orthodox creed of our fathers. How deplorable is the change! how tremendous the scandal! You now accuse the Catholics of idolatry; and, by the accusation, you betray your own impiety and ignorance. To this ignorance we are compelled to adapt the grossness of our style and arguments: the first elements of holy letters are sufficient for your confusion; and were you to enter a grammar-school, and avow yourself the enemy of our worship, the simple and pious children would be provoked to cast their horn-books at your head.” After this decent salutation, the pope attempts the usual distinction between the idols of antiquity and the Christian images. The former were the fanciful representations of phantoms or daemons, at a time when the true God had not manifested his person in any visible likeness. The latter are the genuine forms of Christ, his mother, and his saints, who had approved, by a crowd of miracles, the innocence and merit of this relative worship. He must indeed have trusted to the ignorance of Leo, since he could assert the perpetual use of images, from the apostolic age, and their venerable presence in the six synods of the Catholic church. A more specious argument is drawn from present possession and recent practice the harmony of the Christian world supersedes the demand of a general council; and Gregory frankly confesses, than such assemblies can only be useful under the reign of an orthodox prince. To the impudent and inhuman Leo, more guilty than a heretic, he recommends peace, silence, and implicit obedience to his spiritual guides of Constantinople and Rome. The limits of civil and ecclesiastical powers are defined by the pontiff. To the former he appropriates the body; to the latter, the soul: the sword of justice is in the hands of the magistrate: the more formidable weapon of excommunication is intrusted to the clergy; and in the exercise of their divine commission a zealous son will not spare his offending father: the successor of St. Peter may lawfully chastise the kings of the earth. “You assault us, O tyrant! with a carnal and military hand: unarmed and naked we can only implore the Christ, the prince of the heavenly host, that he will send unto you a devil, for the destruction of your body and the salvation of your soul. You declare, with foolish arrogance, I will despatch my orders to Rome: I will break in pieces the image of St. Peter; and Gregory, like his predecessor Martin, shall be transported in chains, and in exile, to the foot of the Imperial throne. Would to God that I might be permitted to tread in the footsteps of the holy Martin! but may the fate of Constans serve as a warning to the persecutors of the church! After his just condemnation by the bishops of Sicily, the tyrant was cut off, in the fullness of his sins, by a domestic servant: the saint is still adored by the nations of Scythia, among whom he ended his banishment and his life. But it is our duty to live for the edification and support of the faithful people; nor are we reduced to risk our safety on the event of a combat. Incapable as you are of defending your Roman subjects, the maritime situation of the city may perhaps expose it to your depredation but we can remove to the distance of four-and-twenty stadia, to the first fortress of the Lombards, and then—you may pursue the winds. 34 Are you ignorant that the popes are the bond of union, the mediators of peace, between the East and West? The eyes of the nations are fixed on our humility; and they revere, as a God upon earth, the apostle St. Peter, whose image you threaten to destroy. 35 The remote and interior kingdoms of the West present their homage to Christ and his vicegerent; and we now prepare to visit one of their most powerful monarchs, who desires to receive from our hands the sacrament of baptism. 36 The Barbarians have submitted to the yoke of the gospel, while you alone are deaf to the voice of the shepherd. These pious Barbarians are kindled into rage: they thirst to avenge the persecution of the East. Abandon your rash and fatal enterprise; reflect, tremble, and repent. If you persist, we are innocent of the blood that will be spilt in the contest; may it fall on your own head!”
格列高利二世致利奥皇帝的两封书信原文至今尚存;33 这两封信纵然算不上辞令与逻辑的完美典范,却也描画出这位教宗君权奠基者的真容,至少是他的一副面具。格列高利对皇帝写道:“在那纯洁而幸运的十年间,我们年年得享陛下御笔亲书、以紫墨署名的诏书之慰藉,那正是陛下笃守我等先辈正统信条的神圣凭证。而今变故何其可悲!丑闻何其骇人!陛下竟指控大公教徒崇拜偶像;此一指控,恰恰暴露了您自身的不敬与无知。为迁就这般无知,我们不得不把文辞与论证降到粗浅的地步:圣书的最初几条要义,已足叫您理屈词穷;倘若您走进一所文法学校,公然自称我等崇拜之敌,那些淳朴而虔诚的孩童也会被激得把识字板朝您头上掷去。”献上这般“得体”的问候之后,教宗便着手作那套惯常的区分,把古代的偶像与基督教的圣像分辨开来。他说,前者不过是幻影或邪魔的臆造之像,产生于真神尚未以任何可见形貌显现其身的时代;后者则是基督、圣母及诸圣徒的真实形象,而他们早已借无数神迹,印证了此种相对崇拜的纯正无罪与功德。他敢断言圣像自使徒时代以来一直沿用不辍,又说圣像曾庄严现身于大公教会的六次宗教会议,这般言辞,实在是仗着利奥的无知才说得出口。另有一条更似是而非的论据,取自当下的既成事实与晚近的通行做法:基督教世界既已同心一致,也就无须再召开一次普世会议;格列高利更坦然承认,唯有在正统君主治下,这类会议才有用处。利奥厚颜而残暴,其罪更甚于异端;教宗劝这样一个人安分守己、缄口不言,一味顺从君士坦丁堡与罗马两地灵性导师的教诲。世俗权力与教会权力的界限,由教宗一手划定:前者掌管肉体,后者掌管灵魂;公义之剑握于世俗官长之手,而更可畏的绝罚利器则托付给神职人员;在履行这神授职分之时,热忱的儿子对犯错的父亲也绝不宽贷:圣彼得的继任者尽可名正言顺地惩戒天下君王。“暴君啊!您以血肉之躯、以刀兵之手向我们进逼:我们手无寸铁、赤身裸体,只能祈求天军之君基督,愿他遣一恶魔临于您身,以毁灭您的肉体、拯救您的灵魂。您狂妄愚蠢地扬言:我要把敕令发往罗马,把圣彼得的圣像砸个粉碎;至于格列高利,也要像他的前任马丁一样,戴上镣铐、流放异乡,押到皇座脚下。但愿上帝准我追随圣者马丁的足迹!也愿君士坦斯的下场,成为教会迫害者的鉴戒!那暴君在西西里众主教对他作出公正的定罪之后,终于罪孽满盈,竟死于一名家仆之手;而那位圣者至今仍受斯基泰诸族的敬奉,他正是在那片土地上结束了流放与生命。然而我们的本分是活着,为信众提供教化与扶助;我们也不至于沦落到要拿自身安危去赌一场战斗的胜负。您既无力保护自己的罗马臣民,罗马城临海的地势,或许倒让它易遭您的劫掠;可我们大可退到二十四斯塔迪亚之外,退进伦巴第人的第一座城堡,到那时——您就去追风吧。34 难道您不知道,历代教宗正是东西方之间联结的纽带、和平的斡旋者吗?万邦的目光都注视着我们这卑微之身;他们把使徒圣彼得敬奉为人间之神,而您却扬言要毁掉他的圣像。35 西方那些偏远内陆的王国,都向基督及其代理人献上敬意;如今我们正准备去拜访其中一位最强大的君主,他渴望从我们手中领受洗礼的圣事。36 那些蛮族都已俯首承受福音的轭,唯独您对牧者的呼声充耳不闻。这些虔诚的蛮族已被激得怒火中烧:他们渴望为东方所受的迫害复仇。放弃您那鲁莽而招祸的图谋吧;三思、战栗、悔改。倘若您执迷不悟,这场争斗中所流的血,与我们无干;愿它尽数归到您自己头上!”
The first assault of Leo against the images of Constantinople had been witnessed by a crowd of strangers from Italy and the West, who related with grief and indignation the sacrilege of the emperor. But on the reception of his proscriptive edict, they trembled for their domestic deities: the images of Christ and the Virgin, of the angels, martyrs, and saints, were abolished in all the churches of Italy; and a strong alternative was proposed to the Roman pontiff, the royal favor as the price of his compliance, degradation and exile as the penalty of his disobedience. Neither zeal nor policy allowed him to hesitate; and the haughty strain in which Gregory addressed the emperor displays his confidence in the truth of his doctrine or the powers of resistance. Without depending on prayers or miracles, he boldly armed against the public enemy, and his pastoral letters admonished the Italians of their danger and their duty. 37 At this signal, Ravenna, Venice, and the cities of the Exarchate and Pentapolis, adhered to the cause of religion; their military force by sea and land consisted, for the most part, of the natives; and the spirit of patriotism and zeal was transfused into the mercenary strangers. The Italians swore to live and die in the defence of the pope and the holy images; the Roman people was devoted to their father, and even the Lombards were ambitious to share the merit and advantage of this holy war. The most treasonable act, but the most obvious revenge, was the destruction of the statues of Leo himself: the most effectual and pleasing measure of rebellion, was the withholding the tribute of Italy, and depriving him of a power which he had recently abused by the imposition of a new capitation. 38 A form of administration was preserved by the election of magistrates and governors; and so high was the public indignation, that the Italians were prepared to create an orthodox emperor, and to conduct him with a fleet and army to the palace of Constantinople. In that palace, the Roman bishops, the second and third Gregory, were condemned as the authors of the revolt, and every attempt was made, either by fraud or force, to seize their persons, and to strike at their lives. The city was repeatedly visited or assaulted by captains of the guards, and dukes and exarchs of high dignity or secret trust; they landed with foreign troops, they obtained some domestic aid, and the superstition of Naples may blush that her fathers were attached to the cause of heresy. But these clandestine or open attacks were repelled by the courage and vigilance of the Romans; the Greeks were overthrown and massacred, their leaders suffered an ignominious death, and the popes, however inclined to mercy, refused to intercede for these guilty victims. At Ravenna, 39 the several quarters of the city had long exercised a bloody and hereditary feud; in religious controversy they found a new aliment of faction: but the votaries of images were superior in numbers or spirit, and the exarch, who attempted to stem the torrent, lost his life in a popular sedition. To punish this flagitious deed, and restore his dominion in Italy, the emperor sent a fleet and army into the Adriatic Gulf. After suffering from the winds and waves much loss and delay, the Greeks made their descent in the neighborhood of Ravenna: they threatened to depopulate the guilty capital, and to imitate, perhaps to surpass, the example of Justinian the Second, who had chastised a former rebellion by the choice and execution of fifty of the principal inhabitants. The women and clergy, in sackcloth and ashes, lay prostrate in prayer: the men were in arms for the defence of their country; the common danger had united the factions, and the event of a battle was preferred to the slow miseries of a siege. In a hard-fought day, as the two armies alternately yielded and advanced, a phantom was seen, a voice was heard, and Ravenna was victorious by the assurance of victory. The strangers retreated to their ships, but the populous sea-coast poured forth a multitude of boats; the waters of the Po were so deeply infected with blood, that during six years the public prejudice abstained from the fish of the river; and the institution of an annual feast perpetuated the worship of images, and the abhorrence of the Greek tyrant. Amidst the triumph of the Catholic arms, the Roman pontiff convened a synod of ninety-three bishops against the heresy of the Iconoclasts. With their consent, he pronounced a general excommunication against all who by word or deed should attack the tradition of the fathers and the images of the saints: in this sentence the emperor was tacitly involved, 40 but the vote of a last and hopeless remonstrance may seem to imply that the anathema was yet suspended over his guilty head. No sooner had they confirmed their own safety, the worship of images, and the freedom of Rome and Italy, than the popes appear to have relaxed of their severity, and to have spared the relics of the Byzantine dominion. Their moderate councils delayed and prevented the election of a new emperor, and they exhorted the Italians not to separate from the body of the Roman monarchy. The exarch was permitted to reside within the walls of Ravenna, a captive rather than a master; and till the Imperial coronation of Charlemagne, the government of Rome and Italy was exercised in the name of the successors of Constantine. 41
利奥头一回向君士坦丁堡的圣像发难,当时正有一群来自意大利和西方的异乡人在场目睹;他们满怀悲愤,四处传述皇帝这一亵渎之举。而当那道查禁的诏令传来,他们又为自家的神圣之物战栗不安:基督与圣母、天使、殉道者及诸圣徒的圣像,将在意大利所有教堂里一概废除;至于罗马教宗,则面临一道严酷的抉择:顺从,赏赐便是皇恩;违抗,代价便是黜免与流放。无论出于虔信还是权谋,他都容不得半点犹豫;格列高利致皇帝书信中那副高傲的口吻,正显出他对自身教义之真确、或对抗争之实力的十足自信。他不去指望祈祷或神迹,而是毅然武装起来,对抗这一公敌,并以牧函警示意大利人,让他们明白眼前的危险与自身的职责。37 一经此号召,拉文纳、威尼斯以及总督区与五城地区的各城,便都归附于宗教的旗帜;它们水陆两路的军力,大半由本地人组成,而爱国与虔敬之心,也感染了那些受雇的异乡兵。意大利人立誓要为捍卫教宗与圣像而生死与共;罗马民众对他们的“父亲”忠心耿耿,就连伦巴第人也急于分沾这场圣战的功德与实惠。最大逆不道、却也最显而易见的报复,便是把利奥本人的雕像捣毁;而反叛之举中最见成效、也最令人称快的一手,则是扣下意大利应缴的贡赋,剥夺他的权柄——这权柄他新近才滥用过一回,强行开征了一项新的人头税。38 他们靠推选官长与地方长官,维持了一套行政的架子;民愤如此高涨,意大利人甚至准备另立一位正统的皇帝,用一支舰队和大军把他护送到君士坦丁堡的皇宫。在那皇宫之中,两位罗马主教——格列高利二世与三世——被定为这场叛乱的祸首,君士坦丁堡方面无论用诈还是用强,都想方设法要擒获他们本人、取他们性命。罗马城一再遭到禁卫军统领、以及位高权重或身负密命的督军与总督的“造访”或攻击;他们带着外来的军队登陆,也在城中得过内应;那不勒斯素以虔信自诩,如今却大可为其先人曾投向异端一方而羞愧。然而罗马人凭其勇气与警觉,将这些明里暗里的进攻一一击退;希腊人被打垮、遭屠戮,他们的首领落得可耻的下场,而历代教宗纵然心怀慈悲,也拒绝为这些罪有应得的牺牲者说情。在拉文纳,39 城中各区之间早有一段血腥而世代相传的宿怨;这场宗教之争,恰好又给他们的党派倾轧添了新的柴薪:不过,拥护圣像的一派或人多、或气盛,占了上风,那位总督想要力挽狂澜,却在一场民众暴动中丢了性命。为惩治这桩暴行、重建自己在意大利的统治,皇帝派出一支舰队和大军开进亚得里亚海湾。希腊人饱受风浪之苦,损兵折将、迁延时日,终于在拉文纳近郊登陆:他们扬言要把这座罪城夷为空城,要效仿、或许还要超过查士丁尼二世的先例——当年他为惩治一次叛乱,曾专挑五十名首要居民处死。妇女与神职人员披麻蒙灰、伏地祈祷;男子则拿起武器保卫家园;共同的危难弥合了党派的裂痕,人们宁可以一战决胜负,也不愿在围城的缓慢煎熬中受苦。在一场苦战之日,两军你退我进、反复拉锯,忽有幽灵显现、有声音传来,拉文纳便凭着这必胜的信念而获胜。那些异乡人退回船上,而人烟稠密的海滨却涌出无数小艇追击;波河之水被鲜血染得如此之深,以致此后六年间,民众心存忌讳,都不肯食用河中之鱼;人们又设立了一个一年一度的节庆,把对圣像的崇拜和对希腊暴君的憎恶世代传扬下去。值此大公教会一方大获全胜之际,罗马教宗召集了九十三位主教举行宗教会议,共讨圣像破坏派的异端。在众主教的赞同下,他颁下一道普遍的绝罚令,凡以言语或行动攻击先辈传统与诸圣圣像者,一律逐出教门:这道判决暗中也把皇帝牵连在内,40 但会议又投票决定作最后一次、注定徒劳的规劝,这似乎意味着那道诅咒尚悬在他这罪人头顶,暂未落下。教宗们一旦确保了自身的安全、圣像的崇拜以及罗马与意大利的自由,便似乎收敛了先前的严厉,对拜占庭残存的统治网开一面。他们温和的劝导,一再拖延并最终阻止了另立新皇之举,还告诫意大利人不要脱离罗马帝国这一整体。总督获准留居拉文纳城内,与其说是主人,不如说是俘虏;直到查理曼加冕称帝之前,罗马与意大利的政务,始终以君士坦丁历代继承者的名义施行。41
The liberty of Rome, which had been oppressed by the arms and arts of Augustus, was rescued, after seven hundred and fifty years of servitude, from the persecution of Leo the Isaurian. By the Caesars, the triumphs of the consuls had been annihilated: in the decline and fall of the empire, the god Terminus, the sacred boundary, had insensibly receded from the ocean, the Rhine, the Danube, and the Euphrates; and Rome was reduced to her ancient territory from Viterbo to Terracina, and from Narni to the mouth of the Tyber. 42 When the kings were banished, the republic reposed on the firm basis which had been founded by their wisdom and virtue. Their perpetual jurisdiction was divided between two annual magistrates: the senate continued to exercise the powers of administration and counsel; and the legislative authority was distributed in the assemblies of the people, by a well-proportioned scale of property and service. Ignorant of the arts of luxury, the primitive Romans had improved the science of government and war: the will of the community was absolute: the rights of individuals were sacred: one hundred and thirty thousand citizens were armed for defence or conquest; and a band of robbers and outlaws was moulded into a nation deserving of freedom and ambitious of glory. 43 When the sovereignty of the Greek emperors was extinguished, the ruins of Rome presented the sad image of depopulation and decay: her slavery was a habit, her liberty an accident; the effect of superstition, and the object of her own amazement and terror. The last vestige of the substance, or even the forms, of the constitution, was obliterated from the practice and memory of the Romans; and they were devoid of knowledge, or virtue, again to build the fabric of a commonwealth. Their scanty remnant, the offspring of slaves and strangers, was despicable in the eyes of the victorious Barbarians. As often as the Franks or Lombards expressed their most bitter contempt of a foe, they called him a Roman; “and in this name,” says the bishop Liutprand, “we include whatever is base, whatever is cowardly, whatever is perfidious, the extremes of avarice and luxury, and every vice that can prostitute the dignity of human nature.” 44 441 By the necessity of their situation, the inhabitants of Rome were cast into the rough model of a republican government: they were compelled to elect some judges in peace, and some leaders in war: the nobles assembled to deliberate, and their resolves could not be executed without the union and consent of the multitude. The style of the Roman senate and people was revived, 45 but the spirit was fled; and their new independence was disgraced by the tumultuous conflict of vicentiousness and oppression. The want of laws could only be supplied by the influence of religion, and their foreign and domestic counsels were moderated by the authority of the bishop. His alms, his sermons, his correspondence with the kings and prelates of the West, his recent services, their gratitude, and oath, accustomed the Romans to consider him as the first magistrate or prince of the city. The Christian humility of the popes was not offended by the name of Dominus, or Lord; and their face and inscription are still apparent on the most ancient coins. 46 Their temporal dominion is now confirmed by the reverence of a thousand years; and their noblest title is the free choice of a people, whom they had redeemed from slavery.
罗马的自由,当年为奥古斯都的武力与权术所压制,历经七百五十年的奴役之后,如今竟从伊苏里亚人利奥的迫害中得救。诸恺撒把执政官的凯旋荣光尽行抹去;随着帝国的衰亡,那位掌管神圣疆界之神特尔米努斯,也在不知不觉间从大洋、莱茵河、多瑙河与幼发拉底河一路后退;罗马终于缩回它古老的疆域,从维泰博到特拉奇纳,从纳尔尼直抵台伯河口。42 当年诸王被逐之后,共和国便安立在他们的智慧与德行所奠定的坚固根基之上。昔日诸王终身握有的治权,如今由两位任期一年的执政官分掌;元老院继续行使行政与咨议之权;立法之权则分置于人民大会,按财产与服役多寡,以一套比例得当的等级来分配。早期的罗马人不谙奢靡之道,却把治国与用兵之术锤炼得炉火纯青:群体的意志至高无上,个人的权利神圣不可侵犯;十三万公民随时武装起来,或御敌、或征伐;一伙盗匪与亡命之徒,就这样被熔铸成一个配享自由、心慕荣光的民族。43 及至希腊诸帝的宗主权归于熄灭,罗马的废墟只呈现出一派人烟凋敝、颓败衰朽的凄凉景象:奴役于她已成积习,自由则纯属偶然——那是迷信结出的果实,连她自己也为之既惊且惧。昔日政制的实质、乃至其形式,最后一丝痕迹都已从罗马人的实践与记忆中湮灭;他们既无学识、也无德行,再难重建一座共和邦国的大厦。他们所余无几,尽是奴隶与外来者的后裔,在得胜的蛮族眼中不值一提。每当法兰克人或伦巴第人要对仇敌表示最刻毒的鄙夷时,便骂他是“罗马人”;主教柳特普兰德说:“在这个称呼里,我们把一切卑劣、一切怯懦、一切奸诈,以及贪婪与淫奢的极致、凡能玷污人性尊严的种种恶德,统统囊括在内。”44 441 形势所迫,罗马的居民被抛进了一种粗糙的共和政体:他们不得不在平时推选若干法官,在战时推举若干统帅;贵族们聚会商议,而其决议若无民众的一致同意,便无从施行。“罗马元老院与人民”的名号得以重现,45 其精神却早已飘散无存;放纵与压迫之间乱哄哄的冲突,也玷辱了他们新得的独立。法律的缺失,只能靠宗教的影响来填补,而他们对外对内的种种决策,也都受主教权威的节制。主教的施舍、他的讲道、他与西方列王及高级教士的往来书信、他新近立下的功劳,加上罗马人的感激与誓约,久而久之,都让罗马人习惯于把他视作全城的首席长官、乃至君主。教宗们身怀基督徒的谦卑,却也不以“Dominus”即“主上”这一称号为忤;在最古老的一批钱币上,至今仍可见他们的头像与铭文。46 教宗的世俗统治,如今已由千年的崇敬所确立;而他们最高贵的凭据,正在于一个民族的自由拥戴——这个民族,正是他们从奴役中赎救出来的。
In the quarrels of ancient Greece, the holy people of Elis enjoyed a perpetual peace, under the protection of Jupiter, and in the exercise of the Olympic games. 47 Happy would it have been for the Romans, if a similar privilege had guarded the patrimony of St. Peter from the calamities of war; if the Christians, who visited the holy threshold, would have sheathed their swords in the presence of the apostle and his successor. But this mystic circle could have been traced only by the wand of a legislator and a sage: this pacific system was incompatible with the zeal and ambition of the popes; the Romans were not addicted, like the inhabitants of Elis, to the innocent and placid labors of agriculture; and the Barbarians of Italy, though softened by the climate, were far below the Grecian states in the institutions of public and private life. A memorable example of repentance and piety was exhibited by Liutprand, king of the Lombards. In arms, at the gate of the Vatican, the conqueror listened to the voice of Gregory the Second, 48 withdrew his troops, resigned his conquests, respectfully visited the church of St. Peter, and after performing his devotions, offered his sword and dagger, his cuirass and mantle, his silver cross, and his crown of gold, on the tomb of the apostle. But this religious fervor was the illusion, perhaps the artifice, of the moment; the sense of interest is strong and lasting; the love of arms and rapine was congenial to the Lombards; and both the prince and people were irresistibly tempted by the disorders of Italy, the nakedness of Rome, and the unwarlike profession of her new chief. On the first edicts of the emperor, they declared themselves the champions of the holy images: Liutprand invaded the province of Romagna, which had already assumed that distinctive appellation; the Catholics of the Exarchate yielded without reluctance to his civil and military power; and a foreign enemy was introduced for the first time into the impregnable fortress of Ravenna. That city and fortress were speedily recovered by the active diligence and maritime forces of the Venetians; and those faithful subjects obeyed the exhortation of Gregory himself, in separating the personal guilt of Leo from the general cause of the Roman empire. 49 The Greeks were less mindful of the service, than the Lombards of the injury: the two nations, hostile in their faith, were reconciled in a dangerous and unnatural alliance: the king and the exarch marched to the conquest of Spoleto and Rome: the storm evaporated without effect, but the policy of Liutprand alarmed Italy with a vexatious alternative of hostility and truce. His successor Astolphus declared himself the equal enemy of the emperor and the pope: Ravenna was subdued by force or treachery, 50 and this final conquest extinguished the series of the exarchs, who had reigned with a subordinate power since the time of Justinian and the ruin of the Gothic kingdom. Rome was summoned to acknowledge the victorious Lombard as her lawful sovereign; the annual tribute of a piece of gold was fixed as the ransom of each citizen, and the sword of destruction was unsheathed to exact the penalty of her disobedience. The Romans hesitated; they entreated; they complained; and the threatening Barbarians were checked by arms and negotiations, till the popes had engaged the friendship of an ally and avenger beyond the Alps. 51
在古希腊的种种纷争之中,埃利斯的圣民却始终享有太平,既受朱庇特的庇佑,又主持着奥林匹亚赛会。47 倘若罗马人也能享有类似的特权,使圣彼得的领地免遭兵燹之灾,倘若前来朝拜圣门的基督徒,一到使徒及其继任者的面前便肯收剑入鞘,那对罗马人该是何等的幸事。然而,这样一道神秘的界圈,唯有立法者兼哲人手中的法杖才画得出来:这般止戈息争的格局,与教宗们的热忱和野心格格不入;罗马人也不像埃利斯的居民那样,安于农耕那种质朴宁静的劳作;至于意大利的蛮族,纵然被这方水土磨去了几分粗野,其公私生活的制度较之希腊诸邦仍相去甚远。伦巴第国王柳特普兰德,曾演出一幕令人难忘的忏悔与虔敬。这位征服者已兵临梵蒂冈城门,却听从了格列高利二世的规劝,48 遂撤回军队、交还占地,恭敬地拜谒圣彼得教堂,行过礼拜之后,把自己的佩剑与短刀、胸甲与披风、银十字架与黄金冠冕,一一供奉在使徒的陵墓前。然而这般宗教热忱,不过是一时的幻觉,或许还是一时的做作;唯有利害之念才既强烈又持久;伦巴第人生来就好动干戈、贪图劫掠;无论君主还是百姓,都抵挡不住意大利的乱局、罗马的不设防、以及她那位新首领不谙武事的诱惑。皇帝一颁下最初那几道诏令,他们便自命为圣像的捍卫者:柳特普兰德挥师侵入罗马涅省——此地当时已冠上这一独特的名号;总督区的大公教徒毫不迟疑地俯首听命于他的政、军之权;于是,一个外来之敌头一回被引进了固若金汤的拉文纳要塞。但威尼斯人凭其奋勉的努力与海上的力量,很快便收复了这座城池与要塞;这些忠诚的臣民听从了格列高利本人的劝谕,把利奥个人的罪责同罗马帝国的整体大业区分开来。49 希腊人未把这番效劳放在心上,伦巴第人却对所受的损害耿耿于怀:两个信仰敌对的民族,竟以一桩危险而反常的同盟言归于好;国王与总督联手出兵,去攻取斯波莱托和罗马;这场风暴最终无果而散,然而柳特普兰德时战时和、变幻不定的策略,却始终让意大利惶惶不安。他的继任者阿斯托尔弗斯,宣称自己与皇帝、教宗一概为敌:拉文纳或凭武力、或靠背叛而告沦陷,50 这最后一役,彻底终结了历任总督的世系——自查士丁尼时代、哥特王国覆灭以来,这些总督一直以从属之权治理该地。罗马被勒令承认这位得胜的伦巴第人为其合法君主;每名市民每年须缴纳一枚金币作为赎金,而毁灭之剑也已出鞘,只待惩治她的抗命。罗马人迟疑不决,时而恳求,时而申诉;而这些咄咄逼人的蛮族,被武力和谈判暂且遏住,直到教宗们在阿尔卑斯山那边结下一位盟友兼复仇者的情谊为止。51
In his distress, the first 511 Gregory had implored the aid of the hero of the age, of Charles Martel, who governed the French monarchy with the humble title of mayor or duke; and who, by his signal victory over the Saracens, had saved his country, and perhaps Europe, from the Mahometan yoke. The ambassadors of the pope were received by Charles with decent reverence; but the greatness of his occupations, and the shortness of his life, prevented his interference in the affairs of Italy, except by a friendly and ineffectual mediation. His son Pepin, the heir of his power and virtues, assumed the office of champion of the Roman church; and the zeal of the French prince appears to have been prompted by the love of glory and religion. But the danger was on the banks of the Tyber, the succor on those of the Seine, and our sympathy is cold to the relation of distant misery. Amidst the tears of the city, Stephen the Third embraced the generous resolution of visiting in person the courts of Lombardy and France, to deprecate the injustice of his enemy, or to excite the pity and indignation of his friend. After soothing the public despair by litanies and orations, he undertook this laborious journey with the ambassadors of the French monarch and the Greek emperor. The king of the Lombards was inexorable; but his threats could not silence the complaints, nor retard the speed of the Roman pontiff, who traversed the Pennine Alps, reposed in the abbey of St. Maurice, and hastened to grasp the right hand of his protector; a hand which was never lifted in vain, either in war or friendship. Stephen was entertained as the visible successor of the apostle; at the next assembly, the field of March or of May, his injuries were exposed to a devout and warlike nation, and he repassed the Alps, not as a suppliant, but as a conqueror, at the head of a French army, which was led by the king in person. The Lombards, after a weak resistance, obtained an ignominious peace, and swore to restore the possessions, and to respect the sanctity, of the Roman church. But no sooner was Astolphus delivered from the presence of the French arms, than he forgot his promise and resented his disgrace. Rome was again encompassed by his arms; and Stephen, apprehensive of fatiguing the zeal of his Transalpine allies enforced his complaint and request by an eloquent letter in the name and person of St. Peter himself. 52 The apostle assures his adopted sons, the king, the clergy, and the nobles of France, that, dead in the flesh, he is still alive in the spirit; that they now hear, and must obey, the voice of the founder and guardian of the Roman church; that the Virgin, the angels, the saints, and the martyrs, and all the host of heaven, unanimously urge the request, and will confess the obligation; that riches, victory, and paradise, will crown their pious enterprise, and that eternal damnation will be the penalty of their neglect, if they suffer his tomb, his temple, and his people, to fall into the hands of the perfidious Lombards. The second expedition of Pepin was not less rapid and fortunate than the first: St. Peter was satisfied, Rome was again saved, and Astolphus was taught the lessons of justice and sincerity by the scourge of a foreign master. After this double chastisement, the Lombards languished about twenty years in a state of languor and decay. But their minds were not yet humbled to their condition; and instead of affecting the pacific virtues of the feeble, they peevishly harassed the Romans with a repetition of claims, evasions, and inroads, which they undertook without reflection, and terminated without glory. On either side, their expiring monarchy was pressed by the zeal and prudence of Pope Adrian the First, the genius, the fortune, and greatness of Charlemagne, the son of Pepin; these heroes of the church and state were united in public and domestic friendship, and while they trampled on the prostrate, they varnished their proceedings with the fairest colors of equity and moderation. 53 The passes of the Alps, and the walls of Pavia, were the only defence of the Lombards; the former were surprised, the latter were invested, by the son of Pepin; and after a blockade of two years, 531 Desiderius, the last of their native princes, surrendered his sceptre and his capital.
早在困厄之中,第一位511格列高利便曾向当世英雄查理·马特求援;此人以“宫相”或“公爵”这一谦卑的头衔统辖法兰克王国,又凭其大败萨拉森人的辉煌一役,使自己的国家,或许还有整个欧洲,免于沦入穆斯林的枷锁。查理以得体的敬意接待了教宗的使节;但他事务繁重、寿数又促,终未能插手意大利的局势,至多作了一番友好却无济于事的调停。他的儿子丕平,承继了他的权势与德行,担起了罗马教会捍卫者的职任;这位法兰克君主的热忱,似乎既出于对荣耀的追求,也出于对宗教的虔敬。然而危难远在台伯河畔,援手却远在塞纳河边;而对于遥远之地的苦难,人的同情总归是冷淡的。在满城的泪水之中,斯蒂芬三世毅然作出一个慷慨的决断:亲自出访伦巴第与法兰克两处宫廷,或去规劝仇敌收回其不义之举,或去激起友人的怜悯与义愤。他先以连祷与讲道抚平了民众的绝望,随后便偕同法兰克国王与希腊皇帝的使节,踏上了这段劳顿的旅程。伦巴第国王铁石心肠,不为所动;然而他的恫吓,既堵不住罗马教宗的申诉,也拦不住他前行的脚步:教宗翻越潘尼恩阿尔卑斯山,在圣莫里斯修道院稍事歇息,便匆匆赶去握住他保护者的右手——这只手,无论用于征战还是待友,从不曾徒然举起。斯蒂芬被奉为使徒在世的继任者而受到款待;在随后召开的“三月校场”或“五月校场”大会上,他所蒙受的种种冤屈,都摊开在这个虔诚而尚武的民族面前;于是他再度翻越阿尔卑斯山,这一回不再是乞援的哀求者,而是一位征服者——率领着一支由国王亲自统领的法兰克大军。伦巴第人稍作抵抗,便屈辱求和,立誓归还罗马教会的产业、尊重其神圣不可侵犯。然而法兰克军队一撤离,阿斯托尔弗斯便把誓言抛诸脑后,只对自己蒙受的耻辱耿耿于怀。罗马再度被他的兵马围困;斯蒂芬唯恐把阿尔卑斯山那边盟友的热忱消磨殆尽,便以圣彼得本人的名义、假借其口吻,写下一封辞采动人的书信,为自己的申诉与请求增添分量。52 这位使徒向他的义子们——法兰克的国王、教士与贵族——保证说:他虽肉身已死,灵魂却依然长存;他们此刻所听见、也必须遵从的,正是罗马教会的奠基者与守护者之声;童贞女、天使、诸圣与殉道者,连同整个天军,都异口同声地敦促他们应允此请,并将铭记这份恩义;财富、胜利与天国,将成为他们这一虔诚壮举的冠冕,而倘若他们坐视他的陵墓、他的圣殿、他的子民落入奸诈的伦巴第人之手,永劫的沉沦便是他们怠慢的报应。丕平的第二次远征,其迅捷与顺遂丝毫不逊于头一回:圣彼得的心愿得偿,罗马再度获救,而阿斯托尔弗斯则在一位外来主子的鞭笞下,学会了何谓公道与信义。遭此两番惩创,伦巴第人在此后约二十年间,一直萎靡不振、日渐衰颓。然而他们的心气,尚未低到与其处境相称的地步;他们非但不去装出弱者那种息事宁人的姿态,反倒任性地一再以种种索求、搪塞与侵扰去骚扰罗马人——这些举动往往起于莽撞,收场也毫无光彩。他们奄奄一息的王国,两面受敌:一面是教宗阿德里安一世的热忱与审慎,一面是丕平之子查理曼的天纵之才、好运与雄图;这两位教会与国家的英雄,无论在公务还是私谊上都亲密无间,一边把倒地者踩在脚下,一边又用公正与克制这些最漂亮的辞藻,为自己的行径涂脂抹粉。53 伦巴第人仅有的屏障,只剩下阿尔卑斯山的隘口与帕维亚的城墙;丕平之子出其不意夺取了前者,又围困了后者;经过两年的封锁,531 他们本族最后一位君主德西德里乌斯,交出了自己的权杖与都城。
Under the dominion of a foreign king, but in the possession of their national laws, the Lombards became the brethren, rather than the subjects, of the Franks; who derived their blood, and manners, and language, from the same Germanic origin. 54
从此伦巴第人虽受一位异邦国王统治,却仍保有本族的法律;他们之于法兰克人,与其说是臣属,不如说是兄弟——两族的血统、习俗与语言,本就同出于日耳曼一源。54

Notes 注释

33
The two epistles of Gregory II. have been preserved in the Acta of the Nicene Council, (tom. viii. p. 651-674.) They are without a date, which is variously fixed, by Baronius in the year 726, by Muratori (Annali d’Italia, tom. vi. p. 120) in 729, and by Pagi in 730. Such is the force of prejudice, that some papists have praised the good sense and moderation of these letters.
格列高利二世的这两封书信,保存于《尼西亚会议纪要》之中(Acta of the Nicene Council, tom. viii. p. 651-674)。信件均无日期,各家考订不一:巴罗尼乌斯定于726年,穆拉托里(Annali d’Italia, tom. vi. p. 120)定于729年,帕吉则定于730年。偏见之力竟至于此——某些天主教徒居然称赞这些信件识见通达、措辞温和。
34
(Epist. i. p. 664.) This proximity of the Lombards is hard of digestion. Camillo Pellegrini (Dissert. iv. de Ducatu Beneventi, in the Script. Ital. tom. v. p. 172, 173) forcibly reckons the xxivth stadia, not from Rome, but from the limits of the Roman duchy, to the first fortress, perhaps Sora, of the Lombards. I rather believe that Gregory, with the pedantry of the age, employs stadia for miles, without much inquiry into the genuine measure.
(Epist. i. p. 664。)伦巴第人竟近在咫尺,这话叫人难以信服。卡米洛·佩莱格里尼(Dissert. iv. de Ducatu Beneventi, in the Script. Ital. tom. v. p. 172, 173)力主:那二十四斯塔迪亚并非从罗马算起,而是从罗马公国的边界算到伦巴第人的第一座城堡——或许就是索拉。我倒宁愿相信,格列高利染有那个时代的迂腐习气,把斯塔迪亚当作英里来用,并未细究其真正的量度。
35
{Greek}
{Greek}
36
(p. 665.) The pope appears to have imposed on the ignorance of the Greeks: he lived and died in the Lateran; and in his time all the kingdoms of the West had embraced Christianity. May not this unknown Septetus have some reference to the chief of the Saxon Heptarchy, to Ina king of Wessex, who, in the pontificate of Gregory the Second, visited Rome for the purpose, not of baptism, but of pilgrimage! (Pagi. A., 89, No. 2. A.D. 726, No. 15.)
(p. 665。)教宗似乎是在利用希腊人的无知:他一生居于拉特兰、也死于拉特兰;而在他的时代,西方所有王国都早已皈依基督教。这位不知名的塞普特图斯(Septetus),会不会另有所指——指的是撒克逊七国时代的某位盟主,即韦塞克斯国王伊尼?此人正是在格列高利二世在位期间到访罗马的,但目的并非受洗,而是朝圣!(Pagi. A., 89, No. 2. A.D. 726, No. 15。)
37
I shall transcribe the important and decisive passage of the Liber Pontificalis. Respiciens ergo pius vir profanam principis jussionem, jam contra Imperatorem quasi contra hostem se armavit, renuens haeresim ejus, scribens ubique se cavere Christianos, eo quod orta fuisset impietas talis. Igitur permoti omnes Pentapolenses, atque Venetiarum exercitus contra Imperatoris jussionem restiterunt; dicentes se nunquam in ejusdem pontificis condescendere necem, sed pro ejus magis defensione viriliter decertare, (p. 156.)
我且抄录《历代教宗传》(Liber Pontificalis)中那段紧要而具决定意义的文字:Respiciens ergo pius vir profanam principis jussionem, jam contra Imperatorem quasi contra hostem se armavit, renuens haeresim ejus, scribens ubique se cavere Christianos, eo quod orta fuisset impietas talis. Igitur permoti omnes Pentapolenses, atque Venetiarum exercitus contra Imperatoris jussionem restiterunt; dicentes se nunquam in ejusdem pontificis condescendere necem, sed pro ejus magis defensione viriliter decertare(p. 156)。
38
A census, or capitation, says Anastasius, (p. 156;) a most cruel tax, unknown to the Saracens themselves, exclaims the zealous Maimbourg, (Hist. des Iconoclastes, l. i.,) and Theophanes, (p. 344,) who talks of Pharaoh’s numbering the male children of Israel. This mode of taxation was familiar to the Saracens; and, most unluckily for the historians, it was imposed a few years afterwards in France by his patron Louis XIV.
阿纳斯塔修斯(p. 156)称之为一种户口税或人头税;热忱的曼布尔(Hist. des Iconoclastes, l. i.)则惊呼这是一种极其残酷的赋税,连萨拉森人自己都闻所未闻;塞奥法尼斯(p. 344)更把它比作法老清点以色列的男丁。其实这种征税方式,萨拉森人本就习以为常;而最令史家们尴尬的是,数年之后,法国也开征了同样的税,主持者正是曼布尔的恩主路易十四。
39
See the Liber Pontificalis of Agnellus, (in the Scriptores Rerum Italicarum of Muratori, tom. ii. pars i.,) whose deeper shade of barbarism marks the difference between Rome and Ravenna. Yet we are indebted to him for some curious and domestic facts—the quarters and factions of Ravenna, (p. 154,) the revenge of Justinian II, (p. 160, 161,) the defeat of the Greeks, (p. 170, 171,) &c.
参见阿格内卢斯所撰《历代教宗传》(Liber Pontificalis,收于穆拉托里《意大利史料集》Scriptores Rerum Italicarum, tom. ii. pars i.);其笔调更显蒙昧粗野,恰可见罗马与拉文纳之间的差别。不过,我们仍要感谢他记下了若干珍奇的地方掌故——拉文纳的城区与党派(p. 154)、查士丁尼二世的报复(p. 160, 161)、希腊人的败绩(p. 170, 171)等等。
40
Yet Leo was undoubtedly comprised in the si quis .... imaginum sacrarum.... destructor.... extiterit, sit extorris a cor pore D. N. Jesu Christi vel totius ecclesiae unitate. The canonists may decide whether the guilt or the name constitutes the excommunication; and the decision is of the last importance to their safety, since, according to the oracle (Gratian, Caus. xxiii. q. 5, 47, apud Spanheim, Hist. Imag. p. 112) homicidas non esse qui excommunicatos trucidant.
然而利奥无疑也在这道判词所指之列:si quis .... imaginum sacrarum.... destructor.... extiterit, sit extorris a corpore D. N. Jesu Christi vel totius ecclesiae unitate(凡有毁坏圣像者,当逐出我主耶稣基督之身、绝于全教会之合一)。至于究竟是罪行本身、还是罪人之名才构成绝罚,尽可交由教会法学家们裁断;而这一裁断对他们的身家性命至关紧要,因为按那句神谕(Gratian, Caus. xxiii. q. 5, 47, apud Spanheim, Hist. Imag. p. 112)所言:homicidas non esse qui excommunicatos trucidant——诛杀被绝罚者的人,不算凶手。
41
Compescuit tale consilium Pontifex, sperans conversionem principis, (Anastas. p. 156.) Sed ne desisterent ab amore et fide R. J. admonebat, (p. 157.) The popes style Leo and Constantine Copronymus, Imperatores et Domini, with the strange epithet of Piissimi. A famous Mosaic of the Lateran (A.D. 798) represents Christ, who delivers the keys to St. Peter and the banner to Constantine V. (Muratori, Annali d’Italia, tom. vi. p. 337.)
Compescuit tale consilium Pontifex, sperans conversionem principis(教宗压下了这一动议,仍指望君主回心转意;Anastas. p. 156)。Sed ne desisterent ab amore et fide R. J. admonebat(他又劝诫众人不要背弃对罗马国的爱戴与忠诚;p. 157)。历代教宗称利奥与君士坦丁·科普罗尼穆斯为“Imperatores et Domini”(皇帝与主上),还冠以“Piissimi”(至虔者)这一古怪的头衔。拉特兰有一幅著名的镶嵌画(公元798年),画的是基督把钥匙交给圣彼得、把旗帜交给君士坦丁五世(穆拉托里,Annali d’Italia, tom. vi. p. 337)。
42
I have traced the Roman duchy according to the maps, and the maps according to the excellent dissertation of father Beretti, (de Chorographia Italiae Medii Aevi, sect. xx. p. 216-232.) Yet I must nicely observe, that Viterbo is of Lombard foundation, (p. 211,) and that Terracina was usurped by the Greeks.
我依据地图勾勒出罗马公国的疆界,而这些地图又依据贝雷蒂神父那篇出色的论文(de Chorographia Italiae Medii Aevi, sect. xx. p. 216-232)。不过我须审慎地指出:维泰博乃伦巴第人所建(p. 211),而特拉奇纳则是希腊人所侵夺。
43
On the extent, population, &c., of the Roman kingdom, the reader may peruse, with pleasure, the Discours Preliminaire to the Republique Romaine of M. de Beaufort, (tom. i.,) who will not be accused of too much credulity for the early ages of Rome.
关于罗马王国的疆域、人口等等,读者不妨愉快地一读德博福尔先生《罗马共和国》(Republique Romaine, tom. i.)卷首的《绪论》(Discours Preliminaire);论及罗马早期的历史,此人绝不会被人指为过于轻信。
44
Quos (Romanos) nos, Longobardi scilicet, Saxones, Franci, Locharingi, Bajoarii, Suevi, Burgundiones, tanto dedignamur ut inimicos nostros commoti, nil aliud contumeliarum nisi Romane, dicamus: hoc solo, id est Romanorum nomine, quicquid ignobilitatis, quicquid timiditatis, quicquid avaritiae, quicquid luxuriae, quicquid mendacii, immo quicquid vitiorum est comprehendentes, (Liutprand, in Legat Script. Ital. tom. ii. para i. p. 481.) For the sins of Cato or Tully Minos might have imposed as a fit penance the daily perusal of this barbarous passage.
Quos (Romanos) nos, Longobardi scilicet, Saxones, Franci, Locharingi, Bajoarii, Suevi, Burgundiones, tanto dedignamur ut inimicos nostros commoti, nil aliud contumeliarum nisi Romane, dicamus: hoc solo, id est Romanorum nomine, quicquid ignobilitatis, quicquid timiditatis, quicquid avaritiae, quicquid luxuriae, quicquid mendacii, immo quicquid vitiorum est comprehendentes(Liutprand, in Legat. Script. Ital. tom. ii. para i. p. 481)。若要为加图或西塞罗赎罪,米诺斯本可判他们每日诵读这段粗野的文字,权当一份相宜的苦修。
441
Yet this contumelious sentence, quoted by Robertson (Charles V note 2) as well as Gibbon, was applied by the angry bishop to the Byzantine Romans, whom, indeed, he admits to be the genuine descendants of Romulus.—M.
然而这句辱骂之辞,罗伯逊(《查理五世》注2)与吉本都曾援引,可那位愤怒的主教原是拿它来骂拜占庭的罗马人的——他倒也承认,这些人才是罗慕路斯的正宗后裔。—M
45
Pipino regi Francorum, omnis senatus, atque universa populi generalitas a Deo servatae Romanae urbis. Codex Carolin. epist. 36, in Script. Ital. tom. iii. pars ii. p. 160. The names of senatus and senator were never totally extinct, (Dissert. Chorograph. p. 216, 217;) but in the middle ages they signified little more than nobiles, optimates, &c., (Ducange, Gloss. Latin.)
Pipino regi Francorum, omnis senatus, atque universa populi generalitas a Deo servatae Romanae urbis(“蒙上帝护佑的罗马城全体元老与全体人民,致法兰克人的国王丕平”;Codex Carolin. epist. 36, in Script. Ital. tom. iii. pars ii. p. 160)。senatus(元老院)与senator(元老)之名,从未彻底湮灭(Dissert. Chorograph. p. 216, 217);但在中世纪,它们的含义已不过等同于nobiles(贵族)、optimates(显贵)之类(Ducange, Gloss. Latin.)。
46
See Muratori, Antiquit. Italiae Medii Aevi, tom. ii. Dissertat xxvii. p. 548. On one of these coins we read Hadrianus Papa (A.D. 772;) on the reverse, Vict. Ddnn. with the word Conob, which the Pere Joubert (Science des Medailles, tom. ii. p. 42) explains by Constantinopoli Officina B (secunda.)
参见穆拉托里《中世纪意大利古物志》(Antiquit. Italiae Medii Aevi, tom. ii. Dissertat. xxvii. p. 548)。其中一枚钱币上刻着Hadrianus Papa(教宗阿德里安,公元772年);背面则是Vict. Ddnn.,还有Conob一词——儒贝尔神父(Science des Medailles, tom. ii. p. 42)将其解作Constantinopoli Officina B(第二,即君士坦丁堡第二铸币工坊)。
47
See West’s Dissertation on the Olympic Games, (Pindar. vol. ii. p. 32-36, edition in 12mo.,) and the judicious reflections of Polybius (tom. i. l. iv. p. 466, edit Gronov.)
参见韦斯特论奥林匹亚赛会的专论(附于所编品达集,Pindar. vol. ii. p. 32-36,12开本),以及波利比乌斯明达的评述(tom. i. l. iv. p. 466, 格罗诺维乌斯校订本)。
48
The speech of Gregory to the Lombard is finely composed by Sigonius, (de Regno Italiae, l. iii. Opera, tom. ii. p. 173,) who imitates the license and the spirit of Sallust or Livy.
格列高利对那伦巴第人所作的演说,由西戈尼乌斯(de Regno Italiae, l. iii. Opera, tom. ii. p. 173)润饰得十分精彩;他模仿的正是撒路斯提乌斯或李维那种恣肆的笔法与气魄。
49
The Venetian historians, John Sagorninus, (Chron. Venet. p. 13,) and the doge Andrew Dandolo, (Scriptores Rer. Ital. tom. xii. p. 135,) have preserved this epistle of Gregory. The loss and recovery of Ravenna are mentioned by Paulus Diaconus, (de Gest. Langobard, l. vi. c. 42, 54, in Script. Ital. tom. i. pars i. p. 506, 508;) but our chronologists, Pagi, Muratori, &c., cannot ascertain the date or circumstances
威尼斯的两位史家——约翰·萨戈尔尼努斯(Chron. Venet. p. 13)与威尼斯总督安德烈·丹多洛(Scriptores Rer. Ital. tom. xii. p. 135)——都保存了格列高利的这封书信。拉文纳的失守与收复,执事保罗曾有提及(de Gest. Langobard, l. vi. c. 42, 54, in Script. Ital. tom. i. pars i. p. 506, 508);但我们的年代学家帕吉、穆拉托里等人,都无法确定其确切的日期与情由。
50
The option will depend on the various readings of the Mss. of Anastasius—deceperat, or decerpserat, (Script. Ital. tom. iii. pars i. p. 167.)
究竟取哪一说,要看阿纳斯塔修斯抄本的异文而定——是deceperat(欺骗)还是decerpserat(攫取)(Script. Ital. tom. iii. pars i. p. 167)。
51
The Codex Carolinus is a collection of the epistles of the popes to Charles Martel, (whom they style Subregulus,) Pepin, and Charlemagne, as far as the year 791, when it was formed by the last of these princes. His original and authentic Ms. (Bibliothecae Cubicularis) is now in the Imperial library of Vienna, and has been published by Lambecius and Muratori, (Script. Rerum Ital. tom. iii. pars ii. p. 75, &c.)
《卡洛林书信集》(Codex Carolinus)汇集了历代教宗写给查理·马特(他们称他为Subregulus,即“副王”)、丕平与查理曼的书信,止于791年,由这几位君主中的最后一位汇编而成。其原始而真确的抄本(Bibliothecae Cubicularis)如今藏于维也纳的帝国图书馆,兰贝奇乌斯与穆拉托里已将其刊行(Script. Rerum Ital. tom. iii. pars ii. p. 75, &c.)。
511
Gregory I. had been dead above a century; read Gregory III.—M
格列高利一世此时已辞世逾一个世纪;此处应作格列高利三世。—M
52
See this most extraordinary letter in the Codex Carolinus, epist iii. p. 92. The enemies of the popes have charged them with fraud and blasphemy; yet they surely meant to persuade rather than deceive. This introduction of the dead, or of immortals, was familiar to the ancient orators, though it is executed on this occasion in the rude fashion of the age.
这封奇特无比的书信,见《卡洛林书信集》(Codex Carolinus, epist. iii. p. 92)。教宗的敌人指责他们此举既是欺诈又是亵渎;然而他们的本意,想来是要打动人心,而非蒙骗世人。这种借亡者或不朽者之口说话的手法,古代演说家本就用得娴熟,只是这一回施展得颇合那个时代的粗陋风气罢了。
53
Except in the divorce of the daughter of Desiderius, whom Charlemagne repudiated sine aliquo crimine. Pope Stephen IV. had most furiously opposed the alliance of a noble Frank—cum perfida, horrida nec dicenda, foetentissima natione Longobardorum—to whom he imputes the first stain of leprosy, (Cod. Carolin. epist. 45, p. 178, 179.) Another reason against the marriage was the existence of a first wife, (Muratori, Annali d’Italia, tom. vi. p. 232, 233, 236, 237.) But Charlemagne indulged himself in the freedom of polygamy or concubinage.
唯有休弃德西德里乌斯之女一事是例外——查理曼将她遣归,却sine aliquo crimine(毫无过错可言)。当初教宗斯蒂芬四世曾激烈反对一位高贵的法兰克人同伦巴第人联姻,痛斥后者为cum perfida, horrida nec dicenda, foetentissima natione Longobardorum(那背信弃义、狰狞可怖、不堪言说、臭不可闻的伦巴第族),还把麻风的头一缕污秽也归咎于他们(Cod. Carolin. epist. 45, p. 178, 179)。反对这桩婚事的另一个理由,是他原有一位发妻尚在(穆拉托里,Annali d’Italia, tom. vi. p. 232, 233, 236, 237)。不过查理曼向来纵情于一夫多妻或蓄妾的自由。
531
Of fifteen months. James, Life of Charlemagne, p. 187.—M.
实为十五个月。詹姆斯《查理曼传》(Life of Charlemagne),p. 187。—M
54
See the Annali d’Italia of Muratori, tom. vi., and the three first Dissertations of his Antiquitates Italiae Medii Aevi, tom. i.
参见穆拉托里《意大利编年史》(Annali d’Italia, tom. vi.),以及他《中世纪意大利古物志》(Antiquitates Italiae Medii Aevi, tom. i.)开篇的三篇论文。